| Literature DB >> 35958744 |
Jing Fan1.
Abstract
Greenery are the parks in the urban areas and it becomes progressively most significant as cities grow more crowded. In the end, urban parks contribute to the population's healthiness and welfare by providing opportunities intended for physical and social activity, leisure, and relaxation. In order to construct "Digital Land," computer and system software and hardware were used. Computer simulations are used to examine the value of a city garden's landscape design. Digital models and multimedia performances are being built using computer-aided design (CAD), this underlines the need for digitizing data for landscape design. A region's landscapes can only be accurately assessed if sufficient information is available on the elements that influence the people's awareness of landscape quality, as well as the kind, method, and effective rate of each of them. We use an LVQANN (artificial neural network) to forecast the landscape aesthetic assessment of urban parks and priorities the model's significant factors in this research. User viewpoint and artificial neural network modelling were utilized in conjunction to assess the aesthetic quality of the urban park's environment. This was done for two reasons. The design of urban parks decision support system is known as MATLAB software's multilayer perceptions model, which gives the ability to anticipate landscape visual significance in innovative parks. In this study, the ANN LVQ model is used to execute an ageing design of an urban park landscape based on a computer virtual simulation application. An example land is selected as input and area linked to sunny spot, top view, and so on is fixed. The ANN tool box is used to develop this application in MATLAB 2018b software. The following approach is used to create the ideal urban park landscape model. An accuracy of 89.23 percent, a sensitivity of 87.34 percent, and a recall of 78.93 percent were achieved, outperforming the approach and competing with the current model.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35958744 PMCID: PMC9357757 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3150371
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Urban park landscape.
Figure 2Proposed block.
Figure 3MATLAB-based ANN LVQ analysis.
Parameter estimation.
| Regression weights | Estimate | S.E. | C.R. |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UP-1 <---URBAN PARK _SCAPE | 1.000 | |||
| UP-2 <---URBAN PARK _SCAPE | 1.440 | 0.149 | 9.675 |
|
| UP-3 <---URBAN PARK _SCAPE | 1.733 | 0.161 | 10.778 |
|
| UP-4 <---URBAN PARK _SCAPE | 1.894 | 0.174 | 10.875 |
|
| UP-5 <---URBAN PARK _SCAPE | 1.458 | 0.144 | 10.141 |
|
| UP-6 <---URBAN PARK _SCAPE | 1.246 | 0.126 | 9.886 |
|
| UP-7 <---URBAN PARK _SCAPE | 1.723 | 0.147 | 11.700 |
|
| UP01-6 <---URBAN PARK _SCAPE_001 | 1.000 | |||
| UP01-5 <---URBAN PARK _SCAPE_001 | 3.596 | 1.396 | 2.576 | 0.010 |
| UP01-4 <---URBAN PARK _SCAPE_001 | 4.129 | 1.584 | 2.607 | 0.009 |
| UP01-3 <---URBAN PARK _SCAPE_001 | 4.297 | 1.648 | 2.607 | 0.009 |
| UP01-2 <---URBAN PARK _SCAPE_001 | 0.721 | 0.491 | 1.469 | 0.142 |
| UP01-1 <---URBAN PARK _SCAPE_001 | 1.403 | 0.631 | 2.223 | 0.026 |
| URBAN PARK _SCAPE_002-6 <--- URBAN PARK | 1.000 | |||
| URBAN PARK _SCAPE_002-5 <---URBAN PARK | 0.911 | 0.116 | 7.883 |
|
| URBAN PARK _SCAPE_002-4 <---URBAN PARK | 0.939 | 0.110 | 8.533 |
|
| URBAN PARK _SCAPE_002-3 <---URBAN PARK | 1.151 | 0.122 | 9.441 |
|
| URBAN PARK _SCAPE_002-2 <---URBAN PARK | 0.827 | 0.092 | 9.006 |
|
| URBAN PARK _SCAPE_002-1 <---URBAN PARK | 1.042 | 0.105 | 9.954 |
|
| TAD-6 <---LANDSCAPE analysis | 1.000 | |||
| TAD-5 <---LANDSCAPE analysis | 1.208 | 0.139 | 8.662 |
|
| TAD-4 <---LANDSCAPE analysis | 1.277 | 0.131 | 9.752 |
|
| TAD-3 <---LANDSCAPE analysis | 1.586 | 0.157 | 10.095 |
|
| TAD-2 <---LANDSCAPE analysis | 1.139 | 0.134 | 8.502 |
|
| TAD-1 <---LANDSCAPE analysis | 1.579 | 0.153 | 10.328 |
|
| Essential service dept for eco-tourism < ---URBAN PARK _SCAPE | 0.233 | 0.057 | 4.084 |
|
| Essential service dept for eco-tourism < ---URBAN PARK _SCAPE_001 | 0.670 | 0.298 | 2.251 | 0.024 |
| Essential service dept for eco-tourism < ---URBAN PARK | −0.051 | 0.152 | −0.333 | 0.739 |
| Essential service dept for eco-tourism < ---LANDSCAPE analysis | 1.050 | 0.185 | 5.688 |
|
Figure 4Top view for selected urban park landscape.
Figure 5Computer level design with ANN.
Figure 6Inner layout.
Figure 7Final layout.
Results comparison.
| Models | LVQ [ | ANN [ | Deep ML [ | Deep GA [ | EST [30] | ANN_LVQ proposed | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MATLAB | Accuracy | 77.877 | 83.8687 | 87.6 | 84.3035 | 87.77 | 88.386 |
| Specificity | 77.7373 | 83.743 | 83.7 | 83.8737 | 87.37 | 85.37 | |
| Sensitivity | 57.6473 | 74.43 | 87.77 | 87.3456 | 87.57 | 88.37 | |
|
| |||||||
| Theory | Accuracy | 87.3374 | 83.76 | 83.45 | 83.6433 | 87.737 | 88.43 |
| Specificity | 83.7378 | 83.56 | 83.7 | 83.874 | 85.74 | 86.37 | |
| Sensitivity | 87.6557 | 87.7 | 87.3 | 83 | 86.84 | 87.33 | |
Figure 8Comparison of results.