| Literature DB >> 35965298 |
Veronia S Nazim1, Ghada M El-Sayed1, Sawsan M Amer1, Ahmed H Nadim2.
Abstract
Eco-friendly stannic oxide nanoparticles functionalized with gallic acid (SnO2/GA NP) were synthesized and employed as a novel photocatalyst for the degradation of citalopram, a commonly prescribed antidepressant drug. SnO2/GA NP were characterized using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller measurements and X-ray diffraction. A validated RP-HPLC assay was developed to monitor citalopram concentration in the presence of its degradation products. Full factorial design (24) was conducted to investigate the effect of irradiation time, pH, SnO2/GA NP loading and initial citalopram concentration on the efficiency of the photodegradation process. Citalopram initial concentration was found to be the most significant parameter followed by irradiation time and pH, respectively. At optimum conditions, 88.43 ± 0.7% degradation of citalopram (25.00 µg/mL) was obtained in 1 h using UV light (1.01 mW/cm2). Citalopram kinetics of degradation followed pseudo-first order rate with Kobs and t0.5 of - 0.037 min-1 and 18.73 min, respectively. The optimized protocol was successfully applied for treatment of water samples collected during different cleaning validation cycles of citalopram production lines. The reusability of SnO2/GA NP was studied for 3 cycles without significant loss in activity. This approach would provide a green and economic alternative for pharmaceutical wastewater treatment of organic pollutants.Entities:
Keywords: Cleaning validation; Gallic acid; Pharmaceutical wastewater treatment; Photocatalytic degradation; SnO2 nanoparticles; UV irradiation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35965298 PMCID: PMC9376129 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-22447-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 5.190
Fig. 1Chemical structure of Citalopram
Actual factors and the levels used in two-level full factorial design experiment
| Factor name | Factor code | Low level (− 1) | High level (+ 1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time (h) | A | 1 | 2 |
| SnO2/GA loading (mg/mL) | B | 0.5 | 1 |
| pH | C | 7 | 9 |
| Initial CIT concentration (µg/mL) | D | 25 | 50 |
Design matrix for 24 full factorial experimental design constructed for photocatalytic degradation of CIT and results obtained through RP-HPLC assay
| Run no | Factor code | RP-HPLC | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | CIT concentration (µg/mL) | % Photodegradation | |
| 1 | + 1 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 2.51 | 89.97 |
| 2 | + 1 | + 1 | − 1 | + 1 | 8.85 | 82.30 |
| 3 | − 1 | + 1 | + 1 | + 1 | 16.08 | 67.85 |
| 4 | + 1 | − 1 | + 1 | − 1 | 3.37 | 86.52 |
| 5 | − 1 | + 1 | + 1 | − 1 | 5.08 | 79.68 |
| 6 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | + 1 | 13.80 | 72.41 |
| 7 | + 1 | + 1 | + 1 | − 1 | 3.26 | 86.97 |
| 8 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 2.89 | 88.43 |
| 9 | + 1 | − 1 | + 1 | + 1 | 12.64 | 74.73 |
| 10 | − 1 | + 1 | − 1 | + 1 | 15.31 | 69.38 |
| 11 | + 1 | + 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 2.10 | 91.61 |
| 12 | − 1 | + 1 | − 1 | − 1 | 4.41 | 82.35 |
| 13 | − 1 | − 1 | + 1 | + 1 | 17.46 | 65.09 |
| 14 | + 1 | + 1 | + 1 | + 1 | 11.11 | 77.79 |
| 15 | − 1 | − 1 | + 1 | − 1 | 7.15 | 71.42 |
| 16 | + 1 | − 1 | − 1 | + 1 | 11.75 | 76.50 |
Fig. 2Transmission electron micrograph of SnO2/GA NP
Fig. 3FT-IR spectra of (A) pure GA and (B) SnO2/GA NP
Fig. 4(A) XRD graph of SnO2/GA NP. (B) Nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms surface area of SnO2/GA NP
Summary of system suitability and validation parameters for the developed RP-HPLC assay
| System suitability parameters a | |
| Retention time (min) | 3.84 |
| Asymmetric factor ( | 0.72 |
| Selectivity ( | 1.30 |
| Resolution ( | 4.93 |
| Capacity factor ( | 1.13 |
| Number of theoretical plates ( | 7572 |
| Height equivalent to a theoretical plate (HETP) | 0.03 |
| Validation parameters | |
| Accuracy (mean ± SD)b | 100.85 ± 1.01 |
| Precision (%RSD) | |
| Repeatability c | 0.525 |
| Intermediate precision d | 1.747 |
| Linearity | |
| Regression equation | y = 75.667x + 84.865 |
| Correlation coefficient ( | 0.9998 |
| Range (µg/mL) | 0.50—25.00 |
| LOD (µg/mL) e | 0.01 |
| LOQ (µg/mL) f | 0.24 |
| Robustness (mean ± SD) g | |
| Asymmetric factor ( | 0.55 ± 0.01 |
| Capacity factor ( | 1.15 ± 0.17 |
aReference values for HPLC parameters: k` ≥ 1, α ≥ 1, Rs ≥ 1.5, T ≤ 2 and N ≥ 2000
bAverage percentage recovery of nine determinations over three concentration levels
cThe intraday, average of nine determinations over three concentration levels repeated three times within the same day
dThe interday, average of nine determinations over three concentration levels repeated three times over three different days
eLOD determined via calculations, 3.3 (SD of the response/slope)
fLOD determined via calculations, 10 (SD of the response/slope)
gAverage of nine determinations over three concentration levels
Fig. 5HPLC chromatogram of (A) CIT sample (50.00 μg/mL) not subjected to UV irradiation. (B) CIT degradation upon exposure to UV light intensity (1.01 mW/cm2) at pH 7.0 for 1 h in the absence of SnO2/GA NP. (C) CIT photocatalytic degradation upon exposure to UV light intensity (1.01 mW/cm2) at pH 7.0 for 1 h in the presence of 0.50 mg/mL SnO2/GA NP
Fig. 6Adsorption isotherm of CIT on SnO2/GA NP using (A) Langmuir model and (B) Freundlich model
Adsorption isotherm parameters of CIT on SnO2/GA NP
| Langmuir isotherm constants | Freundlich isotherm constants |
|---|---|
Fig. 7(A) Pareto chart of the standardized effects of single and interaction factors on CIT photodegradation. (B) Normal plot of the standardized effects of single and interaction factors on CIT photodegradation
Fig. 8Contour plot for pH versus (A) CIT initial concentration (hold values: UV irradiation time 1 h, SnO2/GA NP loading 0.50 mg/mL). (B) UV irradiation time (hold values: initial concentration 25.00 μg/mL, SnO2/GA NP loading 0.50 mg/mL)
Summary of reported methods for SnO2 photocatalysis
| SnO2 NP | Studied model | Degradation efficiency | Comment | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SnO2/GA | Citalopram | 88% in 60 min | - Green simple synthesis - Low-watt UV consumption (1.01 mW/cm2) | This work |
| SnO2 NP (using chitosan) | Eriochrome Black T | 77% in 270 min | - High-watt UV lamp was used (500 W) | (Najjar et al. |
| SnO2 quantum dots encapsulated carbon nanoflakes | Bisphenol A | 98% in 60 min | - Green multi-step synthesis - Synergistic adsorption and photodegradation process - Relatively high-watt UV consumption (3.47 mW/cm2) | (Mohanta and Ahmaruzzaman |
| AgBr/SnO2 nanocomposite | Rhodamine B and caffeic acid | 95% in 45 min | - High cost of Ag used - High-watt UV consumption (90,000 mW/cm2) | (Puga et al. |
| Flower-like SnO2 nanocomposites | Methyl orange and rhodamine B | 95% in 90 min | - Hazardous chemicals were used - High-watt UV lamp was used (250 W) | (Lu et al. |
| Strontium-doped SnO2 NP | - Methylene blue - Dinoseb | 94% in 60 min 82% in 120 min | - Hazardous chemicals were used - High-watt UV lamp was used (125 W) | (Ahmed et al. |
| Quasi-monodispersed SnO2 microspheres | Rhodamine B | 98% in 210 min | - Hazardous chemicals were used - High-watt UV lamp was used (300 W) | (Zhu et al. |
Fig. 9Kinetics profile of CIT photodegradation with initial CIT concentration 25.00 µg/mL at pH 7.0 with 0.50 mg/mL SnO2/GA NP