| Literature DB >> 35959354 |
Qian Yang1, Yuedong Yang2, Xiaoting Li1.
Abstract
Background: Cerebral infarction is a common neurological disease with high incidence, which is the main factor causing death and disability in adults in China. Cerebral hemorrhage transformation is a common clinical complication. High NIHSS score at admission, atrial fibrillation, and small artery occlusion cerebral infarction can increase the risk of cerebral infarction complicated with hemorrhage transformation. Aim: To explore the related factors of cerebral hemorrhage transformation after cerebral infarction and the value of atorvastatin calcium tablets combined with early intensive care measures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35959354 PMCID: PMC9357761 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9546006
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Math Methods Med ISSN: 1748-670X Impact factor: 2.809
Univariate analysis results of basic data.
| Index | Observation group ( | Control group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 70.3 ± 5.2 | 68.2 ± 6.1 | 2.188 | 0.030 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 25.1 ± 1.9 | 24.7 ± 2.2 | 1.151 | 0.252 |
| NIHSS score (points) | 13.29 ± 2.65 | 12.40 ± 2.38 | 2.144 | 0.034 |
| GOS score (points) | 9.45 ± 1.03 | 9.72 ± 1.16 | -1.459 | 0.147 |
| Time from onset to admission (h) | 13.3 ± 2.4 | 12.6 ± 2.8 | 1.586 | 0.115 |
| Male/female | 37/23 | 46/44 | 1.623 | 0.203 |
| Diabetes (%) | 28 (46.67) | 31 (34.44) | 2.254 | 0.133 |
| Hypertension (%) | 41 (68.33) | 45 (50.00) | 4.946 | 0.026 |
| Hyperlipidemia (%) | 45 (75.00) | 73 (81.11) | 0.801 | 0.371 |
| Coronary heart disease (%) | 9 (15.00) | 7 (7.78) | 1.971 | 0.160 |
| Atrial fibrillation (%) | 13 (21.67) | 6 (6.67) | 7.322 | 0.007 |
| Smoking (%) | 25 (41.67) | 31 (34.44) | 0.803 | 0.370 |
| Drinking (%) | 29 (48.33) | 36 (40.00) | 1.018 | 0.313 |
| TOAST type (%) | 10.935 | 0.001 | ||
| Atherosclerosis of large arteries | 17 (28.33) | 34 (37.78) | ||
| Small artery occlusion type | 33 (55.00) | 26 (28.89) | ||
| Other reasons | 10 (16.67) | 30 (33.33) | ||
| Infarct size (%) | 7.325 | 0.025 | ||
| Large infarct | 34 (56.67) | 32 (35.56) | ||
| Middle infarction | 21 (35.00) | 41 (45.56) | ||
| Lacunar infarction | 5 (8.33) | 17 (18.89) |
Logistic regression model results.
| Index |
| SE | Walds |
| OR | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.611 | 0.443 | 1.902 | 0.201 | 1.842 | 0.773 | 4.390 |
| NIHSS score | 0.594 | 0.211 | 7.925 | 0.000 | 1.811 | 1.198 | 2.739 |
| Hypertension (%) | 0.701 | 0.335 | 4.379 | 0.046 | 2.016 | 1.045 | 3.887 |
| Atrial fibrillation (%) | 0.883 | 0.338 | 6.825 | 0.000 | 2.418 | 1.247 | 4.690 |
| TOAST type | 0.548 | 0.241 | 5.170 | 0.031 | 1.730 | 1.079 | 2.774 |
| Infarct size | 0.632 | 0.296 | 4.559 | 0.043 | 1.881 | 1.053 | 3.361 |
| Constant term | 1.627 | 0.740 | 4.834 | 0.040 | 5.089 | 1.193 | 21.702 |
Comparison of blood lipid levels between the intervention group and conventional group .
| Group |
| TC (mmol/L) | TG (mmol/L) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before therapy | After treatment | Before therapy | After treatment | ||
| Intervention group | 30 | 6.34 ± 0.68 | 4.70 ± 0.60∗ | 2.73 ± 0.50 | 1.84 ± 0.36∗ |
| Control group | 30 | 6.51 ± 0.72 | 4.84 ± 0.66∗ | 2.81 ± 0.46 | 1.89 ± 0.40∗ |
|
| -0.940 | -0.860 | -0.645 | -0.509 | |
|
| 0.351 | 0.394 | 0.522 | 0.613 | |
|
| |||||
| Group |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | LDL-C (mmol/L) | ||
| Before therapy | After treatment | After treatment | Before therapy | ||
|
| |||||
| Intervention group | 30 | 0.90 ± 0.14 | 1.18 ± 0.18∗ | 3.85 ± 0.60 | 2.94 ± 0.47∗ |
| Control group | 30 | 0.88 ± 0.13 | 1.22 ± 0.20∗ | 3.97 ± 0.66 | 3.07 ± 0.51∗ |
|
| 0.573 | -0.814 | -0.737 | -1.027 | |
|
| 0.569 | 0.419 | 0.464 | 0.309 | |
Note: compared with this group before treatment ∗P < 0.05.
Comparison of NIHSS score between the intervention group and conventional group (, points).
| Group |
| Before therapy | 2 weeks after treatment | 4 weeks after treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | 30 | 13.41 ± 2.61 | 8.43 ± 1.96∗ | 4.31 ± 1.10∗ |
| Control group | 30 | 13.17 ± 2.55 | 9.50 ± 2.11∗ | 5.20 ± 1.34∗ |
|
| 0.360 | -2.035 | -2.812 | |
|
| 0.720 | 0.046 | 0.007 |
Note: compared with this group before treatment ∗P < 0.05.
Comparison of prognostic outcomes between the intervention group and conventional group.
| Group |
| 5 points | 4 points | 3 points | 2 points | 1 point |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | 30 | 5 (16.67) | 17 (56.67) | 5 (16.67) | 2 (6.67) | 1 (3.33) |
| Control group | 30 | 2 (6.67) | 10 (33.33) | 8 (26.67) | 7 (23.33) | 3 (10.00) |
|
| -2.238 | |||||
|
| 0.025 | |||||
Figure 1A 63-year-old male patient with a history of hypertension for more than 10 years. (a and b) Right basal ganglia lacunar infarction, (c and d) brainstem hemorrhage after thrombolysis, and (e and f) right thalamic hemorrhage breaking into ventricle.