| Literature DB >> 35958794 |
Wenkai Jin1,2, Jian Ma1, Xin Chen1, Guohui Yan3.
Abstract
Human activities have considerably increased nitrogen intake into waterways, resulting in the deterioration of water quality. The state of surface water requires special consideration in light of the water crisis caused by nitrogen pollution. In this study, the natural abundance of the nitrogen stable isotope (δ 15N) is measured and sampled in sediments and compared with the total dissolved nitrogen (DN) in four main Chinese tributaries of Hun River upper reach, including the Dasuhe, Beisanjia, Beikouqian, and Nanzamu tributaries. Results show that for the Dasuhe and Nankouqian tributaries, the δ 15N values of sediment samples in 2016 are all significantly higher than previous values in 2011. In the Dasuhe tributary, this change is attributed to the promotion of organic agricultural production under which chemical fertilizers are replaced by organic fertilizers. For the δ 15N values of the sediment in the Nankouqian tributary, the construction of the municipal sewer system and wastewater treatment facilities are the causes of this rising trend. The δ 15N values of nitrate released by facilities could be raised by microbial denitrification that is employed in the tertiary treatment process. Most of the δ 15N values of the sediments are distributed between soil and manure, indicating that nitrogen in the river water mainly comes from agriculture. All the surveyed tributaries except Dasuhe show a significant increase in DN. In addition, a significant positive correlation between the change ratio of the farmland area and DN in river water is observed, suggesting that the increase in nitrogen in river water from 2011 to 2016 is due to agriculture. Based on the abovementioned data, this study provides a basis for local governments to formulate management measures.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35958794 PMCID: PMC9357724 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4175218
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Changes in main background information from the year 2011 to the year 2016.
| Tributaries | Population density (people·km−2) | Farmland area percent (%) | Villages/townspercent (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 2016 | 2011 | 2016 | 2011 | 2016 | |
| Dasuhe | 31 | 33 | 5.1 | 2.9 | 0.19 | 0.140771 |
| Nankouqian | 70 | 66 | 16.3 | 10.2 | 0.61 | 0.54912 |
| Beisanjia | 54 | 57 | 2.6 | 7.7 | 0.46 | 0.587495 |
| Nanzamu | 320 | 314 | 17.9 | 10.9 | 4.50 | 4.823265 |
Figure 1Sampling locations and the WTF running status.
Stable nitrogen isotope values of main nitrogen sources to Hun River aquatic systems.
| Type of nitrogen sources | Soil | Chemical fertilizers | Livestock manure | Wastewater | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forest | Field | ||||
|
| 4.6 (0.4) (2.5–5.7) | 5.1 (0.4) (3.6–6.22) | 0.35 (0.5) (−1.84–2.8) | 7.6 (1.0) (5.8–10.1) | 25.5 (3.2) (18.2–38.3) |
| Number of samples | 9 | 15 | 10 | 6 | 6 |
Values are mean (± standard deviation) with the range between parentheses.
Figure 2Changes in dissolved total nitrogen concentration and the proportion of inorganic nitrogen in the four tributaries.
Total nitrogen and stable nitrogen isotope values of sediment and composition of water nitrogen from 2011 to 2016.
| Tributary | Station code | 2011 | 2016 | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sediment | Water | Sediment | Water | ||||||||
|
| TN ± S.D. (%) |
| Inorganic nitrogen (mg/L) | Dissolved nitrogen (mg/L) |
| TN ± S.D. (%) |
| Inorganic nitrogen (mg/l) | Dissolved nitrogen (mg/l) | ||
| Dasuhe | HR1 | 3 | 0.24 (0.1) | 2.2 (0.2) | 1.8 | 1.9 | 3 | 0.04 (0.01) | 4.7 (0.7) | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| HR2 | 4 | 0.31 (0.1) | 3.6 (0.6) | 1.0 | 1.3 | 3 | 0.12 (0.01) | 5.6 (0.3) | 1.9 | 2.3 | |
| HR3 | 3 | 0.23 (0.02) | 4.0 (0.2) | 1.7 | 1.8 | 3 | 0.06 (0.01) | 5.9 (0.4) | 2.1 | 2.3 | |
| HR4 | 2 | 0.14 (0.06) | 3.3 (0.1) | 4.8 | 5.5 | 3 | 0.12 (0.01) | 6.1 (0.4) | 1.6 | 1.6 | |
| HR5 | 1 | 0.14 | 4.2 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 3 | 0.13 (0.03) | 5.9 (0.1) | 1.7 | 1.7 | |
|
| |||||||||||
| Nankouqian | HR6 | 3 | 0.17 (0.2) | 2.2 (0.1) | 5.7 | 7.2 | 2 | 0.29 (0.01) | 4.3 (0.1) | 0.5 | 1.5 |
| HR7 | 3 | 0.11 (0.1) | 3.5 (0.1) | 2.3 | 2.5 | 3 | 0.04 (0.01) | 7.0 (0.3) | 4.2 | 4.2 | |
| HR8 | 3 | 0.07 (0.02) | 4.5 (0.1) | 1.8 | 2.1 | 3 | 0.22 (0.04) | 7.4 (0.2) | 2.8 | 2.8 | |
| HR9 | 3 | 0.09 (0.02) | 5.4 (0.1) | 1.9 | 2.0 | 3 | 0.04 (0.01) | 10.4 (3.2) | 4.1 | 4.2 | |
| HR10 | 4 | 0.21 (0.03) | 5.9 (0.2) | 0.4 | 0.4 | 3 | 0.09 (0.01) | 9.2 (1.3) | 5.9 | 8.2 | |
|
| |||||||||||
| Beisanjia | HR11 | 3 | 0.17 (0.03) | 3.7 (0.07) | 1.4 | 1.8 | 3 | 0.15 (0.02) | 6.6 (0.2) | 4.0 | 5.3 |
| HR12 | 2 | 0.04 (0.03) | 5.2 (0.1) | 1.4 | 1.6 | 3 | 0.32 (0.02) | 4.8 (0.5) | 2.8 | 2.8 | |
| HR13 | 3 | 0.12 (0.03) | 5.8 (0.1) | 0.5 | 0.6 | 3 | 0.46 (0.03) | 3.8 (0.1) | 3.3 | 3.3 | |
|
| |||||||||||
| Nanzamu | HR14 | 2 | 0.45 (0.1) | 2.6 (0.1) | 3.0 | 3.2 | 3 | 0.22 (0.01) | 6.6 (0.1) | 3.7 | 4.2 |
| HR15 | 3 | 0.63 (0.2) | 4.2 (0.1) | 2.2 | 2.3 | 3 | 0.27 (0.01) | 6.0 (0.2) | 5.2 | 7.3 | |
| HR16 | 3 | 0.57 (0.1) | 5.9 (0.1) | 7.9 | 7.9 | 3 | 0.28 (0.01) | 6.4 (0.2) | 5.7 | 9.3 | |
| HR17 | 4 | 0.34 (0.02) | 9.1 (0.7) | 4.6 | 4.8 | 3 | 0.28 (0.01) | 6.0 (0.1) | 5.4 | 5.7 | |
|
| |||||||||||
| Hun River stem | HS1 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 0.60 (0.02) | 4.9 (0.2) | 3.3 | 5.1 |
| HS2 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 0.17 (0.02) | 10.1 (2.4) | 3.1 | 3.2 | |
| HS3 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 0.13 (0.02) | 8.8 (0.5) | 2.8 | 3.0 | |
| HS4 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 0.04 (0.02) | 6.4 (0.3) | 2.9 | 4.3 | |
| HS5 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 0.18 (0.02) | 6.7 (0.4) | 3.3 | 5.2 | |
| HS6 | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 0.11(0.02) | 8.5 (0.7) | 3.3 | 3.9 | |
“—” means that this sampling point was not established in 2011.
Figure 3Changes in sediment δ15N values in each sampling point.
Figure 4Changes in mean sediment δ15N values in the four tributaries.
Figure 5Range of the sediment δ15N value and TN concentration in each sampling point.
Figure 6Correlation analysis of the change rate of total nitrogen dissolved in river water and change rate of farmland proportion.