Louis Kuijpers1, Theo van Laar1, Richard Janissen2, Nynke H Dekker3. 1. Department of Bionanoscience, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HZ Delft, the Netherlands. 2. Department of Bionanoscience, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HZ Delft, the Netherlands. Electronic address: r.janissen@tudelft.nl. 3. Department of Bionanoscience, Delft University of Technology, 2629 HZ Delft, the Netherlands. Electronic address: n.h.dekker@tudelft.nl.
Abstract
Multiplexed single-molecule magnetic tweezers (MT) have recently been employed to probe the RNA synthesis dynamics of RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRp). Here, we present a protocol for simultaneously probing the RNA synthesis dynamics of hundreds of single polymerases with MT. We describe the preparation of a dsRNA construct for probing single RdRp kinetics. We then detail the measurement of RdRp RNA synthesis kinetics using MT. The protocol is suitable for high-throughput probing of RdRp-targeting antiviral compounds for mechanistic function and efficacy. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Janissen et al. (2021).
Multiplexed single-molecule magnetic tweezers (MT) have recently been employed to probe the RNA synthesis dynamics of RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRp). Here, we present a protocol for simultaneously probing the RNA synthesis dynamics of hundreds of single polymerases with MT. We describe the preparation of a dsRNA construct for probing single RdRp kinetics. We then detail the measurement of RdRp RNA synthesis kinetics using MT. The protocol is suitable for high-throughput probing of RdRp-targeting antiviral compounds for mechanistic function and efficacy. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Janissen et al. (2021).
The presented assay allows a quantitative description of the RNA synthesis dynamics of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, including the nucleotide incorporation rate, pausing frequency, and pause lifetimes under a variety of conditions (Janissen et al. (2021)). The assay further serves as a platform for the systemic screening of RdRp-targeting antivirals and their effects on RNA synthesis, which can be identified by changes in the processivity, pause frequency and pause duration (Janissen et al. (2021); (Seifert et al., 2021)). Due to the high spatiotemporal resolution of the presented technique, the assay can also be used to identify potential sequence motifs acting as copy-back recombination triggers (Janissen et al. (2021)).The protocol is written for researchers with a working understanding of MT experimentation. This protocol, initially designed for the quantitative investigation of bacteriophage Ф6 RdRp dynamics (Dulin et al., 2015a), was modified for the RNA virus species enterovirus A71 (EV71) and poliovirus (PV) (Janissen et al., 2021). This protocol describes all steps for constructing the RNA template, setting up the MT experiment to measure RdRp RNA synthesis dynamics, and analysis of the RdRp translocation data. The protocol requires the RdRp of choice to be already purified (Fields et al., 1996), and the magnet distance-force relationship to be known (Ostrofet et al., 2018; Yu et al., 2014).
Preparation of the RNA construct
Timing: 1 dayThe following steps describe the construction of a dsRNA construct containing a short hairpin structure at the 3′ overhang of the template strand for RdRp binding and primer extension. The dsRNA construct consists of five fragments initially amplified as DNA, then transcribed to generate RNA fragments that are annealed to obtain the full dsRNA construct (Figure 1).
Figure 1
dsRNA construct preparation for the RdRp RNA synthesis assay
(A) Simplified pBAD plasmid maps for PCR amplification of the five DNA fragments.
(B) Annealing of the RNA transcripts to generate the dsRNA construct used in MT. The transcripts originate from run-off T7 transcription of the individual DNA fragments. BIO: biotin-enriched handle; DIG: digoxigenin-enriched handle; SP: spacer fragment; CD: RNA synthesis template; AB: construct backbone.
The pBAD vector is subjected to gradient PCR with the primer combinations described in the KRT to produce the five DNA fragments (Figure 1). Only one primer in each combination contains a T7 promoter.dsRNA construct preparation for the RdRp RNA synthesis assay(A) Simplified pBAD plasmid maps for PCR amplification of the five DNA fragments.(B) Annealing of the RNA transcripts to generate the dsRNA construct used in MT. The transcripts originate from run-off T7 transcription of the individual DNA fragments. BIO: biotin-enriched handle; DIG: digoxigenin-enriched handle; SP: spacer fragment; CD: RNA synthesis template; AB: construct backbone.∗For the extension step, use 45 s/kb of the fragment length. Fragment lengths are presented in Figure 1.Load 20 μL of each DNA fragment into a lane of a 0.7% agarose gel, run for 60 min at 60 V, and purify them using gel electrophoresis (Figure 2A).
Figure 2
Agarose gels for verification of fragment size
(A) DNA fragments amplified by gradient PCR purified on individual 0.7% agarose gels (here, joined lanes), stained with SYBR Safe.
(B) Transcribed RNA products running on a 1.0% agarose gel, stained with SYBR Safe. AB: construct backbone; CD: RNA synthesis template; SP: spacer fragment; BIO: biotin-enriched handle; DIG: digoxigenin-enriched handle.
Agarose gels for verification of fragment size(A) DNA fragments amplified by gradient PCR purified on individual 0.7% agarose gels (here, joined lanes), stained with SYBR Safe.(B) Transcribed RNA products running on a 1.0% agarose gel, stained with SYBR Safe. AB: construct backbone; CD: RNA synthesis template; SP: spacer fragment; BIO: biotin-enriched handle; DIG: digoxigenin-enriched handle.Stain the gel with SYBR Safe and visualize using blue light.Cut the bands of each DNA fragment out of the gel and purify using the Promega Wizard kit according to the manufacturer’s manual.Determine the concentrations of the different DNA eluates with a spectrophotometer and adjust to 10 μM in MilliQ water.For the conversion of RNA concentration from ng/μL to molar concentration, the following formula can be used:with = mass of dsDNA in grams, = length of dsDNA in base pairs, and V (l) = volume in liters.For each DNA fragment, prepare the RNA transcription reaction using the Promega T7 transcription kit together with the appropriate pipetting protocol:Since RNases can cleave and degrade the RNA, we recommend the use of RNase free reagents and pipette tips from this point forward.Incubate the transcription reactions for 3 h at 37°C without shaking or rotation.To each transcription mixture add 0.5 μL DNaseI and incubate for another 15 min at 37°C.Purify the synthesized RNA fragments with an RNeasy MinElute cleanup kit, following the manufacturer’s manual. Elute the RNA fragments in 1 mM sodium citrate (pH 6.4).Confirm the RNA fragment size using a 1% agarose gel, run for 60 min at 60 V (Figure 2B).Determine the concentration of the eluted RNA transcripts with a spectrophotometer.To anneal the RNA transcripts to the dsRNA construct, mix the SP, CD, and AB RNA transcripts in equimolar ratio and add the DIG and BIO handles in 4× molar excess in SSC buffer (0.5× saline-sodium citrate) in a total reaction volume of 200 μL.To obtain the force-extension relationship of ssRNA and dsRNA in MT, perform the same annealing reaction as in step 12, but without the CD fragment.Perform the annealing reaction of the dsRNA or ssRNA constructs using the following program in the thermocycler:
Key resources table
Materials and equipment
SCC buffer (pH 7.0)Store at 4°C for up to 3 months, heat to RT prior to use.PBS buffer (pH 7.4)Store at 4°C for up to 3 months, heat to RT prior to use.Passivation buffer (pH 7.0)Store at 4°C for up to 3 months, heat to RT prior to use.BSA buffer (pH 7.4)Store at 4°C for up to 3 months, heat to RT prior to use.Preparation buffer (pH 7.4)Store at 4°C for up to 3 months, heat to RT prior to use.Transcription buffer (pH 6.6)Store at 4°C for up to 3 months, heat to RT prior to use.
Step-by-step method details
Preparation of the flow cell
Timing: 2.5 hUse a sandblaster, CNC laser cutter, or diamond drill to drill two holes (∼1.0–1.5 mm diameter) into the top cover slip for the inlet and outlet of the flow cell; see Figure 3A.
Figure 3
Flow cell assembly process
(A) A flow cell consists of a top coverslip with two holes of 1–1.5 mm diameter, approximately 40 mm from each other, a double layer of parafilm (∼200 μm thickness) with cut-out channel in the center, and a bottom coverslip. The total volume of the flow cell channel corresponds to ∼70 μL.
(B) Representation of flow cell assembly by melting the double-layer of parafilm between the top and bottom coverslips.
(C) Assembly of the flow cell in an MT flow cell holder. The technical drawings of the MT flow cell holder parts are available at https://doi.org/10.4121/19145426.
Flow cell assembly process(A) A flow cell consists of a top coverslip with two holes of 1–1.5 mm diameter, approximately 40 mm from each other, a double layer of parafilm (∼200 μm thickness) with cut-out channel in the center, and a bottom coverslip. The total volume of the flow cell channel corresponds to ∼70 μL.(B) Representation of flow cell assembly by melting the double-layer of parafilm between the top and bottom coverslips.(C) Assembly of the flow cell in an MT flow cell holder. The technical drawings of the MT flow cell holder parts are available at https://doi.org/10.4121/19145426.Cut a double-layer of parafilm with a scalpel to the desired channel dimensions (here, 5 mm wide and 40 mm long; see also Figure 3A.Clean a (top) coverslip with holes (obtained at step 1) and a (bottom) coverslip without holes by sonicating them for 25 min in 4% (v/v) Hellmanex III in MilliQ water at 40°C in a coplin staining jar.Wash the coverslips multiple times with MilliQ water.Sonicate the coverslips for 25 min in MilliQ water at 20°C.Sonicate the coverslips for 25 min in Ethanol (e.g., pro analysis grade).Dry the coverslips with a nitrogen stream.Apply oxygen plasma to both coverslips (20 s, oxygen flow: 2.5 SCFH; 200 W).Assemble the flow cell by melting the double-layer of parafilm between the top and the bottom coverslip on a hot plate (95°C for 30 s; see also Figure 3B).It is recommended to prepare multiple coverslips for higher throughput or in case of leakage/breaking of flow cells.
Flow cell assembly
Timing: 30 minThe flow cell holder ensures proper attachment to the magnetic tweezers, minimizing potential vibrational influence and mechanical drift to measurement accuracy. Additionally, it adds practical inlet and outlet connections to the flow cell.Assemble the flow cell in a flow cell holder (Figure 3C).Attach the flow cell to the magnetic tweezers instrument and attach the outlet to a tube that is connected to a peristaltic pump (Figure 3C).Any pump type (e.g., peristaltic, syringe) can be used as long as speeds as low as ∼200 μL/min can be achieved.Flow 300 μL PBS buffer though the flow cell by pipetting the solution directly into the inlet (Figure 3C) during pumping and assure full wetting (complete side-to-side covering of the channel with buffer within the flow cell).Throughout the protocol it is important to have all buffers at least at 20°C and use low flow rates (e.g., ∼200 μL/min) to minimize the formation of air bubbles in the flow cell. Additionally, prior degassing of the buffers can be beneficial.Perform a leakage test by closing the valve to the pump, filling the inlet with buffer, and observing the reduction in volume at the inlet for ∼15 min. A large reduction in volume indicates leakage.Evaporation will also reduce the volume, but only marginally over time. If leakage is apparent, it might be resolved using one of the presented solutions (Troubleshooting; Problem 1: the flow cell).
Attachment of reference beads to flow cell surface
Timing: 15 minReference bead attachment to the surface provides a reference point for displacement of the magnetic beads relative to the surface.Flow 100 μL of polystyrene beads (stock concentration of 1.35 × 1010 beads/mL) diluted 1,500 times in PBS into the flow cell (see Figure 4: step 1).
Figure 4
Schematic of the MT and step-wise functionalization of the flow cell surface
(Left) General overview of the MT setup: light originating from an LED travels through the gap between the magnets, illuminates the flow cell, and is captured by the objective. The images are reflected to and recorded by a CMOS camera and analyzed with custom-written software to determine the x, y and z positions of the magnetic beads in real time (Cnossen et al., 2014). The outlet of the flow cell holder is connected to a suction pump. (Right) The steps involved in coating the flow cell surface and tethering the RNA construct: (1) Reference beads are attached to the surface. (2) Anti-DIG antibodies are attached to the surface, serving as an anchor for the RNA construct. (3) Passivation of the glass surface using the poloxamer Pluronics F127 to suppress unspecific adhesion of biomolecules and magnetic beads. The antibodies and reference beads protrude through the surface coating. (4) The RNA construct is anchored to the flow cell via anti-DIG:DIG linkage. (5) A streptavidin-coated magnetic bead is attached to the RNA construct through the strong biotin:streptavidin interaction. Drawings are not to scale.
Schematic of the MT and step-wise functionalization of the flow cell surface(Left) General overview of the MT setup: light originating from an LED travels through the gap between the magnets, illuminates the flow cell, and is captured by the objective. The images are reflected to and recorded by a CMOS camera and analyzed with custom-written software to determine the x, y and z positions of the magnetic beads in real time (Cnossen et al., 2014). The outlet of the flow cell holder is connected to a suction pump. (Right) The steps involved in coating the flow cell surface and tethering the RNA construct: (1) Reference beads are attached to the surface. (2) Anti-DIG antibodies are attached to the surface, serving as an anchor for the RNA construct. (3) Passivation of the glass surface using the poloxamer Pluronics F127 to suppress unspecific adhesion of biomolecules and magnetic beads. The antibodies and reference beads protrude through the surface coating. (4) The RNA construct is anchored to the flow cell via anti-DIG:DIG linkage. (5) A streptavidin-coated magnetic bead is attached to the RNA construct through the strong biotin:streptavidin interaction. Drawings are not to scale.Incubate solution until 5–8 beads per field of view are adhered to the surface.Flush all non-adhered beads out using 1–2 mL PBS buffer.
Attaching digoxigenin antibodies to the flow cell surface
Timing: 70 minThe digoxigenin antibodies provide the RNA construct an anchor point on the surface.Flush 100 μL of 0.1 mg/mL anti-DIG IgG in PBS into the flow cell and incubate for 1 h (see Figure 4: step 2).Flush out non-adhered, residual anti-DIG IgG using 500 μL PBS buffer.
Surface passivation with BSA and F127
Timing: 170 minSurface passivation ensures that non-specific adhesion of proteins, RNA, or magnetic beads is reduced to a minimum.Flush though the flow cell 500 μL of PBS supplemented with 10 mg/mL BSA (see Figure 4: step 3).Incubate for 2 h.Flush though the flow cell 500 μL BSA buffer.Flush though the flow cell 500 μL of PBS supplemented with 0.5% F127.Incubate for 30 min.Flush though the flow cell 500 μL PBS.
Washing of magnetic beads
Timing: 10 minWashing the magnetic beads in passivation buffer ensures that non-specific adhesion of magnetic beads to the surface is reduced to a minimum. Furthermore, it allows for a buffer exchange from the manufacturer’s storage buffer.The washing of the magnetic beads can be performed in parallel to the surface passivation. We advise to perform the steps 25–27. during the incubation of 0.5% F127 in the flow cell (step 23).Add 3.0 μL of M280 magnetic beads to 100 μL of passivation buffer.Mix the solution, then separate the magnetic beads from the liquid using a magnetic stand and discard the supernatant.Repeat previous step 2 more times with fresh passivation buffer. Afterwards, resuspend the magnetic beads in 100 μL preparation buffer.
RNA tethering between surface and magnetic beads
Timing: 35 minRNA and magnetic bead tethering are crucial for setting up the MT assay.Inject 100 μL of 2 pM RNA construct in preparation buffer into the flow cell (see Figure 4: step 4).For the conversion of RNA concentration from ng/μL to M, the following formula can be used:with = mass of dsRNA in grams, = length of dsRNA in base pairs, and V (l) = volume in liters.Incubate for 20 min.Flush 500 μL of preparation buffer though the flow cell to wash away non-tethered RNA constructs.Inject 100 μL of washed magnetic beads and incubate until 200–300 beads are tethered per field of view, typically after ∼5 min (here, the field-of-view dimensions are 491 μm × 369 μm; see Figure 4: step 5).For this protocol we recommend using M280 beads because they can readily reach forces up to tens of pN, and their hydrophobic surface coating t significantly reduces non-specific bead adhesion on the surface compared to hydrophilic M270 beads.If unspecific bead adhesion to the surface is apparent, it might be resolved using one of the presented solutions (Troubleshooting; Problem 3: all magnetic beads are adhered to the surface).Wash surplus of untethered beads out using 1–2 mL of preparation buffer.The magnetic beads should be held at a constant force of ≥2 pN to exclude potential non-specific bead adhesion on the surface before the initiation of RNA synthesis.If tether formation is not observed, it might be resolved using one of the presented solutions (Troubleshooting; Problem 2: absence of tether formation).
Creating a magnetic bead Z-lookup table
Timing: 5 minBead Z-position lookup tables are created as a reference to accurately determine the beads’ vertical position relative to the focal plane over time. There are different ways to determine the bead Z-position in MT. Here, we create an individual look-up table for each dsRNA-tethered bead and reference bead (Cnossen et al., 2014; Gosse and Croquette, 2002).Create bead Z-position look-up tables (200 steps, 50 nm step size) at a constant force of 10 pN.
Measuring the force extension curves for dsRNA and ssRNA
Timing: 30 minThis measurement has to be made only once to estimate the extensions of the dsRNA and ssRNA (created by annealing all fragments with the exception of the CD fragment (Figure 1B) according to before you begin, step 12) constructs as a function of force. This information will be important at later stage to convert the height change of the tethered beads in micrometers to nucleotides synthesized by RdRp.Measure the extension of dsRNA and ssRNA with force ranging from 0.01 to 40 pN.Repeat steps 1–34. using the ssRNA construct (without CD transcript).Determine the ssRNA l(F) and dsRNA l(F) extensions. Select the lowest possible force at which the the difference between l(F) and l(F) is sufficiently large. Larger differences between l(F) and l(F) will result in a larger bead displacement in I-direction per nucleotide incorporated by the RdRp, and thus an increased spatial resolution. For the RNA constructs used here, 25 pN was chosen; see also Figure 5.
Figure 5
Force-extension curves of ssRNA and dsRNA
Force-extension curve of the dsRNA construct (gray) and the ssRNA construct (red) that lacks the CD fragment. The lines represent a WLC fit to the dsRNA data (black) and a linear interpolation of the ssRNA data (red). During RdRp RNA synthesis, the CD template strand is displaced from the AB strand, gradually increasing the fraction of ssRNA. A constant force of 25 pN (blue) was selected for our experiments due the large difference in extension between dsRNA and ssRNA, which provides high spatial resolution for RdRp RNA synthesis. Error bars represent standard deviation (N = 8).
Force-extension curves of ssRNA and dsRNAForce-extension curve of the dsRNA construct (gray) and the ssRNA construct (red) that lacks the CD fragment. The lines represent a WLC fit to the dsRNA data (black) and a linear interpolation of the ssRNA data (red). During RdRp RNA synthesis, the CD template strand is displaced from the AB strand, gradually increasing the fraction of ssRNA. A constant force of 25 pN (blue) was selected for our experiments due the large difference in extension between dsRNA and ssRNA, which provides high spatial resolution for RdRp RNA synthesis. Error bars represent standard deviation (N = 8).
Ternary complex formation
Timing: 30 minTernary complex formation is the construction of the full RNA tether with a stalled RdRp present on the RNA template. Ternary complex formation can significantly increase RdRp re-initiation efficiency when dinucleotide ApC is used.Flush 80 μL of transcription buffer supplemented with 600 nM RdRp, 0.6 mM ATP, 0.6 mM CTP and 1.2 mM ApC dinucleotide into the flow cell.Incubate for 20 min.Wash out all non-bound RdRp with 500 μL of transcription buffer.
RNA tether characterization
Timing: 15 minIt is important to verify that the dsRNA constructs are singly tethered to a magnetic bead and of correct length. Furthermore, the measured length of each dsRNA tether must be known to convert the reduction in bead height upon RdRp RNA synthesis from micrometers to transcribed RNA nucleotides. The recording of the magnetic bead movement in all three dimensions was conducted with the control software described and published in Cnossen et al. (2014). The measurement parameters were set to: 25 Hz camera frequency, Look Up Table (LUT) range of 10 μm with steps of 50 nm, quadrant interpolation as the algorithm used for the bead’s Z-position determination, and a Region of Interest (ROI) of 90 px.Start the data acquisition and perform the dsRNA tether characterization by changing the force and magnet rotation over time (see also Figures 6A and 6B) as follows:
Figure 6
dsRNA tether characterization measurement and analysis
(A) The dsRNA tether is stretched from low to high force () as well as rotated () with a varying speed and number of turns.
(B) Bead Z-position at zero force (top; red) and applied force (middle; black) during the experiment (here, 25 pN), allowing the determination of the apparent end-to-end length (L) of the dsRNA tether. The magnet is rotated (bottom; blue) to determine whether the dsRNA is singly tethered to the magnetic bead (with -30 turns at the force applied for the RNA synthesis experiment), and to assess the distance R between the off-center attachment point of the dsRNA tether and the bead’s geometric south pole (as defined when the bead’s net magnetic moment (m) aligns with the field, panel D).
(C) X- and Y-positions of the magnetic bead during slow rotations (0.25 s/turn; see the dashed box in (B)) allow the determination of R using a circular fit.
(D) The correct end-to-end dsRNA construct length L is the sum of the apparent length Z and ΔZ, where ΔZ is the height difference between the off-center dsRNA attachment point.
dsRNA tether characterization measurement and analysis(A) The dsRNA tether is stretched from low to high force () as well as rotated () with a varying speed and number of turns.(B) Bead Z-position at zero force (top; red) and applied force (middle; black) during the experiment (here, 25 pN), allowing the determination of the apparent end-to-end length (L) of the dsRNA tether. The magnet is rotated (bottom; blue) to determine whether the dsRNA is singly tethered to the magnetic bead (with -30 turns at the force applied for the RNA synthesis experiment), and to assess the distance R between the off-center attachment point of the dsRNA tether and the bead’s geometric south pole (as defined when the bead’s net magnetic moment (m) aligns with the field, panel D).(C) X- and Y-positions of the magnetic bead during slow rotations (0.25 s/turn; see the dashed box in (B)) allow the determination of R using a circular fit.(D) The correct end-to-end dsRNA construct length L is the sum of the apparent length Z and ΔZ, where ΔZ is the height difference between the off-center dsRNA attachment point.The undesired tethering of multiple RNA tethers to one bead is signified by a sharp decrease in the bead I-position during the rotation of the magnets in the negative direction at high force. Additionally, the rotations provide information instrumental to the determination of the length of the RNA tether, see below.From the traces, determine each the magnetic bead’s height at zero force (Z0) and at 25 pN (Z); see Figure 6B.Determine the radius of the magnetic beads’ rotational motion R by fitting the plot of X-positions in function of Y-positions with a circle; see Figure 6C.The attachment point of the RNA tether to the magnetic bead is in most instances not perfectly at the bead’s geometric south pole (Figure 6D) (Klaue and Seidel, 2009; Lipfert et al., 2009). Therefore, the apparent length of tether (Zext) can be significantly smaller than the actual tether length (Lcorr) and needs to be corrected. Slow rotation of the bead will provide crucial information for the correction. While we used Igor Pro (V6.37) as the software platform for the analysis of the bead traces, any other scripting-capable software that is able to import the text file output of the data acquisition software can be used, i.e., commonly used MATLAB and Python.Calculate the length difference between the RNA attachment point R and the bead’s south pole using the bead radius R and the Pythagorean theorem (see also Figure 6D):Add the corrected tether length by adding to the apparent end-to-end length Zext obtained from the calibration measurement (see Figure 6D):Calculate the average length of an RNA base by dividing Lcorr by the number of base pairs in the construct; this value is later used to convert changes in bead Z-position to synthesized RNA products as a function of time.
Measuring RdRp RNA synthesis kinetics
Timing: 2 hAddition of all nucleotides allows the ternary complexes to re-initiate RdRp RNA synthesis (Figure 7A).
Figure 7
Processing of RNA synthesis trajectory data
(A) Schematic of the single-molecule (+)-strand RNA synthesis assay, showing binding of an RdRp to a hairpin at the 3′ end of the (-)-strand (gray) of the surface-attached RNA construct. A magnetic bead attached to the RNA construct is subject to a constant force of 25 pN during RNA synthesis. Primer extension (red) from the 3′ end of hairpin will lead to displacement of the template RNA (gray) from the tethered RNA (black). At 25 pN force, conversion of dsRNA to ssRNA causes a corresponding increase in the distance of the magnetic bead from the surface.
(B) Non-processed RdRp RNA synthesis example trajectory, normalized to the initial RNA extension prior NTP-addition. The lag time (green) is the time that the RdRp is inactive before re-initializing RNA synthesis upon NTP-addition and can vastly differ between RdRps. RNA synthesis (red) is intermittent, with stochastic pauses of different lifetimes. Arrest or dissociation of the RdRp causes the RNA extension (or bead z-position) to stop changing (blue).
(C) Superimposed, processed example RNA synthesis trajectories that were cut and converted to RNA nucleotides synthesized (data sets from (Janissen et al., 2021)).
Lower the magnet to the appropriate height to apply a constant force of 25 pN (or any other force determined in steps 34–36).Re-initiate RNA synthesis by flushing 100 μL of transcription buffer supplemented with all four rNTPs into the flow cell (the NTP concentration depends on the experiment design; here, 1 mM was chosen).Immediately after, start the measurement and record all magnetic bead Z-positions for 2 h.Complete absence of RdRp trajectories might be resolved using one of the presented solutions (Troubleshooting; Problem 4: no RdRp activity observed).Processing of RNA synthesis trajectory data(A) Schematic of the single-molecule (+)-strand RNA synthesis assay, showing binding of an RdRp to a hairpin at the 3′ end of the (-)-strand (gray) of the surface-attached RNA construct. A magnetic bead attached to the RNA construct is subject to a constant force of 25 pN during RNA synthesis. Primer extension (red) from the 3′ end of hairpin will lead to displacement of the template RNA (gray) from the tethered RNA (black). At 25 pN force, conversion of dsRNA to ssRNA causes a corresponding increase in the distance of the magnetic bead from the surface.(B) Non-processed RdRp RNA synthesis example trajectory, normalized to the initial RNA extension prior NTP-addition. The lag time (green) is the time that the RdRp is inactive before re-initializing RNA synthesis upon NTP-addition and can vastly differ between RdRps. RNA synthesis (red) is intermittent, with stochastic pauses of different lifetimes. Arrest or dissociation of the RdRp causes the RNA extension (or bead z-position) to stop changing (blue).(C) Superimposed, processed example RNA synthesis trajectories that were cut and converted to RNA nucleotides synthesized (data sets from (Janissen et al., 2021)).
Expected outcomes
The magnetic tweezers protocol presented here enables a quantitative description of RdRp RNA synthesis dynamics, including the nucleotide incorporation rate, pausing frequency, and pause lifetimes, which can be probed under a variety of conditions. The presented data show the detectable changes in RNA synthesis processivity and pausing dynamics in presence of pyrazine carboxamide nucleotide analog T-1106 (Figures 8 and 9). The application of this method to variations in conditions, such as NTP concentration, different nucleotide analogs, or even transient roadblocks imposed by RNA-binding proteins, will allow the identification and quantitative characterization of their effect on RdRp translocation and RNA synthesis dynamics. Figures related to the expected outcome of each step of the protocol have been presented.
Figure 8
RdRp processivity and average RNA synthesis velocity of EV-A71 RdRp
(A and B) (A) RdRp processivity and (B) average RNA synthesis velocity (mean±SD) derived from example EV-A71 RdRp trajectories in the absence and presence of T-1106 triphosphate (data sets from (Janissen et al., 2021)). Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired, two-tailed t-tests (significance level: ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001).
Figure 9
Constructing the dwell time distribution and extracting pausing dynamics of EV-A71 RdRp RNA synthesis
(A) Magnified region of the individual RNA synthesis trajectory shown in Figure 7A. The dwell times are determined by extracting the time (τ) needed for the RdRp to synthesize a defined number of consecutive nucleotides; the example shows ten-nucleotide dwell time windows as dashed lines.
(B) Dwell time probability distribution of 9,981 dwell times extracted from RNA synthesis trajectories using a dwell time window of four nucleotides and binned with six bins per decade. The error bars (AVG ± SD) result from bootstrapping with 1,000 iterations. Solid curves show the best fit of a simple model to the data, where the contributions of individual components of the model are separated: the blue curve at short timescales captures the effective pause-free elongation rate, while the black curve corresponds to a single pause state with exponential decay.
(C) Superimposed dwell time distributions of EV-A71 RdRp in absence (gray) and presence (magenta) of the nucleotide analog T-1106 triphosphate; data sets from (Janissen et al., 2021).
(D and E) Quantification of the dwell time distributions in (C): the addition of T-1106 triphosphate (magenta) induces a significant increase in (D) pausing probability (mean±SD) and (E) average pause duration (mean±SEM). Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired, two-tailed t-tests (significance level: ∗∗∗p < 0.001).
RdRp processivity and average RNA synthesis velocity of EV-A71 RdRp(A and B) (A) RdRp processivity and (B) average RNA synthesis velocity (mean±SD) derived from example EV-A71 RdRp trajectories in the absence and presence of T-1106 triphosphate (data sets from (Janissen et al., 2021)). Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired, two-tailed t-tests (significance level: ∗∗p < 0.01; ∗∗∗p < 0.001).Constructing the dwell time distribution and extracting pausing dynamics of EV-A71 RdRp RNA synthesis(A) Magnified region of the individual RNA synthesis trajectory shown in Figure 7A. The dwell times are determined by extracting the time (τ) needed for the RdRp to synthesize a defined number of consecutive nucleotides; the example shows ten-nucleotide dwell time windows as dashed lines.(B) Dwell time probability distribution of 9,981 dwell times extracted from RNA synthesis trajectories using a dwell time window of four nucleotides and binned with six bins per decade. The error bars (AVG ± SD) result from bootstrapping with 1,000 iterations. Solid curves show the best fit of a simple model to the data, where the contributions of individual components of the model are separated: the blue curve at short timescales captures the effective pause-free elongation rate, while the black curve corresponds to a single pause state with exponential decay.(C) Superimposed dwell time distributions of EV-A71 RdRp in absence (gray) and presence (magenta) of the nucleotide analog T-1106 triphosphate; data sets from (Janissen et al., 2021).(D and E) Quantification of the dwell time distributions in (C): the addition of T-1106 triphosphate (magenta) induces a significant increase in (D) pausing probability (mean±SD) and (E) average pause duration (mean±SEM). Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired, two-tailed t-tests (significance level: ∗∗∗p < 0.001).
Quantification and statistical analysis
In this section, the protocol describes the analysis of the bead z-displacement (associated with ssRNA displacement during RNA synthesis) obtained in the MT experiment in a step-wise fashion. In the first step, the z-displacement of the magnetic bead is converted into number of nucleotides synthesized, from which the RdRp processivity and the average velocity are calculated. In the last step the protocol guides through the process of constructing the dwell time distributions of the RNA synthesis kinetics, from which the average pause lifetimes and pausing probabilities are extracted. As aforementioned, we used Igor Pro (V6.37) as software platform for the analysis of the RdRp trajectories, however, scripting-capable software that is able to import the delimited text file output from the acquisition software (e.g., MATLAB or Python) is equally suited.
Converting changes in RNA extension to nucleotides synthesized
Timing: 1 hFor each individual RdRp trajectory, normalize the RNA extension to the extension before the addition of NTPs. Next, cut out the lag time and final plateaus where there is no RdRp synthesis activity or dissociation has occurred (see Figures 7B and 7C).Convert the ssRNA extension to the number of RNA nucleotides synthesized, NTsynth, using the formula below, where represents the measured apparent increase in RNA length, and is the difference in length between the extensions of ssRNA and dsRNA:
Extracting RdRp processivity and average RNA synthesis velocity
Timing: 1 hDetermine the average RdRp processivity from the maximum amount of RNA synthesized in each individual trajectory (nucleotidesi; example shown in Figure 8A):Compute the average velocity by dividing individual RdRp processivities (step 3) by the duration of active RNA synthesis (example shown in Figure 8B):
Constructing the dwell time distribution and extracting average pause lifetimes and pausing probability
Timing: 1 hThe construction of the dwell time distribution allows for the calculation of both the average pause probability as well as the average pause lifetime. The dwell times are determined by extracting from all RNA synthesis trajectories the time needed for the RdRp to synthesize a defined number of consecutive nucleotides (Dulin et al., 2015c).Filter the individual RNA synthesis trajectories using a 1 Hz sliding mean filter.Construct a dwell time distribution (Figures 9A–9C) of all the RNA synthesis trajectories belonging to the same experimental condition. You may use the MATLAB script provided in a repository (https://doi.org/10.4121/19145426), which also includes example data.From the dwell time distribution, determine the lifetime where pausing starts. In the example shown in Figures 9B and 9C, the lower bound of pausing lifetimes is > 1 s.Calculate the average pause probability Ppause by integrating dwell times larger than the pause lifetime lower bound (see example in Figure 9D):Determine the average pause lifetime by averaging all dwell times larger than the pause lifetime lower bound (see example in Figure 9E):
Limitations
A limitation of the presented method is the inability to directly interrogate the RNA products of RdRp activity that are produced in the magnetic tweezers. In addition, the amount of processing power required to determine many tracked bead positions using Z-lookup table cross-correlation can be significant. To avoid crashing or freezing of the software, it is advised to ensure that a PC with sufficient computational power is used for tracking of many magnetic beads.
Troubleshooting
Problem 1
The flow cell leaks.
Potential solution
Reduce the inlet and outlet holes’ diameter in the top cover slip (step 1).Tighten carefully the screws of the flow cell (step 10).Check O-rings for graining or damage of the rubber and possibly replace them (step 10).Replace the flow cell in the holder (step 10).Check attachment of inlet and outlet tubing (step 11).
Problem 2
Absence of tether formation.Replace stocks of anti-DIG, RNA construct, RNase inhibitor, and magnetic beads (steps 17, 28, and 31).Use or synthesize a new RNA construct. Contaminations with RNases can cut the dsRNA, thus preventing tether formation (step 28).Increase RNA concentration (step 28).Increase incubation time of magnetic beads (step 31).
Problem 3
All magnetic beads are adhered to the surface.Increase passivation time of the flow cell (step 20).Use new magnetic bead stock. Make sure magnetic beads are not expired (step 25).Switch hydrophobicity of the beads (from M280 to M270 or vice versa) (step 25).Increase passivation time of the magnetic beads (step 26).Reduce incubation time of the magnetic beads (step 31).Give a short pulse of high force (max. 40 pN) to break non-specific bead adhesion (prior to step 46).
Problem 4
No RdRp activity observed.Use another batch of or purify new RdRp (step 37).Increase ternary complex formation time (step 38).Increase the concentration of rNTPs (step 47).
Problem 5
Output parameters differ significantly between experiments with the same conditions.Exclude outliers (step 1).Ensure that the cropping of the RdRp trajectory is performed correctly: directly after the lag phase and right before reaching the final plateau (step 1).Ensure that all used materials (e.g., RNA, nucleotides, RdRp, buffers, etc.) are from the same batch and within expiration dates (steps 28 and 47).
Resource availability
Lead contact
Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Nynke H. Dekker (N.H.Dekker@tudelft.nl).
Materials availability
This study did not generate new unique reagents.
PCR reaction pipetting protocol
Reagent
Volume (μL)
Template (10 ng/μL)
4
Primer F (10 μM)
4
Primer R (10 μM)
4
dNTPs (1 mM each)
4
5× HF buffer
32
MilliQ
110.8
Phusion polymerase
1.2
PCR cycle times
Steps
Temperature (°C)
Time
Cycles
Initial Denaturation
98
2′30″
1
Denaturation
94
30″
29
Annealing
58
30″
Extension
72
45″∗
Final extension
72
8′00″
1
Hold
20
1′00″
1
∗For the extension step, use 45 s/kb of the fragment length. Fragment lengths are presented in Figure 1.
Transcription of fragments SP, CD, and AB
Transcription mixture
Volume (μL)
PCR product 250 ng
6
Transcription buffer (5×)
10
ATP (100 mM)
1
UTP (100 mM)
1
GTP (100 mM)
1
CTP (100 mM)
1
T7 polymerase
5
MilliQ water
25
Transcription of fragments BIO and DIG
Transcription mixture
Volume (μL)
PCR product 250 ng
6
Transcription buffer (5×)
10
ATP (100 mM)
1
UTP (100 mM)
0.5
GTP (100 mM)
1
CTP (100 mM)
1
Bio-UTP/DIG-UTP (10 mM)
5
T7 polymerase
5
MilliQ water
20.5
Steps
Temperature (°C)
Time (min)
Cyles
Denaturation
65
60
1
Step-wise cooldown for annealing
−1.2
5
51
Hold
5
10
1
REAGENT or RESOURCE
SOURCE
IDENTIFIER
Antibodies
Digoxigenin antibodies
Roche
RRID: AB_514496
Chemicals, peptides and recombinant proteins
Hellmanex II or III
Sigma-Aldrich
Cat#Z805939
Ethanol
Honeywell
Cat#32221
PBS
Sigma-Aldrich
Cat#P4417
Agarose
Sigma-Aldrich
Cat#A9539
SYBR Safe
Fisher Scientific
Cat#S33102
MilliQ
Millipore
Cat#ZWMQ22INEE0
SCC buffer (20×)
Promega
Cat#V4261
HEPES
Sigma-Aldrich
Cat#H3784
Pluronics® F127
Sigma-Aldrich
Cat#9003-11-6
BSA
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Cat#AM2616
NaCl
Sigma-Aldrich
Cat#S9888
MgCl2
Sigma-Aldrich
Cat#M8266
DnaseI
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Cat#EN0525
RdRp
Janissen et al. (2021)
N/A
ApU dinucleotide
IBA Lifesciences GmbH
Cat#0-31004
Biotin-16-UTP
Roche
Cat#14470528
Digoxigenin-11-UTP
Roche
Cat#14129222
rNTPs
GE Healthcare
Cat#27-2025-01
T1106 triphosphate
Blake Peterson lab
N/A
Ribavirin triphosphate
Jena Bioscience
Cat#NU-1105L
Superase RNase inhibitor
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Cat#AM2694
Polystyrene beads 1.50 μm
Polysciences
Cat#17133
Streptavidin-coated Superparamagnetic beads M280
Thermo Fisher Scientific
Cat#65001
Biological samples
RNA template
(Dulin et al., 2015b)
N/A
pBAD vector
Addgene
RRID: Addgene_37505
Software and algorithms
Labview 2011
National Instruments
RRID: SCR_014325
Igor Pro 6.37
WaveMetrics
RRID: SCR_000325
MATLAB
MathWorks
RRID: SCR_001622
MATLAB analysis algorithm
This study
https://doi.org/10.4121/19145426
Critial commercial assays
Promega Wizard Genomic DNA purification kit
Fisher Scientific
Cat#PR-A1120
RNeasy kit
QIAGEN
Cat#74004
Promega T7 RiboMAX Express Large Scale RNA Production system
Promega
Cat#P1320
Phusion High-Fidelity PCR Master Mix with HF Buffer
Authors: David Dulin; Igor D Vilfan; Bojk A Berghuis; Susanne Hage; Dennis H Bamford; Minna M Poranen; Martin Depken; Nynke H Dekker Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Richard Janissen; Andrew Woodman; Djoshkun Shengjuler; Thomas Vallet; Kuo-Ming Lee; Louis Kuijpers; Ibrahim M Moustafa; Fiona Fitzgerald; Peng-Nien Huang; Angela L Perkins; Daniel A Harki; Jamie J Arnold; Belén Solano; Shin-Ru Shih; Marco Vignuzzi; Craig E Cameron; Nynke H Dekker Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2021-10-22 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Mona Seifert; Subhas C Bera; Pauline van Nies; Robert N Kirchdoerfer; Ashleigh Shannon; Thi-Tuyet-Nhung Le; Xiangzhi Meng; Hongjie Xia; James M Wood; Lawrence D Harris; Flavia S Papini; Jamie J Arnold; Steven Almo; Tyler L Grove; Pei-Yong Shi; Yan Xiang; Bruno Canard; Martin Depken; Craig E Cameron; David Dulin Journal: Elife Date: 2021-10-07 Impact factor: 8.713
Authors: David Dulin; Igor D Vilfan; Bojk A Berghuis; Minna M Poranen; Martin Depken; Nynke H Dekker Journal: Nucleic Acids Res Date: 2015-10-22 Impact factor: 16.971