Literature DB >> 35960699

Surgical Outcomes During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Gustavo Romero-Velez1, Xavier Pereira2, Vicente Ramos-Santillan2, Diego R Camacho2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35960699      PMCID: PMC9524518          DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000001078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech        ISSN: 1530-4515            Impact factor:   1.455


× No keyword cloud information.
The coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has had a profound impact on our healthcare system. Surgery in particular faced significant challenges related to allocation of resources and equitable patient selection. During 2020, the volume of nonurgent and nonemergent procedures dramatically decreased in an attempt to (a) allocate valuable resources for the increasing number of infected patients, (b) protect healthcare workers and (c) protect patients from potential nosocomial infection. At that time, multiple surgical societies published guidelines on resuming elective surgery during the pandemic, which include protective measures for healthcare workers and preoperative testing. In the preoperative period, it was reported that 0.74 to 0.93% of patients could test positive for SARS-CoV-2.1,2 Current evidence demonstrates that patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 have increased risk of perioperative mortality and pulmonary complications even for several weeks past the infection.3–6 Accounting for the possibility of future waves we need to be prepared and analyze our past practices to better serve our patients.7 We sought to analyze the national outcomes after surgery during the first year of the pandemic. We examined the 30-day outcomes of all the procedures captured by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) from 2018 to 2020 irrespective of the type of anesthesia. Using χ2 test we compared the 30-day surgical outcomes between 2020 and its preceding year. Results are expressed as odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals. All statistical analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4 (SAS, Cary, NC, USA). Hypothesis test were 2-sided and evaluated at a significance level of P<0.05. A total of 2,999,923 procedures were captured by NSQIP during those years (2018=1,020,511; 2019=1,076,441, and 2020=902,971). The majority of the population was female (57.4%), white (66.2%), non-Hispanic (72.9%), and had general anesthesia (87.2%). Table 1 shows that there was a significant increase in 30-day complications during 2020, including mortality (24%), cardiac arrest (24%), myocardial infarction (22%), and septic shock (21%). In addition, there was a 23% increased rate of postoperative pneumonia along with other pulmonary complications (unplanned intubation and failure to wean). In addition, the rates of postoperative pneumonia when divided by quarters were similar for 2018 and 2019 but differed for 2020 (Fig. 1). Even though our data does not differentiate between etiologies of postoperative pneumonia, when the data were compared with the COVID-19 cases across the United States, the peaks of postoperative pneumonia seen in 2020 seem to correlate with the peaks of COVID-19 cases (Fig. 1).
TABLE 1

Complications by Year

NSQIP Complications2018 (%)2019 (%)2020 (%)Changea Odds Ratio (95% CI) a
Mortality0.970.881.09241.24 (1.20-1.27)
Cardiac arrest requiring CPR0.280.250.31241.24 (1.17-1.31)
Pneumonia1.031.031.27231.24 (1.21-1.27)
Septic shock0.750.720.87211.21 (1.17-1.25)
Myocardial infarction0.350.370.45221.20 (1.15-1.26)
Fail to wean ventilator0.780.740.85151.16 (1.12-1.19)
Unplanned intubation0.630.570.65141.14 (1.10-1.18)
Acute renal failure0.240.230.27171.14 (1.08-1.20)
Transfusions4.214.054.59131.14 (1.12-1.15)
Sepsis1.601.481.67131.14 (1.11-1.16)
Organ/space SSI1.471.561.76131.14 (1.11-1.16)
Pulmonary embolism0.310.320.36131.11 (1.06-1.17)
Deep SSI0.370.320.3591.11 (1.06-1.17)
Deep vein thrombosis0.510.510.5581.09 (1.05-1.13)
Dehiscence0.360.370.4081.09 (1.04-1.14)
Stroke0.180.190.21111.09 (1.03-1.16)
Progressive renal insufficiency0.230.220.2491.09 (1.03-1.15)
Return to operating room2.672.512.6971.07 (1.05-1.09)
Reoperation2.672.512.6971.07 (1.05-1.09)
Readmission5.004.904.9821.02 (1.00-1.03)
Superficial SSI1.301.751.7611.01 (0.99-1.03)
Urinary tract infection1.211.291.3011.00 (0.98-1.03)
Clostridium Difficile 0.320.280.26−70.95 (0.90-1.00)

2020 compared with the prior year.

CI indicates confidence interval; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; NSQIP, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; SSI, surgical site infection.

FIGURE 1

Comparison of postoperative pneumonia between years by quarters and COVID-19 positivity rate for 2020.

Complications by Year 2020 compared with the prior year. CI indicates confidence interval; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; NSQIP, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; SSI, surgical site infection. Comparison of postoperative pneumonia between years by quarters and COVID-19 positivity rate for 2020. Although this data cannot directly attribute all of the increased complication rates to perioperative COVID-19 infections, other complications not associated with SARS-CoV-2, such as urinary tract infection, surgical site infection, and dehiscence, remained relatively stable during the same time period. In spite of the fact that these increased complication rates seen in 2020 could be multifactorial, we must consider that these could also be a surrogate marker for perioperative SARS-CoV-2 infections. Interestingly, the rate of Clostridium Difficile decreased, which might be a consequence of stricter infection control protocols for COVID-19. A prior study during the beginning of the pandemic reported a 1.8% incidence of symptomatic COVID-19 among 501 patients who underwent surgery.8 However, other studies have found hospital-acquired infection rates of 12 to 15% in nonsurgical patients.9 Given the emergence of new variants with periodic spikes in COVID-19 cases that continue to strain our health care systems, surgeons need to be cognizant of the increased risk COVID-19 poses on our patients and follow current recommendations to prevent the spread of the virus.10 Our individual participation to stop the spread is key, as it has been shown that interrupting all “elective” cases is not a feasible solution.11 Therefore we would like to make surgeons aware of these poor surgical outcomes seen during the first year of the pandemic based on an overall analysis of the NSQIP data. Further analysis of individual populations and procedures might be warranted to prepare us for future COVID-19 waves.
  11 in total

1.  Hospital-Acquired SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Lessons for Public Health.

Authors:  Aaron Richterman; Eric A Meyerowitz; Muge Cevik
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Preserving Elective Surgeries in the COVID-19 Pandemic and the Future.

Authors:  J Wayne Meredith; Kevin P High; Julie Ann Freischlag
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Surgery and COVID-19.

Authors:  Melina R Kibbe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Beyond Omicron: what's next for COVID's viral evolution.

Authors:  Ewen Callaway
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Surgery in times of COVID-19-recommendations for hospital and patient management.

Authors:  S Flemming; M Hankir; R-I Ernestus; F Seyfried; C-T Germer; P Meybohm; T Wurmb; U Vogel; A Wiegering
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Postoperative In-Hospital Morbidity and Mortality of Patients With COVID-19 Infection Compared With Patients Without COVID-19 Infection.

Authors:  Max R Haffner; Hai V Le; Augustine M Saiz; Gloria Han; Jeffrey Fine; Philip Wolinsky; Eric O Klineberg
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-04-01

7.  Hospital-Acquired SARS-Cov-2 Infections in Patients: Inevitable Conditions or Medical Malpractice?

Authors:  Rosario Barranco; Luca Vallega Bernucci Du Tremoul; Francesco Ventura
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Timing of surgery following SARS-CoV-2 infection: an international prospective cohort study.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 12.893

9.  Delaying surgery for patients with a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Authors: 
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 11.122

10.  Risk of Acquiring Perioperative COVID-19 During the Initial Pandemic Peak: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Lucas G Axiotakis; Brett E Youngerman; Randy K Casals; Tyler S Cooke; Graham M Winston; Cory L Chang; Deborah M Boyett; Anil K Lalwani; Guy M McKhann
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 13.787

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.