Srikanth Boinapally1, Alla Lisok1, Gabriela Lofland1, Il Minn1, Yu Yan1, Zirui Jiang1, Min Jay Shin1, Vanessa F Merino1, Lei Zheng2, Cory Brayton3, Martin G Pomper4,5, Sangeeta Ray Banerjee6,7. 1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Baltimore, MD, USA. 2. Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA. 3. Department of Molecular and Comparative Pathobiology, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Baltimore, MD, USA. mpomper@jhmi.edu. 5. Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA. mpomper@jhmi.edu. 6. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Baltimore, MD, USA. sray9@jhmi.edu. 7. Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA. sray9@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We developed a theranostic radiopharmaceutical that engages two key cell surface proteases, fibroblast activation protein alpha (FAP) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), each frequently overexpressed within the tumor microenvironment (TME). The latter is also expressed in most prostate tumor epithelium. To engage a broader spectrum of cancers for imaging and therapy, we conjugated small-molecule FAP and PSMA-targeting moieties using an optimized linker to provide 64Cu-labeled compounds. METHODS: We synthesized FP-L1 and FP-L2 using two linker constructs attaching the FAP and PSMA-binding pharmacophores. We determined in vitro inhibition constants (Ki) for FAP and PSMA. Cell uptake assays and flow cytometry were conducted in human glioma (U87), melanoma (SK-MEL-24), prostate cancer (PSMA + PC3 PIP and PSMA - PC3 flu), and clear cell renal cell carcinoma lines (PSMA + /PSMA - 786-O). Quantitative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and tissue biodistribution studies were performed using U87, SK-MEL-24, PSMA + PC3 PIP, and PSMA + 786-O experimental xenograft models and the KPC genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: 64Cu-FP-L1 and 64Cu-FP-L2 were produced in high radiochemical yields (> 98%) and molar activities (> 19 MBq/nmol). Ki values were in the nanomolar range for both FAP and PSMA. PET imaging and biodistribution studies revealed high and specific targeting of 64Cu-FP-L1 and 64Cu-FP-L2 for FAP and PSMA. 64Cu-FP-L1 displayed more favorable pharmacokinetics than 64Cu-FP-L2. In the U87 tumor model at 2 h post-injection, tumor uptake of 64Cu-FP-L1 (10.83 ± 1.02%ID/g) was comparable to 64Cu-FAPI-04 (9.53 ± 2.55%ID/g). 64Cu-FP-L1 demonstrated high retention 5.34 ± 0.29%ID/g at 48 h in U87 tumor. Additionally, 64Cu-FP-L1 showed high retention in PSMA + PC3 PIP tumor (12.06 ± 0.78%ID/g at 2 h and 10.51 ± 1.82%ID/g at 24 h). CONCLUSIONS: 64Cu-FP-L1 demonstrated high and specific tumor targeting of FAP and PSMA. This compound should enable imaging of lesions expressing FAP, PSMA, or both on the tumor cell surface or within the TME. FP-L1 can readily be converted into a theranostic for the management of heterogeneous tumors.
PURPOSE: We developed a theranostic radiopharmaceutical that engages two key cell surface proteases, fibroblast activation protein alpha (FAP) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), each frequently overexpressed within the tumor microenvironment (TME). The latter is also expressed in most prostate tumor epithelium. To engage a broader spectrum of cancers for imaging and therapy, we conjugated small-molecule FAP and PSMA-targeting moieties using an optimized linker to provide 64Cu-labeled compounds. METHODS: We synthesized FP-L1 and FP-L2 using two linker constructs attaching the FAP and PSMA-binding pharmacophores. We determined in vitro inhibition constants (Ki) for FAP and PSMA. Cell uptake assays and flow cytometry were conducted in human glioma (U87), melanoma (SK-MEL-24), prostate cancer (PSMA + PC3 PIP and PSMA - PC3 flu), and clear cell renal cell carcinoma lines (PSMA + /PSMA - 786-O). Quantitative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and tissue biodistribution studies were performed using U87, SK-MEL-24, PSMA + PC3 PIP, and PSMA + 786-O experimental xenograft models and the KPC genetically engineered mouse model of pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: 64Cu-FP-L1 and 64Cu-FP-L2 were produced in high radiochemical yields (> 98%) and molar activities (> 19 MBq/nmol). Ki values were in the nanomolar range for both FAP and PSMA. PET imaging and biodistribution studies revealed high and specific targeting of 64Cu-FP-L1 and 64Cu-FP-L2 for FAP and PSMA. 64Cu-FP-L1 displayed more favorable pharmacokinetics than 64Cu-FP-L2. In the U87 tumor model at 2 h post-injection, tumor uptake of 64Cu-FP-L1 (10.83 ± 1.02%ID/g) was comparable to 64Cu-FAPI-04 (9.53 ± 2.55%ID/g). 64Cu-FP-L1 demonstrated high retention 5.34 ± 0.29%ID/g at 48 h in U87 tumor. Additionally, 64Cu-FP-L1 showed high retention in PSMA + PC3 PIP tumor (12.06 ± 0.78%ID/g at 2 h and 10.51 ± 1.82%ID/g at 24 h). CONCLUSIONS: 64Cu-FP-L1 demonstrated high and specific tumor targeting of FAP and PSMA. This compound should enable imaging of lesions expressing FAP, PSMA, or both on the tumor cell surface or within the TME. FP-L1 can readily be converted into a theranostic for the management of heterogeneous tumors.
Authors: Ken Herrmann; Markus Schwaiger; Jason S Lewis; Stephen B Solomon; Barbara J McNeil; Michael Baumann; Sanjiv S Gambhir; Hedvig Hricak; Ralph Weissleder Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Sophia Spatz; Yuri Tolkach; Klaus Jung; Carsten Stephan; Jonas Busch; Bernhard Ralla; Anja Rabien; Georg Feldmann; Peter Brossart; Ralph A Bundschuh; Hojjat Ahmadzadehfar; Markus Essler; Marieta Toma; Stefan C Müller; Jörg Ellinger; Stefan Hauser; Glen Kristiansen Journal: J Urol Date: 2017-08-19 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Michael S Hofman; Louise Emmett; Shahneen Sandhu; Amir Iravani; Anthony M Joshua; Jeffrey C Goh; David A Pattison; Thean Hsiang Tan; Ian D Kirkwood; Siobhan Ng; Roslyn J Francis; Craig Gedye; Natalie K Rutherford; Andrew Weickhardt; Andrew M Scott; Sze-Ting Lee; Edmond M Kwan; Arun A Azad; Shakher Ramdave; Andrew D Redfern; William Macdonald; Alex Guminski; Edward Hsiao; Wei Chua; Peter Lin; Alison Y Zhang; Margaret M McJannett; Martin R Stockler; John A Violet; Scott G Williams; Andrew J Martin; Ian D Davis Journal: Lancet Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Steven J Cohen; R Katherine Alpaugh; Irma Palazzo; Neal J Meropol; André Rogatko; Zhiheng Xu; John P Hoffman; Louis M Weiner; Jonathan D Cheng Journal: Pancreas Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Alec Paschalis; Beshara Sheehan; Ruth Riisnaes; Daniel Nava Rodrigues; Bora Gurel; Claudia Bertan; Ana Ferreira; Maryou B K Lambros; George Seed; Wei Yuan; David Dolling; Jon C Welti; Antje Neeb; Semini Sumanasuriya; Pasquale Rescigno; Diletta Bianchini; Nina Tunariu; Suzanne Carreira; Adam Sharp; Wim Oyen; Johann S de Bono Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2019-07-22 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: M J M Uijen; Y H W Derks; W A M van Gemert; J Nagarajah; R I J Merkx; M G M Schilham; J Roosen; B M Privé; S A M van Lith; C M L van Herpen; M Gotthardt; S Heskamp Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2021-06-12 Impact factor: 9.236