| Literature DB >> 35958743 |
Fupeng Zhang1,2, Xia Liu2.
Abstract
In order to explore the real effect of art mental health therapy, this paper proposes a feature selection algorithm based on genetic algorithm. The algorithm takes college students as the research object and discusses the effect of psychotherapy on college students through painting art therapy. The results showed that there were extremely significant differences in EPQ extraversion factors among the people treated with the educational intervention of art psychology course (P < 0.01), and there was no significant change in other factors (P > 0.05). There was no significant change in total depression score and depression index (P > 0.05). There were significant differences in social avoidance factors and social anxiety (P < 0.05), and there were relatively significant differences in the total score of sadness (P < 0.01). It is concluded that the use of artistic elements can effectively help people express themselves and express their psychological emotions, which has a certain effect in mental health treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35958743 PMCID: PMC9363173 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5718050
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Figure 1Comprehensive evaluation model of artistic psychotherapy health based on genetic algorithm.
Figure 2Feature selection process.
Figure 3Filter feature selection process.
Figure 4Wrapper feature selection process.
Figure 5Principle of genetic algorithm.
Figure 6Coding of a gene.
Figure 7Two hybridization methods.
Corresponding table of cluster labels.
| Homocluster | Different clusters | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Same label | a | b | a + b |
| Different labels | c | d | c + d |
| Total | a + c | b + d | a + b + c + d |
Implementation plan of SPAT mental health course.
| Course time | Course unit topics | Course implementation process and method | Remarks: art media |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 March 1, 2010 | Purpose of family formation: to understand the course form, eliminate the strangeness among members, understand each other, and form a small family | (1) Course introduction: introduce the course content, form, and teaching methods | A4 sketch paper, Hb pencil, eraser, etc. |
| Establish reasonable coping styles before, after, or after falling in love | (2) The first test of psychological scale is the pretest | Zhi, glue, scissors, self-brought pictures, and photos related to love, etc. | |
| (3) Warm-up activities: use the Gestalt grouping method to group according to age, zodiac, and exchange personality characteristics with each other | |||
| (4) Group grouping “simulated family”: divided into 10 small families, with more than 11 people in each group. Each group selects two principal and deputy parents to be responsible for management and gives a sentence of “who is (she),” and finally shares it | |||
| (5) Situational drama activities: the performance of “the development process of love emotion” in situational drama, that is, acquaintance, development, conflict, redevelopment, and decision, who is most able to think about their own pursuit and ideas, emotional needs, and how to actively guide | |||
|
| |||
| 9 May 10, 2010 | Emotional integration purpose: to integrate friendship, family affection, and love emotion from the level of knowing and doing | (1) Introduction to the course: the explanation of love sentiment, that is, sense of reason, aesthetics, and morality | 24 color watercolor pens, oil painting stick, color pencil, A4 sketch paper, Hb pencil, eraser, etc. |
| (2) Emotional test and case discussion and explanation | |||
| (3) Painting and story analysis: “future life—a better tomorrow” nine-division painting and story sharing, according to the operation steps of the nine-division integration painting method | |||
| (4) Viewing of audiovisual materials: emotion and marital emotion | |||
|
| |||
| 10 May 17, 2010 | The purpose of personality integration: members share deeply, integrate the curriculum harvest, and integrate into personality | (1) Course introduction: course summary | Watercolor pen, oil painting stick, watercolor pigment, rice paper, A4 sketch paper, pencil, eraser, etc. |
| (2) Personal painting: “a growing tree of life” and sharing | |||
| (3) Group painting: “emotional garden,” small family as a group, using large rice paper | |||
| (4) Explore the future career blueprint, discuss, and share | |||
| (5) After the second test of the psychological scale, the students bid farewell to each other | |||
SPAT group psychological counseling program.
| Activity name | Activity objectives | Process and method | Art media |
|---|---|---|---|
| (1) A new family 2010.03.04 | (1) Clarify the objectives of the group and the formation of the group | (1) Introduction and discussion on the content and form of group activities (20 minutes) | Watercolor pen, color pencil, oil painting stick, color small cardboard; psychological scale and informed consent |
| (2) Be familiar with team members and art media | (2) Psychological scale measurement and signing informed consent (20 minutes) | ||
| (3) Build trust and warm group atmosphere | (3) Warm-up activities—social measurement and body bumper car (20 minutes) | ||
| (4) Set up three small families to discuss and display “family name,” “family number,” “family song,” and “family dance” (25 minutes) | |||
| (5) Nine-cell emotional painting (20 minutes) | |||
| (6) End sharing (15 minutes) | |||
|
| |||
| (2) Who am I 2010.03.11 | (1) Emphasize group commitment and enhance group motivation | (1) Group dynamic reconstruction (15 minutes) | 2B pencil, eraser, A4 sketch paper: oil paint, rice paper, brush, platter; |
| (2) Improve self-awareness | (2) Self-portrait painting (30 minutes) | ||
| (3) Music image painting (30 minutes) | |||
Results of pretest ANOVA of psychological scale in intervention group and control group.
| Scale and its factor name | Group |
| Mean | SD | Variance homogeneity test | Analysis of variance results | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Levene statistics | Sig. ( |
|
| |||||
| Disharmony factors of SCCS self and experience | Intervention group A | 15 | 41.470 | 6.543 | 2.430 | 0.130 | 1.802 | 0.190 |
| SCCS self-spirit | Control group B | 15 | 46.070 | 10.879 | ||||
| Intervention group A | 15 | 21.730 | 3.918 | |||||
T-test results before and after spat curriculum education intervention love attitude scale.
| Paired comparison of pretest and posttest differences |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scale and factor name | Mean | SD |
|
|
| Romantic love | 0.257 | 2.557 | 1.030 | 0.305 |
| Game love | −0.124 | 3.021 | −0.420 | 0.675 |
| Companion love | 0.705 | 3.079 | 2.346 | 0.021 |
| Possessive love | −0.114 | 2.569 | −0.456 | 0.650 |
| Realistic love | −0.105 | 2.382 | −0.451 | 0.653 |
| Give love | −0.057 | 2.541 | −0.230 | 0.818 |
P < 0.05, P < 0.01.
Results of t-test before and after the short EPQ scale of educational intervention in SPAT course.
| Paired comparison of pretest and posttest differences |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scale and factor name | Mean | SD |
|
|
| EPQ psychoticism factor | −0.123 | 1.357 | −0.935 | 0.352 |
| EPQ extraversion factor | −0.686 | 2.105 | −3.339 | 0.001 |
| EPQ neuroticism factor | −0.019 | 2.780 | −0.070 | 0.944 |
| EPQ masking factor | 0.076 | 1.895 | 0.412 | 0.681 |
stands for P < 0.05, P < 0.01.
T-test results before and after LOT-R of educational intervention in SPAT course.
| Paired comparison of pretest and posttest differences |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scale and factor name | Mean | SD |
|
|
| Total score of LOT-R life orientation scale | −0.029 | 3.712 | −0.079 | 0.937 |
P < 0.05, P < 0.01.
T-test results before and after TCSQ of educational intervention in spat course.
| Paired comparison of pretest and posttest differences |
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scale and factor name | Mean | SD |
|
|
| TCSQ negative coping style factor | −0.038 | 5.932 | −0.066 | 0.948 |
| TCSQ positive coping style factor | −0.419 | 6.978 | −0.615 | 0.540 |
P < 0.05, P < 0.01).