| Literature DB >> 35962000 |
Arafat Hussain1, Jun Wang2, Yasir Akbar3, Riaz Shah3.
Abstract
In this analysis, the thermal and flow properties of modified hybrid nanofluids (MNFs) have been investigated under the effects of electroosmosis and homogeneous-heterogeneous chemical reactions. Three types of nanoparticles of Cu, CuO, and Al2O3 are utilized to monitor the performance of the MNFs with water as a working liquid. The determination of the heating phenomenon is explored by incorporating the effects of NPs shape, temperature reliant viscosity, Joule heating, heat generation/absorption and viscous dissipation. In this exploration, equal diffusion factors for the auto catalyst and reactants are assumed. The model formulation contains a highly non-linear PDE system, which is converted to ODEs under physical assumptions with lubrication and Debye-Huckel. The solution treatment involves the Homotopy perturbation method for solving the governing differential equations is used. A major outcome discloses that an addition in heterogeneous reaction parameter aids in enhancing the concentration profile. In a result, the temperature curve decreases at increasing volume fraction of the NPs. Modified hybrid NFs have higher heat transfer rate as compared to base H20, or ordinary Al2O3-H20 and hybrid Cu + Al2O3-H20 NFs. Pressure gradient decreases by improving electroosmotic parameter. Further a comparison between analytically (HPM) and numerical results (NDSolve) show that both results are in good agreement.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35962000 PMCID: PMC9374699 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-17522-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Geometry of the considered problem.
The shape factor for several types of NPs.
Numerical values of physical properties of base liquid and NPs.
| Base fluid/solid particles | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 997.1 | 4179 | 0.613 | 0.05 | |
| 6500 | 540 | 18 | ||
| 8933 | 385 | 400 | ||
| 3970 | 765 | 40 |
Figure 2Flow chart of HPM.
Figure 3(a–c) Velocity profile for change in different embedded parameters.
Figure 4(a–e) θ for change in various parameters.
Numerical values of against different involved parameters.
| Parameters | Different shapes of nanoparticles | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bricks | Cylinders | Platelets | Blades | ||||
| 0.01 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 4.0852 | 4.0853 | 4.0854 | 4.0858 |
| 0.02 | 4.1581 | 4.1584 | 4.1586 | 4.1593 | |||
| 0.04 | 4.3090 | 4.3096 | 4.3100 | 4.3111 | |||
| 0.5 | 4.0797 | 4.0799 | 4.0800 | 4.0804 | |||
| 1.0 | 4.0852 | 4.0853 | 4.0854 | 4.0858 | |||
| 1.5 | 40,929 | 40,930 | 40,932 | 40,935 | |||
| −1.0 | 0.7008 | 0.7009 | 0.7009 | 0.7010 | |||
| 0.0 | 2.3930 | 2.3931 | 2.3932 | 2.3934 | |||
| 1.0 | 4.0852 | 4.0853 | 4.0854 | 4.0858 | |||
| 0.0 | 3.6855 | 3.6857 | 3.6858 | 3.6861 | |||
| 1.0 | 4.0852 | 4.0853 | 4.0854 | 4.0858 | |||
| 2.0 | 5.1678 | 5.1680 | 5.1681 | 5.1686 | |||
Comparison of for regular base fluid, ordinary nanofluid, hybrid nanoliquid and modified hybrid nanoliquid.
| Base fluid ( | Nanofluid ( | Hybrid nanofluid ( | Modified hybrid nanofluid ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 3.55898 | 3.58731 | 3.66059 | 3.68559 |
| 1.0 | 3.93591 | 3.96423 | 4.05441 | 4.08521 |
| 2.0 | 4.95542 | 4.99189 | 5.12308 | 5.1678 |
Figure 5Isotherms for change in M.
Figure 6Isotherms for change in S.
Figure 7(a–e) Velocity profile for change in M.
Figure 8(a–e) Pressure gradient for change in M.
Figure 9A comparison of the results obtained at analytical technique (HPM) and numerical technique (NDSolve).