| Literature DB >> 35958792 |
Li Yuan1, Bei Chen1, Zhaojun Wu1, Gefei He1, Juanjuan Huang1.
Abstract
Objective: The objective is to analyze the application effect of mind map in the standardized training of new pharmacists, providing reference information for the standardized training and teaching methods of new pharmacists.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35958792 PMCID: PMC9357737 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7985027
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1An integrated training model based on the needs of different positions of pharmacists and focusing on practical operation.
Outline of training courses for new pharmacists.
| Module classification | Professional knowledge (required) | Professional skills (required) | Professionalism (elective) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic knowledge of pharmacy | Capacity of drug supply and allocation | Cultural building | |
| Professional knowledge related to pharmacy | Pharmaceutical care ability | Moral accomplishment | |
| Laws and regulations, rules and regulations | Drug management ability | Adaptability | |
| Drug policy | Interpersonal communication skills | ||
| Scientific research ability | |||
| Emergency handling capacity | |||
| School hours | 30 | 56 | 12 |
| Teaching method | Online and offline integration, centralized training | Group practice (outpatient pharmacy, inpatient pharmacy, pharmacy, and clinical pharmacy) | Online and offline integration, centralized training |
| Teaching team | Pharmaceutical expert, clinical pharmacist | Senior dispensing pharmacist and clinical pharmacist | Director of pharmacy |
Figure 2Mind map of prescription review and practical training points.
Comparison of core competence scores of pharmacists before and after training.
| Prescription/doctor's order review | Drug dispensing | Medication guidance and consultation | Special drug management | Drug storage and maintenance | Prescription review | Adverse reaction report | Therapeutic drug monitoring | Emergency management | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretraining score | 2.46 ± 0.66 | 2.79 ± 0.59 | 2.50 ± 0.66 | 2.92 ± 0.58 | 2.75 ± 0.53 | 2.38 ± 0.65 | 2.54 ± 0.51 | 2.63 ± 0.58 | 2.79 ± 0.59 |
| Score after training | 3.08 ± 0.50 | 3.29 ± 0.55 | 3.17 ± 0.38 | 3.46 ± 0.51 | 3.17 ± 0.48 | 3.13 ± 0.45 | 3.00 ± 0.59 | 3.04 ± 0.46 | 3.28 ± 0.59 |
| T value | 3.668 | 3.037 | 4.310 | 3.425 | 2.878 | 4.648 | 2.890 | 2.713 | 2.877 |
|
| <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 | <0.01 |
Figure 3Comparison of post competency rate of new pharmacists before and after training.