Literature DB >> 35962228

[S073]-The impact of interval appendectomy timing on follow-up adverse outcomes.

Mohammad Noubani1, Elizabeth McCarthy2, Xiaoyue Zhang3, Jie Yang3, Konstantinos Spaniolas2, Aurora D Pryor2, Kinga Powers2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to compare the timing of interval appendectomy (IA) and its impact on post-operative outcomes.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed for adult patients diagnosed with appendicitis between 2006 and 2017. IA was defined as a follow-up appendectomy > 1 week and < 2 years after the initial presentation. Time intervals were divided into 4 groups based on patient quartiles: 1-6 weeks, 7-9 weeks, 10-15 weeks, and > 15 weeks. The primary outcome measure was length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes included 30-day readmission and IA post-operative complications. Tertiary outcomes included 30-day mortality and colonoscopy suggesting neoplasm or Inflammatory Bowel Disease.
RESULTS: A total of 5069 patients' records whose interval appendectomy fell > 1 week and < 2 years after initial presentation were analyzed. Among them, 1006 (19.85%) underwent an initial percutaneous abscess drainage at diagnosis. The median timing for IA was 9.2 weeks. Patients with IA at 1-6 weeks were more likely to have longer LOS when compared to 7-9 weeks (ratio 1.33, 95% CI 1.2-1.48) and 10-15 weeks (ratio 1.38, 95% CI 1.25-1.52). IA between 7 and 9 weeks (ratio 0.81, 95% CI 0.73-0.89) and 10-15 weeks (ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.71-0.86) was associated with significantly shorter LOS compared to those receiving the operation after 15 weeks. Further, patients requiring abscess drainage (ratio 1.2, 95% CI 1.13-1.34) or those with comorbidities (ratio 1.51, 95% CI 1.39-1.63) were more likely to have longer LOS at IA. Socioeconomic and demographic differences including Black, Hispanic, and those with Medicare and Medicaid insurance had a greater LOS after their IA.
CONCLUSION: LOS remains lowest among patients undergoing IA between 7-9 weeks and 10-15 weeks after initial appendicitis presentation. Patients with lower socioeconomic status or from racial minorities had a longer LOS after IA.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Insurance status; Interval appendectomy; Length of stay; Racial disparities

Year:  2022        PMID: 35962228     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09517-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  22 in total

1.  The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States.

Authors:  D G Addiss; N Shaffer; B S Fowler; R V Tauxe
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Discriminating between simple and perforated appendicitis.

Authors:  Mirelle E E Bröker; Esther M M van Lieshout; Maarten van der Elst; Laurents P S Stassen; Tim Schepers
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2011-10-14       Impact factor: 2.192

3.  A meta-analysis comparing conservative treatment versus acute appendectomy for complicated appendicitis (abscess or phlegmon).

Authors:  Constantinos Simillis; Panayiotis Symeonides; Andrew J Shorthouse; Paris P Tekkis
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 4.  CT of the acute abdomen: findings and impact on diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  B Siewert; V Raptopoulos
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Complicated appendicitis and considerations for interval appendectomy.

Authors:  Kelly Sue Perez; Steven R Allen
Journal:  JAAPA       Date:  2018-09

6.  Initial nonoperative management for periappendiceal abscess.

Authors:  D Oliak; D Yamini; V M Udani; R J Lewis; T Arnell; H Vargas; M J Stamos
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Paulina Salminen; Hannu Paajanen; Tero Rautio; Pia Nordström; Markku Aarnio; Tuomo Rantanen; Risto Tuominen; Saija Hurme; Johanna Virtanen; Jukka-Pekka Mecklin; Juhani Sand; Airi Jartti; Irina Rinta-Kiikka; Juha M Grönroos
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Laparoscopic Surgery or Conservative Treatment for Appendiceal Abscess in Adults? A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Panu Mentula; Henna Sammalkorpi; Ari Leppäniemi
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Appendiceal abscess: immediate operation or percutaneous drainage?

Authors:  Carlos V R Brown; Michael Abrishami; Matthew Muller; George C Velmahos
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 10.  Meta-analysis of antibiotics versus appendicectomy for non-perforated acute appendicitis.

Authors:  V Sallinen; E A Akl; J J You; A Agarwal; S Shoucair; P O Vandvik; T Agoritsas; D Heels-Ansdell; G H Guyatt; K A O Tikkinen
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 6.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.