Quanzhi Tian1, Hainan Wang1,2, Yinhai Pan1,2. 1. Chinese National Engineering Research Center of Coal Preparation and Purification, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China. 2. School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, China.
Abstract
The mass production of flotation tailings has become a serious risk to the environment. Re-concentration of tailings is one of the best ways to solve this problem, which requires a better understanding of flotation tailings. In the present work, flotation kinetics, timed-release flotation, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) were used to analyze the properties of flotation tailings with different particle sizes and densities, the occurrence and binding state of gangue minerals in tailing, and the transportation behaviors in the re-flotation process. Flotation results showed that the flotation yield exhibited little change with the extension of flotation time, while the ash content of the froth concentrates increased. An increase of the flotation time could reduce the ash content of the obtained product. The characterization results confirmed that the main gangue minerals in the tailings were kaolinite and quartz. With the decrease of particle size or the increase of floating and sinking density, the contents of kaolinite and quartz increased. However, due to the different dissemination characteristics of kaolinite and quartz in the tailings, the distributions of kaolinite and quartz in the different particle sizes and densities of tailing had differences. Although both kaolinite and quartz could exist as monomers, kaolinite was more easily associated with coal. Based on the above cognition, a new flotation method is proposed for coal flotation tailing. A part of the concentrates in the early stage of flotation should be scraped out quickly. Then, the concentrates obtained in the later stage of flotation are collected and merged into the concentrates obtained during the early stage of flotation, while the secondary tailing is directly pumped into the raw feed system.
The mass production of flotation tailings has become a serious risk to the environment. Re-concentration of tailings is one of the best ways to solve this problem, which requires a better understanding of flotation tailings. In the present work, flotation kinetics, timed-release flotation, X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) were used to analyze the properties of flotation tailings with different particle sizes and densities, the occurrence and binding state of gangue minerals in tailing, and the transportation behaviors in the re-flotation process. Flotation results showed that the flotation yield exhibited little change with the extension of flotation time, while the ash content of the froth concentrates increased. An increase of the flotation time could reduce the ash content of the obtained product. The characterization results confirmed that the main gangue minerals in the tailings were kaolinite and quartz. With the decrease of particle size or the increase of floating and sinking density, the contents of kaolinite and quartz increased. However, due to the different dissemination characteristics of kaolinite and quartz in the tailings, the distributions of kaolinite and quartz in the different particle sizes and densities of tailing had differences. Although both kaolinite and quartz could exist as monomers, kaolinite was more easily associated with coal. Based on the above cognition, a new flotation method is proposed for coal flotation tailing. A part of the concentrates in the early stage of flotation should be scraped out quickly. Then, the concentrates obtained in the later stage of flotation are collected and merged into the concentrates obtained during the early stage of flotation, while the secondary tailing is directly pumped into the raw feed system.
Coal is an important energy
source in some countries, especially
in China,[1] Australia,[2] Poland,[3] and India.[4] The proportion of fine coal in the raw coal significantly
increases with the high mechanization of coal mining technology. The
separation of fine coal has become a severe challenge for the coal
industry.[5,6] Froth flotation is widely used for processing
fine coal, utilizing the difference between the surface hydrophobicities
of particles to separate coal from gangue.[7−9] In the flotation
process, hydrophobic particles are expected to attach to the bubble
surface and float to form a froth layer, whereas hydrophilic particles
tend to sink to the bottom of the cell to form tailings. It has been
reported that the annual output of these coal flotation tailings reaches
up to 100 million tons.[10] The long-term
storage of coal flotation tailings occupies a huge amount of land
resources, causing a serious risk to the environment. Recently, the
disposal of coal flotation tailing has received more and more attention.
Generally, coal flotation tailings can be mixed into raw coal or medium
coal for combustion. Besides, coal flotation tailings contain abundant
silicon and aluminum components, which can be used to produce brick,
cement, and filling material.[10−12] The presence of large amounts
of carbon in these coal tailings can have a negative effect on the
material utilization of tailings. On the other hand, the carbon in
the coal flotation tailing is also a valuable resource, which can
be used to generate electricity and prepare carbon materials.[13] Therefore, the recovery of carbon components
from coal flotation tailings is an important stage to rationally dispose
of coal flotation tailings, which is conducive to saving resources,
protecting the environment, and creating greater economic benefits
for coal enterprises.Extensive research on the recovery of
carbon components from coal
flotation tailing has been carried out. Yang et al.[14] reported a novel gravity-flotation process to re-separate
the coal flotation tailings, including the disposal of tailings via
gravity, grinding liberation, and froth flotation. A clean coal product
with an ash content of 12.33% and an appreciable yield of 32.34% could
be obtained using this process. Yu et al.[15] proposed a separation process of coal flotation tailing, namely
reverse flotation–grinding–re-separation, to obtain
the clean coal product with a yield of 25% and an ash content of 13.96%.
It is worth noting that the above re-separation processes of coal
flotation tailing all include a grinding stage. The carbon component
in the coal flotation tailings is closely connected with the gangue
and needs to be ground to achieve further dissociation. Kaolinite
(Al2O3·2SiO2·2H2O) and quartz (SiO2) are two typical minerals in gangue.[16−18] In the flotation process, these gangue minerals may enter into clean
coal products through coating or entrainment. Numerous studies have
been carried out to explore the adverse effects of the nonselective
flotation behavior of gangue minerals in the flotation process.[19−23] However, the associations of gangue minerals such as kaolinite and
quartz in raw coal are different; especially for coal flotation tailings
with high ash content, the irregular inclusion of gangue minerals
makes the tailings complex in nature. In addition, based on the different
crystal structures and surface physicochemical properties of kaolinite
and quartz, their transportation behaviors in the flotation process
are quite different. It is necessary to clarify the association behaviors
of gangue minerals in coal flotation tailing and their transportation
behaviors in the flotation process.This work aimed to investigate
the associations of gangue minerals
in coal flotation tailing and their transportation behaviors in the
re-flotation process. Flotation kinetic tests and timed-release flotation
tests were performed to analyze the re-flotation efficiency of coal
flotation tailing. A series of characterization measurements such
as X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
(FTIR), scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy
(SEM-EDS), and solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) measurements
were carried out to study the associations of gangue minerals such
as kaolinite and quartz in coal flotation tailing, clarifying the
transportation behavior differences between kaolinite and quartz in
the re-flotation process. The results of this work are expected to
provide valuable guidance for the separation and utilization of coal
flotation tailing.
Results
Flotation Kinetic Results
The results
of the flotation kinetic test are shown in Figure . As shown in Figure , in each flotation period, the concentrates
had a low yield, and the cumulative yield of the concentrates was
31.91%. Moreover, the flotation yield exhibited little change with
the extension of flotation time. The ash content of the coal concentrates
increased with the increasing flotation time, but the ash content
of each concentrate product was high, and the lowest ash content reached
13.37%. The results of the flotation kinetic test indicated that the
coal flotation tailings were difficult to effectively separate carbon
and ash by increasing the flotation time, and low-ash clean coal could
only be collected in a short flotation time.
Figure 1
Results of the flotation
kinetic test.
Results of the flotation
kinetic test.
Timed-Release Flotation Test Results
The results of timed-release flotation test are shown in Figure . As observed, after
timed-release flotation, the roughing tailing product Tr1 occupied the highest yield, which was 73.13%, and the yields of
tailing products obtained by the four subsequent re-flotations were
all less than 10%. The ash content of the obtained tailing products
gradually decreased with the increase of flotation time, indicating
that the gangue minerals were gradually separated from coal slime
and the grade of the froth concentrate gradually increased. Tailing
product Tr1 exhibited the highest ash content of 67.75%,
implying that a large number of coal and gangue combinations existed
in the coal flotation tailings, which were difficult to separate directly.
After two flotation separations, the low-ash products with a yield
of 19.28% and an ash content of less than 10% could be recovered.
This result was consistent with the density analysis of the coal samples.
Figure 2
Timed-release
flotation test results.
Timed-release
flotation test results.
XRD Results
XRD is a crucial method
that reflects the distribution of gangue minerals in coal flotation
tailing. Figure shows
the XRD patterns of coal flotation tailings with various size and
density fractions. As shown in Figure a, the peaks of kaolinite and quartz could be observed
in coal flotation tailings with different size fractions, and the
peak intensity increased with decrease in the tailing particle size.
This indicated that higher contents of kaolinite and quartz were present
in the fine coal tailing, resulting in a high ash content in the fine
coal tailing, which was consistent with the size distribution of the
coal tailing samples. It is worth noting that the quartz peak intensity
of the size fraction of 0.074–0.045 mm was significantly higher
than that of the size fraction of −0.045 mm. However, the characteristic
peak intensity of kaolinite did not show a proportional change with
the quartz peak. This seems to imply that kaolinite and quartz had
different distribution characteristics in coal tailings with different
size fractions. The XRD patterns of coal flotation tailings with different
density fractions are observed in Figure b. For a density fraction of −1.6
g/cm3, a broad peak at 2θ angles of 20–30°
representing the amorphous carbon could be observed in the XRD pattern,
indicating that the carbon was the main component of the coal tailings
of this density fraction. However, for a density fraction of +1.6
g/cm3, the amorphous carbon was difficult to be observed
in the XRD patterns, especially for the density fraction of +2.0 g/cm3, indicating that these coal samples were mainly gangue minerals.
In addition, similar to the XRD patterns of the screening products,
the peak intensities of kaolinite and quartz did not show an obvious
correlation.
Figure 3
XRD patterns of coal flotation tailing with various (a)
sizes and
(b) density fractions.
XRD patterns of coal flotation tailing with various (a)
sizes and
(b) density fractions.The XRD patterns of the flotation kinetic test
products are shown
in Figure a. As observed,
kaolinite and quartz were distributed in all flotation products, and
their XRD peak intensities gradually increased with the continuation
of the flotation process, indicating that the content of gangue minerals
in the concentrate increased with the increase of flotation time. Figure b presents the XRD
patterns of the timed-release flotation test products. As noted, amorphous
carbon could not be observed in the XRD spectrum of Tr1 products, and the main components were kaolinite and quartz. Amorphous
carbon could be gradually observed in the tailing products with the
increase of flotation times, and the peak intensities of kaolinite
and quartz were low, especially for Tr3, Tr4, Tr5, and Fr products. It indicated that the
main content of these products was carbon, which was consistent with
the ash analysis results of the timed-release flotation test products.
Furthermore, the intensity of the quartz peak gradually decreased
with the increase of flotation times, and it was difficult to observe
the quartz peaks in Tr5 and Fr products. However,
the peak of kaolinite could be observed in each product. This was
consistent with the results reported by Yu et al.[20,21] In the flotation process, the energy barrier between the kaolinite
and coal particles is low, resulting in the occurrence of slime coating
and the increase of concentrate ash content.
Figure 4
XRD patterns of the (a)
flotation kinetic test products and (b)
timed-release flotation test products.
XRD patterns of the (a)
flotation kinetic test products and (b)
timed-release flotation test products.
FTIR Results
The FTIR spectra of
the timed-release flotation test products are shown in Figure . The peaks at around 3600,
1600, and 1000 cm–1 are the OH stretching vibration
of kaolinite, OH bending vibration, and Si–O–T (T is
Al or Si) asymmetric stretching vibration, respectively. The two peaks
at around 700 cm–1 represent the Si-O-Al symmetric
absorption vibration.[24,25] As shown in Figure , the intensity of these infrared
peaks in the products gradually decreased with the continuation of
the flotation process. Only a very weak Si–O peak could be
observed in the FTIR spectra of Tr5 and Fr products,
and the OH stretching vibration peak had disappeared. These results
indicated that the products obtained by multiple flotation still contained
kaolinite, but the relative content was low, which was consistent
with the ash analysis results of the timed-release flotation test
products.
Figure 5
FTIR spectra of the timed-release flotation test samples.
FTIR spectra of the timed-release flotation test samples.
SEM-EDS Results
Figure presents the SEM-EDS images
of the raw coal sample and partial timed-release flotation test products.
As shown in Figure a, the raw coal flotation tailing contained C, Si, and Al elements,
and the carbon content was found to be relatively low. The particle
appearing in the central area of the SEM image of Figure a was rich in silicon elements,
while the corresponding position was less in aluminum, indicating
that this particle may be a quartz particle. This result implied that
the quartz could exist in the coal flotation tailing in the form of
a monomer. In the surrounding area of the image, the distributions
of Si and Al elements overlapped, suggesting the existence of kaolinite.
Additionally, a large amount of carbon elements was present in this
area, indicating that kaolinite was associated with coal. Figure b presents the SEM-EDS
images of the concentrate samples obtained from the timed-release
flotation test. The surface of the concentrates mainly contained C
elements, and Si and Al elements were distributed in the form of scattered
points. The distributions of Si and Al elements almost overlapped,
inferring the presence of kaolinite. It indicated that the concentrates
were mainly composed of carbon, with a small amount of kaolinite and
almost no quartz. As noted in Figure c,d, the distributions of C, Si, and Al elements had
a high degree of coincidence, indicating that much kaolinite might
cover the coal particle surface. A part of the Si elements existed
almost alone (highlighted by red boxes), confirming the existence
of the quartz monomer. SEM-EDS test results suggested that the ash
content of the concentrates decreased with the flotation process continuing,
and the quartz could be gradually separated. However, part of the
kaolinite could cover the coal surface and enter into the concentrates,
which affected the grade of the concentrates.
Figure 6
SEM-EDS images of (a)
the raw coal sample, (b) Fr, (c)
Tr1, and (d) Tr3.
SEM-EDS images of (a)
the raw coal sample, (b) Fr, (c)
Tr1, and (d) Tr3.
SSNMR Results
29Si solid-state
nuclear magnetic resonance can confirm the coordination situation
around the Si atoms, which is beneficial to understand the association
behavior of Si components. Figure presents the SSNMR results of Tr1 and Fr products obtained from the timed-release flotation test.
The Si in kaolinite is tetracoordinated, and the silicon-oxygen tetrahedron
is connected with an aluminum-oxygen octahedron and three other silicon-oxygen
tetrahedra. As observed, the peak at around a chemical shift of 97
ppm was Q3, corresponding to the coordination of silicon
in kaolinite.[26,27] The peak marked by the dotted
line on the right was Q4, corresponding to the coordination
of silicon in quartz.[28] These results were
consistent with the XRD analysis. For Fr products, two
new peaks (i.e., peak 1 and peak 2) were observed, indicating that
the Si in Fr products had other coordination forms besides
kaolinite and quartz. Based on the elemental composition analysis,
Si might bond with the carbon in coal to form a new coordination form.
The chemical shifts that peaks 1 and 2 were located at were high,
which could rule out the embedding of single Si atoms in the coal
macromolecular network. The inorganic phase (gangue) and organic phase
(coal) atomic layers could have mutual inclusions, resulting in the
substitution of Si atoms on the surface of kaolinite by C atoms to
form C–O–Si bonds.[29]
Figure 7
SSNMR results
of Tr1 and Fr.
SSNMR results
of Tr1 and Fr.
Discussion
According to the analysis
of the above characterizations, kaolinite
and quartz were found to exist in most concentrate products. Among
them, quartz was found to appear in the form of monomers, while kaolinite
presented in two forms, i.e., monomer and kaolinite–coal integration.
Kaolinite is a 1:1 layered silicate of dioctahedral structure, and
its basic structure is composed of a silicon-oxygen tetrahedron and
an aluminum-oxygen octahedron layer. The interlayers are connected
by hydrogen bonds, which are easily split into small flakes along
the 001 surface. Quartz has a shelf-like structure, and its structural
unit is a silicon-oxygen tetrahedron.[30,31] In the flotation
process, kaolinite and quartz have exhibited different partitioning
behaviors. The Si4+ in kaolinite is easily replaced by
Al3+ and Fe3+, resulting in the 001 crystal
face being negatively charged. Quartz becomes negatively charged by
losing the charged particles. The bubble surface is usually negatively
charged, causing its strong electrostatic repulsion with kaolinite
and quartz. On the other hand, kaolinite and quartz are hydrophilic
particles with a low attachment force to the bubbles, which are difficult
to adhere to the bubble surface. Therefore, kaolinite and quartz in
monomeric forms contaminate the flotation concentrates due to the
water entrainment rather than the capture of bubbles, increasing the
ash content of the concentrates. An increase of froth flotation times
can effectively slow down the water entrainment to increase the concentrate
grade, and it is confirmed by the timed-release flotation test results.
Additionally, the surface of coal is usually negatively charged, resulting
in the electrostatic repulsion between kaolinite, quartz, and coal
particles to hinder the adhesion. However, kaolinite is easy to sludge
in the process of coal mining and separation, resulting in a finer
particle size, which is reflected from the XRD patterns of the screening
products. In the flotation process, the kaolinite particle has an
interface polar interaction energy with the coal particle, which is
the attraction potential energy, and the value is much larger than
the van der Waals potential energy and electrostatic force potential
energy. It dominates the total interaction energy between the kaolinite
and coal particles, because of which kaolinite particles can coat
the coal surface after overcoming the “energy barrier”,
which has been confirmed by numerous studies.[19−21] The fine kaolinite
particle has a lower “energy barrier”, which explains
why kaolinite can exist in various products in the form of a continuum,
which is difficult to be effectively restrained by increasing the
flotation process or time.Based on the above analysis of the
association behaviors of gangue
minerals in coal flotation tailing and their transportation behaviors
in the re-flotation process, an effective separation method of combustion
in the coal flotation tailing is proposed, as shown in Figure . Firstly, the froth concentrates
with the low ash preferentially separated in the flotation process
should be collected, and the entrainment of gangue minerals is weak.
For the froth concentrates collected at the later stage of flotation,
one or more re-flotation processes may be used for further separation
and enrichment to obtain the low-ash products. The concentrates obtained
from the above flotation process are mixed to form the final concentrate
products. Referring to the experimental process and coal samples of
the flotation kinetic test and timed-release flotation test, the laboratory
flotation test using the above flotation process showed that the concentrate
product with a yield of 24% and an ash content of 11% could be obtained.
Figure 8
Flow chart
of the separation method of combustion in coal flotation
tailing.
Flow chart
of the separation method of combustion in coal flotation
tailing.
Conclusions
To improve the utilization
efficiency of coal flotation tailing,
achieving the clean production of fine coal, the association behaviors
of gangue minerals such as kaolinite and quartz in coal flotation
tailing and their transportation behaviors in the re-flotation process
were explored. The following conclusions can be drawn:Results of the flotation kinetic test
illustrated that the flotation yield exhibited little change with
the extension of flotation time, while the ash content of the froth
concentrates increased. A low yield of concentrate products with low
ash content could be obtained in the initial flotation time. Furthermore,
analysis of the timed-release flotation test showed that the ash content
of the obtained tailing products gradually decreased with the increase
of flotation time, indicating that the products with high grades could
be obtained by the re-flotation.A series of characterization analyses
confirmed that the main gangue minerals in coal flotation tailing
were kaolinite and quartz. With the decrease of particle size or the
increase of density fraction, the contents of kaolinite and quartz
showed an increasing trend. The association behaviors of the kaolinite
in the coal flotation tailing were different from quartz, which was
found to present in the form of monomers, while kaolinite presented
in two forms: monomer and kaolinite–coal complex. In the flotation
process, the kaolinite and quartz presented different transportation
behaviors. Quartz in monomeric form contaminated the flotation concentrates
due to the water entrainment, and it could be relieved by the increase
of the flotation time. Kaolinite entered into the froth products by
the water entrainment and coating, which was difficult to be effectively
restrained.A separation
method of combustion
in coal flotation tailing was proposed. Firstly, the froth concentrates
with the low ash preferentially separated in the flotation process
should be collected. Once or more flotation may be used to further
separate the froth concentrates collected at the later stage of flotation
to obtain the low-ash products. The concentrates obtained from the
above flotation process are mixed to form the final concentrate product.
The laboratory flotation test showed that the concentrate product
with a yield of 24% and an ash content of 11% could be obtained using
this method.
Experiments
Materials
The test coal samples for
coal flotation tailing were obtained from the Zaozhuang mining area,
Shandong province, China. The size distribution of the coal samples
is given in Table . As observed, the ash content increased with the decrease of coal
particle size. The size fraction of -0.045 mm with a high ash content
of 64.42% occupied the highest mass fraction, which was 75.50%. The
density analysis of the coal samples is shown in Table . As noted, the ash content
increased with increase in the coal sample density. The highest mass
fraction and ash content located at the density fraction of +2.0 g/cm3 were 51.80 and 71.85%, respectively. It is worth noting that
the density fraction of −1.5 g/cm3 with a yield
of 19.23% had a low ash content of 9.46%, and these needed to be separated
and recovered. The X-ray diffraction analysis of the test samples
was conducted using a D8 Advance type X-ray diffractometer (Bruker,
Germany), as shown in Figure . An initial observation indicated that some peaks of quartz
and montmorillonite were present, indicating that the main mineral
phases in the test coal samples were quartz and kaolinite. It is also
worth noting that kaolinite is a typical gangue mineral with high
argillization, which is not conducive to flotation.[17,20] Furthermore, the collector and frother used in this study were diesel
and 2-octanol, respectively.
Table 1
Size Distribution of the Coal Sample
cumulative
oversize
cumulative
undersize
size (mm)
yield (%)
ash (%)
yield (%)
ash (%)
yield (%)
ash (%)
+0.5
3.76
6.40
3.76
6.40
100.00
52.02
0.5–0.25
4.67
6.87
8.43
6.66
96.24
53.80
0.25–0.125
6.28
9.02
14.71
7.67
91.57
56.20
0.125–0.074
6.10
17.32
20.81
10.50
85.29
59.67
0.074–0.045
3.70
32.63
24.50
13.83
79.19
62.93
–0.045
75.50
64.42
100.00
52.02
75.50
64.42
total
100.00
52.02
Table 2
Density Analysis of the Coal Sample
cumulative
floats
cumulative
sinks
density (g/cm3)
yield (%)
ash (%)
yield (%)
ash (%)
yield (%)
ash (%)
–1.3
3.50
5.29
3.50
5.29
100.00
52.32
1.3–1.4
9.51
8.43
13.01
7.59
96.50
54.03
1.4–1.5
6.22
13.37
19.23
9.46
86.99
59.01
1.5–1.6
4.87
18.23
24.09
11.23
80.77
62.53
1.6–1.8
6.76
26.80
30.85
14.64
75.91
65.37
1.8–2.0
17.35
49.09
48.20
27.04
69.15
69.14
+2.0
51.80
75.85
100.00
52.32
51.80
75.85
total
100.00
52.32
Figure 9
XRD pattern of the coal flotation tailing.
XRD pattern of the coal flotation tailing.
Flotation Kinetic Test
In this study,
an XFD-1.0 L type lab-scale single mechanical flotation machine was
used to carry out the flotation kinetic test. The coal samples were
added to the flotation cell containing 1.0 L of water with a concentration
of 80 g/L, and premixed at an impeller speed of 1800 rpm for 180 s.
After that, the collector was added to the coal slurry at a dosage
of 275 g/t coal with a mixing time of 180 s. Subsequently, the frother
was added to the slurry at a dose of 115 g/t coal and mixed for another
60 s. Air was then introduced into the flotation cell at a constant
air intake of 0.18 m3/h. The total flotation process was
180 s. In the flotation process, five froth concentrate products,
namely, Fk1, Fk2, Fk3, Fk4, and Fk5, were consecutively collected after 20, 40,
80, 120, and 180 s, and the collected tailing product was named Tk. The collected products were filtered, dried, and weighed
for yield and ash analysis, and the yield (γ,%) of each concentrate was calculated as eq where m and m are the
mass of each concentrate and the flotation feed, respectively (g).
Timed-Release Flotation Test
The
timed-release flotation test was also performed using the above mechanical
flotation machine at an impeller speed of 1800 rpm and an air intake
of 0.18 m3/h. The amounts of collector and frother added
were 500 and 300 g/t coal, respectively. The whole flotation experimental
process is shown in Figure . As noted, five tailing products and one concentrate product
were collected. All six products were filtered, dried, and weighed
for the following analysis, and the yield was calculated using eq .
Figure 10
Schematic of the timed-release
flotation test.
Schematic of the timed-release
flotation test.
Characterizations
In this study,
a D8 Advance type X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, Germany) was used
to conduct the XRD measurements of various coal samples. Prior to
the XRD measurements, coal samples were ground to obtain 0–45
μm size fractions and pressed to form a coal plate. The XRD
patterns (scanning range: 5–70 2θ/degree) were recorded
using Cu Ka (40 kV, 40 mA) at a scanning speed of 2° min–1. The FTIR spectra of the coal samples after diluting
by KBr were recorded using a Vertex 80v spectrometer with a resolution
of 4 cm–1. The surface morphology and elemental
composition analyses of the coal samples were carried out using a
Quanta 250 scanning electron microscope-energy dispersive spectrometer
(FEI, USA). Before the experiments, the dried coal samples were adhered
to the conductive tape on the sample stage, and gold layers were sputtered
on the sample surfaces. The whole test was carried out in a low-vacuum
environment. The 29Si SSNMR (solid-state nuclear magnetic
resonance) spectra of the coal samples were measured using an Avance
NEO 400 WB solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometer (Bruker,
Switzerland).
Authors: Francieli Tiecher; Renata N Florindo; Geilma L Vieira; Márcia E B Gomes; Denise C C Dal Molin; Richard T Lermen Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 3.623