Antiproliferative Activities of the Lipophilic Fraction of Eucalyptus camaldulensis against MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells, UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS Metabolite Profile, and Antioxidative Functions.

Although a number of pharmacological properties have been linked to Eucalyptus camaldulensis leaf essential oil and extracts, the biological attributes of the lipophilic fraction remain unknown. Moreover, only a limited number of active compounds have so far been identified. This work aimed to investigate the anti-oxidative, anti-aggregation, and cytotoxic properties as well as profile the secondary metabolites in the lipophilic fraction of E. camaldulensis leaf extract (Lipo-Eucam) using UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). It was found that Lipo-Eucam possessed potent antioxidant properties against DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP with IC50 values of 31.46, 32.78, and 10.12 μg/mL, respectively. The fraction was able to attenuate metal-catalyzed oxidation of bovine serum albumin (BSA) in a dose-dependent manner (p < 0.05) and abrogated the aggregation of amyloidogenic BSA as revealed by the Congo red assay and transmission electron microscopy. Furthermore, Lipo-Eucam demonstrated potent cytotoxic effects against MCF-7 (IC50 7.34 μg/mL) but was noncytotoxic at used concentrations against HEK-293 cells (IC50 > 80 μg/mL), suggestive of its selective anticancer properties. Spectrophotometric, UHPLC-MS, and GC-MS analysis revealed that Lipo-Eucam is rich in phenolics, flavonoids, terpenoids, volatile constituents, and a plethora of active metabolites, probably responsible for the observed activities. These findings indicate that Lipo-Eucam is endowed with pharmacologically relevant active principles with strong potential for use in the amelioration of disease conditions related to oxidative stress, protein aggregation, and breast cancer and therefore worthy of further investigations.

Introduction

The demand for functional ingredients from natural origin for healthcare, food, and pharmaceutical applications is increasing at an unprecedented rate. In particular, the desire for antioxidants from natural sources over their synthetic counterparts has been steadily growing aided by rising concerns of the potential toxicity of chemically synthesized agents. Also, the increasing incidence of intractable chronic conditions and cancers justifies the search for novel bioactive agents to either prevent, counter, and/or ameliorate these conditions. Plants remain one of the most reliable sources for the identification and development of important bioactive principles.

Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh (river red gum) is an evergreen perennial tree belonging to the Myrtaceae family. E. camaldulensis is one of the most widely distributed Eucalyptus spp. and one of the most planted trees in the world, having immense commercial and pharmacological value. Its dense wood has made E. camaldulensis very valuable for pulping.[1] During processing of the log, vast quantities of waste byproducts are often generated in the form of stem bark, small branches, and leaves. In view of closing the loop and enhancing the sustainable use of this plant, these byproducts represent a cheap and potentially valuable bioresource which can be valorized for various purposes. Traditionally, the plant leaves and stem bark had been used for the treatment of various ailments including fevers, flu, cold, general sickness,[2] as anesthetic, astringent, and antiseptic agent.[3] Recent reports on the pharmacological and biological properties of E. camaldulensis leaf extract have pointed to the antimicrobial, antioxidant, antifungal, anti-inflammatory attributes, and antitumor, among others. These activities were mostly attributed to the leaf essential oils[4] as well as other bioactive agents present in the leaf extracts, such as flavonoids, phenolic acids, and tannins.[5,6] Despite an increasing number of studies highlighting the potential bioactivity of E. camaldulensis, only a limited number of compounds have been identified to date.

Apparently, the composition and bioactivity of E. camaldulensis extract is influenced not only by the source material but also by the adopted method of preparation. In the past, there had been reports on the activity of the aqueous,[3] aqueous-acetone,[7] methanol, ethyl acetate, n-butanol,[8] chloroform and hexane,[9] ethanol,[10] dichloromethane, and petroleum ether[11] prepared via conventional approaches. The limitations of conventional extraction approaches such as requirements for high energy, enormous quantity of organic solvents which are sometimes toxic, and the tedious and time-consuming nature together pose considerable challenges to large-scale extract preparation, health and environmental concerns, as well as use of the extract in food, nutraceutical, cosmetics, or pharmaceutical applications. Consequently, there had been increasing push toward more benign and greener extraction techniques as previously reported.[12] Nonetheless, there is currently an absence of reports on the lipophilic extract of E. camaldulensis leaves prepared via a “green” route nor an assessment of its activity as potential antioxidative, anticancer, or anti-aggregation agent.

The current work aimed to elucidate some important biological activities of lipophilic fraction of E. camaldulensis. Specifically, the study is centered on evaluating the anti-oxidative, anti-aggregation, and anti-proliferative effects of the lipophilic fraction of E. camaldulensis leaf extract (Lipo-Eucam) prepared without using any noxious organic solvent. Consequently, the chemical profile of the secondary metabolites present in Lipo-Eucam will be ascertained by spectrophotometry and using UHPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis. The impact of Lipo-Eucam on oxidation will be evaluated using DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP assays as well as metal-catalyzed protein oxidation system. Then, the influence of the fraction on protein aggregation will be monitored using Congo red assay and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Finally, the cytotoxic effect will be examined using human breast cancer (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231) cell lines and human embryonic kidney (HEK-293) cell line via the [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide] (MTT) assay.

Results and Discussion

Chemical Constituents of Lipo-Eucam

The leaves of Eucalyptus spp are well known for their poor nutritional attributes such as very low amounts of available protein;[13] however, these plant samples are equally renowned for their high content of secondary metabolites, including polyphenols, tannins, terpenes, phloroglucinol compounds, and essential oils, among others.[14] These bioactive compounds have been implicated in the plants’ ability to fend off herbivores. More importantly, they are now widely recognized for the numerous pharmacological properties associated with Eucalyptus spp, such as antimicrobial, antifungal, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, analgesic, antiulcer, and antidiabetic.[15,16] The number and content of secondary metabolites present in any particular Eucalyptus spp leaf extract are influenced by several factors including agronomic, environmental, genetic (species), and certainly, the manner in which the extract was prepared,[17] that is, extraction method, time, solvents, and ratio of solvent to solid material, among others. This in turn could play a significant role in their pharmacological and nutraceutical application. Thus, it is imperative to evaluate the content as well as determine the particular individual bioactives present in Eucalyptus species prepared under different conditions. Particularly, in E. camaldulensis leaves, the paucity of information on the chemical profile of the lipophilic fraction further accentuates the importance. Ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry qualitative analysis of the lipophilic fraction of E. camaldulensis leaf extract (Lipo-Eucam) enabled the identification of 70 compounds (Table ) eluted between 2 and 22 min (Figure A).

Table 1

Chemical Profile of Bioactive Compounds Present in E. camaldulensis Extract Obtained by UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS Analysisa

S/N	name (tentative ID)	formula	precursor (m/z)	accurate mass (Da)	RT (min)	score (DB)	diff (ppm)
1	quinic acid	C7H12O6	191.0561	192.0634	2.195	99.7	–0.02
2	4-glucogallic acid	C13H16O10	331.0667	332.074	4.83	99.26	1
3	chlorogenic acid	C16H18O9	353.0877	354.0949	6.525	99.82	0.41
4	gardoside	C16H22O10	373.1137	374.1209	6.738	98.66	1.19
5	(±)-catechin	C15H14O6	289.0716	290.0789	6.814	99.86	0.6
6	sonchuionoside C	C19H30O8	431.1922	386.1943	6.914	90.44	–0.61
7	isosyringinoside	C23H34O14	533.1871	534.1944	6.939	98.58	0.92
8	hydrojuglone glucoside	C16H18O8	337.0928	338.1001	7.24	99.61	0.35
9	pantoyllactone glucoside	C12H20O8	351.1295	292.1156	7.303	99.25	0.7
10	isoorientin 6″-O-glucoside	C26H28O16	595.1299	596.1371	7.366	98.45	1.06
11	(S)-rutaretin	C14H14O5	261.0769	262.0841	7.541	99.27	0.05
12	dihydroferulic acid 4-O-glucuronide	C16H20O10	371.0982	372.1054	7.558	98.93	0.55
13	quercetin 3-(2-galloylglucoside)	C28H24O16	615.0987	616.1057	7.642	96.32	1.2
14	isovitexin	C21H20O10	431.0984	432.1058	7.667	96.84	–0.25
15	quercetin 7-(6″-acetylglucoside)	C23H22O13	505.098	506.1048	7.767	91.86	2.47
16	quercetin 3-galactoside	C21H20O12	463.0879	464.0952	7.881	98.58	0.61
17	quercetin 3′-O-glucuronide	C21H18O13	477.0671	478.0744	7.881	99.33	0.66
18	rumexoside	C20H22O10	421.1138	422.121	8.119	99.15	0.74
19	tricetin 3′-xyloside	C20H18O11	433.0777	434.0849	8.194	98.56	–0.08
20	kaempferol 4′-glucoside	C21H20O11	447.0934	448.1004	8.32	95.31	0.4
21	methyl (3x,10R)-dihydroxy-11-dodecene-6,8-diynoate 10-glucoside	C19H26O9	397.1504	398.1576	8.42	98.89	0.19
22	6-C-β-d-xylopyranosylluteolin	C20H18O10	417.0826	418.0898	8.571	98.82	0.54
23	epigallocatechin 3-O-p-coumarate	C24H20O9	451.1034	452.1106	8.571	99.56	0.3
24	hesperetin	C16H14O6	301.0711	302.0785	10.654	97.1	1.91
25	phloretin	C15H14O5	273.0767	274.084	8.747	97.6	0.49
26	okanin 4-methyl ether 3′-glucoside	C22H24O11	463.1246	464.1318	8.847	99.15	0.09
27	gallocatechin-(4α->8)-epigallocatechin	C30H26O14	609.1245	610.1319	9.023	99.05	0.66
28	maritimetin 6-O-(3″,4″,6″-tri-O-acetylglucoside)	C27H26O14	573.1244	574.1316	9.073	98.41	1.09
29	dalpaniculin	C25H28O13	535.1457	536.1529	9.123	98.05	0.19
30	okanin 3,4-dimethyl ehter 4′-glucoside	C23H26O11	477.1401	478.1482	9.148	71.75	–1.38
31	2,3-dihydro-5,5′,7,7′-tetrahydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)[3,8′-bi-4H-1-benzopyran]-4,4′-dione	C24H16O9	447.0722	448.0795	9.374	98.18	–0.11
32	medicagenic acid 3-O-β-d-glucuronide	C36H54O12	677.3534	678.3609	9.449	96.88	0.99
33	3,5-dicaffeoyl-4-succinoylquinic acid	C29H28O15	615.135	616.1423	9.525	99.27	0.92
34	(R)-rutaretin 1’-(6″-sinapoylglucoside)	C31H34O14	629.1872	630.1945	9.588	99.55	0.64
35	2a-hydroxygypsogenin 3-O-β-d-glucoside	C36H56O10	693.3847	648.3871	9.65	83.11	0.34
36	glucosyl passiflorate	C37H60O12	695.4008	696.408	9.889	98.74	0.67
37	9,12,13-trihydroxy-10,15-octadecadienoic acid	C18H32O5	327.2175	328.2248	10.353	99.53	0.63
38	2,8-di-O-methylellagic acid	C16H10O8	329.03	330.0372	10.504	99.11	0.97
39	corchoionoside B	C19H28O9	399.1655	400.1728	10.755	98.68	1.22
40	11,12,13-trihydroxy-9-octadecenoic acid	C18H34O5	329.233	330.2403	10.78	98.73	0.91
41	lethedoside B	C25H28O12	519.1507	520.1579	10.931	99.17	0.37
42	luteolin	C15H10O6	285.0403	286.0476	11.081	99.11	0.57
43	5-hydroxy-7,2′,5′-trimethoxyflavone	C18H16O6	327.0873	328.0945	11.232	98.81	0.54
44	matteuorienate B	C29H34O13	589.1924	590.1997	11.433	97.9	0.43
45	5,3′,4′-trihydroxy-3-methoxy-6,7-methylenedioxyflavone	C17H12O8	343.0457	344.053	12.11	98.51	0.73
46	(7′S,8′S)-4,7′-epoxy-3,8′-bilign-7-ene-3′,5-dimethoxy-4′,9,9′-triol 4′-glucoside	C26H32O11	565.1929	520.1945	12.337	98.11	–0.05
47	cnidilin	C17H16O5	299.0925	300.0998	12.437	97.59	0.07
48	luteolin 7-O-β-d-glucoside	C21H32O10	443.1925	444.1996	12.613	98.75	–0.19
49	bayogenin	C30H48O5	487.3429	488.3501	12.65	97.41
50	methoxyhydroxymethyl hydrocinnamic acid	C11H14O4	209.0818	210.0891	13.102	98.96	0.55
51	2,2,4,4,-tetramethyl-6-(1-oxopropyl)-1,3,5-cyclohexanetrione	C13H18O4	237.1131	238.1203	13.654	98.76	0.87
52	bolegrevilol	C28H40O4	439.2851	440.2922	13.868	96.77	0.98
53	quillaic acid	C30H46O5	485.3269	486.334	13.993	77.95	1.16
54	aspidinol	C12H16O4	223.098	224.1052	14.056	98.42	–1.73
55	α-peroxyachifolide	C20H24O7	375.145	376.1523	15.199	97.48	–0.39
56	5,7,4′-trimethoxyflavone	C18H16O5	311.0923	312.0995	15.248	99.6	0.77
57	3-trans-p-coumaroylrotundic acid	C39H54O7	633.3798	634.3869	15.374	98.55	0.05
58	anhydrocinnzeylanine	C22H32O7	453.2128	408.2147	15.65	99.16	0.23
59	maslinic acid	C30H48O4	471.3478	472.3551	15.738	99.34	0.26
60	macrocarpal I	C28H42O7	489.2858	490.293	15.977	99.08	0.03
61	12-hydroxy-11-methoxy-8,11,13-abietatrien-20-oic acid	C21H30O4	405.2283	346.2144	16.83	98.33	0.01
62	artecanin	C15H18O5	277.1084	278.1157	17.081	96.42	–0.85
63	anhydrocinnzeylanine	C22H32O7	453.213	408.2148	17.182	98.86	–0.08
64	eucalypcamal F	C20H22O6	357.1344	358.1418	17.257	96.55	–0.56
65	pseudolaric acid B	C23H28O8	431.1724	432.1797	17.521	90.14	–3.07
66	eucalypcamal B	C23H28O6	399.1814	400.1886	17.709	91.61	–0.79
67	eucalypcamal N	C23H30O7	417.1921	418.1992	18.663	98.4	–0.51
68	eucalypcamal D	C23H32O4	371.2225	372.2301	20.596	99.03	0.9
69	laxiflorin	C23H26O7	459.1661	414.1679	20.872	99.07	–0.01
70	eucalypcamal M	C23H30O6	401.1967	402.2042	21.575	95.16	0.4

Rt: retention time.

Figure 1

(A) Total ion chromatogram of secondary metabolites found in Lipo-Eucam by UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS and (B) GC–MS chromatogram of Lipo-Eucam.

The majority of these compounds were found to belong in major classes, such as terpenes and terpenoids, tannins, flavonoids, phenolic acid and derivatives, fatty acids, and phloroglucinol derivatives. Terpenes and terpenoid derivatives found in Lipo-Eucam included sonchuionoside C, medicagenic acid 3-O-β-d-glucuronide, 2α-hydroxygypsogenin 3-O-β-d-glucoside, glucosyl passiflorate, bayogenin, bolegrevilol, quillaic acid, α-peroxyachifolide, maslinic acid, artecanin, and pseudolaric acid B. The oleanane pentacyclic triterpene, maslinic acid, had previously been reported in Eucalyptus spp leaves.[18] Along with the terpenes, many flavonoid compounds were also detected in Lipo-Eucam. Notably, these were mostly quercetin (compounds #13, #15, #16, and #17), luteolin (compounds #22, #42, and #48), apigenin (compound #14), or kaempferol (compound #20) derivatives, as well as the methylated flavonoid 8-demethyleucalyptin,[19] which is consistent with past reports from other studies.[6,12]

Chlorogenic acid was found as compound #3 by examining the theoretical mass versus the experimental mass of the deprotonated parent ion [M – H]− (353.0878 vs 353.0877 Da) as well as the fragment at m/z 191.0560 which was consistent with the mass of quinic acid, the main fragment of chlorogenic acids. Other hydroxycinnamate derivatives uncovered included dihydroferulic acid 4-O-glucuronide, 3,5-dicaffeoyl-4-succinoylquinic acid, and methoxyhydroxymethyl-hydrocinnamic acid.

Eucalyptus spp. leaves are also known to harbor a great diversity of tannin compounds.[7] In Lipo-Eucam, several tannins were found to be present such as (±)-catechin (*5), epigallocatechin 3-O-p-coumarate, gallocatechin-(4-α->8)-epigallocatechin, 2,8-di-O-methylellagic acid. Phenolic compounds such as (±)-catechin, hesperitin, phloretin, tricetin, and chlorogenic acid found in Lipo-Eucam had previously been observed in E. camaldulensis leaves.[20] Phloroglucinol derivatives located in Lipo-Eucam included aspidinol and macrocarpal I. While this is the first report of the presence of macrocarpal I in the E. camaldulensis leaf sample, these compounds are known to be present in other Eucalyptus spp.[18] In addition, several phloroglucinol-meroterpenoids eluted between Rt 17.25–21.57 min were also present in Lipo-Eucam such as eucalypcamal F, eucalypcamal B, eucalypcamal N, eucalypcamal D, and eucalypcamal M. The strong presence of these compounds in Lipo-Eucam is consistent with recent reports according to Daus et al., wherein the authors noted that phloroglucinol-meroterpenoids constitute the major bioactive components in dichloromethane extract of the E. camaldulensis leaf extract.[21] The identity of most of these compounds was proposed on the basis of their UPLC–MS/MS data by comparing with chemistry databases as well as published literature on the phytochemistry of E. camaldulensis and related species of the same genus.[7,14,21] Thus, further corroboration is still warranted via the use of other spectroscopic techniques and compound standards to confirm the position of glycosylation as well as stereochemistry of the compounds. While consistent with previous reports on the class and identity of compound in E. camaldulensis, this study provides the first and extensive list of compounds in the lipophilic fraction of the leaves sample.

Also, E. camaldulensis is reputed as a rich source of essential oils and volatile constituents.[22] Lipo-Eucam was expected to contain some essential oil constituents, as well as other semi- and volatile organic compounds. To further verify the identity of these compounds, GC–MS qualitative analysis was employed to extend the coverage. GC–MS analysis of Lipo-Eucam revealed several semi- and volatile components (Table ) eluted between 9 and 70 min (Figure B). Most of the compounds identified by GC–MS were monoterpene hydrocarbons, which was in line with previous report on E. camaldulensis leaves.[23] Other compounds also captured by the analysis include many sesquiterpenes, terpenoids as well as flavonoid [7-methoxy-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one], steroids (stigmasta-3,5-diene and γ-sitosterol), α-tocopherol, and many fatty acids. Similar compounds were also found in the lipophilic extractives of Brazilian eucalypt hybrids.[24] It is notable that the major oil components in Lipo-Eucam were α-phellandrene, o-cymene, n-hexadecenoic acid, and phytol, which was in agreement with previously documented accounts of leaf essential oils of E. camaldulensis.[25,26] α-Phellandrene was the most abundant volatile oil component, and this compound is known for its widespread occurrence in Eucalyptus spp.[27] 1,8-Cineole previously found in other reports was absent. It is conceivable that this difference in composition could be attributed to the source of the plant sample, variation in season of harvest, genetics as well as the extraction approach.[20,26,28] The extraction method adopted herein is not tailored specifically for essential oils. Rather the objective was to obtain a broad spectrum of lipophilic components in the leaves presumably including essential oils and many other bioactive secondary metabolites. In this regard, the adopted extraction method proved to be suitable indeed.

Table 2

GC–MS Qualitative Analysis of Bioactive Compounds Present in Lipophilic Fraction of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Leaf Extracta

S/N	RT (min)	name (tentative ID)	formula	CAS RN	% oftotal	nature of compound
1	9.6679	α-phellandrene	C10H16	2000048-82-3	15.3	cyclic monoterpenes
2	10.2453	o-cymene	C10H14	527-84-4	1.74	aromatic hydrocarbon
3	10.3736	3-methylene-6-(1-methylethyl)-cyclohexene	C10H16	555-10-2	0.86	cyclic monoterpene
4	16.0255	benzaldehyde, 4-methyl-	C8H8O	104-87-0	0.16	benzoyl derivative
5	21.3439	caryophyllene	C15H24	87-44-5	0.28	bicyclic sesquiterpene
6	21.9919	isoledene	C15H24	95910-36-4	0.15	sesquiterpene
7	23.878	(1S,4S,4αS)-1-isopropyl-4,7-dimethyl-1,2,3,4,4α,5-hexahydronaphthalene	C15H24	267665-20-3	0.41	cadinane sesquiterpenoids
8	24.8082	1,6,10-dodecatrien-3-ol, 3,7,11-trimethyl-	C15H26O	7212-44-4	2.55	sesquiterpene
9	25.6037	hexadecane	C16H34	544-76-3	0.2	hydrocarbon
10	26.9189	2-naphthalenemethanol, 1,2,3,4,4a,5,6,8α-octahydro-α,α,4α,8-tetramethyl-,[2R-(2α,4a.α.,8a.β.)]-	C15H26O	473-16-5	0.19	cedrane and isocedrane sesquiterpenoids
11	28.7665	α-phellandrene, dimer	C20H32	7350-11-0	0.22	cyclic monoterpenes
13	29.9662	α-phellandrene, dimer	C20H32	7350-11-0	8.58	cyclic monoterpenes
14	30.2677	α-phellandrene, dimer	C20H32	7350-11-0	1.63	cyclic monoterpenes
15	30.4923	(2,6,6-trimethylcyclohex-1-enylmethanesulfonyl)benzene	C16H22O2S	56691-74-8	0.21	benzenesulfonyl compounds
16	30.7874	3,7,11,15-tetramethylhexadec-2-en-1-yl acetate	C22H42O2	76337-16-1	5.09	acyclic diterpenoids
17	30.9285	(2E)-3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecene	C20H40	14237-73-1	0.17	hydrocarbone
18	31.2942	phytol, acetate	C22H42O2	2000646-53-2	0.84	acyclic diterpenoids
19	31.6534	phytol, acetate	C22H42O2	2000646-53-2	1.19	acyclic diterpenoids
20	32.4554	methyl 5-tert-butyl-3-(chloromethyl)-2-thiophenecarboxylate	C11H15ClO2S	252914-61-7	2.24
21	33.2509	n-hexadecanoic acid	C16H32O2	57-10-3	3.51	fatty acid
22	33.8347	2H-indol-2-one, 3-[(4-ethylphenyl)imino]-1,3-dihydro-	C16H14N2O	2000365-27-0	4.38
23	33.9309	eicosane	C20H42	112-95-8	1.21	alkane
24	36.048	phytol	C20H40O	150-86-7	2.48	acyclic hydrogenated diterpene alcohol
25	36.388	9,12-octadecadienoic acid (Z,Z)-	C18H32O2	60-33-3	0.19	fatty acid
26	36.5227	9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid, (Z,Z,Z)-	C18H30O2	463-40-1	0.89	fatty acid
27	38.9798	1,4-naphthoquinone, 2-acetyl-3-hydroxy-5,6,8-trimethoxy-	C15H14O7	14090-54-1	0.73	1,4-naphthoquinones
28	42.4762	octadecane, 3-ethyl-5-(2-ethylbutyl)-	C26H54	55282-12-7	0.19	hydrocarbon
29	45.895	1-heptacosanol	C27H56O	2004-39-9	3.86	fatty alcohol
30	45.9983	triacontane	C30H62	638-68-6	0.49	hydrocarbon
31	49.0584	squalene	C30H50	111-02-4	0.6	triterpene
32	50.6174	17-pentatriacontene	C35H70	6971-40-0	1.09	hydrocarbon
33	54.1138	stigmasta-3,5-diene	C29H48	79897-80-6	0.41	steroid
34	54.9157	α-tocopherol	C29H50O2	59-02-9	1.76	tocopherol
35	55.5636	7-methoxy-3-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one	C18H16O5	1621-61-0	0.43	flavonoid
36	57.623	γ-sitosterol	C29H50O	83-47-6	6.18	steroid
37	61.3311	betulinaldehyde	C30H48O2	13159-28-9	0.54	pentacyclic triterpenoids
38	61.639	(3β)-3-hydroxy-urs-12-en-28-oic acid, methyl ester	C31H50O3	32208-45-0	0.72	ursolic acid derivatives
39	61.8122	ursolic aldehyde	C30H48O2	19132-81-1	0.87	ursolic acid derivatives
40	62.8323	uvaol	C30H50O2	545-46-0	0.18	triterpenoid
41	66.7457	3-(1,5-dimethyl-hexyl)-3a,10,10,12b-tetramethyl-1,2,3,3a,4,6,8,9,10,10a,11,12,12a,12b-tetradecahydro-benzo[4,5]cyclohepta[1,2-E]inde	C30H50	2000800-89-0	1.26	hydrocarbon
42	67.2076	oleanolic acid	C30H48O3	508-02-1	0.44	pentacyclic triterpenoid

Rt: retention time; CAS RN: CAS Registry Number.

Anti-Oxidative Properties of Lipo-Eucam

Cellular oxidation is a complex biochemical process essential to normal physiological functions as well as the pathological mechanisms of many ailments. Reactive chemical intermediates are involved in signal transduction, inflammatory response, and cellular defense, among other vital physiological roles. On the other hand, unchecked production and accumulation of reactive species beyond cellular regulatory capacity could result in oxidative stress, under which important cellular components such as proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids are oxidatively modified leading to the loss of normal cellular functions and in some cases, acquisition of toxic functions. Oxidative stress has been implicated in the etiopathogenesis of several chronic conditions. There has been several reports suggesting that the use of natural antioxidants could modulate or ameliorate the incidence of deleterious oxidation. Plants have been recognized as vital sources of natural antioxidants, especially in the form of polyphenols and terpenoids. The UPLC–MS and GC–MS profile of Eucam indicated the presence of a multitude of natural phenolics and terpenoids with reported antioxidant function.

Spectrophotometric evaluation of the phenolic and flavonoid content of the sample revealed that Lipo-Eucam revealed a total phenolic content of 112.18 mg GAE/g DW and total flavonoid content of 34.56 mg QE/d DW (Table ). To put these results in context, it is worth mentioning that many other authors have alluded to the fact that Eucalyptus spp is rich in phenolics, although the reports have been less consistent. For instance, Nasr et al. observed that the E. camaldulensis leaf extract yielded 28.44–38.21, 32.8–38.21, and 30.20–46.56 mg/g DW when prepared using ethanol, methanol, and ethyl acetate as extraction solvent. The authors also noted that when water was used as extractant under boiling, maceration, or sonication, the total phenolic content was less than 32 mg/g DW.[20] Similarly, Elansary et al. found that methanol extracts of E. camaldulensis, E. camaldulensis var obtusa, and Eucalyptus gamphocephala leaves displayed TPC of about 14–34 mg GAE/g DW.[5]

Table 3

Chemical and Antioxidant Properties of Lipo-Eucam

S/N	attribute	Lipo-Eucam
1	total phenolic content (mg GAE/g dw)	112.18 ± 5.81
2	total flavonoid content (mg QE/g dw)	34.56 ± 1.06
3	DPPH [IC50 μg/mL]	31.46 ± 1.32
4	ABTS [IC50 μg/mL]	32.78 ± 1.44
5	FRAP [IC50 μg/mL]	10.12 ± 0.35

Similarly, Álvarez et al., in their recent study on the effect of six solvents on the phytochemical composition of leaves extract of six Eucalyptus spp including E. camaldulensis confirmed that the total phenolic content was greatly influenced by the solvent and extraction conditions, with the hexane extract of Ectropis obliqua presenting the lowest (1.57 mg/g DW) and methanol extract of Eucalyptus nitens presenting the highest (124.17 mg/g DW) values.[29] Compared to these accounts, Lipo-Eucam apparently displayed superior phenolic content against the majority of the extracts and this outcome can be attributed not only to the source of the material itself but also equally to the adopted mode of preparation. The ethanolic extraction allowed for a high phenolic content as suggested by Álvarez et al.[29] Also, cold fractionation further facilitated the enrichment of the extract, increasing the amounts of phenolic components with low aqueous solubility. Importantly, no toxic solvent was used in the preparation of Lipo-Eucam, indicating its potential suitability for various applications.

The in vitro anti-radical activity was evaluated against DPPH• and ABTS•+. The results showed a concentration-dependent inhibition of both radical species by Lipo-Eucam with more than 90% inhibition recorded at 80 μg/mL of the sample (Figure A). Both assays are simple, reliable, and widely used in the evaluation of radical scavenging capacity of natural pharmacological agents. The DPPH assay is based on a hydrogen transfer system and therefore reflects the sample’s ability to donate hydrogen atoms to the radical species, neutralizing them or breaking the radical chain reaction. Besides, electron transfer reactions have also been noticed in the DPPH reaction mechanism. Nonetheless, the ABTS assay was performed to cover this aspect of the anti-radical mechanism. The ABTS radical scavenging activity simulates the capacity of the antioxidant sample to transfer electrons to the radical species, facilitating their neutralization. The FRAP assay depicts the reducing antioxidant capacity of any sample and have been reported to strongly correlate with cellular antioxidant capacity. As indicated by the results of the assays, Lipo-Eucam demonstrated potent radical scavenging activity with low IC50 values of 31.46 and 32.78 μg/mL against DPPH• and ABTS•+, respectively. Trolox, a standard antioxidant, reportedly exhibits antiradical activities with IC50 values of 113.12 and 93.83 μg/mL against DPPH and ABTS,[30] while the DPPH IC50 values for various Eucalyptus essential oils were 4.21–52.53 mg/mL.[31] In this context, the lower IC50 values of Lipo-Eucam suggest it is a stronger antioxidant than the synthetic antioxidant and an even more potent antioxidant compared to the essential oils, indicating its high prospects in combating oxidative stress and damage.

Figure 2

(A) In vitro radical scavenging activity and reducing antioxidant capacity of Lipo-Eucam. (B) The effect of Lipo-Eucam (0.25–1.0 mg/mL) on metal-catalyzed oxidation of BSA. Statistical significance was defined as *p < 0.05 compared to oxidized BSA alone.

Protein carbonyls are one of the most prominent forms of protein oxidative modifications. These modifications do not only alter the structure of the proteins leading to loss-of-function but also trigger the formation of harmful adducts that have been implicated in inflammation stress, apoptosis, cytotoxic damage, and immunogenicity.[32] The formation of protein carbonyls occur during the early phase of oxidative stress, and in addition, these oxidative modifications are relatively stable and irreversible. Consequently, the measurement of the levels of protein carbonylation has come to be regarded as a reliable indicator of the global protein oxidation and the extent of oxidative stress within the context of cellular damage in aging as well as oxidative-stress related disorders such as chronic kidney disease, advance diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular diseases, and neurodegeneration among others.[33] In this work, bovine serum albumin (BSA) was subjected to metal-catalyzed oxidation (MCO) to simulate oxidative stress in vitro. The content of protein carbonyls was measured spectrophotometrically via the DNPH assay, a simple technique widely used for the quantification of protein-bound carbonyls.[34] As revealed in Figure B, the content of protein carbonyls in the oxidized BSA sample (4.35 nmol/mg) clearly exceeded those of the native protein (0.34 nmol/mg), indicating the success of protein oxidation in the treated samples. This was consistent with other accounts in literature which had noted relatively modest amounts of serum albumin-bound carbonyls under MCO conditions compared to other oxidants such as hypochlorous acid, but a substantial increase nonetheless relative to the native protein.[34,35] Compared to oxidized BSA alone, BSA samples subjected to oxidation in the presence of Lipo-Eucam significantly retarded the formation of protein-bound carbonyls (p < 0.05). That is, the BSA samples presented bound carbonyl levels of 4.35, 3.77, 2.90, and 1.22 nmol/mg upon treatment with 0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/mL Lipo-Eucam. These results suggest that Lipo-Eucam could markedly suppress the formation of protein oxidation in a concentration-dependent manner. Le Guen et al. in a series of experiments involving chelators, catalase, and superoxide dismutase noted that hydroxyl radicals constitute the active principles in MCO.[36] As such, it is likely that the counteractive effect of Lipo-Eucam could be due to its capacity to scavenge these radical species, limiting the oxidation of susceptible lysine, proline, and arginine residues to glutamic and aminoadipic semialdehydes counterparts.[32] The suppressive effect of Lipo-Eucam on protein oxidation is an indication that this fraction could ameliorate oxidative stress and conditions related to oxidative damage.

Influence of Lipo-Eucam on Protein Aggregation

Furthermore, the effect of Lipo-Eucam on protein aggregation, a process that is closely linked with oxidation and disease phenomenon in conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus was also evaluated. BSA was used as the model protein given that albumins are known to be amyloidogenic in vivo and thus have been extensively used to understand protein aggregation.[37] Four concentrations of Lipo-Eucam, vis: 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/mL were investigated to ascertain their effect on BSA under aggregation stress. The extent of aggregation was probed using Congo red, an anionic diazo dye widely used for the quantification protein aggregation because of its propensity to intercalate between the β-strands of the amyloid morphology of aggregated proteins.[38] Native BSA and aggregated BSA without any treatment, respectively, served as positive and negative controls for the inhibition study. The effect of Lipo-Eucam on the formation of aggregated BSA as well as a representative Congo red absorption spectra of BSA samples incubated with or without treatment is presented in Figure . The Congo red spectra of the protein solutions revealed a red shift in the position of the λmax of the native protein (∼490 nm) relative to the protein solutions subjected to aggregation (∼520 nm). Also, the peak intensity of the incubated protein solutions was largely higher than that of the native protein solution. Both observations were indicative and consistent with the presence of protein aggregates in the incubated protein solutions.[39] Upon binding with protein amyloids, the Congo red spectrum displays a red shift of the absorbance peak as well as an increase in the intensity of the λmax. BSA co-incubated with Lipo-Eucam (BSA 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0) revealed a consistent and marked decrease in peak intensity of the spectra relative to BSA without any treatment (BSA 0). Based on the absorbance at 520 nm, it was found that the presence of Lipo-Eucam induced a concentration-dependent inhibition of BSA aggregate formation (p < 0.05) (Figure A). The aggregate formation of BSA was suppressed by 43.67, 46.64, 52.37, and 80.47% as a consequence of adding 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/mL Lipo-Eucam, respectively, to the aggregating protein solution. These data suggest a remarkable capacity of Lipo-Eucam to abrogate the aggregation of amyloidogenic proteins.

Figure 3

(A) Inhibition of aggregate formation by BSA subjected to aggregation stress with or without Lipo-Eucam determined by Congo red binding. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3) and statistical significance was defined as *p < 0.05 compared to aggregated BSA alone. (B) Representative Congo red absorbance spectrum of BSA incubated with or without Lipo-Eucam. (C) TEM images of native and aggregated BSA with or without Lipo-Eucam.

The morphological changes associated with BSA subjected to aggregation stress in the presence or absence of Lipo-Eucam was obtained via TEM microscopy. TEM images of the native protein solution revealed a clear solution, void of any aggregated proteins or amyloid fibrils (Figure C). In contrast, BSA exposed to aggregation conditions without any treatment exhibited a massive network of amorphous aggregates. Notably, when BSA was pre-incubated with 0.5 mg/mL of Lipo-Eucam, the presence of protein aggregates was greatly diminished. This result is consistent with the data from Congo red binding assay, indicating that the presence of Lipo-Eucam enabled the protein to resist morphological changes caused by aggregation. Phenolic and volatile compounds such as quercetin, isovitexin, luteolin, catechin, phytol, and caryophyllene found in Lipo-Eucam have been widely reported for their anti-aggregation activity[40−43] and are most likely responsible for the anti-amyloidogenic property of the lipophilic fraction.

In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Lipo-Eucam

Eucalyptus spp. remain of great interest owing to their versatile pharmacological attributes such as antioxidative, antimicrobial, antifungal, anti-nociceptive, and anticancer activities. The cytotoxic properties of Lipo-Eucam were evaluated against human breast cancer (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231) cell lines as well as the normal human embryonic kidney (HEK-293) cell line. The antitumor drug, doxorubicin, was employed as a positive control. The results revealed a negligible decrease in the cell viability of HEK-293 upon exposure to Lipo-Eucam at every concentration tested (IC50 > 80 μg/mL, data not shown). Conversely, after MCF-7 cells were challenged with the sample, a remarkable, dose-dependent decrease in cell viability was observed (Figure ). Similarly, the sample was very active against the MDA-MB-231 cell line. Between the cancer cells, MCF-7 cells (estrogen receptor-α positive) were more sensitive to the cytotoxic action of Lipo-Eucam compared to MDA-MB-231 (estrogen receptor-α negative). The cytotoxic activity of Lipo-Eucam against the cancer and normal cell lines is summarized in Table . The IC50 values of the extract/control obtained using GraphPad Prism denote the sample concentration required to reduce the viability of the cells to 50% relative to that of the untreated cells. Lipo-Eucam was found to exhibit an IC50 value of 7.34 μg/mL against the breast cancer cells and >80 μg/mL against HEK-293 cells. The US National Cancer Institute’s guideline for in vitro screening of chemical agents and natural products for cytotoxic property recommended that for a pure compound, an IC50 value of ≤4 μg/mL should be considered cytotoxic. For natural products such as plant samples, the protocol stipulated that an IC50 value ≤20 is cytotoxic.[44] Accordingly, the high IC50 value of Lipo-Eucam against HEK-293 cells is an indication that this fraction is noncytotoxic and biocompatible to normal cells. In contrast, the very low IC50 value of the fraction against MCF-7 is indicative of its potent cytotoxic attributes against the breast cancer cells.

Figure 4

Effect of different concentration of Lipo-Eucam on the viability of human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) and human embryonic kidney (HEK-293) cell lines using the MTT assay after 72 h.

Table 4

In Vitro Cytotoxic Activities of Lipo-Eucama

	in vitro cytotoxic activity (IC50 in μg/mL)			SIb
samples	MCF-7	MDA-MB-231	HEK-293	MCF-7	MDA-MB-231
Lipo-Eucam	7.34 ± 0.51	13.86 ± 0.89	>80	>10.9	5.77
DOX	0.45 ± 0.01	0.23 ± 0.01	0.31 ± 0.03	0.67	1.35

The treatment period was 72 h. Data represent the mean ± standard deviation of triplicate.

The SI was obtained as the average of the IC50 value of the normal HEK-293 cell line divided by the IC50 value of the cancer cell line in obtained in each independent experiment.

Also, considering that one of the most important criteria for determining the anticancer potential of any agent in vitro is selectivity,[45] the selectivity index (SI) of Lipo-Eucam was equally determined to ascertain this parameter. For any anticancer agent to be meaningfully deployed as a pharmacotherapeutic agent, it is imperative that while the active agent inhibits the proliferation of cancerous cells, the harmful impact on normal cells should be negligible or minimal. A good number of prospective anticancer agents with strong in vitro cytotoxic activity against cancer cells failed in subsequent clinical trials for not satisfying this requirement. SI is regarded as the toxicity of the compound of interest toward cancer cell lines in comparison to normal cell lines. The SI of Lipo-Eucam was obtained as the average IC50 value in the normal (HEK-293) cell line divided by the average IC50 value in the cancer cell for each independent experiment.[45,46] The SI values of Lipo-Eucam were high and satisfactory, especially against MCF-7 cells (SI > 10 is indicative of an agent that display selective cytotoxic activity against cancer cells).[47] With regards to the anticancer drug, doxorubicin, while the IC50 value was very low (0.45 μg/mL), indicating strong antiproliferative activity against MCF-7 cell lines, the selectivity with respect to the normal kidney cell line was less encouraging.

A growing number of studies have indicated the antiproliferative properties of Eucalyptus spp extracts, fractions, essential oils, and bioactives against various cancer cell lines including colorectal (HCT-15), pancreatic (PANC-1), non-small cell lung cancer (NCI-H460),[48] hepatocellular carcinoma (HEPG2 and HU-7),[49] human clear renal cell carcinoma (Caki), kidney carcinoma (A495), prostate cancer (PC3), epithelial carcinoma (HeLa) Burkitt’s lymphoma Raji, as well as breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231).[7,8,50] According to Hrubik et al., the antiproliferative activity of E. camaldulensis methanol, ethyl acetate, n-butanol, and aqueous leaf extracts on MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells examined by the MTT assay after 72 h revealed that the extracts were cytotoxic to the cancer cell lines (IC50 26.7–250.7 μg/mL).[8] They observed that the ethyl acetate extract was the most active, while water extract was the least. Similarly, Singab et al., observed that phenolic-rich aqueous acetone extract of E. camaldulensis leaves demonstrated growth inhibitory effects against MCF-7 (IC50 36.5 μg/mL), Hep-2 (IC50 57.7 μg/mL), HepG-2 (IC50 38.7 μg/mL), HeLa (IC50 49.0 μg/mL), HCT-116 (IC50 33.3 μg/mL), and Caco-2 (IC50 38.3 μg/mL).[7] Meanwhile, studies by Mubarak et al. found that essential oils of E. camaldulensis leaves exerted cytotoxic action against cancer cell lines, WEHI-3 (IC50 16.1 μg/mL), HT-29 (IC50 50.5 μg/mL), and HL-60 (IC50 42.1), but were less cytotoxic against normal cells, RAW 264.7 macrophage (IC50 > 100 μg/mL).[23] Taheri et al., noted that the cytotoxic effect of E. camaldulensis aerial parts essential oils was likely mediated via the induction of the cellular apoptotic pathway,[51] which was consistent with past observations on Jurkat cancer cells[52] and on BJAB and Raji lymphoma tumor cell lines.[50] Given that most of the compounds in these earlier studies were represented in Lipo-Eucam, the cytotoxic action of the extract probably involves triggering cellular apoptosis. It is also important to underscore that compared to most of the aforementioned reports, Lipo-Eucam exerted superior cytotoxic activity against the human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) cell line. Additionally, the presence of many bioactive compounds with demonstrated anticancer effects in Lipo-Eucam, including phenolic acids, polyphenols, flavonoids, phloroglucinols, phloroglucinol-meroterpenoids, 2,4,-naphthoquinones,[7,21,48,53] terpenes, sesquiterpenes, and terpenoids,[4,50,52,54−58] indicated that the potent inhibitory action against the viability of the breast cancer cell line may be related to entourage effect and synergism among the bioactives. These preliminary findings highlighted the fact that Lipo-Eucam holds encouraging prospects for anticancer therapeutic development. Further studies are required to elucidate the relevant mechanism(s) of action, the efficacy and safety in animal models as well as its bioavailability, in order to ascertain its effectiveness for clinical application.

Conclusions

In the present contribution, it was revealed that the lipophilic fraction of E. camaldulensis leaves extract (Lipo-Eucam) was rich in a plethora of bioactive compounds. The number of compounds putatively identified by LC–MS and GC extended the current list of known active compounds known to be present in E. camaldulensis leaves. Also, Lipo-Eucam was shown to exhibit superior anti-radical and anti-oxidative properties. Moreover, the lipophilic fraction was found to suppress the aggregation of amyloidogenic BSA. The selective cytotoxic property of Lipo-Eucam was very impressive, with high activity against MCF-7 cells, but negligible toxic effects against HEK-293 cells. These findings highlights the strong prospects of Lipo-Eucam as a rich bioactive natural agent with potential for combating oxidative stress, aggregation, and cancer-related conditions and therefore worthy of further investigations.

Experimental Section

Preparation of Lipophilic Fraction of E. camaldulensis Leaf Extract

The lipophilic fraction of E. camaldulensis leaf extract was prepared following cold extraction as previously described with minor modifications.[59] Briefly, the leaves were pulverized using an electric grinder into fine powder. The leaf powder was carefully weighed (100 g) and extracted with 80% ethanol (2 L) using an overhead stirrer at 300 rpm for 2 h at room temperature. The extract was then filtered using Whatman number 4 filter paper. The residue was re-extracted as before and filtered. The filtrate from both rounds of extraction were combined and filtered with Whatman number 1 filter paper. The clean extract was concentrated under reduced pressure at 35 °C to about 20 percent of the initial volume. This concentrate was left overnight at 4 °C to fractionate. Thereafter, the hydrophilic upper layer was carefully decanted while the congealed lipophilic precipitate at the bottom was collected and lyophilized, yielding the lipophilic fraction as a dark green powder (aka Lipo-Eucam). Lipo-Eucam powder was stored at −20 °C in airtight amber vials until further investigations.

Chemical Characterization of Lipo-Eucam

UPLC-DAD-ESI-MS Analysis

Briefly Lipo-Eucam was measured and dissolved in methanol: water (70:30 v/v). The solution was thoroughly vortexed and centrifuged (8000 rpm for 10 min). Thereafter, the Eucam solution was filtered through a 0.2 μm nylon membrane syringe filter. The clear Eucam solution was then analyzed by UPLC-DAD-ESI-QTOF-MS as previously described[59] using liquid chromatograph-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (LC-QTOF MS), 1290 Infinity II LC-6545 Quadrupole-TOF (Agilent Technologies, USA) with a Zorbax Eclipse Plus C18 2.1 × 150 mm, 1.8 μm column.

Identification of E. camaldulensis Secondary Metabolites by (GC–MS)

The GC–MS analyses of Lipo-Eucam was conducted using GC-electron ionization/MS (GC-EI/MS) technique performed on GC/MS GC 7890 B, MSD 5977B, Agilent Technologies, USA. Helium was used as the carrier gas with Agilent HP-5MS column (flow rate 1 mL/min; pressure 7.0699 psi; average velocity 36.262 cm/s; holdup time 1.3789 min; post run 1 mL/min; 325 °C: 30 m × 250 μm × 0.25 μm). The sample (1 μL) was injected in the split mode. The initial oven temperature was 40 °C (hold time of 1 min) and then increased at 5 °C/min to 250 °C (hold time of 5 min) and further increased at a rate of 5 °C/min to 320 °C (hold time of 10 min), for a total run time of 72 min. The putative identities of the compounds in Lipo-Eucam were established using Wiley 10 and the National Institute of Standards and Technology 14 (NIST14) chemical libraries, and the match score criteria accepted was ≥90%.[60]

Total Phenolic Content

The total phenolic content of Lipo-Eucam was ascertained using Folin-Ciocalteu colorimetric assay as previously described.[59] Ethanol solution of Lipo-Eucam or gallic acid (100 μL) was added into 2 mL Eppendorf tubes. This was followed by 200 μL of 10% Folin–Ciocalteu reagent. In blank solutions, the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent was replaced by distilled water. The solutions were briefly vortexed. Thereafter, 800 μL of 0.7 M Na2CO3 solution was added to the mixtures, vortexed, and incubated in the dark for 2 h. The absorbance of the mixtures was obtained at 765 nm. The absorbance values of gallic acid (0–0.1 mg/mL) were used to prepare the standard curved from which the total phenolic content of Lipo-Eucam was extrapolated.

Total Flavonoid Content

The total flavonoid content was evaluated using the aluminum chloride colorimetric assay.[61] Briefly, various concentrations of Lipo-Eucam solution or quercetin (30 μL) were added into 2 mL Eppendorf tubes followed by 160 μL of methanol. Then, 30 μL of freshly prepared 10% aluminum chloride in methanol was added to the solutions and mixed. This was followed by 30 μL of 1 M sodium acetate solution and 850 μL of distilled water. The solutions were vortexed and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Absorbance of the solutions were obtained ta 415 nm. The total flavonoid content was calculated and presented as milligram quercetin equivalent per gram of Lipo-Eucam in dry weight (mg QE/g dw).

Antioxidative Properties of Lipo-Eucam

DPPH (2,2,-Diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) Radical Scavenging Assay

Sample solution (120 μL) was added to 96-well microplate. DPPH solution (0.1 mM, 120 μL) was subsequently added to the samples and incubated for 30 min in the dark at room temperature. The absorbance of the solutions was recorded at 515 nm and the anti-radical activity was expressed as percentage inhibition.[62]

ABTS Assay

ABTS reagent was prepared by mixing equal volumes of ABTS and potassium persulfate solution, followed by incubation for 12–16 h. The working solution was prepared by diluting the stock solution to an OD of 0.70 ± 0.01 at 730 nm. The sample (15 μL) was added to the ABTS reagent (180 μL) and incubated for 10 min. The absorbance of the solution was recorded at 730 nm and the anti-radical activity calculated as percent inhibition.[62]

Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power

The reducing antioxidant capacity of Lipo-Eucam was assessed using the FRAP assay as previously described.[63] Succinctly, 10 μL of the sample was introduced to a 96-well plate. This was followed by 200 μL of pre-warmed and freshly prepared FRAP reagent. The blank solutions contained only sodium acetate buffer in lieu of the reagent. The plate was then incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Thereafter, the absorbance was measured at 593 nm and the reducing capacity of the sample was presented as IC50 in μg/mL.

Determination of Protein Carbonyl Content

The influence of Lipo-Eucam on protein oxidation was evaluated using the MCO of the BSA system as previously described with minor modifications.[34,64] Briefly, oxidation was triggered via the addition of oxidation buffer into protein solutions preincubated with or without various concentrations of Lipo-Eucam. The solutions were incubated at 37 °C at a speed of 250 rpm for 12 h. Thereafter, oxidation was terminated by adding EDTA-Na2 solution (final concentration of 1 mM). The levels of protein carbonyls in the various solutions was assessed spectrophotometrically using the 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine assay. The results were presented as protein carbonyl content in nmol per mg of protein.

Determination of Protein Aggregation

Oxidation-induced aggregation of BSA was triggered as previously described[65,66] with some modifications. Briefly, the protein solution in 20 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.0 was incubated with varying concentrations of Lipo-Eucam at 37 °C for 30 min. Thereafter, hydrogen peroxide was added to the mixture and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The final concentrations of BSA and hydrogen peroxide in the mixture were 4 mg/mL and 3%, respectively. The protein solutions were then adjusted with ethanol to a final concentration of 33% (v/v). The solutions were then incubated at 37 °C for 38 h. The reaction was stopped by introducing the solutions to −20 °C for 1 h. The impact of Lipo-Eucam on BSA aggregation was evaluated using the Congo red assay. Wherein, 2 mL of the protein solution was incubated with 1 mL of Congo red [100 μM in 10% ethanol/PBS (v/v)] for 30 min at room temperature. The absorbance was measured at 530 nm and used to calculate the inhibition of the aggregate formation.where control, sample, and native represent the absorbance of the BSA without any treatment, BSA treated with Lipo-Eucam, and native BSA, respectively.

Transmission Electron Microscopy

TEM was performed to examine the effect of Lipo-Eucam on the morphology of the aggregated sample. Sample (10 μL) was carefully placed on copper grids. Excess sample was blotted away. After about 2 min, the grid was rinsed twice with ultrapure water. Then, 2% uranyl acetate (10 μL) was used to fix the sample. After 3 min, excess uranyl acetate was removed from the sample and the grid was allowed to dry at room temperature. Subsequently, the grids were examined under TEM (JOEL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operating at 200 kV.

Cell Culture and Cell Viability

Cell Lines and Culture Conditions

Human breast cancer (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231) cell lines and non-cancer (human embryonic kidney 293, HEK) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum, at 5% CO2 and 37 °C.

In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay

The cytotoxic activity of Lipo-Eucam was evaluated using the MTT assay as previously described.[8] The cells were seeded in 96-well plates and exposed to various concentrations of Lipo-Eucam or doxorubicin (positive control) for a period of 72 h. Wells containing only the diluent served as negative control. The IC50 values, that is, half of the maximal inhibitory concentration of the extract or positive control were determined using GraphPad prism 7.0.

Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed on Graph Pad Prism version 7.0 for Microsoft windows (Graph Pad Software, San Diego CA, USA) using one-way analysis of variance, followed by post hoc analysis using the Tukey test. Statistical significance was defined as *p < 0.05. All determinations were performed, at least, in triplicate and results represented as means ± SD.