Junhao Yin1,2,3,4,5, Jiayao Fu1,2,3,4,5, Yijie Zhao6, Jiabao Xu1,2,3,4,5, Changyu Chen1,2,3,4,5, Lingyan Zheng1,2,3,4,5, Baoli Wang1,2,3,4,5. 1. Department of Oral Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. 2. College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China. 3. National Center for Stomatology, Shanghai, China. 4. National Clinical Research Center for Oral Disease, Shanghai, China. 5. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China. 6. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Shanghai Stomatological Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a life-threatening disease, associated with poor prognosis and the absence of specific biomarkers. Studies have shown that the ferroptosis-related genes (FRGs) can be used as tumor prognostic markers. However, FRGs' prognostic value in OSCC needs further exploration. In our study, gene expression profile and clinical data of OSCC patients were collected from a public domain. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to construct a multigene signature. The Kaplan-Meier and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methods were used to test the effectiveness of the signature, followed by the expression analysis of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and immune checkpoints. The Cox regression analysis identified 4 hubs from 103 FRGs expressed in OSCC that were associated with overall survival (OS). A risk model based on the 4 FRGs was established to classify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Compared with the low-risk group, the survival time of the high-risk group was significantly reduced. According to the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the risk score acted as an independent predictor for OS. The accuracy of the 4 FRGs risk predictive model was confirmed by ROC curve analysis. Moreover, the low-risk group had the characteristics of higher expression of HLA and immune checkpoints, a lower tumor purity, and a higher immune infiltration, indicating a more sensitive response to immunotherapy. The novel FRGs-OSCC risk score system can be used to predict the prognosis of OSCC patients and their response to immunotherapy.
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a life-threatening disease, associated with poor prognosis and the absence of specific biomarkers. Studies have shown that the ferroptosis-related genes (FRGs) can be used as tumor prognostic markers. However, FRGs' prognostic value in OSCC needs further exploration. In our study, gene expression profile and clinical data of OSCC patients were collected from a public domain. We performed univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses to construct a multigene signature. The Kaplan-Meier and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methods were used to test the effectiveness of the signature, followed by the expression analysis of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and immune checkpoints. The Cox regression analysis identified 4 hubs from 103 FRGs expressed in OSCC that were associated with overall survival (OS). A risk model based on the 4 FRGs was established to classify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Compared with the low-risk group, the survival time of the high-risk group was significantly reduced. According to the multivariate Cox regression analysis, the risk score acted as an independent predictor for OS. The accuracy of the 4 FRGs risk predictive model was confirmed by ROC curve analysis. Moreover, the low-risk group had the characteristics of higher expression of HLA and immune checkpoints, a lower tumor purity, and a higher immune infiltration, indicating a more sensitive response to immunotherapy. The novel FRGs-OSCC risk score system can be used to predict the prognosis of OSCC patients and their response to immunotherapy.
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common type of oral cancer, with more
than 300 000 newly diagnosed cancer cases worldwide in 2018, according to the
GLOBOCAN database.
The OSCC predilection sites include the tongue, the alveolar, the mouth
floor, the lips, and the buccal mucosa. The OSCC is characterized by high
recurrence, metastatic, and mortality rates, especially in patients with a late diagnosis.
In recent years, multidisciplinary collaborative diagnosis and treatment has
been proposed for OSCC treatment, which included chemotherapy, biological therapy,
and radiotherapy. Although multimodality therapies can improve the prognosis, the
5-year overall survival (OS) rate of OSCC patients remains stable, at approximately
56%, and the posttreatment local recurrence and distant metastasis rates are 25% to
50%.[3,4] Therefore,
there is a need to find effective prognostic biomarkers that could guide these
management decisions.Ferroptosis is a new form of programmed cell death, characterized by iron overload
and lipid peroxidation that cause lipid reactive oxygen species (ROS)
accumulation.[5,6]
Numerous studies demonstrated that ferroptosis is involved in cancer initiation,
progression, and suppression.
For instance, the tumor suppressor gene p53 may modulate the
susceptibility of cancer cells to ferroptosis in a cell type–specific
manner.[8,9]
Artesunate, a clinically approved drug, can selectively kill OSCC cells by inducing ferroptosis.
Recently, Kotaro Sato et al
found that non-thermal plasma exposure kills OSCC cells through a specific
mechanism that depends on ample catalytic Fe (II). There are 2 mixed forms of
programmed cell death that are caused by this treatment method, including apoptosis
and ferroptosis, which suggest that ferroptosis might be closely related to OSCC
occurrence. Moreover, ferroptosis is also associated with the efficacy of immunotherapy.It is well known that CD8+ T cells generally induce tumor cell death
through the pore-forming protein-granzyme and the Fas/FasL pathways.[13,14] However, a
new study
showed that CD8+ T cells, which are activated by immunotherapy,
augment ferroptosis in tumor cells, which contributes, therefore, to the antitumor
efficacy of immunotherapy. This discovery provided important evidence for the
correlation between ferroptosis and antitumor immunity. Besides, Lang et al
also found that interferon-γ, which is produced by CD8+ T cells,
has a synergistic effect with radiotherapy-activated ataxia-telangiectasia mutated,
on promoting lipid oxidation and ferroptosis in tumor cells. These evidences
indicate that the induction of ferroptosis is expected to enhance the antitumor
efficacy of immunotherapy; however, it is not currently clear whether the
immunotherapeutic targeting of ferroptosis is effective for OSCC patients.The purpose of this study is to explore potential diagnostic and prognostic markers
of OSCC and investigate their biological functions through bioinformatics analysis.
We successfully constructed a novel prognostic model for OSCC, focusing on 4 FRGs
that are mainly involved in the biological processes (BP) of immunity and
glycolysis. Finally, we also discussed the prediction of a prognostic model on the
sensitivity to immunotherapy.
Materials and Methods
Data collection
The mRNA expression profiles and the corresponding clinical characteristics of
273 OSCC patients were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database
(https://gdc-portal.nci.nih.gov/).
The HTSeq-FPKM files of 273 oral samples (254 tumors and 19 controls)
were retained, including the tongue, alveolus, buccal mucosa, soft and hard
palate, oral cavity, and lips. In total, 108 driver genes and 111 marker genes
were downloaded from FerrDb database (http://www.zhounan.org/ferrdb/).
The genes tested only in mice (12 genes) and multi-annotated genes in
both groups (15 genes) were filtered out. As a result, a total of 192 FRGs were
obtained. The accession numbers of all samples were included in Supplementary Table 1. The names of public domains and the
direct Web links were listed in Supplementary Table 2.
Cox risk regression establishment
A univariate Cox regression analysis was used to filter the prognostic-associated
factors that were closely related to the OS of OSCC patients. Then, we performed
a multivariate Cox regression analysis with a stepwise regression analysis to
construct a risk model. Finally, 4 FRGs-OSCC were enrolled in a risk Cox
regression, forming a risk formula that was determined by a linear combination
of the 4 genes’ expression levels and weighted with the corresponding regression
coefficients from the stepwise Cox regression model. The risk score was defined
asAccording to the median of the risk score, we divided the OSCC patients into 2
groups: a high-risk and a low-risk group. The Kaplan-Meier (K-M) and ROC
analyses were performed, based on the risk score, using the survival R package.
Moreover, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to
analyze whether the risk score was an independent prognostic factor. A nomogram
was also established, based on the risk score, the pathological stage, and the M
stage, to obtain survival rates of patients at 1, 3, and 5 years. We also used
the K-M analysis to test the prognostic value of 4 single genes. Furthermore,
randomized sampling method was used to obtain 4 random genes. A random gene
signature was finally constructed to verify the validity of the 4-gene
signature.
Identification of differentially expressed mRNAs
The limma R package
was used to screen the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between
high-risk and low-risk samples, according to the thresholds of|log2 (fold
change)| > 2.0 and P < .05.
Functional enrichment analysis
We performed a Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis and a Kyoto Encyclopedia of
Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis using the clusterProfiler R package.
The GO results were composed of 3 parts: the BP, the cellular component
(CC), and the molecular function (MF). Functional categories were considered
when P value is less than .05.
Estimation of immune and stromal scores
ESTIMATE (Estimation of Stromal and Immune cells in Malignant Tumor tissues using
Expression data) is a novel algorithm, based on ssGSEA (single sample Gene Set
Enrichment Analysis) for predicting the level of tumor tissues’ infiltrating
immune and stromal cells, based on gene expression profiles.[21,22] Herein,
this method was applied to estimate the immune and stromal scores, for each OSCC
patient from the 2 risk groups using the estimate R package. The tumor purity
was inferred according to the formula derived from Prof. Yoshihara’s research.
Estimation of immune cell type fractions
CIBERSORT is a deconvolution algorithm that is used to characterize the cellular
constitution of complex tissues.[23,24] The LM22 gene signature
contains 547 gene expression signatures that can distinguish 22 human
hematopoietic cell phenotypes, including natural killer (NK) cells, T cells,
myeloid subsets, B cells, and plasma cells.
The CIBERSORT R package and the txt files of LM22 are available on the
CIBERSORT Web site (http://cibersort.stanford.edu/). We used the CIBERSORT method
and LM22 to compare the proportions of 22 infiltrating immune cell types between
the 2 risk groups. For each sample, the sum of all estimates of immune cell type
fractions was equal to 1.
Differential analysis of immunotherapy between the high-risk and low-risk
groups
We checked the expression of HLA genes and immune checkpoint molecules between
the high-risk and low-risk groups. The HLA signatures were downloaded from
Nomenclature (http://hla.alleles.org/genes/index.html). The immune checkpoint
molecules included CD27, CD274, CTLA4, HAVCR2, ICOS, IDO1, LAG3, PDCD1,
PDCD1LG2, and TIGIT. Tumor Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion (TIDE) is a
computational framework for predicting the response of the immune checkpoint
blockade response.
The TIDE scores of OSCC patients were downloaded from the TIDE Web site
(http://tide.dfci.harvard.edu), based on the uploaded
transcriptome profiles.
Statistical analysis
The statistical analyses were undertaken using R v3.6.1 and Bioconductor
(https://www.bioconductor.org/). All statistical tests were
bilateral and P < .05 was considered significant. Besides,
the differences were considered significant if *P < .05,
**P < 0.01, ***P < .001, or
****P < .0001.
Results
A prognosis prediction model based on FRGs in OSCC
Using the comprehensive genome annotation files obtained from NCBI (Supplementary Table 2), 10 000 genes that were expressed in the
tumor samples were identified by analyzing the transcriptome data of oral cancer
of the tongue, alveolus, buccal mucosa, soft and hard palate, oral cavity, and
lips, while the genes not expressed were eliminated. Subsequently, 192 FRGs were
sorted out from the FerrDb database (Supplementary Table 3). The results of the 2 programs were
integrated and only the intersection was selected to increase the specificity.
As a result, 103 FRGs were expressed in the TCGA-OSCC (Figure 1A, Supplementary Table 4).
Figure 1.
Identification of the prognostic ferroptosis-related genes in the TCGA
database. (A) Venn diagram to identify the ferroptosis-related genes
(FRGs) which are expressed in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)
samples. A total of 103 FRGs were expressed in TCGA-OSCC. (B) Forest
plots showing the results of the multivariate Cox regression analysis
between gene expression and overall survival. FTH1,
FLT3, CDKN2A, and
DDIT3 were identified as hub genes.
TCGA indicates The Cancer Genome Atlas.
Identification of the prognostic ferroptosis-related genes in the TCGA
database. (A) Venn diagram to identify the ferroptosis-related genes
(FRGs) which are expressed in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC)
samples. A total of 103 FRGs were expressed in TCGA-OSCC. (B) Forest
plots showing the results of the multivariate Cox regression analysis
between gene expression and overall survival. FTH1,
FLT3, CDKN2A, and
DDIT3 were identified as hub genes.TCGA indicates The Cancer Genome Atlas.To evaluate the prognostic value of the OSCC 103 FRGs, a univariate Cox
regression analysis was performed on these genes and 5 variables
(FTH1, FLT3, CDKN2A,
DDIT3, and BNIP3; all
P < .01) were identified to be significantly associated with
OS (Table 1,
Supplementary Table 5). Furthermore, we applied to the 5 FRGs a
multivariate Cox regression with a stepwise regression. As a result, 4 FRGs
(FTH1, FLT3, CDKN2A, and
DDIT3) were harvested in the Cox regression
(P < .05; Table 2, Figure 1B, Supplementary Table 6) and a risk formula was constructed with
the expression levels of 4 genes and the corresponding regression coefficients:
risk score = −0.0171 × CDKN2A + 0.0111
× DDIT3 − 1.2269 × FLT3 + 0.0014 × FTH1.
Table 1.
Univariate Cox regression of prognostic-related genes for OS.
P value < .05 was considered statistically
significant.
Univariate Cox regression of prognostic-related genes for OS.Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival.P value < .01 was considered statistically
significant.Multivariate Cox regression analysis results.Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; OS, overall survival.P value < .05 was considered statistically
significant.
The prognostic value of the ferroptosis-related signature in OSCC
We calculated the risk score of each patient by the previously described formula
and classified the patients into a high-risk (n = 126, score ⩾ 1.0917) or a
low-risk group (n = 126, score < 1.0917), based on the median of the risk
score. The risk score ranking, the survival status of OSCC patients, and the
heatmaps of 4 FRGs’ expressions are shown in Figure 2A to C. The abscissas of each graph
represented risk scores of OSCC patients. According to the results of the
heatmaps, patients in the high-risk group had much higher expression of
DDIT3/FTH1 genes and lower expression of
CDKN2A/FLT3 genes. Based on the K-M curves
of the TCGA data set, there was an obvious difference between the 2 risk groups
(P = 1.005e-04; Figure 2D). Furthermore, the ROC curve
confirmed the predictive capacity of the 4-FRG risk signature. The area under
the curve (AUC) for the risk signature was 0.749, indicating a considerable
predicting power (Figure
2E). Regarding the prognostic value of 4 single genes, the K-M curve
results showed that patients with high expression of FLT3 and
low expression of FTH1 have better OS
(P < .05; Supplementary Figure 1A and B). However, DDIT3
and CDKN2A are relatively poor in predicting the prognosis of
patients (P > .05; Supplementary Figure 1C and D). In general, the 4-gene
predictive model could reflect the prognosis of patients more effectively than a
single gene. In addition, we used the sample function in R software and obtained
4 random genes from 103 FRGs, namely, CYBB,
EGFR, ATM, and EGLN2.
Subsequently, we performed a stepwise multivariate Cox analysis and 2 FRGs
(EGFR and ATM) were finally used to
construct a random gene signature (Supplementary Figure 2A). The risk score of each patient was
calculated according to the previous formula and all patients were divided into
high- and low-risk groups based on the median value of risk scores (Supplementary Figure 2B, C, and D). The K-M curve showed that
there was no significant difference in OS between the 2 groups (Supplementary Figure 2E) and the AUC was 0.596 (Supplementary Figure 2F), indicating that the random gene
signature is not reliable in predicting the prognosis of OSCC patients. These
results showed that the 4-FRG signature could have better prediction performance
from another perspective.
Figure 2.
Establishment of risk scores model. (A) The distribution of patients’
risk score. (B) The distribution of patients’ survival status. (C)
Heatmaps of 4 ferroptosis-related genes’ expression. (D) Kaplan-Meier
survival curves of overall survival between high-risk and low-risk
groups. The abscissa represents the survival time and the ordinate
represents the survival rate; red represents the high-risk group and
purple represents the low-risk group. (E) ROC curves showed the
predictive efficiency of the risk score model.
AUC indicates area under the curve; ROC, receiver operating
characteristic.
Establishment of risk scores model. (A) The distribution of patients’
risk score. (B) The distribution of patients’ survival status. (C)
Heatmaps of 4 ferroptosis-related genes’ expression. (D) Kaplan-Meier
survival curves of overall survival between high-risk and low-risk
groups. The abscissa represents the survival time and the ordinate
represents the survival rate; red represents the high-risk group and
purple represents the low-risk group. (E) ROC curves showed the
predictive efficiency of the risk score model.AUC indicates area under the curve; ROC, receiver operating
characteristic.
The 4-FRG risk model was independent of conventional clinical
characteristics
The correlation between the ferroptosis-related risk signature and the clinical
traits was analyzed. Although the ferroptosis-related risk score was
significantly related to histological grade and T stages, there was no
correlation between sex, pathological stages, M stages, N stages, and risk score
(Figure 3A and
B, Supplementary Figure 3, P < .05). Meanwhile,
a stratified analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics was further
carried out and the results showed that the risk score level was closely related
to prognosis (Supplementary Figure 4 and 5).
Figure 3.
Relationships between the risk score and clinicopathological parameters
in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). (A) Clinical correlation
analysis between risk scores and histological grades. (B) Clinical
correlation analysis between risk scores and anatomical sizes of the
primary tumors (P < .05). (C) Univariate analysis
with Cox proportional hazard model of the association between
clinicopathological variables and overall survival (OS) of patients with
OSCC. (D) Multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazard model of
the association between clinicopathological variables and OS of patients
with OSCC.
Relationships between the risk score and clinicopathological parameters
in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). (A) Clinical correlation
analysis between risk scores and histological grades. (B) Clinical
correlation analysis between risk scores and anatomical sizes of the
primary tumors (P < .05). (C) Univariate analysis
with Cox proportional hazard model of the association between
clinicopathological variables and overall survival (OS) of patients with
OSCC. (D) Multivariate analysis with Cox proportional hazard model of
the association between clinicopathological variables and OS of patients
with OSCC.To analyze the relationship between the OS, the clinicopathological factors, and
the ferroptosis-related risk signature, a univariate analysis was performed.
Subsequently, a multivariate analysis was used to explore the independent
prediction of the FRGs’ signature. The results of univariate and multivariate
analyses with the Cox proportional hazard model showed that pathological stage,
risk score, and M stage were independent prognostic indicators for OS (Figure 3C and D). The
ferroptosis-related risk model also had a high accuracy in predicting the
patients’ 5-year survival rate (Figure 4A to C).
Figure 4.
Construction of the nomogram model. (A) The nomogram model for predicting
OS of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), each variable axis
represented an individual risk factor, and the line drawn upward was
used to determine the points of each variable. Then, the total points
would be calculated to obtain the probability of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS
rate plotted on the 2 axes below. (B) The calibration plots for
predicting patients’ 1-, 3-, or 5-year OS. The closer the slope is to 1,
the more accurate the prediction is. The results show that the model has
high accuracy in predicting the 5-year survival rate of patients with
OSCC. (C) ROC analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of risk
score.
AUC indicates area under the curve; OS, overall survival; ROC, receiver
operating characteristic.
Construction of the nomogram model. (A) The nomogram model for predicting
OS of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), each variable axis
represented an individual risk factor, and the line drawn upward was
used to determine the points of each variable. Then, the total points
would be calculated to obtain the probability of 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS
rate plotted on the 2 axes below. (B) The calibration plots for
predicting patients’ 1-, 3-, or 5-year OS. The closer the slope is to 1,
the more accurate the prediction is. The results show that the model has
high accuracy in predicting the 5-year survival rate of patients with
OSCC. (C) ROC analysis to evaluate the prognostic value of risk
score.AUC indicates area under the curve; OS, overall survival; ROC, receiver
operating characteristic.
Functional enrichment analysis of DEGs between the 2 risk groups
To explore the DEGs between the 2 groups,|log2FC| > 2 and
P < .05 were set as the screening criteria using the limma R
package. As a result, 631 DEGs were identified, including 244 upregulated and
387 downregulated genes (Supplementary Table 7).The biological functions of the 631 DEGs were speculated by GO enrichment and
KEGG pathway analyses with the help of the clusterProfiler R package (Supplementary Table 8 and 9). The top 10 enriched GO terms and
11 pathways were listed in Figure 5. It was revealed that the 631 DEGs were significantly
enriched in metabolic processes, including glucose catabolic process to pyruvate
(GO:0061718), canonical glycolysis (GO:0061621), NADH regeneration (GO:0006735),
and glycolytic process through fructose-6-phosphate (GO:0061615) in the
biological process category. As for the CC category, the top 4 markedly enriched
GO terms were chaperone complex (GO:0101031), chaperonin-containing T-complex
(GO:0005832), collagen-containing extracellular matrix (GO:0062023), and
eukaryotic 48S preinitiation complex (GO:0033290). The most significantly
enriched MF terms included alcohol dehydrogenase (NADP+) activity (GO:0008106),
and alditol: NADP+ 1-oxidoreductase activity (GO:0004032) (Figure 5A). Also, 11 enriched pathway
terms, including Glycolysis/Gluconeo-genesis (hsa00010), Glutathione metabolism
(hsa00480) and Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 signaling pathway (hsa04066), were
explored by KEGG pathway analysis (Figure 5B).
Figure 5.
Representative results of GO and KEGG analyses. (A) The top 10 most
significant Gene ontology terms, including biological processes, the
cellular component, and molecular function. (B) The result of KEGG
pathway analysis.
GO indicates Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and
Genomes.
Representative results of GO and KEGG analyses. (A) The top 10 most
significant Gene ontology terms, including biological processes, the
cellular component, and molecular function. (B) The result of KEGG
pathway analysis.GO indicates Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and
Genomes.Notably, in GO-BP, we could observe that many DEGs were significantly enriched in
the entry “neutrophil activation involved in immune response”
(P = .0025), indicating these DEGs may participate in the
immune response by regulating the activation of neutrophils.[28,29] In
addition, GO-MF has also enriched “NAD or NADP as acceptor” and “alcohol
dehydrogenase (NADP+) activity” items. It was important to know that
the decomposing substance (NAD+) in NADH can increase the activity of
macrophages to activate other cells of the immune system and, finally, stimulate
the entire immune system.[30,31] This evidence indicated
that the DEGs between the 2 groups may be closely related to immunity.
Therefore, we turned our attention to the difference in the tumor
microenvironment (TME) between the 2 risk groups.
Differential analysis of the TME between the 2 risk groups
We calculated the immune and stromal scores, for each OSCC patient from the 2
risk groups through the estimate R package, finding that patients from the
low-risk group tended to have higher immune scores. However, the stromal score
between the 2 groups showed no significant difference (Figure 6A to C). It was also shown that the patients
from the low-risk group had a higher immune cells content in the TME.
Figure 6.
Comparison of the ESTIMATE scores between high-risk group and low-risk
groups. (A) Immune score of high-/low-risk groups. Immune score
represents the infiltration of immune cells in tumor tissue. (B) Stromal
score of high-/low-risk groups. Stromal score captures the presence of
stroma in tumor tissue. (C) Estimate score of high-/low-risk groups.
Estimate score infers tumor purity. (D) TME cell composition group by
high/low risk, including 22 human hematopoietic cell phenotypes.
Adjusted P values were shown as ns,
*P < .05, **P < .01,
***P < .001,
****P < .0001.
ESTIMATE indicates Estimation of Stromal and Immune cells in Malignant
Tumor tissues using Expression data; ns, not significant; TME, tumor
microenvironment.
Comparison of the ESTIMATE scores between high-risk group and low-risk
groups. (A) Immune score of high-/low-risk groups. Immune score
represents the infiltration of immune cells in tumor tissue. (B) Stromal
score of high-/low-risk groups. Stromal score captures the presence of
stroma in tumor tissue. (C) Estimate score of high-/low-risk groups.
Estimate score infers tumor purity. (D) TME cell composition group by
high/low risk, including 22 human hematopoietic cell phenotypes.
Adjusted P values were shown as ns,
*P < .05, **P < .01,
***P < .001,
****P < .0001.ESTIMATE indicates Estimation of Stromal and Immune cells in Malignant
Tumor tissues using Expression data; ns, not significant; TME, tumor
microenvironment.After that, we estimated the relative infiltration of the 22 immune cells in the
2 risk groups by the CIBERSORT R package and LM22. The relative proportion of 22
immune cells in OSCC samples from 2 groups is significantly different. The
presence of resting memory CD4+ T cells, M0 Macrophages, and M2
Macrophages was positively correlated with the level of risk score. By contrast,
the presence of naive B cell, activated memory CD4+ T cells,
regulatory T cells, T follicular helper cells, CD8+ T cells, M1
Macrophages, gamma delta T cells, and resting mast cells was negatively
correlated with the level of risk score (Figure 6D). The unique differences in
immune infiltration between high- and low-risk groups suggested that the 4-FRG
model can be used to predict the prognosis of immunotherapy.
Differential analysis of the immunotherapy response between the 2 risk
groups
Immunotherapy targeting immune checkpoints cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4
(CTLA4) or programmed death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD/PDL1) has been
successfully applied as a first-line treatment of OSCC.[32-34] However, it is
disappointing that the response rates of this therapy are low, which suggests
that only a subset of OSCC patients respond to immunotherapy, and that the
efficacy could be enhanced by determining the type of immune checkpoint
inhibitors.[35,36] Besides, the major histocompatibility class 1 (MHC1)
complex is essential for presenting endogenous cellular antigens to circulating
T cells and in initiating specific anticancer immune responses.
In that case, we further investigated the HLA expression and immune
checkpoints between the 2 different groups. The patients from the low-risk group
possessed significantly higher expression of most HLA compared with the patients
from the high-risk group (Figure 7A), proving that a higher immune status closely correlates
with the OSCC prognosis. The expression of the immune checkpoints IDO1, LAG3,
PDCD1, and TIGIT significantly increased in the low-risk patients’ group (Figure 7B). Based on
these results, we speculated that OSCC patients with lower risk score might be
promising candidates for immune checkpoint inhibitors. Furthermore, the TIDE
score in the high-risk group was much higher (Figure 7C), suggesting that compared
with the high-risk patients, the low-risk patients may be more sensitive to
immunotherapy. This also confirmed the previous conclusion that the patients
with a lower 4-FRG signature risk score were more suitable for
immunotherapy.
Figure 7.
Distribution of immunotherapy response markers in high-/low-risk groups.
(A) The distribution of HLA genes of high-/low-risk groups was shown in
the box plot. (B) The distribution of immune checkpoint molecules of
high-/low-risk groups was shown in the box plot. (C) The distribution of
TIDE score in high-/low-risk groups.
HLA indicates human leucocyte antigen; ns, not significant; TIDE, Tumor
Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion.
Distribution of immunotherapy response markers in high-/low-risk groups.
(A) The distribution of HLA genes of high-/low-risk groups was shown in
the box plot. (B) The distribution of immune checkpoint molecules of
high-/low-risk groups was shown in the box plot. (C) The distribution of
TIDE score in high-/low-risk groups.HLA indicates human leucocyte antigen; ns, not significant; TIDE, Tumor
Immune Dysfunction and Exclusion.
Discussion
Ferroptosis is a new type of programmed cell death involving lipid metabolism, iron
metabolism, and amino acid metabolism.
The metabolic level of cancer cells is much higher than that of normal cells,
so a large amount of ROS accumulates in the cells, which makes regulation of
ferroptosis an effective way to kill tumor cells. Evidences have shown that multiple
cancer-related genes are involved in ferroptosis. P53 achieves
bidirectional regulation of ferroptosis by affecting key proteins such as SLC7A11
and GLS2.[38-40]
Myc, essential for metabolic reprogramming of tumor cells, inhibits
ferroptosis in tumor cells by activating lymphoid-specific helicase.
In addition, ferroptosis is also closely related to the TME. In the fatty
acid–rich TME, CD8+ T cells will take up more polyunsaturated fatty acids
through CD36, resulting in the accumulation of lipid peroxides and the upregulation
of ferroptosis, which is detrimental to the antitumor ability.
Hsieh et al
found that zero-valent-iron nanoparticles could promote ferroptosis in lung
cancer cells and also affect macrophage M1/M2 polarization and the antitumor
function of CD8+ T cells. Therefore, finding ferroptosis-related genes
(FRGs) related to OSCC prognosis is of great significance for precise targeted
therapy of the disease.To identify potential diagnostic and prognostic markers of OSCC, we constructed a
prognostic model based on FRGs. By applying univariate Cox regression and
multivariate Cox regression analyses to 103 FRGs that were downloaded from
databases, we found 4 FRGs (FTH1, FLT3,
CDKN2A, and DDIT3) that were related to the OS
of OSCC patients. The FTH1 protein expression was significantly upregulated in
breast cancer cells
and the epigenetic silencing of FTH1 and
TFRC that is induced by estrogen, reduced liver cancer cell
growth, and survival.
FLT3 is a receptor tyrosine kinase that plays a crucial role in the
development of hematopoietic progenitor cells.
Furthermore, FLT3 genetic alterations occurred in up to 30%
of cases with acute myelogenous leukemia and patients with FLT3
mutations have poor outcomes.
CDKN2A is a tumor suppressor gene that was reported to be
frequently altered in OSCC progression.
CDKN2A low gene expression is associated with the recurrence of
disease in oral cancer patients and could be used as a prognostic marker for OSCC.
DDIT3 is an endoplasmic reticulum stress-responsive transcription
factor that plays an important role in apoptotic execution pathways that are induced
by the endoplasmic reticulum stress. The speckle-type POZ protein contributes to
prostate cancer by targeting DDIT3.
Besides, DDIT3 acts as a transcription factor that enhances
the expression of TNFRSF10A and TNFRSF10B,
resulting in the initiation of ER stress-mediated apoptosis in human lung cancer cells.
In summary, all 4 FRGs have been reported to be closely correlated with
various cancers.The prognostic model was constructed based on these 4 FRGs. The patients were
separated into high-risk and low-risk groups, according to the threshold of the
median risk score. As mentioned above, the patients with higher expression of
CDKN2A/FLT3 genes and lower expression of
DDIT3/FTH1 genes were more likely to be in the low-risk group,
suggesting that FRGs CDKN2A/FLT3 genes may work as
tumor suppressor genes. This result is consistent with previous research
results.[44,45,49] The prognostic value of the 4-FRG risk signature was evaluated
using the K-M and log-rank methods. There were significant differences in the
survival curves of patients in the 2 groups. The prediction capability of the
specificity and sensitivity of the FRG risk model was assessed by calculating the
AUC of the risk score. Moreover, we found that the ferroptosis-related risk score
was an independent prognostic indicator for OS when considering conventional
clinical characteristics. The results indicated that this risk score model is a firm
prognostic tool that can be used to classify patients and guide future targeted
therapies.For further understanding of the biological functions of DEGs, between different risk
groups, we performed functional enrichment analyses. The results showed significant
enrichment in processes, including NADH regeneration, glucose catabolic process to
pyruvate, canonical glycolysis, and glycolytic process through fructose-6-phosphate,
in the biological process category. The NADH regeneration is a metabolic process
that consumes NAD+ to generate a pool of NADH, which is important to the
immune system. It is indicated that NAD+ promotes the differentiation of
CD4+ T cell without antigens. Furthermore, without relying on
antigen-presenting cells, NAD+ can also regulate the fate of
CD4+ T cell.
Pro-inflammatory stimuli induce the NAD activation of macrophages and
dendritic cells, resulting in a metabolic switch toward glycolysis,[28,29] while
inflammatory macrophages depend on NAD+ salvage, resulting from
ROS-mediated DNA damages.
For KEGG, 11 pathways, including Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis, Glutathione
metabolism, and the HIF-1 signaling pathway, were identified. Several types of
cancer, including OSCC, highly depend on glycolysis for ATP generation. Zheng et al
found that zeste homolog2 can regulate STAT3 and FoxO1 signaling in human
OSCC cells and promote invasion and tumor glycolysis. Another study demonstrated
that circMDM2 could promote the proliferation and glycolysis of human OSCC cells by
acting as ceRNAs to sponge miR-532-3p.
The HIF-1 signaling pathway, as a cancer therapy glycolytic target, is
involved in the regulation of glycolysis at preclinical and clinical
stages.[53,54] Our results indicated that the DEGs, between the 2 different
groups, may affect OSCC progression by altering these immunity-related BP or
metabolic pathways.We also focused on investigating the difference in the TME between the 2 different
risk groups. To this end, we explored the correlation between OSCC and TME. The
immune score and stromal score calculated based on the ESTIMATE algorithm can help
quantify the immune and stromal components in tumors. The immune scores and ESTIMATE
scores of the low-risk group were significantly higher than those in the high-risk
group; however, no significant differences were found in the stromal scores. A high
fraction of gamma delta T cells, macrophages M1, B cell naive, CD4 memory activated
T cells, CD8 T cells, regulatory T cells, follicular helper T cells, and mast cells
resting mainly infiltrated the tumors of the low-risk OSCC patients. A recent study
suggested that the cell density of the high parenchymal CD8+, at the
invading tumor edge, was associated with improved OS, and therefore could be used as
an independent favorable prognostic marker for OSCC.
Moreover, OSCC patients with high levels of
CD4+CD25highCD127low regulatory T cells (Tregs)
were found to have a better survival probability compared to patients with lower
Tregs. This result indicated that immune cells might have an important effect on the
OSCC TME. What’s more, we analyzed the expression of HLA-related genes, important to
the immune system, in the 2 different risk groups, and found that the expression of
most HLAs was significantly higher in the low-risk group, demonstrating that higher
immune status was related to the prognosis of OSCC. The HLA molecules on the surface
of tumor cells can help T cells recognize new antigens to create opportunities for
anticancer immune responses.
The expression of the immune checkpoints IDO1, LAG3, PDCD1, and TIGIT
significantly increased in the low-risk group. Foy et al
found that OSCC tissues are characterized by a higher level of intratumor T
cells, overexpression of PD-L1 and IDO1, and a higher score of response signature to
pembrolizumab, suggesting the inhibition of IDO1 and PD-L1 may have good clinical
significance for OSCC. Another research indicated that several immune checkpoint
receptors (TIM3, LAG3, IDO, PDL1, and CTLA4) could be considered as biomarkers that
reflect the immune status in OSCC patients’ TME during nimotuzumab therapy.
T cells from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, which were collected from
OSCC donors, possessed a high expression level of TIGIT. Moreover, TIGIT blockade
can promote the in vitro proliferative ability and effective cytokine secretion
capacity of CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells isolated from OSCC patients.
These results provided support for the hypothesis that OSCC patients with
lower risk score (patients with higher expression of
CDKN2A/FLT3 genes and lower expression of
DDIT3/FTH1 genes) might respond better to the IDO1, LAG3,
PDCD1, and TIGHT inhibitors.For the first time, we assessed the effects of FRGs on the prognosis of OSCC and
constructed an effective prognostic model to reveal the involved BP. We also proved
that this model can be used as a criterion for determining whether a patient is
suitable for immunotherapy.
Conclusions
In summary, we constructed an effective prognostic model based on 4 FRGs and proved
that it has an independent correlation with the survival time of OSCC patients,
which can provide useful information for the prediction of OSCC prognosis. However,
more data from in vivo/in vitro experiments and clinical trials are needed to
elucidate the mechanisms between FRGs and tumor immunity in OSCC.Click here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-tif-3-bbi-10.1177_11779322221115548 for Comprehensive
Analysis of the Significance of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in the Prognosis and
Immunotherapy of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Junhao Yin, Jiayao Fu, Yijie
Zhao, Jiabao Xu, Changyu Chen, Lingyan Zheng and Baoli Wang in Bioinformatics
and Biology InsightsClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-tif-4-bbi-10.1177_11779322221115548 for Comprehensive
Analysis of the Significance of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in the Prognosis and
Immunotherapy of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Junhao Yin, Jiayao Fu, Yijie
Zhao, Jiabao Xu, Changyu Chen, Lingyan Zheng and Baoli Wang in Bioinformatics
and Biology InsightsClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-tif-5-bbi-10.1177_11779322221115548 for Comprehensive
Analysis of the Significance of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in the Prognosis and
Immunotherapy of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Junhao Yin, Jiayao Fu, Yijie
Zhao, Jiabao Xu, Changyu Chen, Lingyan Zheng and Baoli Wang in Bioinformatics
and Biology InsightsClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-tiff-1-bbi-10.1177_11779322221115548 for Comprehensive
Analysis of the Significance of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in the Prognosis and
Immunotherapy of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Junhao Yin, Jiayao Fu, Yijie
Zhao, Jiabao Xu, Changyu Chen, Lingyan Zheng and Baoli Wang in Bioinformatics
and Biology InsightsClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-tiff-2-bbi-10.1177_11779322221115548 for Comprehensive
Analysis of the Significance of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in the Prognosis and
Immunotherapy of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Junhao Yin, Jiayao Fu, Yijie
Zhao, Jiabao Xu, Changyu Chen, Lingyan Zheng and Baoli Wang in Bioinformatics
and Biology InsightsClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-10-bbi-10.1177_11779322221115548 for Comprehensive
Analysis of the Significance of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in the Prognosis and
Immunotherapy of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Junhao Yin, Jiayao Fu, Yijie
Zhao, Jiabao Xu, Changyu Chen, Lingyan Zheng and Baoli Wang in Bioinformatics
and Biology InsightsClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-11-bbi-10.1177_11779322221115548 for Comprehensive
Analysis of the Significance of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in the Prognosis and
Immunotherapy of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Junhao Yin, Jiayao Fu, Yijie
Zhao, Jiabao Xu, Changyu Chen, Lingyan Zheng and Baoli Wang in Bioinformatics
and Biology InsightsClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-12-bbi-10.1177_11779322221115548 for Comprehensive
Analysis of the Significance of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in the Prognosis and
Immunotherapy of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Junhao Yin, Jiayao Fu, Yijie
Zhao, Jiabao Xu, Changyu Chen, Lingyan Zheng and Baoli Wang in Bioinformatics
and Biology InsightsClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-13-bbi-10.1177_11779322221115548 for Comprehensive
Analysis of the Significance of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in the Prognosis and
Immunotherapy of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Junhao Yin, Jiayao Fu, Yijie
Zhao, Jiabao Xu, Changyu Chen, Lingyan Zheng and Baoli Wang in Bioinformatics
and Biology InsightsClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-14-bbi-10.1177_11779322221115548 for Comprehensive
Analysis of the Significance of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in the Prognosis and
Immunotherapy of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Junhao Yin, Jiayao Fu, Yijie
Zhao, Jiabao Xu, Changyu Chen, Lingyan Zheng and Baoli Wang in Bioinformatics
and Biology InsightsClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-6-bbi-10.1177_11779322221115548 for Comprehensive
Analysis of the Significance of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in the Prognosis and
Immunotherapy of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Junhao Yin, Jiayao Fu, Yijie
Zhao, Jiabao Xu, Changyu Chen, Lingyan Zheng and Baoli Wang in Bioinformatics
and Biology InsightsClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-7-bbi-10.1177_11779322221115548 for Comprehensive
Analysis of the Significance of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in the Prognosis and
Immunotherapy of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Junhao Yin, Jiayao Fu, Yijie
Zhao, Jiabao Xu, Changyu Chen, Lingyan Zheng and Baoli Wang in Bioinformatics
and Biology InsightsClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-8-bbi-10.1177_11779322221115548 for Comprehensive
Analysis of the Significance of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in the Prognosis and
Immunotherapy of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Junhao Yin, Jiayao Fu, Yijie
Zhao, Jiabao Xu, Changyu Chen, Lingyan Zheng and Baoli Wang in Bioinformatics
and Biology InsightsClick here for additional data file.Supplemental material, sj-xlsx-9-bbi-10.1177_11779322221115548 for Comprehensive
Analysis of the Significance of Ferroptosis-Related Genes in the Prognosis and
Immunotherapy of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Junhao Yin, Jiayao Fu, Yijie
Zhao, Jiabao Xu, Changyu Chen, Lingyan Zheng and Baoli Wang in Bioinformatics
and Biology Insights
Authors: Jay S Cooper; Thomas F Pajak; Arlene A Forastiere; John Jacobs; Bruce H Campbell; Scott B Saxman; Julie A Kish; Harold E Kim; Anthony J Cmelak; Marvin Rotman; Mitchell Machtay; John F Ensley; K S Clifford Chao; Christopher J Schultz; Nancy Lee; Karen K Fu Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-05-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paras S Minhas; Ling Liu; Peter K Moon; Amit U Joshi; Christopher Dove; Siddhita Mhatre; Kevin Contrepois; Qian Wang; Brittany A Lee; Michael Coronado; Daniel Bernstein; Michael P Snyder; Marie Migaud; Ravindra Majeti; Daria Mochly-Rosen; Joshua D Rabinowitz; Katrin I Andreasson Journal: Nat Immunol Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 25.606
Authors: Xueting Lang; Michael D Green; Weimin Wang; Jiali Yu; Jae Eun Choi; Long Jiang; Peng Liao; Jiajia Zhou; Qiang Zhang; Ania Dow; Anjali L Saripalli; Ilona Kryczek; Shuang Wei; Wojciech Szeliga; Linda Vatan; Everett M Stone; George Georgiou; Marcin Cieslik; Daniel R Wahl; Meredith A Morgan; Arul M Chinnaiyan; Theodore S Lawrence; Weiping Zou Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2019-09-25 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Michael D Kornberg; Pavan Bhargava; Paul M Kim; Vasanta Putluri; Adele M Snowman; Nagireddy Putluri; Peter A Calabresi; Solomon H Snyder Journal: Science Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Chih-Hao Chang; Jonathan D Curtis; Leonard B Maggi; Brandon Faubert; Alejandro V Villarino; David O'Sullivan; Stanley Ching-Cheng Huang; Gerritje J W van der Windt; Julianna Blagih; Jing Qiu; Jason D Weber; Edward J Pearce; Russell G Jones; Erika L Pearce Journal: Cell Date: 2013-06-06 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Matthew E Ritchie; Belinda Phipson; Di Wu; Yifang Hu; Charity W Law; Wei Shi; Gordon K Smyth Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-01-20 Impact factor: 16.971
Authors: Francesco Vallania; Andrew Tam; Shane Lofgren; Steven Schaffert; Tej D Azad; Erika Bongen; Winston Haynes; Meia Alsup; Michael Alonso; Mark Davis; Edgar Engleman; Purvesh Khatri Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Rong Tang; Jin Xu; Bo Zhang; Jiang Liu; Chen Liang; Jie Hua; Qingcai Meng; Xianjun Yu; Si Shi Journal: J Hematol Oncol Date: 2020-08-10 Impact factor: 17.388