| Literature DB >> 35958919 |
Fen Qian1, Yan Zhang1, Yan Chen2.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of grading rehabilitation nursing mode on limb function, speech function, and QOL of stroke patients.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35958919 PMCID: PMC9363166 DOI: 10.1155/2022/6956406
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Comparison of general data (n (%), (‾x ± s)).
| Groups |
|
|
| Average age (year) | Average disease course (d) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Ischemic | Hemorrhagic | ||||
| Control group | 60 | 33 | 27 | 42 | 18 | 61.24 ± 4.53 | 8.79 ± 2.06 |
| Observation group | 60 | 34 | 26 | 43 | 17 | 62.48 ± 4.76 | 8.64 ± 2.13 |
|
| 0.034 | 0.040 | 1.462 | 0.391 | |||
|
| 0.854 | 0.841 | 0.146 | 0.695 | |||
The limb motor function of the two groups of patients (‾x ± s, point).
| Groups |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before nursing | After nursing | Before nursing | After nursing | |
| Control group | 37.35 ± 6.38 | 46.12 ± 3.26 | 18.43 ± 4.05 | 22.58 ± 2.14 |
| Observation group | 37.86 ± 6.29 | 59.45 ± 3.17 | 18.74 ± 4.26 | 28.54 ± 2.83 |
|
| 0.440 | 22.710 | 0.408 | 13.010 |
|
| 0.660 | <0.001 | 0.683 | <0.001 |
The speech function recovery of the two groups of patients (n (%)).
| Groups |
| Markedly effective | Effective | Ineffective | Total effective rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 60 | 28 (46.67) | 21 (35.00) | 11 (18.33) | 49 (81.67) |
| Observation group | 60 | 33 (55.00) | 24 (40.00) | 3 (5.00) | 57 (95.00) |
|
| 5.175 | ||||
|
| 0.023 |
Comparison of quality of life (‾x ± s, point).
| Groups |
| Mental function | Physiological function | Social function | Cognitive function | Overall quality of life score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 60 | 66.47 ± 5.19 | 63.75 ± 5.43 | 62.84 ± 4.67 | 65.36 ± 4.25 | 69.53 ± 6.42 |
| Observation group | 60 | 72.56 ± 6.08 | 76.49 ± 5.72 | 68.47 ± 4.38 | 78.59 ± 5.13 | 80.72 ± 7.15 |
|
| 5.901 | 12.510 | 6.811 | 15.380 | 9.020 | |
|
| <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.000 | <0.001 |
Comparison of satisfaction (n (%)).
| Groups |
| Satisfied | Generally satisfied | Dissatisfied | Satisfaction rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control group | 60 | 27 (45.00) | 21 (35.00) | 12 (20.00) | 48 (80.00) |
| Observation group | 60 | 32 (53.34) | 23 (38.33) | 5 (8.33) | 55 (91.67) |
|
| 5.316 | ||||
|
| 0.021 |
Figure 1Kaplan–Meier survival curve at 12 months follow-up in two groups. Patients in both groups were followed up for 12 months after discharge. There were 8 deaths and 4 deletions in CG, with a follow-up rate of 80.00%; 4 deaths and 2 tail amputations in OG, with a follow-up rate of 90.00%. The Kaplan–Meier curve analysis showed a statistically significant difference in 12-month survival rates between CG and OG.