Literature DB >> 35958336

NRF2-pathway mutations predict radioresistance in non-small cell lung cancer.

Connor J Kinslow1, Prashanth Kumar1, Luke L Cai1,2, Ramon C Sun3, Kunal R Chaudhary1, Simon K Cheng1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35958336      PMCID: PMC9359947          DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-22-292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-6751


× No keyword cloud information.
Approximately 54% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients present with early-stage or locally-advanced disease and are potentially curable, of which 40% receive radiotherapy as a part of their initial course of treatment (1,2). Although biomarkers routinely guide treatment decisions for systemic therapies in NSCLC, there are no clinical biomarkers that predict response to radiotherapy. Two independent studies have recently converged on alterations in the NRF2 pathway as potential biomarkers of radioresistance in NSCLC (3,4). In Clinical Cancer Research, Sitthideatphaiboon et al. identify STK11 (LKB1) mutations as a predictive biomarker of radioresistance in NSCLC (3). The authors retrospectively analyze a cohort of 194 stage I–III patients treated with radiotherapy and find STK11 mutations to be the strongest predictor of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). They demonstrate that STK11 and KEAP1 mutations confer radioresistance in NSCLC xenograft models and identify glutaminase as a potential therapeutic target to overcome NRF2-mediated radioresistance in vitro. This manuscript complements a recent publication in Cancer Discovery, which identifies pathogenic KEAP1/NFE2L2 (NRF2) mutations as a biomarker of radioresistance in NSCLC, which can similarly be reversed by glutaminase inhibition in vitro (4). Together, these studies support a unifying theory for NRF2-mediated radioresistance and “glutamine-addiction” in NSCLC (5,6). The study by Sitthideatphaiboon et al. (3) is the first to examine clinical outcomes based on STK11 status in a radiotherapy cohort. The authors acknowledge limitations, including its retrospective nature, limited sample size, and inability to access KEAP1 mutations. We, therefore, sought to validate their findings using three large prospective cohorts (). Putative driver (pathogenic) mutations versus variants of unknown significance were defined via OncoKB and Cancer Hotspots annotations in the cBioportal (https://www.cbioportal.org/). Among non-metastatic NSCLC patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) (n=736, 34% prospective) (7), STK11 pathogenic mutations were associated with poorer OS in patients who received radiotherapy {n=83, HR: 3.03 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.38–6.68]}, but not in patients who received no radiotherapy (n=547). Including KEAP1 and NFE2L2 pathogenic mutations in adenocarcinomas (8) increased the number of patients with potentially radioresistant tumors from 6.9% to 9.8% and was a stronger predictive biomarker. KEAP1/NFE2L2/STK11 mutations were associated with poorer OS [HR: 3.78 (1.85–7.74)], progression-free survival [3.80 (1.87–7.72)], DFS [4.46 (0.94–21.1)], and disease-specific survival [4.83 (2.20–10.6)] only in patients that received radiotherapy (interaction with treatment P=0.02, 0.09, 0.23, and 0.02, respectively; ; ). Additionally, KEAP1/NFE2L2/STK11 mutations were not prognostic in patients that received R0 resections (n=592), but were associated with poorer OS [HR: 2.37 (1.00–5.63)] and DFS [3.11 (1.37–7.05)] in patients with less than R0 or no resection (n=137), suggesting that KEAP1/NFE2L2/STK11 status is prognostic in patients who are assumed to undergo adjuvant or definitive radiotherapy. These findings were confirmed in multivariable analysis and after stratifying by stage. Consistent with these findings, in MSK-IMPACT (n=961) (9), KEAP1/NFE2L2/STK11 mutations were associated with poorer OS in tumors that were biopsied [n=407; HR: 2.04 (1.36–3.04)] but not resected (n=378). Similarly, in the TRACERx study (n=100) (10), KEAP1/NFE2L2/STK11 status was not significantly prognostic in patients who underwent curative resection. However, when stratifying by lymph node status, KEAP1/NFE2L2/STK11 status was prognostic of recurrence or death [HR: 5.82 (1.36–24.4)] only in patients with positive lymph nodes after surgery (n=24).
Table 1

Survival by STK11 and KEAP1*/NFE2L2*/STK11 mutational status based on treatment subgroup

Treatment subgroupN STK11 KEAP1*/NFE2L2*/STK11
HR95% CIP valueInteractionHR95% CIP valueInteraction
TCGA Pan-Cancer17366.9%9.8%
   Overall survival0.090.02#
    No radiotherapy5471.390.81, 2.390.241.440.92, 2.240.11
    Radiotherapy833.031.38, 6.680.006#3.781.85, 7.74<0.001#
   Progression-free survival0.520.09
    No radiotherapy2.301.41, 3.75<0.001#1.871.21, 2.900.005#
    Radiotherapy3.141.44, 6.860.004#3.801.87, 7.72<0.001#
   Disease-free survival0.360.23
    No radiotherapy1.890.92, 3.900.091.540.82, 2.890.18
    Radiotherapy4.460.94, 21.10.064.460.94, 21.10.06
   Disease-specific survival0.200.02#
    No radiotherapy1.890.95, 3.760.071.620.88, 2.970.12
    Radiotherapy3.541.49, 8.370.004#4.832.20, 10.6<0.001#
TCGA Firehose27674.2%5.3%
   Overall survival0.210.08
    R0 resection5921.070.59, 1.970.821.040.62, 1.760.88
    Less than R01372.040.80, 5.200.132.371.00, 5.630.05#
   Disease-free survival0.270.08
    R0 resection1.470.80, 2.710.221.320.76, 2.280.32
    Less than R02.641.11, 6.310.03#3.111.37, 7.050.007#
MSK-IMPACT396113.7%16%
   Overall survival0.790.45
    Resection3781.961.02, 3.780.05#1.480.77, 2.860.24
    Biopsy4071.771.15, 2.730.009#2.041.36, 3.04<0.001#
TRACERx41007%13%
   Relapse-free survival0.360.26
    Resection, N0741.010.13, 7.75>0.991.700.47, 6.110.41
    Resection, N+242.270.62, 8.260.215.821.36, 24.40.02#

*, pathogenic KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutations in adenocarcinomas; 1, stage I, II, and III represent 52%, 30%, and 18% of patients, respectively; 2, stage I, II, and III represent 44%, 25%, and 15% of patients, respectively; 3, stage not provided; 4, stage I, II, and III represent 62%, 24%, and 14% of patients, respectively; #, statistically significant. TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; N0/+, lymph node negative/positive; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Figure 1

OS of NSCLC patients stratified by radiotherapy status in TCGA database. OS, overall survival; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas.

*, pathogenic KEAP1/NFE2L2 mutations in adenocarcinomas; 1, stage I, II, and III represent 52%, 30%, and 18% of patients, respectively; 2, stage I, II, and III represent 44%, 25%, and 15% of patients, respectively; 3, stage not provided; 4, stage I, II, and III represent 62%, 24%, and 14% of patients, respectively; #, statistically significant. TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; N0/+, lymph node negative/positive; HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval. OS of NSCLC patients stratified by radiotherapy status in TCGA database. OS, overall survival; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas. Here, we provide further evidence that KEAP1/NFE2L2/STK11 mutations are common and predictive of outcomes after radiotherapy in the TCGA database. We additionally show in three large prospective cohorts with almost 1,800 patients that KEAP1/NFE2L2/STK11 mutations are not prognostic in patients who undergo curative surgery. Collectively, these data support further testing of KEAP1/NFE2L2/STK11 as a biomarker of radioresistance and to identify patients that may be eligible for clinical trials targeting the NRF2 pathway. Limitations of our study include retrospective analysis of datasets with limited clinical information available. Prospective validation of these findings is warranted. The article’s supplementary files as
  10 in total

1.  Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Lung: A Population-Based Study.

Authors:  Connor J Kinslow; Michael S May; Anjali Saqi; Catherine A Shu; Kunal R Chaudhary; Tony J C Wang; Simon K Cheng
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2019-08-03       Impact factor: 4.785

2.  LKB1 and KEAP1/NRF2 Pathways Cooperatively Promote Metabolic Reprogramming with Enhanced Glutamine Dependence in KRAS-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ana Galan-Cobo; Piyada Sitthideatphaiboon; Xiao Qu; Alissa Poteete; Marlese A Pisegna; Pan Tong; Pei-Hsuan Chen; Lindsey K Boroughs; Mirna L M Rodriguez; Winter Zhang; Francesco Parlati; Jing Wang; Varsha Gandhi; Ferdinandos Skoulidis; Ralph J DeBerardinis; John D Minna; John V Heymach
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Mutations in the KEAP1-NFE2L2 Pathway Define a Molecular Subset of Rapidly Progressing Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Frauke Goeman; Francesca De Nicola; Stefano Scalera; Francesca Sperati; Enzo Gallo; Ludovica Ciuffreda; Matteo Pallocca; Laura Pizzuti; Eriseld Krasniqi; Giacomo Barchiesi; Patrizia Vici; Maddalena Barba; Simonetta Buglioni; Beatrice Casini; Paolo Visca; Edoardo Pescarmona; Marco Mazzotta; Ruggero De Maria; Maurizio Fanciulli; Gennaro Ciliberto; Marcello Maugeri-Saccà
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 15.609

4.  Update of Incidence, Prevalence, Survival, and Initial Treatment in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in the US.

Authors:  Apar Kishor Ganti; Alyssa B Klein; Ion Cotarla; Brian Seal; Engels Chou
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 33.006

5.  Tracking the Evolution of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Mariam Jamal-Hanjani; Gareth A Wilson; Nicholas McGranahan; Nicolai J Birkbak; Thomas B K Watkins; Selvaraju Veeriah; Seema Shafi; Diana H Johnson; Richard Mitter; Rachel Rosenthal; Max Salm; Stuart Horswell; Mickael Escudero; Nik Matthews; Andrew Rowan; Tim Chambers; David A Moore; Samra Turajlic; Hang Xu; Siow-Ming Lee; Martin D Forster; Tanya Ahmad; Crispin T Hiley; Christopher Abbosh; Mary Falzon; Elaine Borg; Teresa Marafioti; David Lawrence; Martin Hayward; Shyam Kolvekar; Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos; Sam M Janes; Ricky Thakrar; Asia Ahmed; Fiona Blackhall; Yvonne Summers; Rajesh Shah; Leena Joseph; Anne M Quinn; Phil A Crosbie; Babu Naidu; Gary Middleton; Gerald Langman; Simon Trotter; Marianne Nicolson; Hardy Remmen; Keith Kerr; Mahendran Chetty; Lesley Gomersall; Dean A Fennell; Apostolos Nakas; Sridhar Rathinam; Girija Anand; Sajid Khan; Peter Russell; Veni Ezhil; Babikir Ismail; Melanie Irvin-Sellers; Vineet Prakash; Jason F Lester; Malgorzata Kornaszewska; Richard Attanoos; Haydn Adams; Helen Davies; Stefan Dentro; Philippe Taniere; Brendan O'Sullivan; Helen L Lowe; John A Hartley; Natasha Iles; Harriet Bell; Yenting Ngai; Jacqui A Shaw; Javier Herrero; Zoltan Szallasi; Roland F Schwarz; Aengus Stewart; Sergio A Quezada; John Le Quesne; Peter Van Loo; Caroline Dive; Allan Hackshaw; Charles Swanton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  STK11/LKB1 Mutations in NSCLC Are Associated with KEAP1/NRF2-Dependent Radiotherapy Resistance Targetable by Glutaminase Inhibition.

Authors:  Piyada Sitthideatphaiboon; Ana Galan-Cobo; Marcelo V Negrao; Xiao Qu; Alissa Poteete; Fahao Zhang; Diane D Liu; Whitney E Lewis; Haley N Kemp; Jeff Lewis; Waree Rinsurongkawong; Uma Giri; J Jack Lee; Jianjun Zhang; Jack A Roth; Stephen Swisher; John V Heymach
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  KEAP1/NFE2L2 Mutations Predict Lung Cancer Radiation Resistance That Can Be Targeted by Glutaminase Inhibition.

Authors:  Michael S Binkley; Young-Jun Jeon; Monica Nesselbush; Everett J Moding; Barzin Y Nabet; Diego Almanza; Christian Kunder; Henning Stehr; Christopher H Yoo; Siyeon Rhee; Michael Xiang; Jacob J Chabon; Emily Hamilton; David M Kurtz; Linda Gojenola; Susie Grant Owen; Ryan B Ko; June Ho Shin; Peter G Maxim; Natalie S Lui; Leah M Backhus; Mark F Berry; Joseph B Shrager; Kavitha J Ramchandran; Sukhmani K Padda; Millie Das; Joel W Neal; Heather A Wakelee; Ash A Alizadeh; Billy W Loo; Maximilian Diehn
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 38.272

8.  Mutational landscape of metastatic cancer revealed from prospective clinical sequencing of 10,000 patients.

Authors:  Ahmet Zehir; Ryma Benayed; Ronak H Shah; Aijazuddin Syed; Sumit Middha; Hyunjae R Kim; Preethi Srinivasan; Jianjiong Gao; Debyani Chakravarty; Sean M Devlin; Matthew D Hellmann; David A Barron; Alison M Schram; Meera Hameed; Snjezana Dogan; Dara S Ross; Jaclyn F Hechtman; Deborah F DeLair; JinJuan Yao; Diana L Mandelker; Donavan T Cheng; Raghu Chandramohan; Abhinita S Mohanty; Ryan N Ptashkin; Gowtham Jayakumaran; Meera Prasad; Mustafa H Syed; Anoop Balakrishnan Rema; Zhen Y Liu; Khedoudja Nafa; Laetitia Borsu; Justyna Sadowska; Jacklyn Casanova; Ruben Bacares; Iwona J Kiecka; Anna Razumova; Julie B Son; Lisa Stewart; Tessara Baldi; Kerry A Mullaney; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Efsevia Vakiani; Adam A Abeshouse; Alexander V Penson; Philip Jonsson; Niedzica Camacho; Matthew T Chang; Helen H Won; Benjamin E Gross; Ritika Kundra; Zachary J Heins; Hsiao-Wei Chen; Sarah Phillips; Hongxin Zhang; Jiaojiao Wang; Angelica Ochoa; Jonathan Wills; Michael Eubank; Stacy B Thomas; Stuart M Gardos; Dalicia N Reales; Jesse Galle; Robert Durany; Roy Cambria; Wassim Abida; Andrea Cercek; Darren R Feldman; Mrinal M Gounder; A Ari Hakimi; James J Harding; Gopa Iyer; Yelena Y Janjigian; Emmet J Jordan; Ciara M Kelly; Maeve A Lowery; Luc G T Morris; Antonio M Omuro; Nitya Raj; Pedram Razavi; Alexander N Shoushtari; Neerav Shukla; Tara E Soumerai; Anna M Varghese; Rona Yaeger; Jonathan Coleman; Bernard Bochner; Gregory J Riely; Leonard B Saltz; Howard I Scher; Paul J Sabbatini; Mark E Robson; David S Klimstra; Barry S Taylor; Jose Baselga; Nikolaus Schultz; David M Hyman; Maria E Arcila; David B Solit; Marc Ladanyi; Michael F Berger
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  An Integrated TCGA Pan-Cancer Clinical Data Resource to Drive High-Quality Survival Outcome Analytics.

Authors:  Jianfang Liu; Tara Lichtenberg; Katherine A Hoadley; Laila M Poisson; Alexander J Lazar; Andrew D Cherniack; Albert J Kovatich; Christopher C Benz; Douglas A Levine; Adrian V Lee; Larsson Omberg; Denise M Wolf; Craig D Shriver; Vesteinn Thorsson; Hai Hu
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  Keap1 loss promotes Kras-driven lung cancer and results in dependence on glutaminolysis.

Authors:  Rodrigo Romero; Volkan I Sayin; Shawn M Davidson; Matthew R Bauer; Simranjit X Singh; Sarah E LeBoeuf; Triantafyllia R Karakousi; Donald C Ellis; Arjun Bhutkar; Francisco J Sánchez-Rivera; Lakshmipriya Subbaraj; Britney Martinez; Roderick T Bronson; Justin R Prigge; Edward E Schmidt; Craig J Thomas; Chandra Goparaju; Angela Davies; Igor Dolgalev; Adriana Heguy; Viola Allaj; John T Poirier; Andre L Moreira; Charles M Rudin; Harvey I Pass; Matthew G Vander Heiden; Tyler Jacks; Thales Papagiannakopoulos
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 53.440

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.