Sascha Ellington1, Christine K Olson2. 1. Field Support Branch, Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA. Electronic address: sellington@cdc.gov. 2. Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Pregnant people with COVID-19 are at increased risk of severe illness and death compared with non-pregnant females of reproductive age (aged 15–49 years). Additionally, COVID-19 during pregnancy is associated with increased risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm birth and stillbirth. When mRNA COVID-19 vaccines first became available in December, 2020, safety data in pregnancy were limited because pregnant people were excluded from pre-authorisation clinical trials. Lack of data and safety concerns contributed to initially low uptake among pregnant people, which continues to be lower than uptake among non-pregnant females of reproductive age. To address this issue, public health researchers from across the globe have been assessing the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy.In The Lancet Infectious Diseases, Manish Sadarangani and colleagues report findings from the Canadian National Vaccine Safety (CANVAS) Network assessing adverse events in the week following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people and compare with both unvaccinated pregnant people and vaccinated non-pregnant females. In this large prospective study, the authors found that 226 (4·0%) of 5597 vaccinated pregnant people reported a significant health event (new or worsening health event sufficient to cause work or school absenteeism, medical consultation, or prevent daily activities) after dose 1 of primary series mRNA COVID-19 (mRNA-1273 [Moderna] or BNT162b2 [Pfizer BioNTech]) vaccination, with similar adverse events for both vaccines. Additionally, 227 (7·3%) of 3108 vaccinated pregnant people reported a significant health event after dose 2 of a primary series, and this did differ by vaccine type, with 147 (12·1%) of 1216 reporting a significant health event after dose 2 of mRNA-1273 and 80 (4·2%) of 1892 after dose 2 of BNT162b2.The most common significant health events following both doses in pregnant people were malaise or myalgia (66 [3·5%] of 1892 for two doses of BNT162b2 and 139 [11·4%] of 1216 for two doses of mRNA-1273) and headache or migraine (41 [2·1%] of 1892 for two doses of BNT162b2 and 103 [8·5%] of 1216 for two doses of mRNA-1273). Serious health events, defined as any event resulting in emergency department visit or hospital admission in the previous 7 days, were rare (<1·0% in all groups). The most frequently reported adverse pregnancy outcome was a combined outcome of miscarriage and stillbirth and was reported at a similar frequency in vaccinated (81 [1·4%] of 5597) and unvaccinated (seven [2·1%] of 339) pregnant people. In a multivariable analysis among those vaccinated with mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2, pregnancy was associated with reduced odds of significant adverse events reported in the week following receipt of each dose (any mRNA dose 1: aOR 0·63 [95% CI 0·55–0·72]; any mRNA dose 2: aOR 0·62 [0·54–0·71]). Additionally, pregnancy was not associated with increased risk of serious adverse events following immunisation after either dose of BNT162b2 or dose 1 of mRNA-1273, but was associated with increased risk following dose 2 of mRNA-1273 (aOR 2·3 [95% CI 1·2–4·2]). Among 1216 pregnant females who received dose 2 of mRNA-1273, 11 (0·9%) reported a serious adverse event within 7 days.These findings are consistent with and add to the growing body of evidence that COVID-19 mRNA vaccines are safe during pregnancy. In the USA, data from several vaccine safety monitoring systems, including the Vaccine Adverse Event Report System (VAERS), v-safe, the v-safe COVID-19 Vaccine Pregnancy Registry, and the Vaccine Safety Datalink, have similarly not detected any safety concerns for people who received an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in pregnancy or for their infants.5, 6, 7 In a large study among people vaccinated early in pregnancy, reactogenicity was similar to current findings reported by Sadarangani and colleagues. In VAERS, a passive vaccine safety monitoring system co-managed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), no concerning patterns of negative outcomes among pregnant people or their infants were detected following COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy, but VAERS did not have a control group. Therefore, this finding by Sadarangani and colleagues which includes an unvaccinated pregnant control group is important. As observed by Sadarangani and colleagues, previous studies have found that COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of miscarriage or stillbirth.In addition to being safe in pregnancy, other studies have shown that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are effective at reducing the risk of severe illness in pregnant people and the risk of COVID-19 hospital admission among their infants younger than 6 months.6, 8 Protection in infants born to people vaccinated during pregnancy is particularly important because while mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were approved by the FDA on June 17, 2022, and recommended by the CDC on June 18, 2022, for children aged between 6 months and 5 years, there are not currently any vaccines available for infants younger than six months.COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people continues to be lower than among non-pregnant females of reproductive age. Given the risks of severe illness and adverse pregnancy outcomes, continuing to collect and disseminate data on the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy and encouraging health-care providers to promote vaccination during all trimesters of pregnancy is imperative.The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We declare no competing interests.
Authors: Katherine E Fleming-Dutra; Megan Wallace; Danielle L Moulia; Evelyn Twentyman; Lauren E Roper; Elisha Hall; Ruth Link-Gelles; Monica Godfrey; Kate R Woodworth; Tara C Anderson; Amy B Rubis; Edwin Shanley; Jefferson M Jones; Rebecca L Morgan; Oliver Brooks; H Keipp Talbot; Grace M Lee; Beth P Bell; Matthew Daley; Sarah Meyer; Sara E Oliver Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2022-07-01 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Smriti Prasad; Erkan Kalafat; Helena Blakeway; Rosemary Townsend; Pat O'Brien; Edward Morris; Tim Draycott; Shakila Thangaratinam; Kirsty Le Doare; Shamez Ladhani; Peter von Dadelszen; Laura A Magee; Paul Heath; Asma Khalil Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 17.694
Authors: Hilda Razzaghi; David Yankey; Kushagra Vashist; Peng-Jun Lu; Jennifer L Kriss; Kimberly H Nguyen; James Lee; Sascha Ellington; Kara Polen; Kimberly Bonner; Tara C Jatlaoui; Elisabeth Wilhelm; Dana Meaney-Delman; James A Singleton Journal: Vaccine Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 4.169
Authors: Tom T Shimabukuro; Shin Y Kim; Tanya R Myers; Pedro L Moro; Titilope Oduyebo; Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos; Paige L Marquez; Christine K Olson; Ruiling Liu; Karen T Chang; Sascha R Ellington; Veronica K Burkel; Ashley N Smoots; Caitlin J Green; Charles Licata; Bicheng C Zhang; Meghna Alimchandani; Adamma Mba-Jonas; Stacey W Martin; Julianne M Gee; Dana M Meaney-Delman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Natasha B Halasa; Samantha M Olson; Mary A Staat; Margaret M Newhams; Ashley M Price; Pia S Pannaraj; Julie A Boom; Leila C Sahni; Kathleen Chiotos; Melissa A Cameron; Katherine E Bline; Charlotte V Hobbs; Aline B Maddux; Bria M Coates; Kelly N Michelson; Sabrina M Heidemann; Katherine Irby; Ryan A Nofziger; Elizabeth H Mack; Laura Smallcomb; Stephanie P Schwartz; Tracie C Walker; Shira J Gertz; Jennifer E Schuster; Satoshi Kamidani; Keiko M Tarquinio; Samina S Bhumbra; Mia Maamari; Janet R Hume; Hillary Crandall; Emily R Levy; Matt S Zinter; Tamara T Bradford; Heidi R Flori; Melissa L Cullimore; Michele Kong; Natalie Z Cvijanovich; Suzanne M Gilboa; Kara N Polen; Angela P Campbell; Adrienne G Randolph; Manish M Patel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 176.079