Literature DB >> 35960635

ECM roles and biomechanics in cardiac tissue decellularization.

Kaitlin M Whitehead1, Hanifah K L Hendricks1, Sirin N Cakir1, Lisandra E de Castro Brás1.   

Abstract

Natural biomaterials hold enormous potential for tissue regeneration. The rapid advance of several tissue-engineered biomaterials, such as natural and synthetic polymer-based scaffolds, has led to widespread application of these materials in the clinic and in research. However, biomaterials can have limited repair capacity; obstacles result from immunogenicity, difficulties in mimicking native microenvironments, and maintaining the mechanical and biochemical (i.e., biomechanical) properties of native organs/tissues. The emergence of decellularized extracellular matrix (ECM)-derived biomaterials provides an attractive solution to overcome these hurdles since decellularized ECM provides a nonimmune environment with native three-dimensional structures and bioactive components. More importantly, decellularized ECM can be generated from the tissue of interest, such as the heart, and keep its native macro- and microstructure and tissue-specific composition. These decellularized cardiac matrices/scaffolds can then be reseeded using cardiac cells, and the resulting recellularized construct is considered an ideal choice for regenerating functional organs/tissues. Nonetheless, the decellularization process must be optimized and depends on tissue type, age, and functional goal. Although most decellularization protocols significantly reduce immunogenicity and deliver a matrix that maintains the tissue macrostructure, suboptimal decellularization can change ECM composition and microstructure, which affects the biomechanical properties of the tissue and consequently changes cell-matrix interactions and organ function. Herein, we review methods of decellularization, with particular emphasis on cardiac tissue, and how they can affect the biomechanics of the tissue, which in turn determines success of reseeding and in vivo viability. Moreover, we review recent developments in decellularized ECM-derived cardiac biomaterials and discuss future perspectives.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomechanics; cardiac; decellularization; extracellular matrix

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35960635      PMCID: PMC9467473          DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00372.2022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6135            Impact factor:   5.125


  92 in total

1.  Isolation, characterization, and localization of cardiac collagen type VI. Associations with other extracellular matrix components.

Authors:  R I Bashey; A Martinez-Hernandez; S A Jimenez
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 17.367

2.  Comparative analysis of two porcine kidney decellularization methods for maintenance of functional vascular architectures.

Authors:  Joao Paulo Zambon; In Kap Ko; Mehran Abolbashari; Jennifer Huling; Cara Clouse; Tae Hyoung Kim; Charesa Smith; Anthony Atala; James J Yoo
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 8.947

3.  Collagenase treatment enhances proteomic coverage of low-abundance proteins in decellularized matrix bioscaffolds.

Authors:  Miljan Kuljanin; Cody F C Brown; Matthew J Raleigh; Gilles A Lajoie; Lauren E Flynn
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2017-08-13       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  The impact of detergents on the tissue decellularization process: A ToF-SIMS study.

Authors:  Lisa J White; Adam J Taylor; Denver M Faulk; Timothy J Keane; Lindsey T Saldin; Janet E Reing; Ilea T Swinehart; Neill J Turner; Buddy D Ratner; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 8.947

5.  Repopulation of decellularized mouse heart with human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiovascular progenitor cells.

Authors:  Tung-Ying Lu; Bo Lin; Jong Kim; Mara Sullivan; Kimimasa Tobita; Guy Salama; Lei Yang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Equine pericardium: a versatile alternative reconstructive material in congenital cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Ahmed Abdelrahman Elassal; Osman Osama Al-Radi; Zaher Faisal Zaher; Ahmed Mohamed Dohain; Gaser Abdelmohsen Abdelmohsen; Ragab Sayed Mohamed; Mazin Adel Fatani; Mohamed Esam Abdelmotaleb; Nada Ahmed Noaman; Mahmoud Akl Elmeligy; Osama Saber Eldib
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 1.637

7.  Interindividual heterogeneity affects the outcome of human cardiac tissue decellularization.

Authors:  Miguel F Tenreiro; Henrique V Almeida; Tomás Calmeiro; Elvira Fortunato; Lino Ferreira; Paula M Alves; Margarida Serra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Comparative assessment of the efficiency of various decellularization agents for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Asrin Emami; Tahereh Talaei-Khozani; Zahra Vojdani; Nehleh Zarei Fard
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2020-07-05       Impact factor: 3.368

9.  Optimizing recellularization of whole decellularized heart extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Matthew J Robertson; Jessica L Dries-Devlin; Stefan M Kren; Jana S Burchfield; Doris A Taylor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ambiguity in the Presentation of Decellularized Tissue Composition: The Need for Standardized Approaches.

Authors:  Arne A N Bruyneel; Carolyn A Carr
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.094

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.