| Literature DB >> 35962376 |
Gangqin Li1, Aldo Alberto Conti2, Changjian Qiu3, Wanjie Tang4,5.
Abstract
Both the rate of mobile phone addiction and suicidality among adolescents have increased during the pandemic lockdown. However, the relationship between mobile phone addiction and suicide risk and the underlying psychological mechanisms remains unknown. This study examined the associations between mobile phone addiction in adolescents during the first month of lockdown and the suicide risk in the subsequent five months. A two-wave short-term longitudinal web-based survey was conducted on 1609 senior high school students (mean age = 16.53 years, SD = 0.97 years; 63.5% female). At Time 1 (T1), the severity of mobile phone addiction and basic demographic information was collected from Feb 24 to 28, 2020 in Sichuan Province, China (at the pandemic's peak). Five months later, between July 11 and July 23 (Time 2, T2), mobile phone addiction, daytime sleepiness, depression, and suicidality were measured within the past five months. The regression analysis revealed that mobile phone addiction during quarantine directly predicted suicidality within the next five months, even after controlling for the effect of depression and daytime sleepiness. Meanwhile, mobile phone addiction at T1 also indirectly predicted suicidality at T2, with depression and daytime sleepiness mediating this association. Programs targeting improvement of daytime sleepiness and depressive symptoms may be particularly effective in reducing suicide risk among adolescents with mobile phone addiction.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19; Daytime sleepiness; Depression; Mobile phone addiction; Suicidality
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35962376 PMCID: PMC9372972 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13931-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Public Health ISSN: 1471-2458 Impact factor: 4.135
Demographic and exposure variables in a sample of Chinese adolescents (N = 1609)
| Variables | N | % |
|---|---|---|
| Total | 1609 | 100 |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 588 | 36.5 |
| Female | 1021 | 63.5 |
| Age(yr) | ||
| ≤ 15 | 243 | 15.1 |
| 16 | 526 | 32.7 |
| 17 | 552 | 34.3 |
| 18 | 288 | 17.9 |
| Grade | ||
| 10 | 485 | 30.1 |
| 11 | 692 | 43.0 |
| 12 | 432 | 26.9 |
| Only-child status | ||
| Yes | 397 | 24.7 |
| No | 1212 | 75.3 |
| Someone in the community is infected | ||
| Yes | 92 | 5.7 |
| No | 1517 | 94.3 |
| A relative or friend is infected | ||
| Yes | 13 | 0.8 |
| No | 1596 | 99.2 |
| A relative or friend died from the infection | ||
| Yes | 3 | 0.2 |
| No | 1606 | 99.8 |
| Smoker | ||
| Yes | 31 | 19.3 |
| No | 1578 | 80.7 |
| Drinker | ||
| Yes | 93 | 5.8 |
| No | 1516 | 94.2 |
Suicidality stratified by demographic and exposure variables (N = 1609)
| Variables | Suicidality (n) | Prevalence(%) | χ2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | 20.0 | ||
| Gender | 0.12 | ||
| Male | 115 | 19.6 | |
| Female | 207 | 20.3 | |
| Age(yr) | 3.44 | ||
| ≤ 15 | 38 | 15.6 | |
| 16 | 110 | 20.9 | |
| 17 | 115 | 20.8 | |
| 18 | 59 | 20.5 | |
| Grade | 2.68 | ||
| 10 | 85 | 17.5 | |
| 11 | 146 | 21.1 | |
| 12 | 91 | 21.1 | |
| Only-child status | 0.05 | ||
| Yes | 81 | 20.4 | |
| No | 241 | 19.9 | |
| Someone in the community is infected | 0.48 | ||
| Yes | 21 | 22.8 | |
| No | 301 | 19.8 | |
| A relative or friend is infected | 1.24 | ||
| Yes | 1 | 7.7 | |
| No | 321 | 20.1 | |
| A relative or friend died from the infection | 0.75 | ||
| Yes | 0 | 0 | |
| No | 322 | 20.0 | |
| Smoker | 2.96** | ||
| Yes | 10 | 32.3 | |
| No | 312 | 19.8 | |
| Drinker | 0.41 | ||
| Yes | 21 | 22.6 | |
| No | 301 | 19.9 |
**p < 0.01
Correlations of main study variables (N = 1609)
| Variable | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. MPA_T1 | 41.60 | 12.59 | 1 | |||
| 2. DS_T2 | 13.45 | 5.80 | 0.316** | 1 | ||
| 3. Depression_T2 | 4.22 | 3.73 | 0.312** | 0.364** | 1 | |
| 4. Suicidality_T2 | 4.68 | 2.88 | 0.289** | 0.311** | 0.469** | 1 |
**p < 0.01
MPA_T1 Time 1 smartphone addiction score, DS_T2 Time 2 daytime sleepiness score, Depression_T2 Time 2 depression score, Suicidality_T2 Time 2 suicidality score
Results of the Chain Mediating Effect with daytime sleepiness and depression as mediators between mobile phone addiction and suicidality
| Path | Effect | SE | p | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPA_T1(X) → DS_T2(M1) → Depression_T2(M2) → Suicidality_T2(Y) | ||||
| Total effect of X on Y | 0.289 | 0.024 | < 0.001 | 0.242–0.336 |
| Direct effect of X on Y | 0.129 | 0.023 | < 0.001 | 0.083–0.174 |
| Indirect effect of X on Y(Total) | 0.160 | 0.014 | - | 0.133–0.189 |
| Indirect effect of X on Y(Via M1) | 0.042 | 0.010 | - | 0.023–0.062 |
| Indirect effect of X on Y(Via M2) | 0.083 | 0.012 | - | 0.059–0.110 |
| Indirect effect of X on Y(Via M1 → M2) | 0.036 | 0.006 | - | 0.026–0.047 |
| X → M1 | 0.316 | 0.026 | < 0.001 | 0.265–0.367 |
| M1 → Y | 0.131 | 0.030 | < 0.001 | 0.073–0.189 |
| X → M2 | 0.218 | 0.027 | < 0.001 | 0.162–0.271 |
| M2 → Y | 0.381 | 0.035 | < 0.001 | 0.316–0.451 |
| M1 → M2 | 0.295 | 0.029 | < 0.001 | 0.238–0.353 |
Note. MPA Mobile phone addiction, DS Daytime sleepiness
Fig. 1The standardized path coefficients in chain mediation model. MPA_T1: Time 1 smartphone addiction score; DS_T2: Time 2 daytime sleepiness score; Depression_T2: Time 2 depression score; Suicidality_T2: Time 2 suicidality score
Stepwise regression of suicidal risk with age, gender, COVID-19 related exposure, daytime sleepiness, depressive symptoms, and MPAI in adolescents (N=1609)
| Independent variable | Step 1: Adjusted | Step 2: Adjusted | Step 3: Adjusted | Step 4: Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | Beta | Beta | Beta | |
| Age | 0.019 | 0.019 | 0.021 | 0.021 |
| Gender | 0.026 | 0.025 | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Someone in the community is infected | 0.010 | 0.008 | 0.011 | |
| A relative or friend is infected | -0.037 | -0.030 | -0.035 | |
| A relative or friend died from the infection | -0.025 | -0.018 | -0.019 | |
| Daytime sleepiness_T2 | 0.410*** | 0.381*** | ||
| Depression_T2 | 0.160*** | 0.130*** | ||
| MPAI_T1 | 0.130*** |
Abbreviations: MPA_T1 Time1 mobile phone addiction score, Daytime sleepiness _T2 Time 2 daytime sleepiness score, Depression_T2 Time 2 depression score
***p < 0.001