| Literature DB >> 35959120 |
Tibor Géczi1, Zsolt Simonka1, Judit Lantos2, Melinda Wetzel3, Zsolt Szabó4, György Lázár1, József Furák1.
Abstract
Different applications of near-infrared fluorescence-guided surgery are very promising, and techniques that help surgeons in intraoperative guidance have been developed, thereby bridging the gap between preoperative imaging and intraoperative visualization and palpation. Thus, these techniques are advantageous in terms of being faster, safer, less invasive, and cheaper. There are a few fluorescent dyes available, but the most commonly used dye is indocyanine green. It can be used in its natural form, but different nanocapsulated and targeted modifications are possible, making this dye more stable and specific. A new active tumor-targeting strategy is the conjugation of indocyanine green nanoparticles with antibodies, making this dye targeted and highly selective to various tumor proteins. In this mini-review, we discuss the application of near-infrared fluorescence-guided techniques in thoracic surgery. During lung surgery, it can help find small, non-palpable, or additional tumor nodules, it is also useful for finding the sentinel lymph node and identifying the proper intersegmental plane for segmentectomies. Furthermore, it can help visualize the thoracic duct, smaller bullae of the lung, phrenic nerve, or pleural nodules. We summarize current applications and provide a framework for future applications and development.Entities:
Keywords: VATS; indocyanine green; lung surgery; near-infrared fluorescence-guided surgery; segmentectomy; sentinel lymph node
Year: 2022 PMID: 35959120 PMCID: PMC9360526 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.919739
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Surg ISSN: 2296-875X
Different applications of near-infrared fluorescence-guidance in thoracic surgery.
| LUNG | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study | Year | Dose | Administration route | Interval | Number of patients | |
| Intersegmental plane | Misaki ( | 2009 | 25 mg | iv. | 30–90s | dogs |
| Mun ( | 2017 | 0,25 mg/kg | 30–90s | 22 | ||
| Guigard ( | 2017 | 25 mg | 24 | |||
| Meacci ( | 2018 | 12,5–17,5 mg | ||||
| Pschlik ( | 2018 | 0,15 mg/kg | 86 | |||
| Bedat ( | 2018 | 12,5 mg | 67 | |||
| Chen ( | 2019 | 25 mg | 19 | |||
| Jin ( | 2019 | 0,5 mg/kg | 21 | |||
| Motono ( | 2019 | 5 mg | 22 | |||
| Yotsukura ( | 2021 | 0,25 mg/kg | 209 | |||
| Sun ( | 2021 | 5 mg | 198 | |||
| Oh ( | 2013 | 25 mg | Intrabronchial | 40 | ||
| Wada ( | 2020 | 10–15 mg | Intrabronchial | 15 | ||
| Sekine ( | 2012 | 10 mg | iv. | 10 | ||
| Pulmonary nodule identification | Doo ( | 2015 | 0,2 ml | Intratumoral inj. | 34 | |
| Ujie ( | 2017 | 0,15 ml | Intratumoral inj. | 20 | ||
| Wen ( | 2018 | 0,5 ml | Intratumoral inj. | 26 | ||
| Wu ( | 2021 | 1–2,5 mg | Intratumoral inj. | 32 | ||
| Jiang ( | 2015 | 0,7–10 mg/kg | iv. | 1 min-72 h | mice | |
| Okusanya ( | 2014 | 5 mg/kg | iv. | 24 h | 16 | |
| Predina ( | 2017 | OTL38:0,025 mg/kg iv. | 3–6 h | 20 | ||
| Kim ( | 2016 | 1 mg/kg | 24 h | 11 | ||
| Hamaji ( | 2019 | 0,25 mg/kg | iv. | 12–24 h | 22 | |
| Predina ( | 2019 | 5 mg/kg | iv. | 24 h | 30 | |
| Sentinel lymph node | Yamashita ( | 2011 | 10 mg | Peritumoral | 10 min | 31 |
| Gilmore ( | 2021 | Peritumoral | before surgery | 29 | ||
| Hachey ( | 2017 | 0,5 ml | Peritumoral (bronchoscopy) | before surgery | 20 | |
| Digesu ( | 2018 | 0,5 ml | Peritumoral | 42 | ||
| Thoracic duct | Kamiya ( | 2009 | 7,5 mg | Bilateral inguinal | 14 min | 1 (case report) |
| Matsutani ( | 2014 | 7,5 mg | Bilateral inguinal | 10 min | 1 (case report) | |
| Vecchiato ( | 2020 | 1,5 mg/kg | Bilateral inguinal lymph nodes | 10,5 min | 19 | |
Figure 1Intersegmental plane identification using ICG during VATS segmentectomy.