Curved crystals are a simple but powerful approach to bridge the gap between single crystal surfaces and nanoparticle catalysts, by allowing a rational assessment of the role of active step sites in gas-surface reactions. Using a curved Rh(111) crystal, here, we investigate the effect of A-type (square geometry) and B-type (triangular geometry) atomic packing of steps on the catalytic CO oxidation on Rh at millibar pressures. Imaging the crystal during reaction ignition with laser-induced CO2 fluorescence demonstrates a two-step process, where B-steps ignite at lower temperature than A-steps. Such fundamental dissimilarity is explained in ambient pressure X-ray photoemission (AP-XPS) experiments, which reveal partial CO desorption and oxygen buildup only at B-steps. AP-XPS also proves that A-B step asymmetries extend to the active stage: at A-steps, low-active O-Rh-O trilayers buildup immediately after ignition, while highly active chemisorbed O is the dominant species on B-type steps. We conclude that B-steps are more efficient than A-steps for the CO oxidation.
Curved crystals are a simple but powerful approach to bridge the gap between single crystal surfaces and nanoparticle catalysts, by allowing a rational assessment of the role of active step sites in gas-surface reactions. Using a curved Rh(111) crystal, here, we investigate the effect of A-type (square geometry) and B-type (triangular geometry) atomic packing of steps on the catalytic CO oxidation on Rh at millibar pressures. Imaging the crystal during reaction ignition with laser-induced CO2 fluorescence demonstrates a two-step process, where B-steps ignite at lower temperature than A-steps. Such fundamental dissimilarity is explained in ambient pressure X-ray photoemission (AP-XPS) experiments, which reveal partial CO desorption and oxygen buildup only at B-steps. AP-XPS also proves that A-B step asymmetries extend to the active stage: at A-steps, low-active O-Rh-O trilayers buildup immediately after ignition, while highly active chemisorbed O is the dominant species on B-type steps. We conclude that B-steps are more efficient than A-steps for the CO oxidation.
CO oxidation is a fundamental pillar for
the understanding of surface
catalytic reactions, and, accordingly, it is among the most studied
reactions in surface science.[1−4] However, the majority of scientific investigations
have been performed with either single crystals or under ultrahigh
vacuum, far from the operando requirements of industry. Therefore,
an extrapolation of their conclusions to real catalytic systems (atmospheric
pressures and powder/nanoparticle catalysts) may not be correct.[5] On one side, metallic nanoparticles comprise
several facets, and monitoring their specific activity and interplay
during a chemical reaction is challenging.[6] On the other side, the information that can be obtained using conventional
flat crystals is restricted to one plane alone, and hence it is not
representative of the structure of a real catalyst.[7] One approach to partially close this structure gap is to
use cylindrical sections of single crystals, since their curved surface
provides a smooth variation of the crystal orientation that allows
to systematically compare different facets under the very same reaction
conditions.[8−11]CO oxidation on Rh is characterized by two well-defined stages,
depending on the catalyst temperature.[12] At low temperature, adsorbed CO molecules block the O2 dissociative adsorption. Co-adsorption of reactants is not possible,
and hence there is very low CO2 turnover.[13] At higher temperatures, however, most of the CO molecules
will desorb from the surface, leaving empty sites that are typically
occupied by oxygen species. Co-adsorption of reactants is now possible,
leading to a substantial CO2 production.[12] The transition between the poisoned (CO-covered) and active
(O-covered) stages occurs at the so-called light-off (or ignition)
temperature Ti. A detailed knowledge on
the CO ignition at different crystal facets is mandatory to tailor
new catalysts and improve the energy costs of industrially relevant
processes.The adsorption of both CO and O2 has been
previously
studied on various Rh surfaces with atomic-scale precision, which
facilitates operando studies of the CO oxidation reaction with the
same level of detail, such as the present one. At low temperature,
well below the ignition, CO will adsorb in Rh(111) terraces in top
and hollow positions,[14−16] while it will anchor to top and bridge sites at the
steps of A- and B-type surfaces.[17−19] On the other hand, O2 adsorption on flat and stepped Rh surfaces will lead to dissociation
into single oxygen atoms at face-centered cubic (fcc) hollow sites,
eventually forming oxide stripes as the oxygen coverage increases.[20,21] At higher O coverages, several works at different Rh facets and
nanoparticles report the formation of the Rh surface oxide consisting
of O–Rh–O (RhO2) trilayers.[20−27] Such surface oxide is a less-efficient catalyst for the CO oxidation
than the metallic surface covered with chemisorbed oxygen,[12,28] possibly due to the fact that CO does not stick on the surface oxide
and the reaction is restricted to oxide-metal boundaries.[20]Here, we explore the evolution of chemical
species during the thermal
activation of the CO oxidation at A- and B-type vicinal surfaces simultaneously,
using a curved Rh(111) crystal. Planar laser-induced fluorescence
(PLIF) reveals an asymmetric light-off, where B-steps ignite at a
lower temperature than A-steps. As judged by near ambient-pressure
X-ray photoemission spectroscopy (NAP-XPS), such asymmetry is caused
by the partial CO-depletion and O-accumulation exclusively at B-steps.
During the active stage of the reaction, after the ignition of the
entire sample, we observe surface oxide formation at the (111) terraces
and A-steps, while the oxygen at B-steps remains chemisorbed. Therefore,
since B-steps do not oxidize further during reaction conditions, we
conclude that they are more active toward the CO oxidation than A-type
steps.
Experimental Section
Curved Rh(111) Crystal
The c-Rh(111) sample (see bottom
of Figure a) possesses
the (111) plane at the apex of the crystal, and its cylinder axis
is parallel to the [11̅0] direction. This leads to surfaces
with a smooth increase of either A-type (100 microfacet) or B-type
(111 microfacet) close-packed steps as one departs from the center
of the crystal.[9,10,19,29] Vicinal angles (α), directly related
to the step density,[19] up to α =
± 15°, can be probed using this sample. This allows to reach
vicinal surfaces such as the A- and B-stepped (223) and (553) planes,
with α = +11.4° and −12.3°, respectively. The
curved surface was prepared by several cycles of Ar+ sputtering,
O2 annealing and high-temperature flashes. As described
in ref (19), this yields
a contaminant-free surface with the expected variation of the step
density across the sample.
Figure 1
(a) PLIF images acquired under a 24 mbar, 1:5
CO:O2 gas
mixture. Argon was added to reach 100 mL/min and 150 mbar of total
flow and pressures, respectively. The average heating slope was 12
K/min. Individual snapshots during the activation process, from the
poisoned stage (485 K, no CO2 turnover) to the active stage
(503 K), are shown. The sample design is illustrated in the bottom,
together with the position of relevant surfaces across the curved
crystal and the vicinal angle α scale (i.e., step density[38]). (b) CO2 signal in the QMS (mass
44), as a function of the temperature for individual experiments varying
the CO:O2 pressure ratio. Vertical lines mark the two abrupt
ignition steps that define the entire activation process. Movies of
the ignition at CO:O2 pressure ratios of 1:5 (Figure a), 1:1, and 2:1
are provided in Supplementary Movies 1, 2, and 3.
Planar Laser-Induced Fluorescence
PLIF was employed
to measure the CO2 production above the curved catalyst
surface.[30,31] A broadband laser centered at a wavelength
of λ = 2.7 μm is used to excite multiple vibrational transitions
in the CO2 molecules. The most intense fluorescence transition
occurs at λ = 4.3 μm, which is collected using a set of
lenses and an IR camera. Since the laser is shaped into a sheet by
a cylindrical lens, the fluorescence can be measured in 2D across
the catalytically active sample.[10] Each
image has a spatial resolution of 30 μm per pixel, and the acquisition
rate was 10 frames per second. This yields a time resolution of 1
s after averaging 10 images. The experimental setup is described in
more detail in ref (32). During measurements, the sample is placed in a flow reactor with
optical access from four sides and heated using an inert boron nitride
heater, where we measure the temperature according to ref (33).
The NAP-XPS experiments were conducted at the In Situ and Operando
Soft X-ray Spectroscopy (IOS, 23-ID-2) beamline of NSLS-II synchrotron,
using normal emission geometry and 50° incidence angle, with
respect to the (111) plane,[34] and Circe
beamline of the ALBA synchrotron, using a 55° emission angle
and a 15° incidence angle, with respect to the (111) plane.[35] The experiments at NSLS-II were performed using
an inert boron nitride heater, and the chamber was pumped through
the electron analyzer nozzle (<1 mL/min). For the experiments at
ALBA, an encapsulated Pt filament was used as a heater, and the flux
was ∼2.5 mL/min. Variations in the ignition temperature are
expected due to the differences in the reactants ratio, heater, flow,
and thermocouple position. Accordingly, the temperature for the 1:1
CO:O2 ratio NAP-XPS experiment shown in Figures d and 2e, as well as Figure S3b in the Supporting
Information, is determined with ±15 K accuracy. No time evolution
of the spectra was observed during the α-scans shown in Figures and 3 (∼2–3
h). In order to compare OAds during the early and late
intermediate stages shown in Figure e, spectra at NSLS-II and ALBA were normalized to the
height of TT-CO at the (111) plane. Signal-to-noise is
lower in the ALBA experiments due to a faster acquisition mode, compared
to the spectra measured at NSLS-II.
Figure 2
O 1s (hν = 650 eV) and C 1s (hν = 400 eV) spectra at (a) 0.1 mbar CO at 300 K (far from light-off)
and (b) 0.7 mbar in a 1:4 CO:O2 gas mixture at 460 K, right
after the first ignition step. Top, middle, and bottom rows correspond
to the data acquired at the (553), (111), and (223) planes, respectively.
TT, TH, ST and SB refer
to CO molecules anchored in Terrace-Top, Terrace-Hollow, Step-Top
and Step-Bridge sites. OAds and “C” stand
for atomic oxygen at fcc sites and amorphous carbon, respectively.
Insets illustrate the surface composition of the facets in each case.
(c, d) O 1s photoemission intensity scans along the curved Rh surface
(α-scan) for (c) the 1:4 mixture of panel (b) (0.7 mbar, 460
K), and (d) for a 1:1 CO:O2 gas mixture (1.0 mbar, ∼530
K). They respectively reflect an early and a late intermediate ignition
stage. (e) OAds peak area across the c-Rh(111) sample, as determined from line fit analysis of the spectra
in (c, d) α-scans (see also Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). NAP-XPS data in panels (b) and(c)
have been acquired at NSLS-II with a flux smaller than 1 mL/min, and
in panel (d) at ALBA with 2.5 mL/min flux.
Peak Fitting of the Photoemission Spectra
Peak fitting
was performed with Python’s lmfit package.[36] Surface components were fitted to Doniac-Šunjić
lineshapes[37] convoluted with a Gaussian
profile, while Voigt profiles were considered for gas-phase peaks.
Using the spectra at the (111) plane at 0.1 mbar CO at 300 K as a
reference, chemisorbed CO peaks were constrained to have a similar
width and asymmetry, while subtle changes in position (<50 meV)
were allowed at the different temperatures to improve the fit. During
the active stage, the asymmetry of the O-species was alike, although
the high binding energy component of the RhO2 doublet was
wider than the other contributions. After pumping the CO from the
chamber, the RhO2 doublet become significantly more asymmetric,
compared to reaction conditions.
Results
Asymmetric Light-off at A- and B-Steps
We first investigate
the CO ignition across the curved Rh(111) sample [c-Rh(111)] by PLIF, which allows a spatial and temporal imaging of
the CO2 production above the curved surface.[10,11] The c-Rh(111) crystal is identical to that described
in ref (19), and appears
sketched at the bottom of Figure a. It provides a smooth variation
of the density of steps as one leaves the Rh(111) plane located at
the center. At one side, one finds A-type close-packed steps (square,
100 microfacet), while B-Steps (triangular, 111 microfacet) are encountered
at the other side. The step density is directly related to the vicinal
angle α.[38] With this particular sample
design, one can probe up to α = ±15°, allowing to
reach the densely stepped (223) and (553) planes at each of the sample
edges. Both (223) and (553) facets feature 5-atom-wide terraces (corner
atoms included) separated by either A- or B-type monatomic steps,
respectively. For convenience, we use α > 0 for A-Steps and
α < 0 for B-Steps.(a) PLIF images acquired under a 24 mbar, 1:5
CO:O2 gas
mixture. Argon was added to reach 100 mL/min and 150 mbar of total
flow and pressures, respectively. The average heating slope was 12
K/min. Individual snapshots during the activation process, from the
poisoned stage (485 K, no CO2 turnover) to the active stage
(503 K), are shown. The sample design is illustrated in the bottom,
together with the position of relevant surfaces across the curved
crystal and the vicinal angle α scale (i.e., step density[38]). (b) CO2 signal in the QMS (mass
44), as a function of the temperature for individual experiments varying
the CO:O2 pressure ratio. Vertical lines mark the two abrupt
ignition steps that define the entire activation process. Movies of
the ignition at CO:O2 pressure ratios of 1:5 (Figure a), 1:1, and 2:1
are provided in Supplementary Movies 1, 2, and 3.In PLIF experiments the clean c-Rh(111) sample
was exposed to 24
mbar of a 1:5 CO:O2 gas mixture and subsequently heated
to trigger the reaction. Argon was added as a carrier gas in order
to reach a total flow of 0.1 l/min and a total pressure of 150 mbar.
In addition, a quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS) was employed to
monitor the gases in the outlet of the cell. CO2 PLIF snapshots
were continuously taken at different temperatures along the curved
surface to track the CO ignition (see Figure a). At 485 K, no CO2 production
is observed due to the CO poisoning of the entire surface. The CO2 cloud arises at 498 K at α ≈ – 5°
in the B-side of the crystal (tick mark). At 501 K, the CO2 cloud extends toward the (111) plane located at the center, and
at higher temperatures (503 K) it is detected above the entire c-Rh(111) sample. The PLIF images reveal an earlier ignition
of B-type Rh(111) vicinals, followed by a progressive extension of
the reaction toward the (111) center and the A-side. The activation
of the entire c-Rh(111) sample marks the transition to the complete
active stage. A somewhat different asymmetric ignition is observed
in Pd,[10] while A-type and B-type surfaces
ignite at the same temperature in Pt.[11]The A-B asymmetry noted in PLIF is mirrored in the simultaneously
acquired QMS signal, which, in turn, reveals a two-step ignition process.
In Figure b we display
the CO2 QMS intensity during separate ignition cycles with
different CO:O2 gas ratios. Heating ramp, total pressure
and total flow were kept constant. Looking to all curves, we immediately
note the increase of the ignition temperature with the CO content,
which is a well-known phenomenon.[1] Considering
the 1:5 CO:O2 mixture of Figure a, we observe that the CO2 signal
steadily increases as the sample is heated, but it steeply boosts
at ∼488 and 501 K. PLIF images in Figure a allow one to correlate these steps with
the two abrupt ignition events occurring at the B- (T, 488 K) and A-sides (T, 501 K) of the crystal, marking a
ΔTAB of 13K. The minimum ΔTAB gap occurs at the 1:1 CO:O2 pressure
ratio, and then becomes larger with both the amount of CO or O2 in the gas mixture. As we shall discuss below, such processes
are the successive activation of B- and A-type atomic steps, separated
by the ignition of the (111) terraces in the T-T temperature range, which we call the intermediate stage.
The CO:O2 gas ratio strongly influences both the ignition
temperature and the relative CO coverage at terraces and steps, and
hence the ΔTAB gap is heavily dependent
on it.
Evolution of Chemical Species during Light-off
NAP-XPS
experiments were performed to explore the chemical species involved
in the two-step ignition of the c-Rh(111) sample. For a quantitative
characterization of the CO poisoning layer, it is useful to examine
the CO adsorption alone, and compare with reference chemisorption
experiments performed at low pressures.[19] To this aim, we exposed the c-Rh(111) crystal to 0.1 mbar CO at
300 K. Spectra acquired at three relevant Rh facets, namely, the (111),
A-type (223) and B-type (553) surfaces, are shown in Figure a.O 1s (hν = 650 eV) and C 1s (hν = 400 eV) spectra at (a) 0.1 mbar CO at 300 K (far from light-off)
and (b) 0.7 mbar in a 1:4 CO:O2 gas mixture at 460 K, right
after the first ignition step. Top, middle, and bottom rows correspond
to the data acquired at the (553), (111), and (223) planes, respectively.
TT, TH, ST and SB refer
to CO molecules anchored in Terrace-Top, Terrace-Hollow, Step-Top
and Step-Bridge sites. OAds and “C” stand
for atomic oxygen at fcc sites and amorphous carbon, respectively.
Insets illustrate the surface composition of the facets in each case.
(c, d) O 1s photoemission intensity scans along the curved Rh surface
(α-scan) for (c) the 1:4 mixture of panel (b) (0.7 mbar, 460
K), and (d) for a 1:1 CO:O2 gas mixture (1.0 mbar, ∼530
K). They respectively reflect an early and a late intermediate ignition
stage. (e) OAds peak area across the c-Rh(111) sample, as determined from line fit analysis of the spectra
in (c, d) α-scans (see also Figure S2 in the Supporting Information). NAP-XPS data in panels (b) and(c)
have been acquired at NSLS-II with a flux smaller than 1 mL/min, and
in panel (d) at ALBA with 2.5 mL/min flux.At the (111) plane, two well-resolved peaks are
observed in both
the O 1s and C 1s core level regions. We assign them to CO adsorbed
in top (TT, 532.4 and 286.1 eV) and hollow (TH, 530.8 and 285.5 eV) terrace sites, respectively.[14,15,39] The intensity ratio TH/TT is close to 2, pointing toward the arrangement of the CO
molecules in the (2 × 2)-3CO superstructure, with 0.75 ML (ML
= monolayer, adsorbed molecules per substrate atom).[14−16] In the stepped (553) and (223) (top and bottom rows of Figure a, respectively),
two more features are resolved in the C 1s region. They correspond
to CO molecules adsorbed in top (ST, 285.8 eV) and bridge
(SB 285.4 eV) positions at steps, and as previously reported
they equally cover the surface.[18] Taking
into account the 0.75 ML CO coverage at the (111) plane, one can calculate
the ST- and SB-CO coverages, resulting in 0.07
ML each. These values agree well with the saturation model proposed
in an earlier publication (1 CO molecule in ST and SB sites per 3 Rh atoms[19]). The CO
saturation structure of the aforementioned surfaces are shown in the
insets of Figure a.The intensity of the TH-CO peak decreases from the (111)
surface to the (223) and (553) planes, while that of TT-CO does the reverse. This is explained by considering a transition
of some CO molecules from TH to TT sites, as
TH-CO is known to become less favorable as the step density
increases and the terraces narrow.[40] Step-related
CO contributions cannot be resolved in the O 1s region,[39] hence the peaks are renamed as (SB + TH) and (ST + TT). The CO(g) emission peaks at 536.5 eV. Residual amorphous carbon (“C”,
at 284 eV) at the stepped surfaces may either arise from the CO dissociation
or adsorption of residual hydrocarbons.Next, we proceed to
activate the catalytic CO oxidation by adding
O2 to the mixture and then increasing the temperature.
The mixture is fixed to a CO:O2 ratio of 1:4 with a total
pressure of 0.7 mbar. The temperature is increased until a significant
increase of the CO2 production is detected at 460 K. At
this temperature, the CO2 turnover is roughly half of that
achieved upon full sample activation, which indicates that we lie
between the first and the second ignition steps, i.e., in the intermediate
stage. Spectra are shown in Figure b. Measurements at temperatures below the first ignition
step are discussed in Figure S1 in the Supporting
Information. Note that absolute temperature values may differ from
those in PLIF experiments, which were performed under very different
conditions, particularly flux.[11] Because
of the high turnover, CO(g) coexists now with CO2(g) in
the spectra (shown in Figure S2 in the Supporting
Information).O 1s and C 1s spectra have significantly changed
in the (111) plane,
compared to 300 K. CO anchored at TH sites has reduced
its intensity by more than 60% at 460 K (middle row of Figure b). The reason for this is
that the CO adsorption energy is lower in TT sites, compared
to TH sites.[14,15] An extra contribution
close to 529.5 eV is also detected, which is ascribed to chemisorbed
atomic oxygen (OAds) at hollow fcc sites.[20,21,41] The desorption of TH-CO creates empty surface sites, which allow the O2 dissociative
adsorption to occur and explains the presence of OAds.
Furthermore, the decrease in TH-CO also accounts for the
slight increase of TT-CO, since a portion of the remaining
adsorbed CO molecules may rearrange into R30°-CO domains. These feature a larger
TT-CO coverage than the (2 × 2)-3CO superstructure,
hence explaining its growth just before the ignition.The C
1s spectrum at the (223) plane at 460 K (top row of Figure b) is quite similar
to that acquired at 300 K in the CO atmosphere alone: the step peaks
(ST- and SB-CO) are identical, while both terrace
contributions decrease, but particularly TH-CO. In contrast,
the (553) plane (bottom row of Figure b) has evolved substantially: in addition to the large
decrease of TH-CO (∼70%), the feature related to
SB-CO has vanished from the C 1s region. Therefore, the
photoemission spectra reveal a significant asymmetry after the first
ignition step: A-type steps remain close to CO saturation, while CO
has significantly desorbed from B-steps. Meanwhile, a significant
amount of CO has also desorbed from TH sites everywhere.
Since desorption is the opposite to adsorption, these results agree
with the fact that sticking at TH and SB sites
occurs at a less efficient rate, compared to TT and ST positions at Rh vicinals,[17−19] while CO adsorption
at TH and SB sites is faster at A-type Rh steps.[19]CO-related peaks show the same effect
in the O 1s spectra, i.e.,
nearly the saturation intensity at A-steps and a strong decay at B-steps.
Here, we focus on the OAds peak. Its intensity is roughly
half of the TH-CO feature at the (111) plane, and it is
very small at the (223) surface. This points toward adsorption of
oxygen at terrace fcc terrace sites at (111) and (223) facets. In
contrast, OAds is almost double that of the (SB + TH) contribution in the (553) plane, and it is also
larger than OAds at the (111) surface. We conclude that,
together with a minor adsorption at terraces, oxygen adsorbs majorly
at fcc sites of B-stepped edges. In fact, the C 1s analysis reveals
partially CO-depleted B-steps, which allow oxygen to accumulate and
start the CO oxidation earlier than at the CO-poisoned A-type steps,
as observed in PLIF. The chemical composition of each surface is illustrated
in the insets in Figures a and 2b.The smooth variation
of the surface orientation of curved crystals
allows us to finely investigate the surface species as a function
of the vicinal angle α. By scanning the curved surface with
the small synchrotron ligth beam, one can create photoemission intensity
maps that image the distribution of adsorbates across the different
vicinal planes.[9,11] In Figure c, we show the O 1s α-scan for the
1:4 CO:O2 mixture of Figure b. The (SB + TH) feature steadily
grows from the center to the top of the image (A-side, α >
0),
while it decreases from the center to the bottom (B-side, α
< 0). This confirms that CO adsorbs to SB sites solely
at A-steps, and not at B-steps. OAds follows the reverse
behavior, hence oxygen sticks to the CO-depleted B-steps and not to
the CO-poisoned A-steps.The dashed white line in Figure c marks the crossover from
a (SB + TH)-covered surface to a OAds-covered one at α
≈ −5°. This α angle is coincident with the
center of the emerging CO2 cloud in the 498 K PLIF image
of Figure b, which
may simply reveal that the α-scan in Figure c characterizes an “early”
intermediate stage, immediately after the first ignition step. In
fact, altering the reaction conditions is possible to reach a “late”
intermediate stage, closer to the second ignition step, where the
intensity and distribution of (SB + TH) and
OAds species across the c-Rh(111) surface are markedly
different. This is shown in the α-scan of Figure d, which has been obtained for a 1:1 CO:O2 mixture at ∼530 K. We immediately notice that the
(SB + TH)-OAds crossover point has
shifted toward the A-side the crystal, as it happens with the CO2 cloud in PLIF as the ignition progresses (Figure b).A quantitative comparison
of the OAds intensity between Figures c and 2d surface allows
deeper insights into the evolving chemical
composition of the intermediate stage. This analysis is shown in Figure e, where data points
are determined from the peak fit of individual spectra in the respective
α-scans (selected spectra are shown in Figure
S2). Generally, there is a larger OAds signal in
the 1:1 case, as expected for a surface that is more depleted of CO
at a more advanced ignition stage at a higher temperature. The α-dependent
trends are also different in both cases, revealing a different OAds filling of terrace and step sites in each case. To understand
the intensity variation in these curves one must note that, because
of the lateral extension of the steps, terrace and step signals in
a curved surface are expected to respectively decrease and increase
as a function of α.[38] In the 1:1
case, the OAds intensity is virtually constant at the B-side,
indicating that both steps and terraces are equally occupied by oxygen.
In contrast, at the A-side, where steps remain CO-poisoned, the intensity
decreases linearly as a function of α, reflecting the decaying
contribution of OAds-covered terraces to the total peak
emission. In the 1:4 case, the linear decrease in the A-side also
reveals exclusive, but minor OAds occupation of terraces.
In contrast, the B-side exhibits a α-dependent increase of the
OAds intensity, which reflects the oxygen adsorption of
B-step sites.In summary, the surface chemistry analysis of Figure allows one to explain
the
two-step ignition of the c-Rh(111) surface discussed in Figure . Abrupt changes in the CO2 turnover are due to the sequential activation of B-steps
at T, due to CO desorption
from SB sites and OAds adsorption, and afterward
A-steps at T. Activation
of (111) terraces appears to be progressive and occurs at intermediate
temperatures, when CO desorption allows OAds occupation
of TH sites. Although CO desorption from TT sites
from both sides of the crystal may be most significant at T, a sizable amount remains
at higher temperatures in nonoxidized facets, as we discuss next.
Chemical Species in the Active Stage
Further heating
of the 1:4 CO:O2 mixture to 470 K triggers the reaction.
Most of the CO leaves the surface, CO(g) vanishes from the spectra
and the maximum CO2 production is reached, marking the
activation of the entire sample. Figure a shows O 1s α-scans acquired at different
temperatures above the ignition point (470, 510, and 570 K), while Figures b–d display
fitted spectra for selected positions across the curved crystal. They
unveil, in the most direct way, a striking step-related trend in surface
oxidation during the active stage: the progressive formation of O–Rh–O
(RhO2) trilayers from the A-side toward the B-side of the
crystal as the temperature is increased. At 470 K, only the spectra
at α > 6° (A-side of the sample) feature a pair of peaks
at 529.5 and 528.5 eV, while a single contribution is observed in
the rest of the crystal. Such doublet represents the superficial and
interstitial O-layers of the RhO2 surface oxide trilayer.[20,21] This means that, at this temperature, a O–Rh–O trilayer
forms at densely stepped surfaces with A-steps (two well-defined features
at 529.5 and 528.5 eV), while oxygen remains in its more active chemisorbed
form at (111) terraces and B-steps (single peak at ∼529 eV).
At the B-side, OAds exhibits an α-dependent binding
energy shift, as well as a peak broadening toward the (553) edge of
the sample (Figure b), which likely reflects the presence of terrace and step species
that cannot be resolved.[20,21] The scenario is slightly
different after reaching 510 K: the RhO2 doublet arises
at the (111) plane, indicating that terraces start to form O–Rh–O
trilayers as the temperature of the sample increases. The oxidation
of the terraces is further enhanced after reaching 570 K, and the
RhO2 signal extends to the B-side up to α = −6°.
RhO2 steadily decreases in the range of −6°
< α < −10°, while beyond α = −10°,
only OAds is detected. At 570 K (Figure c), the oxygen remains chemisorbed at B-steps
under reaction conditions, while the other facets of the sample have
fully developed RhO2 trilayers.
Figure 3
(a) O 1s α-scans
acquired at 470, 510, and 570 K under a
1:4 CO:O2, 0.7 mbar gas mixture. Spectra were taken at hν = 650 eV at NSLS-II, after those shown in Figures b and 2c. (b, c) Individual fitted spectra of the (223), (111), and
(553) surfaces at 470 and 570 K under reaction conditions, as well
as at (d) 570 K after pumping the CO (light-beige panel). OAds, RhO2, and Oxide stand for chemisorbed atomic O, surface
oxide trilayers, and an uncharacterized Rh oxide, while CO molecules
anchored to Terrace-Top sites and carbonate/carboxyl species are denoted
as TT and COX, respectively. Vertical dashed
lines are included in panels (b) and (c) to illustrate the shift of
Oxide, OAds, and CO2(g) with α. The latter
is caused by a varying work-function across the curved crystal,[9] which, in turn, reflects the strong differences
in the local surface composition and structure.
(a) O 1s α-scans
acquired at 470, 510, and 570 K under a
1:4 CO:O2, 0.7 mbar gas mixture. Spectra were taken at hν = 650 eV at NSLS-II, after those shown in Figures b and 2c. (b, c) Individual fitted spectra of the (223), (111), and
(553) surfaces at 470 and 570 K under reaction conditions, as well
as at (d) 570 K after pumping the CO (light-beige panel). OAds, RhO2, and Oxide stand for chemisorbed atomic O, surface
oxide trilayers, and an uncharacterized Rh oxide, while CO molecules
anchored to Terrace-Top sites and carbonate/carboxyl species are denoted
as TT and COX, respectively. Vertical dashed
lines are included in panels (b) and (c) to illustrate the shift of
Oxide, OAds, and CO2(g) with α. The latter
is caused by a varying work-function across the curved crystal,[9] which, in turn, reflects the strong differences
in the local surface composition and structure.Important details inside the α-scan images
are better observed
in the single spectra shown in Figures b and 3c. Similarly to Pd,[9] Ir,[42] and Ru,[43] and in clear contrast to Pt,[42,44] a sizable amount of CO can still be detected at both the (111) and
(553) Rh facets after the ignition. The significantly smaller CO peak
at the (223) plane reflects the fact that RhO2 quenches
the CO adsorption.[20] An additional feature
arises at 533.3 eV at the (223) surface. As judged by its binding
energy, we assign this peak to carbonates/carboxyls (COX)[45] anchored exclusively at the A-steps.
Small extra contributions [531.0 eV at the (111) plane, 530.5 eV at
the (223) plane] are observed in parallel to the surface oxide doublet,
which we attribute to a different Rh oxide. This feature vanishes
once the CO is removed from the gas mixture, suggesting a reaction-stabilized
oxide[46] or reaction intermediate.[44]Under the oxidative reaction conditions
of Figure c, OAds can only be removed from
the B-edge of the sample by closing the CO valve, which leads to a
progressive pumping of CO from the chamber, and to a pure O2 atmosphere within minutes. The resulting spectra are shown in Figure d. The surface oxide
covers the entire sample, but peaks become more asymmetric. This points
to the buildup of additional, unresolved oxidic species, which would
contribute to the high binding energy tail of the RhO2 doublet.
Similar spectra are obtained in the reference oxidation shown in Figure S3 in the Supporting Information. The fact
that removing the CO from the gas feed is required to further oxidize
B-stepped surfaces is very meaningful. It reveals a larger CO oxidation
rate at B-Steps, compared to A-Steps, since the formation of the surface
oxide would be hindered if the CO oxidation kinetics are faster than
those of the metal oxidation.[47,48] Surface reduction kinetics
are further accelerated, and no surface oxide is formed if the CO:O2 ratio is closer to stoichiometry (1:1 pressure ratio, see Figure S3). Although faster CO oxidation kinetics
are expected for B-steps rather than A-steps, we could not estimate
this effect with the data available. After the ignition, the reaction
reaches the mass-transfer limit (MLT), where the CO2 cloud
blocks the diffusion of reactants toward the Rh surface and limits
the reaction rate.[49] As discussed in Figure S4 in the Supporting Information, the CO2(g) peak exhibits the same random intensity variation as the
O2(g) feature across the c-Rh(111) surface.
This indicates that, because of insufficient pumping, the CO2 cloud equally covers the sample, and hence differences in turnover
frequencies cannot be estimated.Klikovits and co-workers studied
the oxidation of A- and B-type
Rh(111) steps, observing closed and open oxide structures for A- and
B-type steps, respectively.[50] The open
oxide would be tentatively easier to reduce than the closed one, simply
explaining the larger activity of B-steps over A-steps for the CO
oxidation that we postulate. In any case, RhO2 is known
to be less active toward CO oxidation than OAds.[12,28] On the other hand, Gustafson et al. concluded that specific Rh crystal
planes exposed during catalysis will not directly influence the activity.[27] However, we have shown that there is a clear
A-B asymmetry in both the ignition temperature and composition of
the active stage of the CO oxidation under the very same experimental
conditions. Finally, we must not discard faceting of any of the aforementioned
surfaces, since Rh vicinals are known to undergo faceting under oxidative[21,22] and CO oxidation conditions.[23] This calls
for a combined effort for the simultaneous probing of the chemical
species and surface structure during the CO oxidation reaction.[51]
Conclusions
In summary, we have investigated the role
of A- and B-type steps
during the CO oxidation at millibar pressures using a curved Rh(111)
crystal. PLIF images reveal an asymmetric, two-step light-off, where
B-type vicinals ignite at lower temperature than A-type surfaces.
NAP-XPS points toward a significant CO-depletion and O-accumulation
exclusively at B-steps just before the full sample ignition, while
A-steps remain CO-poisoned. After the light-off is completed, A-steps
readily develop the less-active RhO2 trilayers, while oxygen
at B-steps remains chemisorbed and no RhO2 is formed under
reaction conditions. Therefore, we conclude that B-steps are more
active toward the CO oxidation than A-steps. Our experiments using
curved surfaces emphasize the need of operando studies on the influence
of steps and their interplay with other surface sites in chemical
reactions.
Authors: S B Vendelbo; C F Elkjær; H Falsig; I Puspitasari; P Dona; L Mele; B Morana; B J Nelissen; R van Rijn; J F Creemer; P J Kooyman; S Helveg Journal: Nat Mater Date: 2014-07-20 Impact factor: 43.841
Authors: Fernando Garcia-Martinez; Carlos García-Fernández; Juan Pablo Simonovis; Adrian Hunt; Andrew Walter; Iradwikanari Waluyo; Florian Bertram; Lindsay R Merte; Mikhail Shipilin; Sebastian Pfaff; Sara Blomberg; Johan Zetterberg; Johan Gustafson; Edvin Lundgren; Daniel Sánchez-Portal; Frederik Schiller; J Enrique Ortega Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2020-08-31 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: M D Ackermann; T M Pedersen; B L M Hendriksen; O Robach; S C Bobaru; I Popa; C Quiros; H Kim; B Hammer; S Ferrer; J W M Frenken Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2005-12-16 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Johan Zetterberg; Sara Blomberg; Johan Gustafson; Jonas Evertsson; Jianfeng Zhou; Emma C Adams; Per-Anders Carlsson; Marcus Aldén; Edvin Lundgren Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-05-08 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Andrew L Walter; Frederik Schiller; Martina Corso; Lindsay R Merte; Florian Bertram; Jorge Lobo-Checa; Mikhail Shipilin; Johan Gustafson; Edvin Lundgren; Anto N X Brión-Ríos; Pepa Cabrera-Sanfelix; Daniel Sánchez-Portal; J Enrique Ortega Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-11-12 Impact factor: 14.919