| Literature DB >> 35958378 |
Abstract
There are currently many different types and dispersed online educational resources, which inconvenience users and result in a low utilisation rate of resources. As a result, a new approach is required to realise the integration and recommendation of educational resources. This paper examines the intelligent integration and recommendation of online learning resources for English language and literature majors based on CF. The development of online English language and literature education resources is currently in the process of being discussed, and some flaws in the process are being examined in this paper. The creation and incorporation of a network education resource database are proposed as some strategies and recommendations. The information entropy method is employed to address the cold start problem brought on by the data sparseness of new users and new projects in CF. While this is happening, the recommendation process's similarity algorithm is being enhanced. This algorithm's decision support accuracy has been found to be 96.01% after extensive testing. Its accuracy is roughly 8% better than that of conventional CF, which has a precision of 8%. The results demonstrated a degree of accuracy in the improved algorithm.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35958378 PMCID: PMC9357698 DOI: 10.1155/2022/7594359
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1Functional structure of intelligent integration system of network education resources.
Figure 2Modeling process of resource recommendation system.
Figure 3MAE of different algorithms.
Figure 4MAUE of different algorithms.
RMSE comparison of different algorithms.
| Number of experiments | Traditional collaborative filtering algorithm | Recommendation algorithm based on SVD-CF | CF based on project | Improved algorithm in this paper |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.829 | 0.701 | 0.713 | 0.514 |
| 2 | 0.835 | 0.654 | 0.774 | 0.507 |
| 3 | 0.843 | 0.621 | 0.752 | 0.538 |
| 4 | 0.813 | 0.643 | 0.719 | 0.509 |
| 5 | 0.801 | 0.627 | 0.764 | 0.511 |
Figure 5Precision and recall.
Figure 6Decision support precision comparison.
Figure 7RMSE comparison results.
Average precision table of feature extraction.
| Model | Data set A | Data set B | Data set C | Data set D |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Improved algorithm in this paper | 0.881 | 0.829 | 0.867 | 0.894 |
| Recommendation algorithm based on SVD-CF | 0.724 | 0.767 | 0.793 | 0.742 |
| Memory-based CF | 0.625 | 0.637 | 0.698 | 0.654 |
| Project-based CF | 0.529 | 0.582 | 0.661 | 0.673 |