| Literature DB >> 35958763 |
Qiaolian Chai1,2, Lixue Mei3, Zhenxing Zou4, Haixia Peng1.
Abstract
Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy based on artificial neural network, as a safe, effective, and simple preoperative pathological diagnosis technique, has been widely used in clinical practice. Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy based on artificial neural networks for suspicious breast lesions found in conventional ultrasound examinations is an effective method for preoperative diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to study the value of artificial neural network ultrasound in improving breast cancer diagnosis. This article summarizes the neuron model of PCNN by observing and studying its impulse synchronization phenomenon. Aiming at gray-scale images disturbed by mixed noise (impulse noise and the Gaussian noise), a comprehensive filtering algorithm based on the simplified PCNN model is proposed. In this paper, the benign and malignant breast masses were evaluated based on the two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging signs of the mass, and compared with the postoperative pathological results, a logistic regression model was established to analyze the shape, boundary, microcalcification, and posterior echo attenuation of the mass, values for keratinization or burrs, convergent signs, and blood flow classification in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant. In this paper, a color ultrasound diagnostic device is used, Sonobi is used as a contrast medium, and the injection volume is 2.4 ml/dose. During the imaging process, the sound image performance of the lesion is dynamically observed, the original dynamic data are stored throughout the whole process, and the playback analysis is performed after the imaging is completed. Studies have shown that CDUS elastography (UE) combined with MRI can increase the sensitivity of breast cancer diagnosis, with a diagnostic accuracy rate of 92.4%.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35958763 PMCID: PMC9357767 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1779337
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Comparison of two-dimensional ultrasound and three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis results.
| Diagnosis method | Benign | Diagnosis rate (%) | Malignant | Diagnosis rate (%) | Total | Diagnosis coincidence rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Two-dimensional ultrasound | 43 | 82.47 | 37 | 76.48 | 90 | 79.4 |
| Three-dimensional ultrasound | 56 | 91.34 | 41 | 89.38 | 97 | 91.2 |
Logistic regression analysis of the features of the two-dimensional ultrasound images.
| Pathology | Benign | Malignant |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Form | 25 | 12 | 6.36 | 0.02 |
| Boundary | 41 | 22 | 11.37 | <0.001 |
| Microcalcification | 16 | 25 | 5.25 | 0.03 |
| Angle/burr | 17 | 27 | 0.73 | 1 |
Figure 1Logistic regression analysis of the features of the two-dimensional ultrasound images.
Comparison of ultrasound signs of benign and malignant lesions (cases).
| Pathological results | Not just on the edge | Irregular shape | Internal calcification | Organizational change |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malignant | 74 | 47 | 38 | 34 |
| Benign | 36 | 43 | 29 | 19 |
|
| 56.3 | 58.6 | 55.3 | 21.8 |
Comparison of accuracy of 7 ultrasound signs in the diagnosis of microbreast cancer (%).
| Ultrasound signs | Sensitivity | Specificity | Accuracy | PPV | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not just on the edge | 84.3 | 78.3 | 77.2 | 46.1 | 86.3 |
| Irregular shape | 88.4 | 74.7 | 71.1 | 47.2 | 91.6 |
| Internal calcification | 54.1 | 81.3 | 69.2 | 62.5 | 88.5 |
| Organizational change | 58.2 | 90.3 | 74.2 | 87.4 | 93.4 |
Puncture pathology and postoperative pathology of breast lesions.
| Puncture pathology | Surgical pathology | |
|---|---|---|
| Positive | Negative | |
| Positive | 265 | 0 |
| Negative | 12 | 317 |
Figure 2Comparative analysis of biopsy pathology and postoperative pathology of breast lesions.
Puncture pathology and postoperative pathology analysis of precancerous lesions.
| Puncture pathology | Postoperative pathology | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Atypical hyperplasia | Carcinoma in situ | Invasive carcinoma | |
| Atypical hyperplasia ( | 17 | 10 | 3 |
| Carcinoma in situ ( | 1 | 13 | 6 |
Figure 3Puncture pathology and postoperative pathology analysis of precancerous lesions.
Comparative analysis of ultrasound findings of precancerous lesions in line with group and underestimated group.
| Group | Rear echo attenuation | Blood flow | Armpits can have lymph nodes | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exist | No | Level ≥2 | Level <2 | Exist | No | |
| Fit group | 7 | 23 | 9 | 21 | 2 | 30 |
| Underestimated group | 9 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
CDUS elastography and MRI examination of tumors, burrs, and calcifications in breast cancer patients.
| Project | Pathological number | Lesion | Glitch sign | Calcification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UE | 150 | 124 | 72 | 55 |
| MRI | 150 | 112 | 128 | 53 |
| UE combined with MRI | 150 | 142 | 137 | 98 |
Figure 4CDUS elastography and MRI examination of tumors, burrs, and calcifications in breast cancer patients.
Figure 5Ultrasound image of breast lesions.
Figure 6Number of time-signal curve diagnoses drawn by MRI dynamic enhancement examination.