| Literature DB >> 35958860 |
Berhanu Senbeta Deriba1, Girma Garedew1, Diriba Gemeda1, Tinsae Abeya Geleta1, Kemal Jemal2, Elias Teferi Bala3, Mulugeta Mekuria3, Tadesse Nigussie1, Dejene Edosa Dirirsa4, Elsabeth Legesse1.
Abstract
Background: Menstrual Hygiene Management (MHM) is a much-neglected issue in developing countries, including Ethiopia. Menstruating women and girls are forced into isolation, prevented from movement, dietary restrictions, and can be prevented from participating in daily routine activities. Furthermore, the way almost all previous studies conducted in Ethiopia measured the practice of MHM did not meet standard definition of safe MHM. This study aimed to assess safe management of menstrual hygiene practice and associated factors among female adolescent students in public high schools in central Ethiopia.Entities:
Keywords: adolescent girls; central Ethiopia; hygiene; menstruation; school
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35958860 PMCID: PMC9360541 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.913262
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Socio demographic characteristics of female adolescents in public high schools in the North Shewa zone, Oromia regional state, central Ethiopia, 2021.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Urban | 253 | 30.1 |
| Rural | 587 | 69.9 |
|
| ||
| 13–16 | 58 | 6.9 |
| 16–19 | 782 | 93.1 |
|
| ||
| Grade 9 | 82 | 9.8 |
| Grade 10 | 119 | 14.2 |
| Grade 11 | 216 | 25.7 |
| Grade 12 | 423 | 50.4 |
|
| ||
| Have no formal education | 474 | 56.4 |
| Have formal education | 366 | 43.6 |
|
| ||
| Have no formal education | 349 | 41.5 |
| Have formal education | 491 | 58.5 |
|
| ||
| Housewife | 366 | 43.6 |
| Student | 8 | 1 |
| Merchant | 152 | 18.1 |
| Private work | 28 | 3.3 |
| Employee | 70 | 8.3 |
| Daily laborer | 60 | 10.7 |
| Farmer | 126 | 15 |
|
| ||
| Merchant | 188 | 22.4 |
| Private work | 36 | 4.3 |
| Employee | 148 | 17.6 |
| Driver | 36 | 4.3 |
| Daily laborer | 170 | 20.2 |
| Farmer | 262 | 31.2 |
|
| ||
| Both parents | 575 | 68.5 |
| Mother only | 148 | 17.6 |
| Relatives | 74 | 8.8 |
| Father only | 16 | 1.9 |
| Living alone | 27 | 3.2 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 378 | 45 |
| No | 462 | 55 |
Management of menstrual hygiene among female adolescents in public high schools in the north Shewa Zone, Oromia regional state, central Ethiopia, 2021.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Disposable sanitary pads | 753 | 89.6 |
| New cloth pieces | 50 | 6 |
| Old cloth pieces | 26 | 3.1 |
| Othersa | 13 | 1.3 |
|
| ||
| Once | 121 | 14.4 |
| Twice | 422 | 50.2 |
| Three times | 239 | 28.6 |
| More than four times | 58 | 6.9 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 308 | 36.7 |
| No | 532 | 63.3 |
|
| ||
| Once per day | 217 | 25.8 |
| More than twice per day | 623 | 74.2 |
|
| ||
| Soap and water | 518 | 61.7 |
| Water only | 280 | 33.3 |
| Plain paper | 32 | 3.8 |
| Others | 10 | 1.2 |
|
| ||
| Water only | 652 | 77.6 |
| Soap and water | 175 | 20.8 |
| Othersa | 13 | 1.5 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 544 | 64.8 |
| No | 296 | 35.2 |
|
| ||
| Open field | 87 | 10.4 |
| Latrine | 388 | 46.2 |
| Waste bins/bury or burn it | 327 | 38.9 |
| Others | 38 | 4.5 |
aRags, paper and soft.
Figure 1Level of MHM practice among adolescent students in the North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia, 2021.
Sociocultural and environmental factors for the management of menstrual hygiene in schools.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Yes | 306 | 36.4 |
| No | 534 | 63.6 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 327 | 38.9 |
| No | 513 | 61.1 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 466 | 55.5 |
| No | 374 | 44.5 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 692 | 82.4 |
| No | 148 | 17.6 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 474 | 56.4 |
| No | 366 | 43.6 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 354 | 42.1 |
| No | 486 | 57.9 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 424 | 50.5 |
| No | 416 | 49.5 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 248 | 29.5 |
| No | 592 | 70.5 |
|
| ||
| No place to dispose used pad | 153 | 22.4 |
| No private place to change sanitary pad | 242 | 35.43 |
| No water for washing | 162 | 23.72 |
| Feeling of had Pain or discomfort | 126 | 18.45 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 266 | 31.7 |
| No | 574 | 68.3 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 348 | 41.4 |
| No | 492 | 58.6 |
Factors associated with MHM for school girls of the north Shewa zone, high schools (multivariate analysis).
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grade of students | Grade 9 | 62 (10.3%) | 20 (8.4%) | 1.1. (0.64–1.84) | 1.24 (0.68–2.23) |
| Grade 10 | 82 (13.6%) | 37 (15.6%) | 0.76 (0.49–1.2) | 0.81 (0.5–1.32) | |
| Grade 11 | 144 (23.9%) | 72 (30.4%) | 0.69 (0.48–0.98) | 0.68 (0.46–1.01) | |
| Grade 12 | 315 (52.2%) | 108 (45.6%) | 1 | 1 | |
| With whom do you live? | Both parents | 407 (67.5%) | 168 (70.9%) | 2.24 (1.10–4.88) | 2.51 (1.11–5.68)** |
| Mother only | 106 (17.6%) | 42 (17.7%) | 2.36 (0.99–5.64) | ||
| Relatives | 65 (10.8%) | 9 (3.8%) | 2.32 (1.01–5.35) | 7.41 (2.55–21.54)** | |
| Father only | 11 (1.8%) | 5 (2.1%) | 6.7 (2.4–18.74) | 1.83 (0.45–7.40) | |
| Living alone | 14 (2.3%) | 13 (5.5%) | 1 | 1 | |
| Occupational status of mother | Housewife | 239 (39.6%) | 127 (53.6%) | 1 | 1 |
| Student | 5 (0.8%) | 3 (1.3%) | 0.89 (0.21–3.77) | 1.23 (.26–5.80) | |
| Merchant | 115 (19.1%) | 37 (15.6%) | 1.65 (1.1–2.54) | 1.81 (1.14–2.9)** | |
| Private work | 25 (4.1%) | 3 (1.3%) | 4.43 (1.31–14.9) | 4.56 (1.31–5.90)** | |
| Employee | 53 (8.8%) | 17 (2.2%) | 1.66 (0.92–2.98) | 1.59 (0.84–3.02) | |
| Daily laborer | 70 (11.6%) | 20 (8.4%) | 1.86 (1.1–3.2) | 1.56 (0.86–2.83) | |
| Farmer | 96 (15.9%) | 30 (12.7%) | 1.7 (1.1–2.7) | 1.40 (0.68–2.46) | |
| Occupational status of father | Merchant | 125 (20.7%) | 63 (26.6%) | 1 | 1 |
| Private work | 26 (4.3%) | 10 (4.2%) | 1.31 (0.6–2.89) | 1.65 (0.71–3.79) | |
| Employee | 108 (17.9%) | 40 (16.9%) | 1.36 (0.85–2.18) | 1.54 (0.91-2.61) | |
| Driver | 27 (4.5%) | 9 (3.8%) | 1.51 (0.67–3.41) | 1.94 (0.83–4.55) | |
| Daily laborer | 120 (19.9%) | 50 (21.1%) | 1.21 (0.77–1.89) | 1.46 (0.86–2.46) | |
| Farmer | 197 (32.7%) | 65 (27.4%) | 1.53 (1.1–2.31) | 1.84 (1.11–3.10)** | |
| Residence | Urban | 164 (27.2%) | 89 (37.6%) | 1 | 1 |
| Rural | 439 (72.8%) | 148 (62.4%) | 1.61 (1.17–2.21) | 1.62 (1.15–2.28)** | |
| Individual toilet compartments contain a container for disposing of Napkins | Yes | 239 (29.6%) | 115 (48.5%) | 1 | 1 |
| No | 364 (60.4%) | 122 (51.5%) | 1.44 (1.1–1.94) | 1.40 (1.1–1.92)** |
COR, Curve Odds Ratio; AOR, Adjusted Odds Ratio; CI, Confidence Interval.
**The variable is a candidate for multivariate analysis at the value of p-value < 0.05, 1 = Reference group. The p-value of the fitness of the model (Hosmer and Lemshow) was 0.890.