| Literature DB >> 35967593 |
Dharmendera Kumar Meena1, Rajeev Tripathi2, Sonam Agrawal1.
Abstract
The spatial analysis of primary schools is needed to ensure that they meet standards set by the Government of India. Therefore, mapping of Prayagraj district primary schools is carried out in this research work. The spatial analysis of schools is performed using various parameters that include: literacy rate, student gender ratio, teacher taught ratio, and students' toilets ratio. Several problems were revealed in the GIS based analysis of schools by highlighting their locations on the map. The results identify the location of all those schools where there is a need to take corrective measures. Further, the route analysis between home and school is handled in this research work. Sometimes, commutation is the sole criteria in the selection of a school. Therefore, optimal path analysis has been performed based on three parameters, i.e. population density, traveling distance and traveling time. A combined weight function is also given to find the optimal path. This work will help people to select the best possible path based upon their requirements. There is often a requirement to reach all the schools to distribute the goods or other physical monitoring activities. This work gave the optimal route to visit all the schools by using the Travelling Salesman Problem (TSP). School accessibility results obtained in this research through TSP will assist in choosing the best possible route. This will help the government identify locations where new roads need to be constructed to have road connectivity.Entities:
Keywords: Accessibility; Education; GIS; Prayagraj; Route; School; Spatial
Year: 2022 PMID: 35967593 PMCID: PMC9358108 DOI: 10.1007/s10708-022-10715-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: GeoJournal ISSN: 0343-2521
Tools, technologies and devices used in the route analysis
| S. No | Tools, technologies and devices | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Geocoding | It is used to estimate the coordinates of school and home with the help of address and postal code |
| 2 | GPS | In many studies, pupils wear the GPS receiver to obtain the actual path |
| 3 | Accelerometer | In contemporary studies, it has been used to measure pupils' speed to obtain more realistic routes |
| 4 | Online participatory mapping | In recent studies, the actual path is obtained by cloud based or web based software like SoftGIS and VERITAS |
| 5 | GIS | The GIS software provides the shortest path. This derived path is compared with the GPS measured actual path. In the majority of studies, network analyst extension of ArcGIS software is used. The network analyst tools like closest facility and service area are frequently applied |
| 6 | Road network | This data set is mandatory to obtain the GIS derived path. It is created through the digitization of topographic maps or can be obtained from OSM, TIGER, local inventory, etc |
| 7 | Built-in parameters | There are the variables that involve in the route selection and priority assignment. There are several parameters given by researchers like: |
Fig. 1Study area location map
Fig. 2Methodology adopted
Fig. 3Map showing the location of all 4,878 schools of the Prayagraj district
Literacy rate of Prayagraj district
| S. No | Literacy rate (%) | Number of villages |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0–10 | 246 |
| 2 | 11–20 | 2 |
| 3 | 21–30 | 18 |
| 4 | 31–40 | 60 |
| 5 | 41–50 | 356 |
| 6 | 51–60 | 1301 |
| 7 | 61–70 | 936 |
| 8 | 71–80 | 137 |
| 9 | 81–90 | 18 |
| 10 | 91–100 | 3 |
Fig. 4Village wise literacy rate map
Students gender ratio
| S. No | Gender status | Number of schools |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Only Boys School | 43 |
| 2 | Girls < Boys | 2302 |
| 3 | Girls = Boys | 171 |
| 4 | Girls > Boys | 2246 |
| 5 | Only Girls Schools | 116 |
Fig. 5Students gender ratio map of schools
Students teacher ratio
| S. No | Number of students per teacher | Number of schools |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 or less | 3584 |
| 2 | 41–60 | 699 |
| 3 | 61–80 | 252 |
| 4 | 81–100 | 121 |
| 5 | > 100 | 222 |
Fig. 6Students teacher ratio map
Students toilets ratio
| S. No | Number of students per toilet | Number of schools |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Toilet not available | 13 |
| 2 | 50 | 2091 |
| 3 | 51–100 | 1836 |
| 4 | 101–151 | 459 |
| 5 | 151–200 | 177 |
| 6 | > 200 | 302 |
Fig. 7Student’s toilet ratio map
Parameters used in route selection in different researches
| S. No | Reference | Study area | Route purpose | Parameters for optimal path identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Choi et al. ( | Kalimantan, Indonesia | Dump truck | Speed, water body, curve, visibility and road condition |
| 2 | Li et al. ( | Singapore | Any type of commuter | Mode of travel, cost, time, fare, length, intersections and stops |
| 3 | D’Orso and Migliore ( | Palermo, Italy | Pedestrian | Slope, surface quality, street shelters, greenness, street light, traffic volume, LULC and traffic signal |
| 4 | Ak et al. ( | Istanbul, Turkey | Hazardous materials transportation | Travel speeds, traffic congestion, open or closed roads, risk exposure and population |
| 5 | Terh and Cao ( | Singapore | Cycling | Slope, traffic, proximity to major roads, proximity to educational proximity to institutions, proximity to shops, proximity to community facilities and proximity to railway/ bus stops |
| 6 | Abousaeidi et al. ( | Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | Delivery route |
Traffic volume, path length, population, two way, proximity to school, proximity to industry, open space and residential status
Fig. 8Schools location map with road network connectivity
Fig. 9Village wise population density map of Prayagraj district
Average speed defined based on population density
| S. No | Population density (people/ km2) | Average speed (km/hr) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0–100 | 60 |
| 2 | 101–500 | 50 |
| 3 | 501–1000 | 40 |
| 4 | 1001–5000 | 30 |
| 5 | Above 5000 | 20 |
Fig. 10Least cost optimal path based on population density
Fig. 11Least cost optimal path based on traveling distance
Unit weight of population density, traveling distance and traveling time
| S. No | Population density | Weight of PD | Traveling distance | Weight of TD | Traveling time | Weight of TT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0–250 | 1 | 0–10 | 1 | 0–1 | 1 |
| 2 | 251–500 | 2 | 11–20 | 2 | 1.01–2 | 2 |
| 3 | 501–750 | 3 | 21–30 | 3 | 2.01–3 | 3 |
| 4 | 750–1000 | 4 | 31–40 | 4 | 3.01–4 | 4 |
| 5 | > 1000 | 5 | > 40 | 5 | > 4 | 5 |
Fig. 12Least cost optimal path based on traveling time
Fig. 13Least cost optimal path based on combine weight
Fig. 14TSP solution for the schools of each tehsil of Prayagraj district