Literature DB >> 35962285

Dancing to a different tune: changing reproductive seasonality in an introduced chital deer population.

Catherine L Kelly1, Lin Schwarzkopf2, Iain J Gordon3,4,5,6, Anthony Pople7, David L Kelly8, Ben T Hirsch2,9.   

Abstract

Male and female reproductive behaviour is typically synchronised. In species such as those in the family Cervidae, reproductive timing is often cued by photoperiod, although in females, it can be dependent on body condition. When a species is introduced to a novel environment, the environment changes, or responses of the sexes to such cues differ, asynchronous reproductive behaviour between males and females may occur. We investigated the seasonality of reproductive behaviour in introduced chital deer in northern Queensland by examining male antler phase in relation to female conception rates. We then analysed the influence of different variables likely to affect the timing of male and female reproductive physiology. The lowest percentage of chital in hard antler in any 1 month in this study was 35% (Fig. 1), but the average value was closer to 50%, thus there was a seasonal peak in antler phase linked with photoperiod. Females conceived at any time of year, but were strongly influenced by the amount of rainfall 3 months prior to conception. This resulted in varying conception peaks year-to-year that often did not correspond to the male's peak in hard antler. In this system, a proportion of males and females were physiologically and behaviourally ready to mate at any time of the year. We predict that differences in the timing of the peaks between the males and females will lead to increased reproductive skew (variation in reproductive success among individual males). This pattern may select for different mating strategies or physiological mechanisms to increase reproductive success. Fig. 1 The average percentage of male chital deer in hard antler by month from 2014 to 2019 in north Queensland. Values above the bars indicate the total number of males that were sampled in each month and the error bars indicate the standard error. In the month with the lowest % males in hard antler in the entire study (November, 2017), 35% of males were in hard antler.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deer; Invasive species; Reproductive physiology; Reproductive skew; Seasonality

Year:  2022        PMID: 35962285     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-022-05232-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.298


  23 in total

Review 1.  Storage of semen and artificial insemination in deer.

Authors:  G W Asher; D K Berg; G Evans
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2000-08-18       Impact factor: 2.145

2.  Mating system and reproductive skew in the black rhinoceros.

Authors:  J N Garnier; M W Bruford; B Goossens
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Seasonal timing of sperm production in roe deer: interrelationship among changes in ejaculate parameters, morphology and function of testis and accessory glands.

Authors:  F Goeritz; M Quest; A Wagener; M Fassbender; A Broich; T B Hildebrandt; R R Hofmann; S Blottner
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 4.  Reproductive cycles of deer.

Authors:  G W Asher
Journal:  Anim Reprod Sci       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 2.145

5.  Considerations for assessing model averaging of regression coefficients.

Authors:  Katharine M Banner; Megan D Higgs
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  How does climate change influence demographic processes of widespread species? Lessons from the comparative analysis of contrasted populations of roe deer.

Authors:  Jean-Michel Gaillard; A J Mark Hewison; François Klein; Floriane Plard; Mathieu Douhard; Raziel Davison; Christophe Bonenfant
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 9.492

7.  Getting the timing right: antler growth phenology and sexual selection in a wild red deer population.

Authors:  Michelle N Clements; Tim H Clutton-Brock; Steve D Albon; Josephine M Pemberton; Loeske E B Kruuk
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2010-05-18       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Mammalian reproductive strategies: genes, photoperiod and latitude.

Authors:  F H Bronson
Journal:  Reprod Nutr Dev       Date:  1988

9.  Age-related effects of body mass on fertility and litter size in roe deer.

Authors:  Katarina Flajšman; Klemen Jerina; Boštjan Pokorny
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Reassessing the determinants of breeding synchrony in ungulates.

Authors:  Annie K English; Aliénor L M Chauvenet; Kamran Safi; Nathalie Pettorelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.