Literature DB >> 35962279

Relationship between ozone and biologically relevant UV at 4 NDACC sites.

Richard McKenzie1, Ben Liley2, Michael Kotkamp2, Alexander Geddes2, Richard Querel2, Scott Stierle3, Kathleen Lantz3, Steve Rhodes4, Sasha Madronich5.   

Abstract

Clouds and aerosols, as well as overhead ozone, can have large effects on ultraviolet (UV) irradiances. We use statistical methods to remove cloud effects and mean aerosol effects from spectral UV irradiance measurements to investigate the relationship between UV and total column ozone. We show that for fixed solar zenith angles (SZA), seasonal changes in ozone lead to marked changes in clear-sky UV irradiances. Such effects are larger at mid-latitudes than in the tropics. At mid-latitudes, the minimum ozone amount over the course of a year can be about 50 percent of its maximum, with the lowest values in autumn and the highest values in spring. These seasonal ozone changes lead to UV Index (UVI) values in autumn that can exceed those in spring at the same SZA by nearly a factor of two. Differences are even larger for UV spectra weighted by the action spectra for DNA-damaging UV, and for cutaneous previtamin D production. In some cases, the seasonal increase exceeds a factor of 4. The analysis experimentally demonstrates the limits of applicability of the concept of constant Radiative Amplification Factors (RAFs) for estimating effects of changes in ozone for some weighting functions. Changes in DNA-weighted UV and erythemally weighted UV are well represented by the published RAFs. However, there are large SZA dependencies in the case of UVB and vitamin D-weighted UV. For all weightings considered, RAFs calculated from the observations as a function of SZA show similar dependencies between sites, in good agreement with published values, independently of the ozone data source. High quality measurements show that natural variations in ozone are responsible for huge variations in biologically damaging UV, with seasonal changes at fixed solar zenith angles sometimes exceeding a factor of four. The measured changes from thousands of spectra agree well with calculations over a wide range of solar zenith angles.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atmosphere; Health; NDACC; Ozone; UV; UV index

Year:  2022        PMID: 35962279     DOI: 10.1007/s43630-022-00281-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci        ISSN: 1474-905X            Impact factor:   4.328


  6 in total

1.  UV radiation: balancing risks and benefits.

Authors:  Richard L McKenzie; J Ben Liley; Lars Olof Björn
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 3.421

2.  Skin cancer and ultraviolet radiation.

Authors:  R D Rundel; D S Nachtwey
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 3.  Environmental factors that influence the cutaneous production of vitamin D.

Authors:  M F Holick
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.045

4.  Sensitivity of biologically active UV radiation to stratospheric ozone changes: effects of action spectrum shape and wavelength ranges.

Authors:  Maria Isabel Micheletti; Rubén D Piacentini; Sasha Madronich
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.421

5.  Comparison of Five Modeling Approaches to Quantify and Estimate the Effect of Clouds on the Radiation Amplification Factor (RAF) for Solar Ultraviolet Radiation.

Authors:  Eric S Hall
Journal:  Atmosphere (Basel)       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.686

6.  Success of Montreal Protocol Demonstrated by Comparing High-Quality UV Measurements with "World Avoided" Calculations from Two Chemistry-Climate Models.

Authors:  Richard McKenzie; Germar Bernhard; Ben Liley; Patrick Disterhoft; Steve Rhodes; Alkiviadis Bais; Olaf Morgenstern; Paul Newman; Luke Oman; Colette Brogniez; Stana Simic
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.