| Literature DB >> 35958696 |
Mickael Vourc'h1,2,3, Antoine Roquilly2,4, Adrien Foucher2,4, Christelle Retiere5, Fanny Feuillet6, Sapna Devi1, Hamish E G McWilliam1, Cecile Braudeau7, Geraldine Bourreille8, Abderrahman Hachani1, Dermot O'Kane9, Scott N Mueller1, Joseph Ischia9, Jean-Christian Roussel10, Jean-Christophe Rigal3, Regis Josien7, Bertrand Rozec3,11, Jose A Villadangos1, Karim Asehnoune2,4,12.
Abstract
Transfusion is a specific cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) after cardiac surgery. Whether there is an association between the composition of blood products and the onset of AKI is unknown. The present study suggests that the transfusion of packed red blood cells containing a high amount of myeloid-related protein 14 (MRP_14) could increase the incidence of AKI after cardiac surgery. In a mouse model, MRP_14 increased the influx of neutrophils in the kidney after ischemia-reperfusion and their ability to damage tubular cells. Higher concentrations of MRP_14 were found in packed red blood cells from female donors or prepared by whole blood filtration.Entities:
Keywords: AKI, acute kidney injury; CPB, cardiopulmonary bypass; IRI, ischemia-reperfusion injury; MPO, myeloperoxidase; MRP_14, myeloid-related protein 14; PRBC, packed red blood cells; acute kidney injury; cardiac surgery; neutrophils; packed red blood cells; transfusion; transfusion safety; trogocytosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35958696 PMCID: PMC9357562 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2022.02.019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JACC Basic Transl Sci ISSN: 2452-302X
Baseline Characteristics
| Non-AKI (n = 87) | AKI (n = 15) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 29 (33) | 9 (60) | |
| Age, y | 73.6 ± 7.4 | 71.6 ± 13.2 | 0.91 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 26.4 ± 5.1 | 25.9 ± 4.1 | 0.95 |
| Theoretical cardiac output, L/min/m2 | 4.2 (3.8, 4.5) | 4.2 (4.0, 4.7) | 0.48 |
| Preoperative medical history | |||
| Active tobacco | 21 (24) | 3 (20) | 0.99 |
| Diabetes | 23 (26) | 3 (20) | 0.75 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 7 (8) | 1 (7) | 0.99 |
| Chronic heart failure (NYHA functional class III or IV) | 37 (42) | 6 (40) | 0.85 |
| Peripheral artery disease | 11 (13) | 5 (33) | 0.056 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 15 (17) | 4 (26) | 0.47 |
| Left ventricular ejection fraction, % | 60.3 ± 9.3 | 59.3 ± 7.3 | 0.46 |
| Medication before surgery | |||
| Antiplatelet therapy | 62 (71) | 11 (73) | 0.99 |
| Anticoagulant | 17 (20) | 6 (40) | 0.098 |
| Beta-Blocker | 52 (60) | 12 (80) | 0.13 |
| Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor | 37 (43) | 7 (47) | 0.77 |
| Calcium channel blocker | 23 (26) | 5 (33) | 0.55 |
| Biology before surgery | |||
| Hemoglobin, g/dL | 12.2 ± 1.3 | 11.6 ± 1.2 | 0.061 |
| Platelet count, × 109/L | 256 ± 71 | 265 ± 114 | 0.98 |
| Blood creatinine, μmol/L | 83.9 ± 22.9 | 83.5 ± 23.9 | 0.92 |
| eGFR, MDRD, mL/min/m2 | 70.5 (57.7, 87.9) | 77.3 (64.2, 95.1) | 0.31 |
| Surgery | |||
| Type of surgery | 0.44 | ||
| Coronary artery bypass | 28 (32) | 4 (27) | |
| Valve replacement | 25 (29) | 3 (20) | |
| Combined surgery | 34 (39) | 8 (53) | |
| Duration of extracorporeal circulation, min | 106 ± 41.4 | 133 ± 27.8 | |
| No. of PRBC transfusions during surgery and the following 6 h | 2.0 (1.0, 2.0) | 2.0 (1.0, 3.0) | 0.097 |
| Postoperative outcome | |||
| Hospital-acquired infection | 7 (8) | 3 (20) | 0.21 |
| Surgical site infection | 1 (1) | 2 (13) | 0.20 |
| Duration of vasopressive/inotropic support, h | |||
| Norepinephrine | 22.7 ± 51.1 | 52.6 ± 65.7 | 0.006 |
| Dobutamine | 16.0 ± 35.7 | 38.1 ± 33.0 | 0.002 |
| Time on ventilator, h | 16 ± 52.9 | 55 ± 91.5 | |
| Duration of stay in the ICU, days | 2.2 ± 3.8 | 10.3 ± 16.4 | |
| Duration of hospital stay, days | 15 ± 6.4 | 22 ± 11.5 | |
| Death at day 90 | 3 (4) | 1 (7) | 0.48 |
Values are n (%), mean ± SD, or median (Q1, Q3). This table presents the baseline characteristics of the population. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (MDRD) used to estimate the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Combined surgery stands for surgery which includes both coronary artery bypass and valve replacement.
AKI = acute kidney injury; BMI = body mass index.
Exposure of the Participants to a Panel of 8 Proteins
| Exposure | Non-AKI (n = 87) | AKI (n = 15) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| HMGB_1 | 25.1 × 104 (2.4 × 104; 19.5 × 105) | 12.0 × 104 (3.5 × 104; 28.3 × 104) | 0.48 |
| [0; 9.2 × 106] | [0.4 × 104; 33.1 × 104] | ||
| HSP_70 | 2.5 × 107 (1.5 × 107; 4.1 × 107) | 3.9 × 107 (2.4 × 107; 8.1 × 107) | |
| [0.3 × 107; 11.3 × 107] | [0.9 × 107; 18.1 × 107] | ||
| PD_L2 | 1.2 × 105 (0.9 × 105; 2.1 × 105) | 1.7 × 105 (1.1 × 105; 3.1 × 105) | 0.15 |
| [0.6 × 105; 5.6 × 105] | [0.2 × 105; 11.7 × 105] | ||
| RANTES | 2.2 × 104 (0.7 × 104; 3.4 × 104) | 3.5 × 104 (1.9 × 104; 5.5 × 104) | |
| [0; 13.2 × 104] | [0.1 × 104; 11.4 × 104] | ||
| RBP_4 | 1.1 × 108 (0.6 × 108; 2.1 × 108) | 1.2 × 108 (0.6 × 108; 1.8 × 10 | 0.73 |
| [0.1 × 108; 5.5 × 108] | [0.3 × 108; 3.2 × 108] | ||
| MRP_14 | 4.5 × 104 (2.6 × 104; 7.1 × 104) | 7.3 × 104 (5.4 × 104; 11.7 × 104) | |
| [0; 17.7 × 104] | [1.7 × 104; 19.4 × 104] | ||
| SDF_1α | 1.3 × 104 (0; 2.9 × 104) | 2.5 × 104 (1.4 × 104; 3.9 × 104) | 0.089 |
| [0; 27.3 × 104] | [0; 38.8 × 104] | ||
| TIMP_1 | 2.5 × 106 (1.3 × 106; 4.2 × 106) | 2.7 × 106 (1.9 × 106; 4.9 × 106) | 0.41 |
| [0.38 × 106; 13.2 × 106] | [0.5 × 106; 34.6 × 106] |
Values are median (25th; 75th percentiles) [min-max], picograms. This table presents the final protein panel established after a 2-step preselection (see Supplemental Tables S2 and S3 for first- and second-step selection). A total of 184 packed red blood cells (PRBCs) were analyzed to determine the exposure of the participants (ie, total amount of each of the 8 proteins in picograms received during transfusion). The strategies to determine the exposure of each patient are described in the Methods section and Supplemental Figure S1.
HMGB_1 = high-mobility group box 1; HSP_70 = heat shock protein_70; MRP = myeloid-related protein; PDL = programmed cell death ligand; RANTES = regulated upon activation, normal T cell expressed and presumably secreted; RBP_4 = retinol-binding protein_4; SDF_1α = stromal cell-derived factor_1 alpha; TIMP_1 = tissue inhibitor matrix metalloproteinase_1.
Figure 1Effect of MRP_14 on Tubular Damage After Kidney Ischemia-Reperfusion
Left kidney section after hematoxylin and eosin staining (magnification 40×) 7 days after surgery in the 4 experimental groups: (A) sham surgery, (B) sham surgery with MRP_14 treatment 12 hours after surgery, (C) ischemia-reperfusion (IRI), and (D) ischemia-reperfusion with MRP_14 treatment 12 hours after reperfusion (IRI + MRP_14). Percentage of necrotic tubules (E) and percentage of tubules with cast (F) in the left kidney 48 hours and 7 days after surgery based on histological analysis. Sham groups are not represented in E and F because of the lack of histological damage in these groups. Data are shown as median with 25th and 75th percentiles; ∗P < 0.050. Analysis was performed on 12 mice (3 mice per group). NS = nonsignificant difference.
Figure 2Effect of MRP_14 on Leukocytes Influx After Kidney Ischemia-Reperfusion
The kidney single-cell suspension was analyzed by flow cytometry in the 4 groups: S = sham surgery; S + MRP_14 = sham surgery with MRP_14 treatment; IRI = ischemia-reperfusion; IRI + MRP_14 = ischemia-reperfusion with MRP_14 treatment. (A) Total number of leukocytes was determined by CD45pos gating. (B) In the leukocyte gate, CD3, NK1.1, Ly6G, CD11c, and MHC class II allowed to determine the percentage of neutrophils (Ly6Gpos, C), NK cells (CD3neg/NK1.1pos, D) and T cells (CD3pos/NK1.1neg, E). In non-T, non-NK cell population, dendritic cells (DC) were defined as CD11cpos/MHC Class IIpos cells (F) (see Supplemental Figure S4, F for gating strategy). ∗P < 0.050; ∗∗P < 0.010; NS = nonsignificant difference; NK = natural killer. Data are shown as median with 25th and 75th percentiles of 2 distinct experiments for a total of 4 S, 4 S + MRP_14, 6 IRI, and 6 IRI + MRP_14.
Figure 3Effect of MRP_14 on Neutrophil Compartmentalization After Kidney Ischemia-Reperfusion
(A) Representative density plot illustrating neutrophil gate, (B and C) interstitial, and (D and E) marginated neutrophils (see the Methods section for gating strategy). Data are shown as median with 25th and 75th percentiles of 2 experiments: 4 S, 4 S + MRP_14, 6 IRI, 6 IRI + MRP_14. (F to I) Kidney confocal microscopy after anti-CD45 (red) in vivo staining followed by anti-Ly6G (green), and anti-CD31 (blue) staining of the cryosections in the 4 groups: S (F), S + MRP_14 (G), IRI (H), IRI + MRP_14 (I). Marginated (green and red) vs interstitial (green only) neutrophils were quantified manually as median with 25th and 75th percentiles (J) in 4 kidneys (2 IRI and 2 IRI + MRP_14) on 4 slides for each kidney. ∗P < 0.050; ∗∗P < 0.010. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.
Figure 4Effect of MRP_14 on Neutrophil Functions
(A) Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by interstitial neutrophils with (IRI + MRP_14) or without (IRI) MRP_14 after ischemia. (B) Myeloperoxidase (MPO) and (C) tumor necrosis factor (TNF_α) activities in the left kidney lysate 48 hours after surgery. Data are shown as median with 25th and 75th percentiles of 2 experiments, (6 [A] and 8 mice [B and C] per group). Trogocytosis assay (D) over 12 hours with or without MRP_14 or anti-CD18 blocking mAb (αCD18), and (E) corresponding contour plots illustrating tdTomatopos neutrophils. Data are shown as median with 25th and 75th percentiles of 2 experiments: 8 mice per group for white bars, 6 mice per group for pink bars (isotype control) and red bars (αCD18); (F) confocal microscopy after 12-hour trogocytosis assay: tdTomato tubular cells (red channel) and neutrophils (transmitted light). ∗P < 0.050; ∗∗P < 0.010. Medium: vol/vol RPMI/HBSS. Abbreviations as in Figure 2.
MRP_14 Concentration According to PRBC Characteristics
| Characteristics of the 184 Donors | MRP_14 Concentration pg/mL, mean ± SD | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Male (n = 91) | 86 ± 52 | |
| Female (n = 93) | 131 ± 67 | |
| Blood group | 0.25 | |
| A (n = 88) | 106 ± 58 | |
| B (n = 16) | 79 ± 50 | |
| AB (n = 5) | 117 ± 58 | |
| O (n = 75) | 115 ± 72 | |
| Rhesus D (Rh1) | 0.42 | |
| Negative (n = 35) | 117 ± 91 | |
| Positive (n = 149) | 107 ± 57 | |
| Prior pregnancy | 0.49 | |
| No (n = 28/93) | 124 ± 38 | |
| Yes (n = 65/93) | 134 ± 76 | |
| Preparation methods | ||
| Whole blood filtration (n = 110) | 125 ± 64 | |
| Buffy coat removal (n = 74) | 64 ± 64 |
This table presents the concentration of MRP_14 in the supernatant of PRBC according to the characteristics of the donor and the preparation methods. In the “whole blood filtration” group (also called “top and top” method), the unseparated components (ie, whole blood of the donor) undergo in-line leucocyte filtration followed by centrifugation to separate plasma and red blood cells. In the “buffy coat removal” group (also called “top and bottom” method), the whole blood undergoes centrifugation to separate red blood cells, platelets, and plasma. Red blood cells undergo filtration afterwards.