Literature DB >> 35966580

Emerging roles of extracellular vesicle-associated non-coding RNAs in hypoxia: Insights from cancer, myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke.

Dirk M Hermann1, Wenqiang Xin2, Mathias Bähr2, Bernd Giebel3, Thorsten R Doeppner2,4,5,6.   

Abstract

Hypoxia is a central pathophysiological component in cancer, myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, which represent the most common medical conditions resulting in long-term disability and death. Recent evidence suggests common signaling pathways in these diverse settings mediated by non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), which are packaged in extracellular vesicles (EVs) protecting ncRNAs from degradation. EVs are a heterogeneous group of lipid bilayer-covered vesicles released from virtually all cells, which have important roles in intercellular communication. Recent studies pointed out that ncRNAs including long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) are selectively sorted into EVs, modulating specific aspects of cancer development, namely cell proliferation, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, immune tolerance or drug resistance, under conditions of hypoxia in recipient cells. In myocardial infarction and stroke, ncRNAs shuttled via EVs have been shown to control tissue survival and remodeling post-hypoxia by regulating cell injury, inflammatory responses, angiogenesis, neurogenesis or neuronal plasticity. This review discusses recent evidence on EV-associated ncRNAs in hypoxic cancer, myocardial infarction and stroke, discussing their cellular origin, biological function and disease significance. The emerging concept of lncRNA-circular RNA/ miRNA/ mRNA networks is outlined, upon which ncRNAs synergistically respond to hypoxia in order to modify disease responses. Particular notion is given to ncRNAs participating in at least two of the three conditions, which revealed a large degree of overlaps across pathophysiological conditions. Possible roles of EV-ncRNAs as therapeutic products or theranostic markers are defined. © The author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35966580      PMCID: PMC9373807          DOI: 10.7150/thno.73931

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theranostics        ISSN: 1838-7640            Impact factor:   11.600


Introduction

Hypoxia, a pathophysiological condition characterized by reduced tissue oxygen content, is a hallmark of a variety of pathophysiological conditions 1, 2. Among these conditions, cancer, myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke play an eminent role, since they represent the most prevalent causes of long-term disability and death in medicine 3. Hypoxia profoundly influences transcriptional responses in the affected cells, e.g., by the transcription factor hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF1α), which is degraded under normoxic conditions by the von Hippel Lindau protein-mediated ubiquitin protease pathway but which is stabilized upon hypoxia 4, regulating a large variety of genes controlling cell proliferation, metabolism, survival and differentiation 5, 6. In cancer, HIF1α-dependent gene expression promotes the development of aggressive tumor phenotypes 1, 7, 8. In myocardial infarction and stroke, persistent hypoxia and ischemia compromise tissue remodeling and recovery 2, 9. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying hypoxia in cancer, myocardial infarction and stroke are very different. The main cause of hypoxia in cancer tissue are proliferating tumor cells growing out from blood vessels, which often have irregular network characteristics with compromised blood supply 1, 8. On the contrary, the primary cause of hypoxia in myocardial infarction and stroke is reduced blood flow associated with vascular occlusions and atherosclerosis 2, 10. Despite obvious pathophysiological differences, the gene responses to hypoxia in these three pathologies exhibit a high degree of similarities. Similarities relate to protein-encoding RNAs and non-encoding RNAs (ncRNAs). Resulting from gene expression changes, cellular biology and communication are fundamentally altered under conditions of hypoxia. To coordinate tissue responses, extracellular vesicles (EVs) are released from hypoxic cells 11, 12. Based on their size and cellular origin, EVs are regularly classified as exosomes (60 to 150 nm), microvesicles (100 to 1000 nm) and apoptotic bodies (typically larger than 500 nm) 11, 13. Exosomes originate from the late endosomal compartment, whereas microvesicles and apoptotic bodies are derived from plasma membrane. EV secretion is considered as an evolutionarily conserved process, which plays important roles in intercellular communication 13. For this purpose, EVs transfer a large variety of cargos, including proteins, RNA, DNA, bioactive metabolites and lipids. It is broadly assumed that all these molecule species can be delivered to recipient cells. The heterogenous group of ncRNAs, which are widely found in EV preparations, has received great interest in EV-mediated cell signaling, since ncRNAs profoundly regulate gene responses at the transcriptional, post-transcriptional or epigenetic levels by interacting with DNAs, RNAs or proteins 14, 15. ncRNAs are categorized by the number of nucleotides constituting RNAs. ncRNAs with less than 200 nucleotides are defined as small ncRNAs, which include microRNAs (miRNAs), small interfering RNAs and piwi-interacting RNAs, whereas long ncRNAs (lncRNAs), which also comprise circular RNAs (circRNAs), are composed of more than 200 nucleotides 14, 16. Although the precise subcellular source of these EVs is still a matter of discussion - some EV-ncRNAs arise from nucleus - 17, shuttled ncRNA transport via EVs has been proposed to regulate tissue responses to hypoxia 18. In light of their roles in disease processes, EV-derived ncRNAs might be promising disease biomarkers and even be considered as therapeutic tools 19-21. The present review summarizes the latest literature regarding the role of EV-ncRNA contents in the progression of hypoxic tumors, myocardial infarction and stroke. Aspects regarding the cellular and subcellular source of EV-associated ncRNAs, their cellular targets and biological functions are evaluated. The possible utility of EV-associated ncRNAs as therapeutic products and theranostic biomarkers is discussed.

1. EVs and ncRNAs

1.1 The characteristics and cellular origins of EVs

EVs are constantly released from eukaryotic cells, archaea and bacteria. They consist of a phospholipid bilayer and are abundantly present in various body fluids including blood, cerebrospinal fluid, urine, breast milk, and lacrima 22, 23. EVs can be classified into subcategories based on their biogenesis, size and physicochemical properties. Exosomes with a size of 60-150 nm and a density of about 1.10-1.21 g/ml 24, 25 are formed as intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) by membrane budding of late endosomes, which are released into the extracellular space as multivesicular bodies (MVBs) by MVB fusion with the plasma membrane 26, 27. Microvesicles, which are 100-1000 nm in diameter with a density of about 1.04-1.07 g/ml 25, are released from the plasma membrane by plasma membrane budding 26, 28. Apoptotic bodies, which are typically larger than 500 nm in diameter, are formed during programmed cell death by plasma membrane budding. In cancer, extremely large vesicles called oncosomes are produced, which are considered to transfer oncogenic messages. Under pathophysiological conditions, apoptotic bodies or oncosomes may be more abundant in certain fluids than exosomes or microvesicles and thus confound EV analyses 29, 30. Whereas exosomes and microvesicles are suggested as 'safe containers' for cargos mediating cell-to-cell communication, apoptotic bodies are released for degradation during the disassembly of dying cells. Importantly, not all EVs released from live cells are involved in cell communication. Live cells may also release vesicles through a cellular excretion machinery that do not aim at transmitting biological signals but are meant for remote degradation especially in the liver 15, 17. Apparently, such garbage vesicles may contain ncRNA cargos that lack cell signaling roles. Besides, apoptotic cells not only fragment into the larger apoptotic bodies, but also generate many EVs in the size of exosomes. When preparing EVs in the size range of exosomes, combinations of exosomes, small microvesicles, small apoptotic vesicles and other small EVs, including nuclear EVs, are enriched 31. To harmonize the nomenclature, the International Society of Extracellular Vesicles recommended to define all prepared vesicles independent of their origin as EVs; if they are all in the size of exosomes, the EVs might be termed more specifically as small EVs 32. Unfortunately, not all scientists and especially researchers from the industry adopted the nomenclature and use the term exosomes as a synonym for small EVs. The issue is further complicated by the fact that hardly any method allows isolation of EVs; regularly concentrated EVs contain a number of non-EV associated byproducts, e.g. blood-derived EV samples typically contain a high load of lipoproteins and urine samples frequently aggregates of Tamm-Horsfall protein also named uromodulin 33, 34. Furthermore, in addition to potentially contributing to functional impacts, byproducts in EV preparations may significantly influence EV quantification 35, 36. The reader should be aware that at least in most of the studies EVs were not isolated but rather enriched likely to contain a panel of different non-EV-associated byproducts.

1.2 The characteristics and associated functions of ncRNAs

Among the different EV cargos, ncRNAs are most systematically studied 37, 38. Despite their heterogeneity of origin and diversity of biological function, there is meanwhile broad evidence supporting a role of ncRNAs in coordinating tissue responses to injuries. Although more than 20,000 proteins are encoded by the human genome, they only account for approximately 20% of the whole genome 39. Emerging evidence demonstrates that both short ncRNAs and lncRNAs play a crucial role in the regulation of gene expression in numerous pathophysiological states 40. miRNAs are single-strand RNAs, which typically are 21-23 nucleotides in size and belong to the family of short ncRNAs. Released from the nucleus as single-strand pre-miRNA hairpins, pre-miRNAs are processed to mature miRNAs in the cytosol via cleavage by the endonuclease Dicer 41. Together with Dicer and associated proteins, miRNAs form the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) 42. As part of the RISC, miRNAs interact with complementary gene sequences in the 3' untranslated region of target mRNA sequences, repressing gene expression by argonaute (AGO)-mediated mRNA cleavage, by mRNA poly(A) tail shortening that destabilizes the mRNA, or by interference with mRNA-ribosome interactions 43-45. The human genome contains >600 genes with robust evidence of miRNA functions 46. These miRNAs target >60% of all human genes 47. Thus, single miRNAs can have hundreds, sometimes >1000 mRNA targets 47. In many cases, these miRNAs moderately influence mRNA expression levels. Due to their multiple mRNA targets, the biological consequences of this action are profound. In contrast to miRNAs, siRNAs are formed as double-strand RNAs in the nucleus which are typically longer than pre-miRNAs 48, 49. Following cleavage by Dicer, 21-24 nucleotide siRNAs result, which dissociate to single-strand siRNAs upon interaction with the RISC. As part of the RISC, these siRNAs scan complementary mRNA sequences 50. Unlike miRNAs, siRNAs have tight target specificity 48, 50. siRNA binding induces cleavage of these target mRNAs. Among small ncRNAs, piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are the largest in size. Their length varies between animal species, it typically ranges from 26 to 31 nucleotides 51. piRNAs form complexes with piwi-AGO proteins capable of binding mRNAs and cleaving them 51. lncRNAs are transcripts with more than 200 nucleotides that are not translated into protein 39. lncRNAs include intergenic and intronic ncRNAs, and may involve sense and antisense RNA sequences. Although the biological role has so far been shown only for a small lncRNA proportion, they control transcription and translation in multiple ways, namely as transcription coregulators, ligands to nuclear transcription repressors, activators of transcription factors, regulators of epigenetic modifications, assistants in DNA double-strand break repair, as well as mRNA processing, splicing, transport, translation, and degradation 52, 53. The recently described circRNAs display a circular covalently bonded structure associated with a higher tolerance to exonucleases 54. They serve as scaffolds for chromatin-modifying complexes, regulate gene transcription and mRNA splicing, and act as miRNA sponges 55, 56.

1.3 ncRNA loading into EVs

Although ncRNAs inside EVs originate from the transcriptome of their source cells, the composition of these ncRNAs differs from their source cell ncRNAs 57. Among ncRNAs enriched in EVs, miRNAs are most abundant 58, 59. Several studies analyzed the loading and sorting processes of ncRNAs into EVs, for which numerous signaling pathways have been shown to be involved 60-62. Recent work demonstrated that miRNA sorting into EVs is not a random but a highly regulated process 63, 64. miRNAs are characterized by a uridine or adenine residue at their 3'-end, which is important for their recognition by AGO2. miRNAs with an adenylated 3'-end are predominantly found in cells, whereas miRNAs with a uridylated 3'-end are sorted in EVs, as shown in RNA sequencing studies on human B cells and their EVs 63. These results suggest that posttranscriptional miRNA modifications, notably, 3'-end adenylation and uridylation, might play a pivotal role in EV packaging. There is increasing evidence that ncRNA sorting into EVs critically depends on membrane lipid and, more specifically, sphingolipid metabolism. The lipid composition of the EV membrane resembles that of membrane microdomains, which are characterized by a high content of cholesterol, phosphatidyl choline, sphingomyelin and ceramide 65. Ceramide formation is controlled by neutral sphingomyelinase-2 and acid sphingomyelinase, which are localized in the cytosolic and luminal membrane leaflets, respectively, and hydrolytically cleave sphingomyelin to ceramide 66-68. Ceramide has unique biophysical properties, as it can self-associate through hydrogen bonding, providing the driving force that results in the coalescence of microscopic microdomains to a large-scale macrodomains 67 and the budding of ILVs from MVBs 65. It has been proposed that membrane microdomains act as platforms for MVB sorting and that ncRNAs integrating into these platforms exhibit specific nucleotide motifs differentially predisposing these ncRNAs for microdomain membrane interaction 62. Indeed, RNAs binding to microdomains possess a specific secondary structure that differs from other RNAs 69. Randomly structured RNA sequences revealed 20-fold lower affinity to the microdomain domains. In addition, specific nucleotide sequences appear to be required for enhanced affinity to phospholipid bilayers, and domains with membrane affinity have not been observed in random RNA sequences 61, 70. Specific exosome-sorting RNA motifs have been shown for both miRNAs (called EXOmotifs) and mRNAs 62. Intracellular transfer of ncRNAs from the nucleus to other subcellular compartments involves RNA-binding proteins, from which larger ribonucleoprotein particles are formed ensuring traveling along the cytoskeleton 71. To date, more than 500 RNA-binding proteins have been reported, which consist of approximately 25% of the protein content of EVs 57, 72. Emerging evidence demonstrates that ncRNAs can be transmitted into MVBs for exosome packaging or to the plasma membrane for extracellular secretion. This transmission takes place in association with RNA binding proteins like heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins A2/B1 (hnRNPA2B1), YBX1, SYNCRIP, AGO2 and others 57. Villarroya et al. revealed that in T cells, hnRNPA2B1 can target a specific motif of numerous miRNAs and transmit them into the ILVs 73. SYNCRIP selectively loads hepatocyte miRNAs with a 4-nucleotide motif near the 3'-end 74, whereas YBX1 selectively carries miR-223 into HEK-293T cell EVs 75. Deletion of AGO2 in HEK293T cells significantly decreased miR-142-3p and miR-451 miRNAs in EVs 76, 77. Although a first picture of the mechanisms underlying ncRNA sorting is currently evolving, the extent to which these pathways are specific to certain ncRNA species in defined EV subsets is elusive. Future studies will have to evaluate how hypoxia regulates these packaging mechanisms.

1.4 Uptake of ncRNA-loaded EVs by recipient cells

To transmit ncRNAs into recipient cells, EVs may merge directly with the recipient cell by direct membrane fusion or be internalized through clathrin-mediated or caveolin-mediated endocytosis, phagocytosis or macropinocytosis 78. EV docking can be assimilated by recipient cells through directly targeting corresponding receptors on the plasma membrane, which in turn activates or inhibits associated signaling pathways 79. The receptors can be manipulated on the cell surface to increase EV uptake. For instance, enzymatic depletion or pharmacological inhibition of the extracellular matrix heparan sulfate proteoglycans on the plasma membrane has been found to promote the uptake of tumor-derived EVs by endocytosis 80. In the latter study, EV uptake was specifically inhibited by free heparan sulfate chains, whereas closely related chondroitin sulfate had no effect 80. Several integrin receptors have been shown to modulate EV uptake in a variety of cancers 57. As such, integrin receptors were shown to be enriched in cancer EVs compared to EVs obtained from benign epithelial cells 81. The total EV integrin levels, including the quantity of integrins α6, αv, and β1, correlated with tumor stage across a variety of epithelial cancers, while integrin α6 was prominently expressed on breast and ovarian progenitor cells 81, suggesting a role of these integrins in cellular EV uptake and the utility of EV integrins as potential theranostic markers. A crucial role in EV uptake might be related to phosphatidylserine, which is highly abundant on the surface of apoptotic cells but also present on a subpopulation of EVs 82, where phosphatidylserine considerably acts as 'eat me' signal by phagocytes 83. In mouse macrophages, the EV uptake is mediated via interaction of phosphatidylserine with T cell immunoglobulin and the mucin domain-containing protein 4 (Tim4) 83. Indeed, the delivery of anti-Tim4 antibody prevented EV uptake by thymic macrophages 83. Despite these emerging data, our current understanding of EV uptake mechanisms is still preliminary. Open questions remain about the endosomal escape of internalized EVs, which is required to deliver luminal EV cargo including ncRNAs into the cytosol of the EV recipient cells. In this context, it is interesting to note that even after successful EV uptake the generation of functional proteins from EV-derived mRNAs was negligible in recipient prostate cancer cells 57, 84. Presumably, these mRNAs could not be released from the endosomal system and thus were unable to reach the ribosomes. Hence, dissection of potential endosomal escape mechanisms is vital for understanding whether ncRNA mediate biological functions after EV uptake. It needs to be considered that EVs containing ncRNAs are taken up as cell nutrition. After EV internalization residual parts are degraded in the lysosome or excreted for digestion in remote cells or tissues, including the liver. Indeed, EV biodistribution studies detect the liver as very prominently labeled organ 85. A brief overview of mechanisms of communication between cells by EVs is shown in Figure

1.5 Possible ncRNA artifacts associated with EV isolation and purification

In a variety of well-defined settings, authors could not confirm that ncRNAs and more specifically miRNAs are sorted into EVs 57. Certainly, results strongly depend on the EV preparation method. Originally and still often today, EVs are isolated by differential ultracentrifugation 86, which as stated before, also results in the preparation of many lipoprotein particles 87. Indeed, lipoproteins frequently contain miRNA-binding AGO proteins and thus can protect extracellular miRNAs 88. Bead capturing experiments using EVs obtained from mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) revealed that EVs recovered by cholera toxin b, a GM1 ganglioside ligand and membrane microdomain marker, contained many exosome markers but hardly any RNAs 17. In contrast, EVs captured by the globotriaosylceramide ligand shiga toxin b were abundant in nuclear markers and contained large amounts of RNAs 17. Interestingly, among the many studies using proteomic methods to analyse the composition of EVs, only one has reported the presence of AGO2 and none has detected Dicer 57. Apparently, the cellular source of EVs and physiological condition in which cells are raised decisively influence EV-ncRNA cargos. In the interpretation of ncRNA findings, possible artifacts related to EV isolation and purification carefully need to be considered.

2. Roles of EV-ncRNAs in the hypoxic tumor microenvironment

Hypoxia is a key feature of solid tumors 89. Highly proliferating tumor cells outgrow the existing local blood supply, forming irregular vessel networks that cannot compensate for tissue oxygen needs 90, 91. Hence, tissue oxygen levels can drop below 2% in tumor masses, which has profound effects on the release and ncRNA contents of EVs 92. ncRNAs released from hypoxic tumor cells via EVs play an important role in creating a microenvironment that supports tumor growth 93-101. Notably, a large number of ncRNAs are increased in EV preparations obtained from hypoxic tumors. Several of these ncRNAs have been attributed to signal pathways associated with cell survival and proliferation, such as the FoxO pathway, the proteoglycans in cancer pathway, the HIF-1 signaling pathway or the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway 11. The involvement of EV-derived ncRNAs in regulating tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, immunosuppression, drug resistance has been studied extensively in specific cancers under conditions of hypoxia 93-136, as outlined in Table and Figure . The main findings are summarized in the following.

2.1 Tumor cell proliferation, migration and invasion

Excessive cellular proliferation is a fundamental characteristic of cancer, which results from the activation of oncogenic signals that overrule the physiological inhibition of cell growth 137. EV-derived ncRNAs contribute to tumor cell proliferation, as has been brought into the spotlight recently. In EVs obtained from bladder carcinoma cells raised under hypoxic conditions, the content of urothelial carcinoma associated-1 (UCA1), a hypoxia-responsive lncRNA, was found to be enriched compared with EVs obtained from normoxic bladder carcinoma cells 102. UCA1 transfer via EVs obtained from hypoxic bladder carcinoma cells promoted tumor cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in recipient cells via mechanisms that involved epithelial-mesenchymal transition, a process relevant for cancer progression 102. The level of lncR-UCA1 in human serum-derived EVs of bladder carcinoma patients was higher than that in healthy control patients 102. Similarly, in hepatocellular carcinoma, lncRNA ROR accumulated in hypoxic tumor cell EVs was found to promote cancer growth by miR-145 downregulation and HIF1α stabilization 120. In non-small cell lung adenocarcinoma, lncRNA metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript-1 (MALAT1) significantly increased tumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion, colony formation and glycolysis via mechanisms involving miR-515 and miR-613 sponging, followed by EEF2 and COMMD8 upregulation 123-125. In breast carcinoma, lncRNA nuclear enriched abundant transcript-1 (NEAT1) promoted tumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion and metastasis via miR-141-3p sponging and KLF12 upregulation 122. In colorectal carcinoma, hypoxic EV-associated circ-133 promoted tumor cell migration and metastasis via miR-133 sponging, GEF-H1 and RhoA elevation 136. Besides lncRNAs, EV miRNAs have been involved in the regulation of tumor cell proliferation in hypoxia. In EVs derived from colorectal carcinoma cells, miR-361-3p was described to be enriched, when cells were cultivated under hypoxic compared with normoxic conditions 103. EV-mediated miR-361-3p delivery from hypoxic cells promoted tumor growth and suppressed tumor cell apoptosis in recipient cells by interaction with TRAF3 resulting in the activation of the NFκB pathway 103. Likewise, in EVs from hepatocellular carcinoma cells, miR-1273f was enriched when cells were raised under hypoxic compared with normoxic conditions 98. miR-1273f delivery via EVs obtained from hypoxic hepatocellular carcinoma cells was reported to increase miR-1273f levels in normoxic target cells, enhancing their proliferation by downregulating LHX6 expression 98. Studies in renal cell carcinoma and lung carcinoma noted roles of miR-155 and miR328-3p in hypoxic cancer proliferation via mechanisms involving inhibition of FOXO3 expression and activation 104 or inhibition of tumor suppressor NF2 targeted Hippo pathway activation 105, respectively. In oral squamous cell carcinoma and ovarian carcinoma, a role of EV miR-21 has been shown in hypoxic cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion via HIF1α and HIF2α stabilization 95, 114, and in lung carcinoma, roles of miR-31-5p, miR-193-3p, miR-201-3p and miR-5100 were found via SATB2-revered epithelial-mesenchymal transition, MAPK/ERK1/2 activation and STAT3 activation 97, 121. In the latter studies, roles in the regulation of tumor cell proliferation, migration and invasion were shown for miRNAs associated with cancer cell EVs and MSC EVs.

2.2 Tumor-associated angiogenesis

Tumor growth vitally depends on tumor-associated angiogenesis, which involves a plethora of events such as the basal membrane degradation, endothelial proliferation, migration, tube formation and branching 138. EV-derived ncRNAs are claimed to facilitate tumor-associated angiogenesis under conditions of hypoxia. In this process, the lncRNA UCA1 again seems to play a prominent role. UCA1 was elevated in EVs obtained from hypoxic compared with normoxic pancreatic carcinoma cells and in serum-derived EVs from pancreatic carcinoma patients 106. In serum EVs of pancreatic carcinoma patients, UCA1 levels were associated with poor patient survival 106. Exposure of HUVECs to UCA1 enriched EVs promoted angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo by acting as a sponge for miR-96-5p that relieved the repressive effects of miR-96-5p on its target gene AMOTL2 106. In leukemia, miR-210 was upregulated in hypoxic compared with normoxic tumor cells and their EVs, inducing angiogenesis by downregulating EFNA3 expression 107. Angiogenesis was also facilitated by miR-23a-enriched EVs from hypoxic lung carcinoma cells, which induced tight junction breakdown, vascular permeability, transendothelial tumor cell migration and tumor growth 108. As underlying mechanism, the suppression of the miR-23a targets prolyl hydroxylase 1 and 2 (PHD1 and 2) that promoted HIF1α accumulation was identified 108. In lung carcinoma, the delivery of miR-494 enriched EVs derived from hypoxic tumor cells enhanced angiogenesis via PTEN, Akt and eNOS signaling 109. Studies in hypoxia-resistant multiple myeloma revealed that miR-135b enrichment in EVs enhanced angiogenesis under conditions of hypoxia via suppression of its target factor inhibiting HIF1 (FIH) 101. In colorectal carcinoma, tumor EV miR-25-3p promoted angiogenesis, vascular permeability and metastasis by downregulating KLF2 and KLF4 134.

2.3 Immune tolerance

Immune surveillance plays a central role in controlling tumor growth. To support its own growth, tumors can induce immune tolerance. In this process, ncRNAs transmitted via EVs are thought to be involved 18, 139. In nasopharyngeal carcinoma, tumor cells found to be enriched in miR-24-3p were shown to inhibit T cell proliferation and Th1 and Th17 differentiation by downregulating its target FGF11, thus increasing MAPK extracellular kinase (ERK)-1/2 activity, increasing signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-1 and STAT3 activity and reducing STAT5 activity 110. In a study comparing a variety of tumor cells models including lung carcinoma cells, EVs from hypoxic tumor cells displayed elevated miR-210 and miR-23a abundance 111. The authors showed that miR-23a in hypoxic EVs downregulated CD107a expression in NK cells and thus lowered their antitumor response 111. In oral squamous cell carcinoma, elevated miR-21 in EVs of hypoxic tumor cells inhibited γδ T cell activation by regulating PTEN and PD-L1 119. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) modulate the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment by inhibiting T cell activation. A sequencing analysis of miRNAs from both hypoxic and normoxic glioma-derived EVs found that miR-10a and miR-21 induced upon hypoxia promoted MDSC expansion and activation by targeting RAR-related orphan receptor alpha (RORA) and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) 93. In lung carcinoma, melanoma, pancreatic carcinoma and ovarian carcinoma, NEAT1, miR-103a, miR-301a, miR-940 and let-7a were shown to regulate macrophage polarization towards an immunotolerant M2 phenotype via mechanisms involving the PTEN, PI3K/ Akt, STAT3 or IQGAP1 pathways, besides others 100, 116-118, 126. The induction of immune tolerance facilitates tumor growth.

2.4 Chemotherapy resistance

Acquired chemotherapy resistance in response repeated drug exposure is an essential factor that contributes to poor prognosis in cancer. Unraveling the underlying mechanisms is a prerequisite for developing novel cancer treatments. ncRNAs shuttled via EVs have recently been shown to contribute to chemotherapy resistance development. Microarray analysis of EV-derived circRNAs from hypoxic and normoxic pancreatic carcinoma cells displayed that circZNF91 was increased in EVs obtained from hypoxic pancreatic carcinoma cells 112. Overexpression of circZNF91 induced chemotherapy resistance in normoxic PC cells, while circZNF91 knockdown attenuated chemotherapy resistance by competitively targeting miR-23b-3p 112. In colorectal carcinoma, EV-associated circRNA ciRS-122 promoted glycolysis and induced oxaliplatin chemotherapy resistance through miR-122 sponging and PKM2 upregulation 135. In hepatocellular carcinoma, the hypoxia-responsive lncRNA ROR was highly abundant in tumor cells and their EVs 99. Incubation of tumor cells with lncRNA ROR-rich EVs induced chemotherapy-resistance to sorafenib 99. Interestingly, sorafenib similarly increased lncRNA ROR levels in tumor cells and their EVs, whereas siRNA-mediated lncRNA ROR knockdown restored chemotherapy responsiveness via mechanisms involving diminished CD133+ cells in response to transforming growth factor-β (TGFβ), a known stimulant inducing chemotherapy resistance 99. In non-small cell lung carcinoma cells, hypoxia increased miR-21 levels in tumor cells and their EVs, promoting cisplatin chemotherapy resistance of recipient cells by downregulating PTEN 94. Notably, high miR-21 levels in non-small cell lung carcinoma samples was associated with short survival in patients receiving chemotherapy, but not in patients not receiving chemotherapy 94. In hypoxic macrophages, elevated miR-223 levels were noted in EVs conferring chemoresistance in ovarian carcinoma cells; and miR-223 was shown to mediate this action via mechanisms involving PTEN downregulation and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K)/ Akt overactivation 113. The role of EV-shuttled ncRNAs supports a role as markers in diagnostics or theranostics in cancer.

3. Roles of EV-ncRNAs in myocardial infarction

The occlusion of a coronary artery in myocardial infarction results in a series of pathological events, among which necrosis, apoptosis, autophagy and inflammatory damage may ultimately lead to heart failure and death 2. Unlike in cancer, in which tumor development occurs progressively, myocardial infarction is an acute disorder characterized by an abrupt interruption of blood flow. Owing perhaps to the acute nature and severity of injury associated with myocardial infarction, several ncRNAs are downregulated in hypoxic-ischemic heart tissue in response to myocardial infarction, as previously shown for lncRNA HCP5, miR-21, miR-24, miR-30e, miR-98-5p, miR-150p, miR-185 and miR-212-5p 140-147, whereas other ncRNAs, such as lncRNA NEAT1 and miR-328-3p, are increased 148, 149. Delivery of EVs derived from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) or patient blood seem to restore reduced ncRNA levels in ischemic heart tissue 140, 141, 143, 144, 147, 150. Suggestively, EV-ncRNAs play important roles in coordinating responses to myocardial injury, i.e., by modulating cardiomyocyte survival, inflammatory responses, angiogenesis and cardiac functional recovery 59, 151, 152. While EV-ncRNAs in hypoxic tumors have been widely studied in patient-derived cancer tissue, similar information from tissue obtained from patients with myocardial infarction is scarce due to the lack of access to histological tissue samples. Unlike in cancer, previous studies on myocardial infarction have mainly been conducted using tissues or cells without preexisting injury, which were experimentally exposed to hypoxia or ischemia 140-150, 153-180, as summarized in Table and Figure and further specified in the following.

3.1 Cell survival and injury

Studies in experimental models mimicking myocardial infarction imply that EV-associated lncRNAs and miRNAs can promote ischemic cardiomyocyte survival and cardiac function recovery. As such, UCA1, MALAT1, NEAT1, KLF3-AS1 and HCP5 lncRNAs shuttled via EVs from cardiomyocytes or MSCs were found to promote cardiomyocyte survival, inhibit cardiomyocyte autophagy and promote cardiac function recovery by mechanisms including miR-143, miR-92a, miR-23c, miR138-5p and miR-497 sponging 140, 149, 153-156. miRNA sponging potently increased the miRNA targets KLF2, STAT5B, SIRT1 and IGF1. Cardioprotective effects were demonstrated for several EV-miRNAs, namely miR-21, miR-25, miR-30e, miR-125b, miR-126, miR-146a, miR-185, miR-210, miR-212-5p, miR-338 and miR-671, which, collected from MSCs, cardiac progenitor cells, endothelial cells, endothelial progenitor cells or patient serum, promoted cardiomyocyte survival by downregulating miRNA targets including PDCD4, FASL, PTEN, LOX1, p53, BAK or SOCS2 141, 145-147, 150, 159, 162, 164, 165, 176-178, 181. As a consequence of EV administration, intrinsic and extrinsic cell death pathways were inhibited. Importantly, not all ncRNAs contained in EV samples protect against ischemic damage. Hence, EV-associated HCG15 lncRNA, miR-153-3p and miR-328-3p were found to exacerbate ischemic injury in myocardial infarction models via mechanisms involving NFκB/ p65 and p38 activation, PI3K/ Akt deactivation and caspase-3 activation, when obtained from ischemic cardiomyocytes, patient serum or MSCs 148, 167, 168.

3.2 Inflammation

The activation of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) via damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) may exacerbate ischemic cardiomyocyte injury via activation of the inflammasome, a multiprotein complex capable of cleaving and releasing proinflammatory IL1β levels, resulting in the activation of a proinflammatory type of programmed cell death called pyroptosis. EV-ncRNAs modulate inflammatory responses via a variety of miRNA targets. Hence, miR-98-5p and miR-129 transferred via endothelial cell EVs or MSC EVs reduced inflammasome activation in the ischemic myocardium by downregulating their miRNA target, the PRR TLR4, which in turn inhibited NFκB and the inflammasome component NLRP3 143, 158. Likewise, miR-146a and miR-671 shuttled via MSC EVs reduced TLR4, NFκB and SMAD2 signaling responses by downregulating their targets EGR1 and TGFBR2 150, 163. Patient serum-derived EV lncRNA HCG15, conversely, promoted IL1, IL6 and TNFα formation in ischemic myocardium via NFκB activation 167.

3.3 Angiogenesis

Vascular protective and angiogenic effects were shown for a variety of EV associated ncRNAs derived from cardiomyocytes, MSCs, cardiac progenitor cells, dendritic cells or patient serum, namely MALAT1 lncRNA, miR-21, miR-31, miR-126, miR-210, miR-223, miR-322, miR486-5p, miR-494-3p and miR-4732-3p in models of myocardial infarction 154, 157, 166, 168, 169, 171-173, 179, 180, 182. These ncRNAs were found to promote endothelial survival, proliferation, migration and tube formation by downregulating the miRNA targets including Krev interaction trapped protein-1 (KRIT1), matrix metalloproteinase-19 (MMP19), and FIH, thus inducing β-catenin activation, VEGF, CCND1, NOX2 or HIF1α elevation, respectively 154, 157, 166, 168, 169, 171-173, 180, 182. As a consequence of the enhanced tissue vascularization, fibrotic scar formation was reduced and cardiac function was enhanced 166, 170, 172, 180. In contrast, miR-153-3p delivered by MSC EVs compromised endothelial survival by downregulating its target angiopoietin-1 (ANGPT1) resulting in β-catenin activation, VEGFR2, PI3K/ Akt and eNOS deactivation 168, whereas miR-143 and miR-145 delivered by smooth muscle cell EVs reduced angiogenesis by downregulating their targets hexokinase-II (HKII) and integrin-β8 174. The cardioprotective, anti-inflammatory and angiogenic roles of EV-ncRNAs support a possible role of ncRNAs as diagnostic/theranostic markers and therapeutic targets in myocardial infarction.

4. Roles of EV-ncRNAs in ischemic stroke

The occlusion of a cerebral artery affects the survival of brain neurons, glial cells and vascular cells. Among these different cells, the vulnerability of brain neurons is highest. Neuronal viability, structural connectivity and functional responses are vital for the recovery of lost neurological functions 183, 184. Yet, neurological recovery post-stroke critically depends on the successful restitution of vascular and glial functions. In the process of brain tissue remodeling, neurons, glial cells and vascular cells tightly interact with each other, preparing the stage so that successful functional recovery can occur 183. Similar to myocardial infarction, a variety of ncRNAs, namely circSCMH1, miR-124-3p, miR-126, miR-132, miR-221-3p and miR542-3p, are reduced in the ischemic brain and blood 185-191, whereas others, namely miR-98 and miR-494, are increased at defined time-points 192-194. Delivery of MSC-derived EVs can boost ncRNA levels in ischemic brain tissue 195-198. Although ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction have distinct pathophysiological features, they thus share common signaling pathways. Hence, EV-ncRNAs have vital roles in coordinating tissue responses to ischemic stroke in the acute and post-acute stroke setting, in which ncRNAs modulate neuronal survival, inflammatory responses, angiogenesis, neurogenesis and neuronal plasticity 151, 199. Similar to myocardial infarction, most studies on ischemic stroke have previously been performed using tissues or cells, which were experimentally exposed to hypoxia or ischemia 185-192, 195-198, 200-224, as summarized in Table and Figure and outlined in the following.

4.1 Cell survival and injury

Experimental stroke studies revealed that EV-ncRNAs can promote ischemic brain tissue survival in the acute stroke phase, reduce the development of brain atrophy in the chronic phase and enhance neurological recovery. Thus, EV samples obtained from hypoxic astrocytes that contained circSHOC2 lncRNA promoted neuronal survival via mechanisms involving miR-7670-3p sponging, resulting in SIRT1 overexpression 200. In HT22 neuronal cells, lncRNA MALAT1 shuttled via MSC EVs promoted neuronal survival via mechanisms including the recruitment of the serine-arginine-rich splice factor-2 (SRSF2), resulting in alternative splicing of protein kinase CδII (PKCδII) and Bcl2 elevation 225. A large set of MSC EV-associated miRNAs, including miR-22-3p, miR-25, miR-26, miR-31, miR-126, miR-138-5p, miR-146a-5p and miR-223-3p, were found to promote neuronal, astrocytic, oligodendrocytic and microglial survival by downregulating target genes including KDM6B, p53, KLF9, CH25H, TRAF6, ACVR2B, LCN2 or CysLT2R 185, 186, 188, 190, 197, 201-204, 209, 212, 213, 215, 216. Besides, miR-34c, miR-92b-3p and miR-361 transferred with EVs from normoxic or ischemic astrocytes increased neuronal survival by downregulating the targets TLR7 and cathepsin-B (CTSB) 205, 206, 217. Likewise, M2 microglial EV miR-124, miR-135a-5p and miR-137 increased neuronal survival and reduced astrocytic activation, proliferation and scar formation via mechanisms involving STAT3, thioredoxin interacting protein (TXNIP) and NOTCH1 downregulation 207, 210, 211. Neuroprotective effects were furthermore reported for miR-1290 derived from endothelial EVs 218. In the latter study, EV uptake by neurons occurred calveolin-1 dependently, and this uptake was increased by hypoxia-ischemia 218. Survival-promoting effects of patient serum-derived EV miR-124-3p and miR-126 via mechanisms involving DNA methylase-3b (DNMT3B) were noted in neurons and microglial cells 189, 208, whereas patient serum-derived miR-27-3p increased neuronal death via mechanisms involving PPARγ downregulation and microglial overactivation 219. The combined evidence of these studies demonstrates that various types of brain cells mutually influence responses to stroke via EV-associated ncRNAs. A peculiar mechanism associated with ncRNA-induced neuroprotection appears to be the inhibition of autophagy in recipient cells. Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism, which maintains cellular homeostasis by degrading misfolded or nonfunctional proteins or damaged organelles 226, 227. Upon severe cellular stress, excessive autophagy may result in cellular accumulation of toxic metabolites or cellular self‐degradation, ultimately resulting in cell death 228-230. Recent studies evaluating effects of MSC EVs showed that EV miR-25-3p protected primary neurons exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation against injury via autophagy inhibition 202. On the molecular level, p53 expression was downregulated by miR-25-3p, resulting in the inhibition of BNIP3 activity and reduced autophagic flux examined by LC3-II levels. Application of a miR-25-3p oligonucleotide mimic promoted neuronal survival, whereas an miR-25-3p anti-oligonucleotide increased autophagic flux and cell death by mechanisms involving p53 overexpression and BNIP3 overactivation 202. Inhibitory effects on autophagy associated with neuronal survival were also described for circSHOC2 and miR-135a-5p released in astrocytic and M2 microglial EVs 200, 210. Hence, autophagy inhibition might represent a more general, hitherto underexplored mechanism via which EV-ncRNAs protect ischemic neurons.

4.2 Inflammation

Similar to the heart, proinflammatory cytokines, namely IL-1β, contribute to ischemic brain injury via pyroptosis. In the brain, proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, TNF-α and IL-1β, are released from a variety of cells, including M1 microglial cells, astrocytes and neurons. ncRNAs transferred via EVs seem to regulate these inflammatory responses, as has been observed for EVs originating from a number of cell sources. Hence, miR-26b-5p, miR-126, miR-138-5p, miR-138-5p, miR-221-3, miR-223-3p and miR-542-3p released via MSC EVs inhibited inflammatory responses of neurons, microglial cells and astrocytes via CH25H, LCN2, RMRP, ATF3, CysLT2R and TLR4 downregulation, resulting in the inhibition of the TLR4, SMAD2, IRAK1/ TRAF6 and PI3K/ Akt/ mTOR pathways 186, 188, 190, 197, 212, 213, 216. Via this mechanism, neuronal survival was enhanced, microglial cells adopted a restorative M2 phenotype, and astrocytic inflammatory responses were inhibited. Likewise, miR-135a-5p derived from M2 microglial EVs reduced inflammatory responses of neurons via TXNIP downregulation, NLRP3 deactivation and decreased IL1β and IL18 formation 210, while neuronal EV miR-98 and miR-181c-3p promoted microglia survival and inhibited microglia phagocytosis or inhibited astrocyte inflammatory responses by PAFR or CXCL1 downregulation, respectively 192, 214. Patient serum-derived EV miR-124-3p inhibited microglial inflammatory responses by mechanisms involving ERK1/2, PI3K/ Akt and p38 MAPK deactivation 189, whereas patient serum-derived EV miR-27-3p promoted M1-like microglial activation via mechanisms involving PPARγ downregulation, resulting in increased cytokine formation and cell death 219.

4.3 Angiogenesis and neurogenesis

In models of cerebral ischemia, angiogenic effects have been shown for miR-181b and miR210 transferred via MSC EVs and for miR-126 transferred via endothelial EVs via mechanisms involving TRPM7 downregulation, HIF1α and VEGF elevation and TIMP3 reduction 187, 220, 221. When cultured under conditions of hypoxia, MSC EVs that were otherwise non-angiogenic adopted a recovery-promoting phenotype that reproducibly induced cerebral microvascular endothelial proliferation, migration and tube formation across a wide range of MSC sources 198. Compared with EVs from normoxic MSCs, hypoxic MSC EVs significantly increased miR-126-3p, miR-140-5p and let-7c-5p and reduced miR-186-5p, miR-370-3p and miR-409-3p in recipient endothelial cells 198. The delivery of these hypoxic MSC EVs in vivo to ischemic mice exposed to middle cerebral artery occlusion enhanced microvascular remodeling, increased microvascular densities, increased microvascular length and increased branching point densities, as revealed by 3D lightsheet fluorescence microscopy in the periinfarct rim 198. Newly formed microvessels act as guidance sheaths for neural progenitor cells migrating from progenitor cell niches to the stroke lesion. Delivery of miR-17-92, miR-26a and miR-124 shuttled via EVs from MSCs or urine-derived stem cells promoted post-ischemic neurogenesis via mechanisms involving histone deacetylase-6 (HDAC6) inhibition 222-224.

4.4 Neuronal plasticity

In response to stroke, axons and dendrites in the vicinity and at distance to the evolving brain infarct sprout, forming new synaptic connections 183. Cell-based therapeutics, including exogenously administered neural progenitor cells or MSCs, promote neuronal plasticity 231, 232. Within this process, EVs and their ncRNAs may play significant roles. Thus, the EV-derived lncRNA circSCMH1 was shown to increase dendritic length, dendritic branches and synaptic spines of ischemic cultured neurons in vitro and of periinfarct cortical neurons of rats exposed to photothrombotic stroke in vivo, as revealed by morphological Golgi-Cox staining analysis 191. EV circSCMH1 improved functional neurological recovery of ischemic rats, reduced microglial activation and reduced the formation of the proinflammatory cytokines IL1β, TNFα and IL6 191. The effect of circSCMH1 was mediated by binding methyl-CpG binding protein-2 (MeCP2), a nuclear transcription factor directly binding methylated DNA, as revealed by proteomic assays, RNA sequencing and transcriptional profiling studies 191. By MeCP2 binding, MeCP2 target gene transcription repression was released. In rat and mouse models of middle cerebral artery occlusion, neuronal plasticity and neurological recovery promoting effects were reported for MSC EV miR-17-92 and miR-133b and for endothelial cell EV miR-126 187, 195, 196, 222. Via mechanisms involving downregulation of PTEN, connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) or RhoA, the three miRNAs were found to increase axonal, dendritic and synaptic sprouting in the periinfarct tissue, as revealed by anterograde tract tracing analysis using biotinylated dextran amine combined with immunohistochemical stainings. In case of miR-17-92, the plasticity-promoting effects were associated with PI3K/ Akt/ mTOR activation and GSK3β deactivation 222. In case of miR-126, which was evaluated in a type-II diabetes stroke model, the neurorestorative effects were linked to a shift of macrophage polarization towards the M2 phenotype 187.

5. Overarching roles of EV-ncRNAs across pathophysiological conditions

lncRNAs, circRNAs, miRNAs and mRNAs form complex RNA networks that synergistically respond to stressors 233. As outlined in sections 2-4, several of these networks are highly active or inactive under conditions of hypoxia and ischemia, representing master regulators of gene expression. We are just starting to understand the complex biology behind these ncRNA networks. miRNAs recognize response elements on RNAs that mediate their interaction and binding. lncRNAs and circRNAs serve as competing endogenous RNAs to miRNAs, and thus act as miRNA sponges. mRNA binding of miRNA induces translational repression or instability, thus regulating protein translation 233. Importantly, lncRNAs do not only interact with miRNAs but can also target DNA transcription and mRNAs directly 234. Thus, EV-circSCMH1, which is decreased in plasma of stroke patients and periinfarct cortex of stroke mice, was found to induce post-ischemic dendritic and synaptic plasticity, antiinflammation and neurological recovery by binding the nuclear transcription factor MeCP2, resulting in release of MeCP2 mediated transcription repression 191 (see also section 4 and Table ). Using antisense oligonucleotide studies and RNA immunoprecipitation assays on HT22 neuronal cells, lncRNA MALAT1, which is highly abundant in MSC EVs, was shown to promote neuronal survival and proliferation by mechanisms involving SRSF2 recruitment, alternative PKCδII splicing and Bcl2 elevation 225 (Table ). For further insights into lncRNA-circRNA/ miRNA/ mRNA networks, the reader is referred to references 235-237. In view of their highly integrated mode of action, ncRNAs profoundly modify disease responses.

5.1 ncRNAs involved in more than one of three hypoxic conditions exhibit a large degree of overlaps regarding modes of action

From the above EV-ncRNA intervention studies, a total of 19 ncRNAs, including 3 lncRNAs and 16 miRNAs, have meanwhile been identified for which robust evidence suggests their involvement in more than one of the three hypoxic pathophysiological conditions. The modes of action of these ncRNAs have been summarized in Table . Notably, 8 of these 19 EV-ncRNAs have been shown to be involved in all three pathophysiological conditions. Including studies evaluating effects of ncRNAs irrelevant whether ncRNAs were associated with EVs, joint evidence in all three pathophysiological conditions exists for 16 of the 19 ncRNAs. Strikingly, the modes of action reveal a high degree of overlaps between the three pathophysiological states. Hence, studies describing promotion of cell survival, proliferation, migration or angiogenesis in one pathophysiological condition usually had corresponding actions in the two other conditions, as shown for lncRNA MALAT1, miR-21, miR-25, miR-31, miR-135, miR-146 and miR-210. Similarly, ncRNAs with roles in immune tolerance, antiinflammation or chemotherapy resistance in one condition also revealed related actions in the two other conditions, as shown for miR-98 and miR-223. Hence, corresponding actions in all three conditions have been reported for 9 of the 16 ncRNAs. Importantly, diverging actions have been reported for 3 ncRNAs. Perhaps due to the different nature of hypoxia, opposing actions were described for cancer compared to myocardial infarction and stroke in case of two ncRNAs. Hence, miR-133a, which was found to be abundant in cancer EVs at low concentration, reduced tumor cell proliferation, survival, migration and metastasis in gastric carcinoma and colorectal carcinoma 136, 238, whereas miR-133a-3p and miR-133b promoted cardiomyocyte survival and neuronal plasticity in myocardial infarction and stroke, respectively, and enhanced functional tissue recovery 162, 195, 196. Likewise, miR-328b-3p promoted tumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion and tumor growth in lung carcinoma 105, whereas miR-328b-3p augmented cardiomyocyte death and apoptosis in myocardial infarction 148 and augmented neuronal death and neuroinflammation in ischemic stroke 239. Besides, EV-associated miR-361 promoted tumor cell proliferation and survival in colorectal carcinoma 103 and neuronal survival in ischemic stroke 217, whereas cardiac-specific miR-361 overexpression reduced cardiomyocyte survival by increasing mitochondrial fission in myocardial infarction 240. Differences in the actions of EV-associated miR-361 and genetically overexpressed miR-361 may explain diverging findings in the two ischemia studies. Important for potential clinical translation, therapeutic miRNA modification may have opposite roles within the same disease category via distinct modes of actions. Hence, EV-associated miR-126 promoted tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis and growth in hepatoblastoma and chronic myeloid leukemia via mechanisms involving CXCL12 and VCAM1 downregulation 129, 131, but inhibited tumor cell proliferation, colony formation, migration, invasion and survival in lung carcinoma via mechanisms including ITGA6 downregulation 130. NEAT1 overexpression promoted neuronal survival in ischemic stroke by regulating the MFN2/ SIRT3 pathway 241, whereas NEAT1 knockdown increased neuronal survival by inhibiting M1 microglia polarization via the Akt/ STAT3 pathway 242. Again in ischemic stroke, miR-494 agomir (that is, mimic) promoted neuronal survival, axonal plasticity and neurological recovery via HDAC3 downregulation 193, similar as miR-494 antagomir (that is, inhibitor), which increased neuronal survival and neurological recovery by reducing the Th1 helper cell shift and decreasing post-ischemic brain neutrophil infiltrates via HDAC2 upregulation 194, 243. In view of the multifaceted roles of ncRNAs, their therapeutic modulation is particularly prone to ambiguous actions in different types of cells. In case of therapeutic interventions, careful actions are needed in order to avoid contrary results of therapeutic interventions, i.e., therapeutic benefits in one cell type (e.g., in neuron) or via one pathway (e.g., MFN2/ SIRT3) vs. harmful actions in another cell type (e.g., brain invading T cells) or pathway (e.g., Akt/ STAT3). The genetic overexpression or knockdown and the delivery of miRNA agomirs or antagomirs are gross interventions that affect miRNA levels in a non-targeted way. In comparison, the delivery of miRNA-loaded EVs is more fine-tuned and allows targeting distinct types of cells.

6. EV-associated ncRNAs as therapeutic products or theranostic biomarkers

From studies in cancer, myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, there is meanwhile solid evidence that EV-associated ncRNAs regulate gene responses in target tissues under conditions associated with hypoxia, modifying cell survival, proliferation, migration and differentiation and influencing disease outcomes in clinically relevant ways. In most pathophysiological conditions, we still lack of detailed information about the precise subcellular origin of therapeutically active EVs. Of note, the association of ncRNAs with EVs does not imply that ncRNAs are exosome constituents 15, and concerns have been raised whether ncRNAs are released from cells as part of the EVs 17. EVs are widely isolated by differential ultracentrifugation 86, which enriches non-EV constituents including lipoproteins 87 that contain large amounts of ncRNAs 88. Bead-capturing experiments revealed that EVs captured by GM1 binding cholera toxin b were largely devoid of RNAs (see also section 1.5). EV contents may differ depending on pathophysiological conditions. Besides exosomes, microvesicles might contain ncRNAs. Irrespective of the precise ncRNA and EV origin and overriding open methodological questions, intervention studies in models of cancer, myocardial infarction and stroke consistently revealed therapeutic actions of EV preparations that were associated with ncRNAs. The observation raises the question about the utility of EV-associated ncRNAs as therapeutics or theranostics in human patients.

6.1 ncRNA-loaded EVs as therapeutic products

Representing instable single-strand RNA molecules, miRNAs are rapidly degraded in the blood by RNAses, unless specifically protected. EVs are abundant in virtually all body fluids, protecting ncRNAs from degradation. Representing nanoparticles covered by lipid bilayer membrane, EVs are capable of transmitting complex biological information to defined target cells. The presence of multiple signals in a single EV allows inducing synergistic cellular responses. When evaluating EV actions, we must consider that not all EVs transmit biological information and that some EVs eliminate waste products, including RNAs, from hypoxic cells (see section 1.1). The proper definition of cells or tissues of origin is decisive in the development of EV products 244. In the development of EV-based therapeutics, we have to be aware that EV contents, including ncRNAs, may greatly differ between EV preparations, even when these preparations are performed from the same source cells 198, 245. This raises the need of potency assays evaluating the efficacy of each EV preparation before this individual preparation is administered to human patients 246. When considering ncRNAs as therapeutic EV contents, it must be taken into account that the biological effect of a given ncRNA may differ between pathophysiological settings and disease-relevant target cell types. As example, miR-494 was shown to promote post-ischemic neuronal survival, axonal plasticity and neurological recovery via its target HDAC3 in one setting 193, while it had opposite effects by modulating Th1 helper cell shifts and brain neutrophil infiltrates via HDAC2 in two other studies 194, 243 (see also Table ). Thorough studies in animal models would be required elucidating various modes of action before clinical proof-of-concept studies are performed. Considering their biological properties that resemble cellular therapeutics, but are more easy to handle and lack intrinsic risks of cellular therapeutics (such as malignant transformation) 244, the administration of EVs is an elegant strategy to boost hypoxic tissues. EVs might potentially be loaded with ncRNAs that prevent disease progression or improve disease outcome, or be loaded with inhibitors or siRNAs for ncRNAs that promote disease progression or deteriorate disease outcome. EV ncRNA contents might possibly be modified by transgenic techniques. Following transfection of cancer cells with plasmid DNA encoding for wild-type p53 and miR-125b, Trivedi et al. observed that the ncRNA profile of EVs was altered, shifting the polarization of recipient macrophages towards the M1 phenotype 247.

6.2 EV-ncRNAs as theranostic biomarkers

EVs carry surface markers specifying their cellular origin and their source cell's activation state. Cell type by cell type, tissue responses can be tracked in remote body fluids. In multiple dimensions, detailed information can be obtained about hypoxic or ischemic tissue states. For this type of biomarker analysis, the term liquid biopsy has been coined. Deregulated EV-ncRNA levels may be used as diagnostic or prognostic markers. As such, Que et al. reported that EV miR-17-5p and miR-21 were elevated 3.2-fold and 5.9-fold, respectively, in the serum of patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and serum miR-21 furthermore differentiated pancreatic adenocarcinoma from chronic pancreatitis 248. In myocardial infarction, serum EV-derived miR-1915-3p, miR-457, and miR-3656 were significantly less abundant compared with patients with stable coronary artery disease, and the miR-3656 level was positively correlated with left ventricular ejection fraction 249. Indeed, by comparing EV-ncRNAs abundancies at baseline, before and after treatment with subsequent correlation with clinical variables, such biomarkers offer an elegant possibility to predict disease outcomes and therapy responses. For instance, in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the level of serum EV circPDE8A was positively correlated with lymphatic invasion, TNM stage and poor survival rate 250. On the contrary, miR‐134 - known as a brain‐specific miRNA - has been associated with neuronal injury under conditions of ischemic stroke 251. Abundances of EV-derived miR‐134 were significantly increased in stroke patients, where they were positively correlated with neurological deficits, stroke volume and functional outcome 252. A detailed and comprehensive analysis of the utility of miRNAs as diagnostic markers is beyond the scope of this review. For more details, the reader is referred to Table 5 102, 108, 110, 113, 114, 248-250, 252-266. Specifically, the here-presented data on the role of EV-ncRNAs in the development of chemotherapy resistance (summarized in section 2.4) supports their role in treatment monitoring. In a variety of cancers, including pancreatic carcinoma, colorectal carcinoma, ovarian carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma and lung carcinoma, pathophysiologically grounded evidence was collected supporting a role of defined ncRNAs in chemotherapy resistance development (summarized in section 2.4 and Figure ). With the identification of concentration cutoffs, these EV-ncRNAs could now be used for chemotherapy monitoring. As theranostics, ncRNA-EVs should provide clinically significant information, whether a given drug is still likely to have preserved its actions or whether it should be exchanged due to drug resistance development. For example, hypoxia-associated miR-21 abundance has revealed its utility as theranostic marker in non-small cell lung carcinoma, where high miR-21 abundance was associated with short survival in patients receiving chemotherapy with cisplatin, but not in patients not receiving chemotherapy 94. The predictive value of EV-ncRNAs may further be enhanced by evaluating EV-ncRNA combinations or EV-ncRNA combinations with classical biomarkers. For instance, serum α-fetoprotein was found to have an insufficient sensitivity and specificity in hepatocellular carcinoma patients, resulting in an unacceptably high false-negative detection rate 267. Combining α-fetoprotein with serum EV ENSG00000258332.1 and LINC00635 markedly increased α-fetoprotein's sensitivity and specificity. With the new biomarker, a higher percentage of patients could now be classified correctly 267.
Table 5

EV-associated non-coding RNAs as biomarkers in the three hypoxic conditions.

Author, year, referenceDiseaseEV provenanceNon-coding RNAAbundanceClinical significance
Bjornetro et al., 2019 253Locally advanced rectal carcinomaPlasmamiR-486-5pDownregulatedAssociated with tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis
Bjornetro et al., 2019 253Locally advanced rectal carcinomaPlasmamiR-181a-5pDownregulatedAssociated with tumor invasion and lymph node metastasis
Bjornetro et al., 2019 253Locally advanced rectal carcinomaPlasmamiR-30d-5pUpregulatedAssociated with tumor metastasis
Zhang et al., 2019 254Non-small cell lung carcinomaSerumlncR MALAT-1UpregulatedAssociated with cell proliferation and migration
Rong et al., 2020 255Non-small cell lung carcinomaSerumlncR MALAT-1UpregulatedAssociated with cancer pathology
Wang et al., 2018 256Pancreatic carcinomaSerummiR-301aUpregulatedAssociated with cancer metastasis
Qeu et al. 2013 248Pancreatic carcinomaSerummiR-17-5pUpregulatedAssociated with cancer pathology
Qeu et al. 2013 248Pancreatic carcinomaSerummiR-21UpregulatedAssociated with cancer pathology
Li et al. 2018 250Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaPlasmacircPDE8AUpregulatedAssociated with lymphatic invasion, TNM stage and poor survival rate
Zhu et al., 2019 113Ovarian carcinomaSerummiR-223UpregulatedAssociated with cancer recurrence
Ye et al., 2016 110Nasopharyngeal carcinomaPlasmamiR-24-3pUpregulatedAssociated with disease-free survival
Hsu et al., 2017 108Lung carcinomaSerummiR-23aUpregulatedAssociated with cancer pathology
Li et al., 2016 114Oral squamous cell carcinomaSerummiR-21UpregulatedAssociated with T stage and N stage
Xue et al., 2017 102Bladder carcinomaSerumlncR UCA1UpregulatedAssociated with cancer pathology
Zhou et al., 2021 257Breast carcinomaSerumlncR NEAT1UpregulatedAssociated with cancer pathology
Zheng et al., 2020 258Myocardial infarctionPlasmalncR ENST00000556899.1UpregulatedAssociated with myocardial infarction pathology
Zheng et al., 2020 258Myocardial infarctionPlasmalncR ENST00000575985.1UpregulatedAssociated with myocardial infarction pathology, inflammatory markers, disease severity and prognosis
Sun et al., 2020 259Myocardial infarctionPlasmalncR UCA1UpregulatedAssociated with myocardial infarction pathology
Chen et al., 2020 260Myocardial infarctionSerumlncR NEAT1UpregulatedAssociated with myocardial infarction pathology
Chen et al., 2020 260Myocardial infarctionSerummiR-204DownregulatedAssociated with myocardial infarction pathology
Ling et al., 2020 261Myocardial infarctionSerummiR-122-5pUpregulatedAssociated with myocardial infarction pathology
Ling et al., 2020 262Myocardial infarctionSerummiR-126UpregulatedAssociated with myocardial infarction pathology and disease severity
Ling et al., 2020 262Myocardial infarctionSerummiR-21UpregulatedAssociated with myocardial infarction pathology
Su et al., 2019 249Myocardial infarctionSerummiR-1915-3p, miR-4507 and miR-3656DownregulatedAssociated with myocardial infarction pathology
Zhou et al., 2018 252Ischemic strokeSerummiR‐134UpregulatedAssociated with ischemic stroke pathology, severity and prognosis
Wang et al., 2018 263Ischemic strokePlasmamiR‐21‐5pUpregulatedAssociated with ischemic stroke pathology
Wang et al., 2018 263Ischemic strokePlasmamiR‐30a‐5pUpregulatedAssociated with ischemic stroke pathology
Chen et al., 2017 264Ischemic strokeSerummiR‐223UpregulatedAssociated with ischemic stroke pathology, severity, and short-term outcome
Li et al., 2017 265Ischemic strokePlasmamiR‐422aDownregulatedAssociated with ischemic stroke pathology
Li et al., 2017 265Ischemic strokePlasmamiR‐125b‐2‐3pDownregulatedAssociated with ischemic stroke pathology
Ji et al., 2016 266Ischemic strokeSerummiR‐9UpregulatedAssociated with ischemic stroke pathology and severity
Ji et al., 2016 266Ischemic strokeSerummiR‐124UpregulatedAssociated with ischemic stroke pathology and severity

7. Conclusion and perspectives

We herein showed that cancer, myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, which represent the most prevalent medical conditions resulting in disability and death 3, profoundly regulate EV-associated ncRNAs, controlling physiological responses including cell survival and proliferation, migration, drug resistance, angiogenesis and neuronal plasticity. As underlying mechanism, hypoxia, which decisively influences tissue fate in all three conditions 1, 2, was found to control endogenous ncRNA responses, some ncRNAs being upregulated and others downregulated upon hypoxia. In several studies, the delivery of ncRNA-loaded EVs harvested from healthy human blood, perilesional tissue, progenitor cells (including MSCs) or antiinflammatory immune cell subsets (such as M2 microglia) allowed attenuating disease progression and restoring functional tissue recovery. Remarkably, EV-ncRNAs exhibited a large degree of overlaps regarding their modes of action across pathophysiological states. Thus, EV-ncRNAs open fascinating perspectives as theranostic biomarkers and besides this, but more challenging, perhaps also as therapeutic products. With respect to clinical translation, major challenges remain with respect to the large-scale isolation and preparation of EVs, the reproducibility of EV preparations under defined culturing conditions as well as the development of potency assays, which ensure that EV activity characteristics are maintained in a given EV preparation before this individual preparation is administered to human patients 245, 246, 268. Only with such skills, we can ensure the success of clinical proof-of-concept trials. Currently, there are 23 clinical trials on EV-enveloped ncRNAs registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ in diverse medical conditions. Among these studies, currently eight trials are active and recruiting, four are active but not recruiting, four are not recruiting and seven are completed. The results of these ongoing studies are envisaged with great interest. Meanwhile, ongoing preclinical efforts will sharpen our understanding of the clinical potential of EV-ncRNA technologies.
Table 1

Preclinical studies assessing the effect of ncRNAs transferred via EVs in the hypoxic tumor microenvironment.

Authors [reference]Cancer typencRNAsEV provenanceRecipient cellPrimary actionMechanism of action
Xue et al. 102Bladder carcinomalncR UCA15637 cancer cellsUMUC2 cancer cellsTumor cell proliferationPromotion of epithelial-mesenchymal transition
Zhang et al. 123Lung carcinomalncR MALAT1Patient serumA549 and H1299 cancer cellsTumor cell proliferation, migration and survivalNot determined
Rong et al. 124Lung carcinomalncR MALAT1Patient serum, A549 andH1299 cancer cellsA549 andH1299 cancer cellsTumor cell proliferation, invasion and survivalmiR-515 sponging, EEF2 upregulation,
Wang et al. 125Lung carcinomalncR MALAT1A549 and H1299 cancer cellsA549 and H1299 cancer cellsTumor cell proliferation, colony formation and glycolysismiR-613 sponging, COMMD8 upregulation
Zhou et al. 122Breast carcinomalncR NEAT1Patient serumMCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cancer cellsTumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion and metastasismiR-141-3p sponging, KLF12 upregulation
Takahashi et al. 120Hepatocellular carcinomalncR RORHepG2 cancer cellsHepG2 cancer cellsTumor cell proliferationmiR-145 downregulation, HIF1α stabilization
Chen et al. 95Ovarian carcinomamiR-21-3p/ miR-125 b-5p/ miR-181d-5pSKOV3 cancer cellsSKOV3 cancer cells/ macrophagesTumor cell proliferation/ immune toleranceHIF-1α/ HIF-2α stabilization, M2 macrophage polarization
Hu et al. 129HepatoblastomamiR-126huH6 and HepG2 cancer cellshuH6 and HepG2 cancer cells, MSCsTumor cell proliferation, tumor growthMSC differentiation into cancer cells
Katakowski et al. 128GliomamiR-146bMSCsGlioma cellsTumor cell proliferation/ tumor growthNot determined
Meng et al. 104Renal carcinomamiR-155786-O and Caki-1 cancer cells786-O and Caki-1 cancer cellsTumor cell proliferationFOXO3 downregulation
Liu et al. 105Lung carcinomamiR-328-3pMSCsA549 and H125 cancer cellsTumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion/ tumor growthPromotion of epithelial-mesanchymal transition; NF2 downregulation, inhibition of Hippo pathway activation
Li et al. 103Colorectal carcinomamiR-361-3pCRC cancer cellsHCT116 and HT29 cancer cellsTumor cell proliferation, survival; tumor growthTRAF3 downregulation, NF-κB activation
Yu et al. 98Hepatocellular carcinomamiR-1273fHuh7 and97H cancer cellsHuh7 and97H cancer cellsTumor cell proliferationLHX6 downregulation
Yang et al. 136Colorectal carcinomacirc-133Patient serum, SW 480 and HCT 116 cancer cellsSW 480 and HCT 116 cancer cellsTumor cell migration/ metastasismiR-133a sponging, GEF-H1 and RhoA elevation
Li et al. 114Oral squamous cell carcinomamiR-21Patient serumSCC-9 and CAL-27 cancer cellsTumor cell migration/ invasionHIF1α/HIF2α stabilization
Liu et al. 133Hepatocellular carcinomamiR-25-5pHuH-7 and HCCLM3 c cancer ellsHuH-7 and HCCLM3 cancer cellsTumor cell migration/ invasionNot determined
Yu et al. 121Lung carcinomamiR-31-5pA549 and H1299 cancer cellsA549 and H1299 cancer cellsTumor cell migration/ invasionSATB2-revered epithelial-mesenchymal transition, ERK1/2 activation
Zhang et al. 97Lung carcinomamiR-193a-3p/ miR-210-3p/ miR-5100MSCsA549, H358, H460 and LLC cancer cellsTumor cell migration/ invasionSTAT3 activation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition
Li et al. 130Lung carcinomamiR-126Patient serumA549 and H460 cancer cellsInhibition of tumor cell proliferation, colony formation, migration, invasion and survivalITGA6 downregulation
Guo et al. 106Pancreatic carcinomalncR UCA1MIA PaCa-2 cancer cellsEndothelial cellsAngiogenesismiR-96-5p sponging, AMOTL2 repression reversal
Hsu et al. 108Lung carcinomamiR-23aCL1-5 cancer cellsEndothelial cellsAngiogenesisPHD1/ PHD2 downregulation, HIF1α stabilization
Zeng et al. 134Colorectal carcinomamiR-25-3pPatient serum and CRC cancer cellsEndothelial cellsAngiogenesis, vascular permeability, metastasisKLF2 and KLF4 downregulation
Taverna et al. 131Chronic myeloid leukemiamiR-126LAMA84 cancer cellsEndothelial cellsAngiogenesisCXCL12 and VCAM1 downregulation
Umezu et al. 101Multiple myelomamiR-135bRPMI8226 cancer cellsEndothelial cellsAngiogenesisFIH downregulation, HIF1α stabilization
Tadokoro et al. 107LeukemiamiR-210K562 cancer cellsEndothelial cellsAngiogenesisEFNA3 downregulation
Mao et al. 109Lung carcinomamiR-494A549 cancer cellsEndothelial cellsAngiogenesis, tumor growthPTEN downregulation, Akt/ eNOS activation
Li et al. 119Oral squamous cell carcinomamiR-21Cal-27 and SCC9 cancer cellsγδ T cellsImmune toleranceγδ T cell deactivation through PTEN/PD-L1 axis regulation
Berchem et al. 111Different cancers, including lung carcinomamiR-23aIGR-Heu and K562 cancer cellsNK cellsImmune toleranceNK cell deactivation through CD107a downregulation
Ye et al. 110Nasopharyngeal carcinomamiR-24-3pTW03, C666 and CNE2 cancer cellsT cellsImmune toleranceT cell deactivation through FGF11 downregulation, ERK1/2 and STAT1/3 activation and STAT5 deactivation
Guo et al. 93GliomamiR-10a/ miR-21P3 and GL261 cancer cellsMDSCsImmune toleranceMDSC expansion, RORA and PTEN downregulation
Yang et al. 126MelanomalncR NEAT1MSCsMacrophagesImmune toleranceM2 macrophage polarization through miR-374 sponging, LGR4-dependent IQGAP1 upregulation
Hsu et al. 116Lung carcinomamiR-103aCL1-5 cancer cellsMacrophagesImmune toleranceM2 macrophage polarization through PTEN downregulation, Akt/ STAT3 activation
Wang et al. 117Pancreatic carcinomamiR-301aPANC-1 cancer cellsMacrophagesImmune toleranceM2 macrophage polarization through PTEN downregulation, PI3Kγ activation
Chen et al. 118Ovarian carcinomamiR-940SKOV3 cancer cellsMacrophagesImmune toleranceM2 macrophage polarization
Park et al. 100Melanomalet-7a miRB16 melanoma cellsMacrophagesImmune toleranceM2 macrophage polarization through inhibition of insulin/ Akt/ mTOR signaling
Yang et al. 127GliomalncR MALAT1Glioma stem cellsMicrogliaProinflammatory responsemiR-129-5p sponging, HMGB1 upregulation, IL6, IL8 and TNFα release in response to lipopolysaccharide exposure increased
Zeng et al. 112Pancreatic carcinomacircZNF91BxPC-3 and SW1990 cancer cellsBxPC-3 cancer cellsChemotherapy resistancemiR-23b-3p sponging, SIRT1 upregulation, HIF1α stabilization
Wang et al. 135Colorectal carcinomaciRS-122SW480 and L‐OHP cancer cellsSW480 cancer cellsChemotherapy resistance, glycolysis promotionmiR-122 sponging, PKM2 upregulation
Takahashi et al. 99Hepatocellular carcinomalncR RORHepG2 cancer cellsHepG2 cancer cellsChemotherapy resistanceCD133+ cell formation
Dong et al. 94Lung carcinomamiR-21A549 cancer cellsA549 cancer cellsChemotherapy resistancePTEN downregulation
Guo et al. 132Ovarian carcinomamiR-98-5pCancer-associated fibroblastsA2780 cancer cellsChemotherapy resistanceCDKN1A downregulation
Zhu et al. 113Ovarian carcinomamiR-223MacrophagesSKOV3 cancer cellsChemotherapy resistancePTEN downregulation, PI3K/Akt activation
Chen et al. 115Oral squamous cell carcinomamiR-340-5pTe13, Te1 and Eca109 cancer cellsTe13, Te1 and Eca109 cancer cellsRadiotherapy resistanceKLF1 downregulation

Abbreviations: EVs, extracellular vesicles; lncR, long non-coding RNA; MDSCs, myeloid-derived suppressor cells; MSCs, mesenchymal stromal cells.

Table 2

Preclinical studies assessing the effects of ncRNAs transferred via EVs in models of myocardial infarction.

Authors [reference]ncRNAsEV provenanceRecipient cellIschemia modelPrimary actionMechanism of action
Diao et al. 153lncR UCA1MSCsCardiomyocytesH/R, LAD ligationCell survival, autophagy inhibitionmiR-143 sponging/ Bcl2 elevation
Shyu et al. 154lncR MALAT1CardiomyocytesCardiomyocytes, endothelial cellsH/R, LAD ligationCell survivalmiR-92a sponging, KLF2 and CD31 elevation
Kenneweg et al. 149lncR NEAT1CardiomyocytesCardiomyocytes, fibroblastsLAD ligationCell survival, cardiac function recovery, antifibrosisNEAT1 transcriptionally upregulated in large EVs by hypoxia through HIF2α
Chen et al. 155lncR KLF3-AS1CardiomyocytesCardiomyocytes, BMSCsLAD ligationCell survivalmiR-23c sponging, STAT5B upregulation
Mao et al. 156lncR KLF3-AS1MSCsCardiomyocytesH/R, LAD ligationCell survival, Pyroptosis inhibitionmiR-138-5p sponging, SIRT1 upregulation
Li et al. 140lncR HCP5MSCsCardiomyocytesH/R, LAD ligationCell survivalmiR-497 sponging, IGF1 upregulation, PI3K/Akt activation
Gu et al. 141miR-21Patient serumCardiomyocytesOGD/R, LAD ligationCell survivalPDCD4 downregulation
Song et al. 157miR-21HEK293TCardiomyocytes, endothelial cellsH2O2, LAD ligationCell survivalPDCD4 downregulation
Zhang et al. 147miR-24MSCsCardiomyocytesLAD ligationCell survival, cardiac function recoveryBax, caspase-3 and activated caspase-3 reduction
Peng et al. 181miR-25MSCsCardiomyocytesOGD/R, LAD ligationCell survivalFASL and PTEN downregulation, EZH2 and H3K27me3 reduction elevating eNOS and SOCS3
Pu et al. 142miR-30eMSCsCardiomyocytesH/R, LAD ligationCell survival, cardiac function recoveryLOX1 downregulation, NF-κB p65 and caspase-9 deactivation
Zhang et al. 143miR-98-5pMSCsCardiomyocytesLAD ligationCell survival, cardiac function recovery, antiinflammationTLR4 downregulation, PI3K/ Akt activation, reduced macrophage infiltration
Zhu et al. 159miR-125bMSCsCardiomyocytesH/R, LAD ligationCell survival, cardiac function recoveryp53/BAK1 downregulation
Chen et al. 176miR-126Endothelial cellsCardiomyocytesMCAOCell survival, cardiac function recoveryVascular cell adhesion protein-1 and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 reduction
Luo et al. 160miR-126MSCsCardiomyocytes, endothelial cellsLAD ligationCell survival, antiinflammation, antifibrosis, angiogenesisReduced proinflammatory cytokine formation
Zheng et al. 158miR-129Endothelial cellsCardiomyocytesOGD/R, LAD ligationCell survival, antiinflammationTLR4 downregulation, NF-κB and NLRP3 inflammasome deactivation
Wang et al. 161miR‐129-5pMSCsCardiomyocytesCoronary artery ligationCell survival, antiinflammation, antifibrosisHMGB1 downregulation
Zhu et al. 162miR-133a-3pMSCsCardiomyocytesH/SD, LAD ligationCell survival, cardiac function recoveryAkt activation
Pan et al. 163miR‐146aMSCsCardiomyocytesH/R, LAD ligationCell survival, antiinflammation, antifibrosisEGR1 downregulation, TLR4/ NFκB deactivation
Wu et al. 144miR-150-5pMSCsCardiomyocytesLAD ligationCell survival, cardiac function recoveryBax downregulation
Li et al. 145miR-185MSCsCardiomyocytesCoronary artery ligationCell survivalSOCS2 downregulation
Barile et al. 177miR-210Cardiac progenitor cellsCardiomyocytesLAD ligationCell survivalEphrin-A3 and PTP1b downregulation
Cheng et al. 178miR-210MSCsCardiomyocytesLAD ligationCell survivalAIFM3 downregulation
Wu et al. 146miR-212-5pMSCsCardiomyocytesLAD ligationCell survival, antifibrosisNLRC5 downregulation, VEGF/ TGFβ1/ SMAD deactivation
Ke at al. 164miR-218-5p/miR-363-3pEndothelialprogenitor cellsCardiomyocytesLAD ligationCell survival, antifibrosis, angiogenesisp53/ JMY downregulation
Fu et al. 165miR-338MSCsCardiomyocytesH2O2, LAD ligationCell survival, cardiac function recoveryMAP3K downregulation, JNK/Bax reduction, Bcl2 elevation
Wang et al. 150miR-671ASCsCardiomyocytesOGD/R, LAD ligationCell survival, antiinflammation, antifibrosisTGFBR2 downregulation, SMAD2 deactivation
Sanchez-Sanchez et al. 166miR-4732-3pMSCsCardiomyocytes, endothelial cellsOGD/R, LAD ligationCell survival, cardiac function recovery, antifibrosis, angiogenesisNot determined
Lin et al. 167lncR HCG15Patient serumCardiomyocytesH/R, LAD ligationCell death/ apoptosis, proinflammationNF-κB/ p65 and p38 activation, IL1, IL6 and TNFα upregulation
Ning et al. 168miR-153-3pMSCsCardiomyocytes, endothelial cellsOGD/RCell deathANGPT1 downregulation, VEGF/ VEGFR2/ PI3K/ Akt/ eNOS deactivation
Huang et al. 148miR-328-3pCardiomyocytesCardiomyocytesLAD ligationCell death/ apoptosisCaspase-3 activation
He et al. 169miR-21-5pPatient serumEndothelial cellsOrthotopic xenograft modelAngiogenesis, vascular permeabilityKRIT1 downregulation, β-catenin activation, VEGF/ CCND1 elevation
Zhu et al. 170miR-31MSCsEndothelial cellsHLI, LAD ligationAngiogenesis, cardiac function recoveryFIH1 downregulation, HIF1α elevation
Wang et al. 179miR-210MSCsEndothelial cellsLAD ligationAngiogenesis, cardiac function recoveryEFNA3 downregulation
Yang et al. 180miR-223MSCsEndothelial cellsH2O2, LAD ligationAngiogenesis, antiinflammation, antifibrosisP53 downregulation, S100A9 reduction
Youn et al. 171miR-322Cardiac progenitor cellsEndothelial cellsLAD ligationAngiogenesisNOX2 and reactive oxygen species (ROS) elevation
Li et al. 172miR-486-5pMSCsEndothelial cells, cardiomyocytesLAD ligationAngiogenesis, cardiac function recoveryMMP19 downregulation, VEGFA elevation due to reduced cleavage
Liu et al. 173miR‑494‑3pDendritic cellsEndothelial cellsH/R, LCA ligationAngiogenesisVEGF elevation
Climent et al. 174miR-143/ miR-145Smooth muscle cellsEndothelial cellsNAInhibition of angiogenesis, inhibition of endothelial proliferationHKII and integrin-β8 downregulation, respectively
Jiang et al. 175miR-2p8bPatient plasmaEndothelial cellsNAInhibition of angiogenesis, promotion of endothelial deathCDKN1A, FAK, RAF1, MAPK1 and Bax upregulation, Bcl2 downregulation

Abbreviations: EVs, extracellular vesicles; lncR, long non-coding RNA; MSC, mesenchymal stromal cells; H/R: hypoxia-reoxygenation; LAD, left anterior descending artery; OGD/R, oxygen-glucose deprivation and reoxygenation/ recultivation; MCAO, middle cerebral artery occlusion; H/SD, hypoxia and serum deprivation; HLI, hindlimb ischemia; LCA, left coronary artery; NA, not available.

Table 3

Preclinical studies assessing the effects of ncRNAs transferred via EVs in ischemic stroke models.

Authors [reference]ncRNAsEV provenanceRecipient cellIschemia modelPrimary actionMechanism of action
Chen et al. 200circSHOC2Primary astrocytesPrimary neuronsOGD, MCAOCell survival, autophagy inhibitionmiR-7670-3p sponging/ SIRT1 elevation
El Bassit et al. 225lncR MALAT1MSCsHT22 neuronal cellsOxidative stressCell survival and proliferationSRSF2 recruitment, alternative PKCδII splicing, Bcl2 elevation
Zhang et al. 201miR-22-3pMSCsPrimary neuronsOGD, MCAOCell survivalKDM6B downregulation, BMP2/ BMF deactivation
Kuang et al. 202miR-25MSCsPrimary neuronsOGD, MCAOCell survival, autophagy inhibitionp53 downregulation, BNIP3 deactivation, reduced LC3-II abundance
Hou et al. 203miR-26aMSCsPrimary neuronsOGD, MCAOCell survivalKLF9 downregulation, TRAF2 and KLF2 elevation
Li et al. 197miR-26b-5pMSCsSH-SY5Y, PC12, primary microgliaOGD, MCAOCell survival, antiinflammationCH25H downregulation, TLR4 deactivation, inhibition of M1 microglia polarization
Lv et al. 204miR-31MSCsPrimary neuronsOGD, MCAOCell survival, functional neurological recoveryTRAF6 downregulation, IRF5 elevation, Bax/ activated caspase-3 reduction
Wu et al. 205miR-34cAstrocytesN2a neuronal cellsOGD, MCAOCell survivalTLR7 downregulation, NFκB/MAPK deactivation
Xu et al. 206miR-92b-3pPrimary astrocytesPrimary neuronsOGDCell survivalNot determined
Yang et al. 192miR-98Primary neuronsPrimary microgliaOGD, MCAOCell survival, antiinflammationPAFR downregulation, inhibition of microglia phagocytosis
Li et al. 207miR-124M2 BV2 microgliaPrimary astrocytesOGD, MCAOCell survival, inhibition astrocytic activation, proliferation and scar formation, functional neurological recovery, antiinflammationSTAT3 downregulation, GFAP reduction, nestin elevation
Qi et al. 189miR-124-3pPatient serumBV2 microgliaAIS patientsCell survival, antiinflammationERK1/2, PI3K/ Akt and p38 MAPK deactivation
Cui et al. 208miR-126Patient serumSH-SY5Y neuronal cellsRIPCCell survivalDNMT3B downregulation
Geng et al. 190miR-126MSCsNeurons, endothelial cells, BV2 microgliaOGD, MCAOCell survival, functional neurological recovery, anti-inflammation, neurogenesis, angiogenesisReduced microglial activation
Feng et al. 185miR-132MSCsPrimary neuronsOGD, MCAOCell survivalACVR2B downregulation, SMAD2/ c-Jun inhibition
Xiao et al. 209miR-134MSCsPrimary oligodendrocytesOGDCell survivalCaspase-8 deactivation
Liu et al. 210miR-135a-5pM2 microgliaHT-22 neuronal cellsOGD, MCAOCell survival, antiinflammation, autophagy inhibitionTXNIP downregulation, NLRP3 deactivation, reduced IL1β and IL18 formation
Zhang et al. 211miR-137M2 microgliaPrimary neuronsOGD, MCAOCell survival, functional neurological recoveryNOTCH1 downregulation
Deng et al. 212miR-138-5pMSCsPrimary astrocytesOGD, MCAOCell survival, antiinflammationLCN2 downregulation, IL1β, IL6 and TNFα reduction, Bcl2 elevation, Bax reduction
Zhang et al. 213miR-146a-5pMSCsBV2 microgliaOGD, MCAOCell survival, antiinflammation, functional neurological recoveryIRAK1/ TRAF6 deactivation, reduced microglial activation
Song et al. 214miR-181c-3pPrimary neuronsPrimary astrocytesOGD, MCAOCell survival, antiinflammationCXCL1 downregulation, reduced astrocyte activation
Zhong et al. 215miR-206/ miR-1-3pMSCsPrimary neuronsOGDCell survivalRMRP downregulation, PI3K/ Akt/ mTOR deactivation, eNOS elevation
Ai et al. 186miR-221-3pMSCsPrimary neuronsOGD, MCAOCell survival, antiinflammationATF3 downregulation
Zhao et al. 216miR-223-3pMSCsBV2 microgliaOGD, MCAOCell survival, antiinflammation, functional neurological recoveryCysLT2R downregulation, M2 microglia polarization
Bu et al. 217miR-361Primary astrocytesPC12 neuronal cellsOGD, MCAOCell survivalCTSB downregulation, AMPK/ mTOR deactivation
Cai et al. 188miR-542-3pMSCsHA1800 astrocytesOGD, MCAOCell survival, antiinflammationTLR4 downregulation, ROS, IL6, TNFα and MCP1 reduction
Yue et al. 218miR-1290Endothelial cellsPrimary neuronsOGD, MCAOCell survivalNeuronal EV uptake caveolin-1 dependent, increased by hypoxia-ischemia
Ye et al. 219miR-27-3pPatient serumBV2 microgliaMCAOCell death, inflammation, compromised neurological recoveryPPARγ downregulation, microglial overactivation, proinflammatory cytokine formation
Yang et al. 220miR-181bMSCsBrain microvascular endothelial cellsOGD, MCAOAngiogenesisTRPM7 downregulation, HIF1α and VEGF elevation, TIMP3 reduction
Zhang et al. 221miR-210MSCsBrain microvascular endothelial cellsMCAOAngiogenesisIntegrin-β3, VEGF and CD34 elevation
Gregorius et al. 198-MSCsBrain microvascular endothelial cellsOGD, MCAOAngiogenesisHypoxic MSC preconditioning induces angiogenic activity. miR-126-3p, miR-140-5p, let-7c-5p upregulated, miR-186-5p, miR-370-3p, miR-409-3p downregulated in endothelial cells in response to hypoxic but not normoxic MSC EVs
Ling et al. 223miR-26aUrine-derived stem cellsNeural stem cellsOGD, MCAONeurogenesisHDAC6 inhibition
Yang et al. 224miR-124MSCsNeural progenitor cellsFocal cortical ischemiaNeurogenesisNot determined
Yang et al. 191circSCMH1Genetically engineered HEK293T cellsNeurons, glial cells, leukocytesPhotothrombosisNeuronal (=dendritic and synaptic) plasticity, functional neurological recovery, antiinflammationRelease of MeCP2 transcription repression, microglial activation reduced, IL1β, TNFα and IL6 formation reduced
Xin et al. 222miR-17-92MSCsNeurons, glial cellsMCAONeuronal (=axonal, dendritic and synaptic) plasticity, neurogenesis, functional neurological recovery, myelin remodelingPTEN downregulation, PI3K/ Akt/ mTOR activation, GSK3β deactivation
Venkat et al. 187miR-126Endothelial cellsNeurons, endothelial cells, oligodendrocytes, microgliaPhotothrombosisNeuronal (=axonal) plasticity, functional neurological recovery, myelin remodeling, angiogenesisM2 macrophage polarization
Xin et al. 195, 196miR-133bMSCsNeurons, astrocytesMCAONeuronal (=axonal) plasticity, functional neurological recoveryCTGF and RhoA downregulation

Abbreviations: EVs, extracellular vesicles; MSCs, mesenchymal stromal cells; OGD, oxygen-glucose deprivation; MCAO, middle cerebral artery occlusion; AIS, acute ischemic stroke; RIPC, remote ischemic preconditioning.

Table 4

ncRNAs transferred via EVs that have been reported to participate in more than one of the three hypoxic conditions.

ncRNAsModes of action in cancerModes of action in myocardial infarctionModes of action in ischemic stroke
lncR UCA1 Promotes tumor cell proliferation and tumor-associated angiogenesis 102, 106Promotes cardiomyocyte survival and inhibits autophagy 153Not assessed
lncR MALAT1 Promotes tumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion, colony formation and glycolysis; promotes inflammation 123-125, 127Promotes cardiomyocyte and endothelial cell survival 154Promotes neuronal survival 225
lncR NEAT1 Promotes tumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion, metastasis, immune tolerance and chemoresistance 122, 126, 269Promotes cardiomyocyte and fibroblast survival; inhibits fibrosis 149[NEAT1 overexpression promotes neuronal survival via MFN2/ SIRT3 pathway 241; NEAT1 knockdown promotes neuronal survival by inhibiting M1 microglia polarization via Akt/ STAT3 pathway 242
miR-21 Promotes tumor cell proliferation, migration and invasion; induces immune tolerance via M2 macrophage polarization, γδ T cell deactivation and myeloid-derived suppressor cell expansion; induces chemoresistance 93-95, 114, 119Promotes cardiomyocyte and endothelial cell survival; promotes periinfarct angiogenesis and vascular permeability 141, 157, 169[miR-21 agomir promotes neuronal survival 270
miR-24 Induces immune tolerance by T cell deactivation 110Promotes cardiomyocyte survival and cardiac function recovery 147[miR-24 agomir promotes neuronal survival 271
miR-25 Promotes tumor cell migration, invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis 133, 134Promotes cardiomyocyte survival 181Promotes neuronal survival and inhibits autophagy 202
miR-31 Promotes tumor cell migration and invasion 121Promotes periinfarct angiogenesis and cardiac function recovery 170Promotes neuronal survival and functional neurological recovery 204
miR-98 Promotes chemotherapy resistance 132Promotes cardiomyocyte survival; induces cardiac function recovery; induces antiinflammation (reduced macrophage infiltration) 143Promotes neuronal survival and antiinflammation (reduced microglial phagocytosis) 192
miR-125 Promotes tumor cell proliferation; induces immune tolerance via M2 macrophage polarization 95Promotes cardiomyocyte survival and cardiac function recovery 159Not assessed
miR-126 Promotes tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis and growth in some tumors 129, 131; opposite effects in other tumors 130Promotes cardiomyocyte survival and cardiac function recovery; induces antiinflammation (proinflammatory cytokines reduced) and antifibrosis; promotes periinfarct angiogenesis 160, 176Promotes neuronal survival and functional neurological recovery; induces anti-inflammation (reduced microglial activation); induces periinfarct neurogenesis and angiogenesis; induces neuronal (=axonal) plasticity and myelin remodeling 187, 190, 198
miR-133 [miR-133a agomir reduces tumor cell proliferation, survival, migration and epithelial-mesenchymal transition; miR-133a antagomir promotes tumor cell survival and migration 238; EV-associated circ-133, a miR-133a sponge, promotes tumor cell migration and metastasis 136Promotes cardiomyocyte survival and cardiac function recovery 162Promotes neuronal (=axonal) plasticity and functional neurological recovery 195, 196
miR-135 Promotes tumor-associated angiogenesis 101[miR-135a overexpression promotes cardiomyocyte survival and cardiac function recovery and induces antiinflammation via TLR4 downregulation 272Promotes neuronal survival; induces antiinflammation (reduced proinflammatory cytokines); inhibits autophagy 210
miR-146 Promotes tumor cell proliferation and tumor growth 128Promotes cardiomyocyte survival; induces antiinflammation (reduced leukocyte infiltration) and antifibrosis 163Promotes neuronal survival; induces antiinflammation (reduced microglial activation); promotes functional neurological recovery 213
miR-181 Promotes tumor cell proliferation; induces immune tolerance via M2 macrophage polarization 95Not assessedPromotes astrocyte survival; inhibits astrocytic inflammatory response; promotes periinfarct angiogenesis 214, 220
miR-210 Promotes tumor cell migration and invasion; increases tumor-associated angiogenesis 97, 107Promotes cardiomyocyte survival, cardiac function recovery and angiogenesis 177-179Promotes angiogenesis and animal survival 221
miR-223 Induces chemotherapy resistance 113Promotes angiogenesis; induces antiinflammation and antifibrosis 180Promotes neuronal survival; induces antiinflammation (M2 microglia polarization); promotes functional neurological recovery 216
miR-328 Promotes tumor cell proliferation, migration, invasion and epithelial - mesenchymal transition; promotes tumor growth 105Augments cardiomyocyte death and apoptosis 148[miR-328-3p agomir augments neuronal death, neurological deficits, brain neutrophil invasion and proinflammatory cytokine levels 239
miR-361 Promotes tumor cell proliferation and survival; promotes tumor growth 103[Cardiac-specific miR-361 overexpression reduces cardiomyocyte survival and increases mitochondrial fission; miR361 has knockdown with opposite effects 240Promotes neuronal survival 217
miR-494 Promotes tumor-associated angiogenesis and tumor growth 109Promotes periinfarct angiogenesis 173[miR-494 agomir promotes neuronal survival, axonal plasticity and neurological recovery via HDAC3 downregulation 193; miR-494 antagomir promotes neuronal survival and neurological recovery by reducing Th1 helper cell shift and decreasing brain neutrophil infiltrates via HDAC2 upregulation 194, 243

For ncRNAs without studies examining the role of EV-associated ncRNAs, data from ncRNA agomir, antagomir, overexpression or knockdown studies are shown in brackets in the table.

Abbreviations: EVs, extracellular vesicles; lncR, long non-coding RNA; miR, microRNA.

  266 in total

1.  The RNA-Binding Protein SYNCRIP Is a Component of the Hepatocyte Exosomal Machinery Controlling MicroRNA Sorting.

Authors:  Laura Santangelo; Giorgio Giurato; Carla Cicchini; Claudia Montaldo; Carmine Mancone; Roberta Tarallo; Cecilia Battistelli; Tonino Alonzi; Alessandro Weisz; Marco Tripodi
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 2.  Extracellular miRNAs: From Biomarkers to Mediators of Physiology and Disease.

Authors:  Marcelo A Mori; Raissa G Ludwig; Ruben Garcia-Martin; Bruna B Brandão; C Ronald Kahn
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 27.287

3.  Exosomal miR-135b shed from hypoxic multiple myeloma cells enhances angiogenesis by targeting factor-inhibiting HIF-1.

Authors:  Tomohiro Umezu; Hiroko Tadokoro; Kenko Azuma; Seiichiro Yoshizawa; Kazuma Ohyashiki; Junko H Ohyashiki
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 4.  HIF in the heart: development, metabolism, ischemia, and atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Andrew Kekūpaʻa Knutson; Allison L Williams; William A Boisvert; Ralph V Shohet
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 19.456

5.  Hypoxia induced exosomal circRNA promotes metastasis of Colorectal Cancer via targeting GEF-H1/RhoA axis.

Authors:  Haiou Yang; Haiyang Zhang; Yuchong Yang; Xinyi Wang; Ting Deng; Rui Liu; Tao Ning; Ming Bai; Hongli Li; Kegan Zhu; Jialu Li; Qian Fan; Guoguang Ying; Yi Ba
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 11.556

Review 6.  Cross-talk between cancer cells and their neighbors via miRNA in extracellular vesicles: an emerging player in cancer metastasis.

Authors:  Akiko Kogure; Nobuyoshi Kosaka; Takahiro Ochiya
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2019-01-12       Impact factor: 8.410

Review 7.  Crosstalk between exosomes and autophagy: A review of molecular mechanisms and therapies.

Authors:  Huifang Xing; Jin Tan; Yuyang Miao; Yingmei Lv; Qiang Zhang
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 5.310

8.  Extracellular vesicle release and uptake by the liver under normo- and hyperlipidemia.

Authors:  Edit I Buzás; Viola Tamási; Krisztina Németh; Zoltán Varga; Dorina Lenzinger; Tamás Visnovitz; Anna Koncz; Nikolett Hegedűs; Ágnes Kittel; Domokos Máthé; Krisztián Szigeti; Péter Lőrincz; Clodagh O'Neill; Róisín Dwyer; Zhonglin Liu
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 9.261

Review 9.  Hypoxia and metabolic adaptation of cancer cells.

Authors:  K L Eales; K E R Hollinshead; D A Tennant
Journal:  Oncogenesis       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 7.485

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.