Literature DB >> 35958298

Multiple Myeloma: Bioinformatic Analysis for Identification of Key Genes and Pathways.

Chaimaa Saadoune1, Badreddine Nouadi1, Hasna Hamdaoui1,2, Fatima Chegdani1, Faiza Bennis1.   

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy in which monoclonal plasma cells multiply in the bone marrow and monoclonal immunoglobulins are overproduced in older people. Several molecular and cytogenetic advances allow scientists to identify several genetic and chromosomal abnormalities that cause the disease. The comprehension of the pathophysiology of MM requires an understanding of the characteristics of malignant clones and the changes in the bone marrow microenvironment. This study aims to identify the central genes and to determine the key signaling pathways in MM by in silico approaches. A list of 114 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) is important in the prognosis of MM. The DEGs are collected from scientific publications and databases (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). These data are analyzed by Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) software (https://string-db.org/) through the construction of protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks and enrichment analysis of the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways, by CytoHubba, AutoAnnotate, Bingo Apps plugins in Cytoscape software (https://cytoscape.org/) and by DAVID database (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/). The analysis of the results shows that there are 7 core genes, including TP53; MYC; CDND1; IL6; UBA52; EZH2, and MDM2. These top genes appear to play a role in the promotion and progression of MM. According to functional enrichment analysis, these genes are mainly involved in the following signaling pathways: Epstein-Barr virus infection, microRNA pathway, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, and p53 signaling pathway. Several crucial genes, including TP53, MYC, CDND1, IL6, UBA52, EZH2, and MDM2, are significantly correlated with MM, which may exert their role in the onset and evolution of MM.
© The Author(s) 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Multiple myeloma; bioinformatics; gene expression; genetic predisposition; heterogeneity; mutational profiles

Year:  2022        PMID: 35958298      PMCID: PMC9358573          DOI: 10.1177/11779322221115545

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinform Biol Insights        ISSN: 1177-9322


Introduction

Multiple myeloma (MM) is one of the incurable hematological diseases, characterized by the proliferation of abnormal plasma cells with distinct cytogenetic characteristics in the bone marrow, representing about 10% to 15% of all hematopoietic tumors. The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) estimates a worldwide incidence of 160 000 cases and a worldwide mortality of 106 000 patients in 2018. However, men are much more affected by this disease than women. Moreover, the median age of patients at diagnosis is about 66 to 70 years old, with 37% of patients being younger than 65 years old. Multiple myeloma is a complex genomic landscape and it is characterized by many types of chromosomal aberrations. Hyperdiploidy and immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) translocations are included as early occurrences. They are present in the precursor stages of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and latent multiple myeloma and are completely clonal in the majority of cases. Hyperdiploidy is considered as the first type of copy number alteration commonly seen in MM. It is usually associated with a standard risk prognosis. It is also characterized by trisomies of 3 or more of the odd-numbered chromosomes, namely, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 15, 19, and 21, whereas the most common IGH translocations are t(4; 14), t(11; 14), t(14; 16), t(14; 20), and t(6; 14) and its prognostic impact depends largely on the partner chromosome. Other alterations in copy number, gains, and losses of the whole chromosome or part of the chromosome occur in the later stages of the disease trajectory and are not considered triggering events. The exception is the gain of the first copy of 1q, which appears to be an early event, whereas subsequent additional gains of 1q are later events. Common gains and losses include del 1p, gain 1q, del 13/13q, del 17p, in addition to del 16q and del 12p. Moreover, point mutations occur later in MM and commonly affect the MAPK pathway, NFKB pathway, DNA damage and repair, plasma cell differentiation, MYC activation, regulation of gene expression, and the cell cycle pathway. These mutations can arise in various subclones, and their influence on disease progression varies depending on environmental factors. KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF were among the most commonly mutated genes involved in the MAPK pathway, where hot-spot activating mutations have been discovered and were present in roughly 40% to 50% of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Recurrent mutations have also been observed in FAM46C, CYLD, DIS3, IRF4, TRAF3, TP53, RB1, LTB, SP140, and more, and mutations in therapeutic targets, namely, lenalidomide targets (CRBN, IKZF1, and IKZF3), proteasome subunits, and steroid receptor (NR3C1), can induce treatment resistance. The combination of all these chromosomal aberrations and gene mutations leads to a differential gene expression profile in the plasma cells of patients with MM. Bioinformatics is one of the newest fields of biological research, which should be broadly considered as the use of mathematics, statistics, and informatics to process and analyze biological data.[8,9] In addition, it is an important element in laboratories that generate, analyze, store, and interpret data from molecular genetic tests. The present study aims to predict interactions between differentially expressed genes (DEGs) to identify central genes and determine key signaling pathways in MM to understand its genetic heterogeneity.

Materials and Methods

To accomplish this integrative analysis, a pipeline was used (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Pipeline chart of all study analysis steps. DEG indicates differentially expressed genes; GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; PPI, protein-protein interaction.

Pipeline chart of all study analysis steps. DEG indicates differentially expressed genes; GO, Gene Ontology; KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; PPI, protein-protein interaction. A set of 114 DEGs in myeloma plasma cells involved in the progression of the disease were collected from different scientific publications[11 -47] and databases (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). The following search terms were used: multiple myeloma, gene expression, heterogeneity, mutational profiles, and genetic predisposition. We used the GenBank database, available at the following link (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene) and GeneCards (https://www.genecards.org/) to match each gene to its ID and functional annotation (Table 1).
Table 1.

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in multiple myeloma selected from various databases and scientific publications.

Gene IDGene symbolsGene namesLocusDescription
2A2MAlpha-2-macroglobulin12p13.31 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/2
84517ACTRT3Actin-related protein T33q26.2 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=ACTRT3
103ADARAdenosine deaminase RNA specific1q21.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/103
57379AICDAActivation induced cytidine deaminase12p13.31 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/57379
242ALOX12BArachidonate 12-lipoxygenase, 12R type17p13.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/242
81611ANP32EAcidic nuclear phosphoprotein 32 family member E1q21.2 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=ANP32E
328APEX1Apurinic/apyrimidinic endodeoxyribonuclease 114q11.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/328
27350APOBEC3CApolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 3C22q13.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/27350
140564APOBEC3DApolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 3D22q13.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/140564
200316APOBEC3FApolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 3F22q13.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/200316
60489APOBEC3GApolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 3G22q13.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/60489
164668APOBEC3HApolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme catalytic subunit 3H22q13.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/164668
596BCL2B-cell lymphoma 218q21.33 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/596
607BCL9B-cell lymphoma 91q21.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/607
29760BLNKB-cell linker10q24.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/29760
23476BRD4Bromodomain containing 419p13.12 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/23476
716C1SComplément C1S12p13.31 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/716
23492CBX7Chromobox 722q13.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/23492
100507056CCAT1Colon cancer–associated transcript 18q24.21 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/100507056
90835CCDC189 orC16orf93Coiled-coil domain containing 18916p11.2 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=CCDC189
595CCND1Cyclin D111q13.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/595
894CCND2Cyclin D212p13.32 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/894
896CCND3Cyclin D36p21.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/896
928CD9CD9 molecule12p13.31 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/928
948CD36CD36 molecule7q21.11 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/948
973CD79ACD79a molecule19q13.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/973
975CD81CD81 molecule11p15.5 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/975
55536CDCA7LCell division cycle associated 7 like7p15.3 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=CDCA7L
153241CEP120Centrosomal protein 1205q23.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/153241
54480CHPF2Chondroitin polymerizing factor 27q36.1 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=CHPF2
91851CHRDL1Chordin-like 1Xq23 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/91851
1163CKS1BCDC28 protein kinase regulatory subunit 1B1q21.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/1163
1164CKS2CDC28 protein kinase regulatory subunit 29q22.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/1164
4094c-MAF or MAFMAF bZIP transcription factor16q23.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/4094
1380CR2Complement C3d receptor 21q32.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/1380
55790CSGALNACT1Chondroitin sulfate N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase 18p21.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/55790
1521CTSWCathepsin W11q13.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/1521
1545CYP1B1Cytochrome P450 family 1 subfamily B member 12p22.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/1545
1634DCNDecorin12q21.33 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/1634
79961DENND2DDENN domain containing 2D1p13.3-p13.2 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=DENND2D
22894DIS3DIS3 homolog, exosome endoribonuclease13q21.33 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=DIS3
1788DNMT3ADNA methyltransferase 3 alpha2p23.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/1788
27335EIF3KEukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 subunit K19q13.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/27335
22936ELL2Elongation factor for RNA polymerase II 25q15 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=ELL2
2071ERCC3ERCC excision repair 3, TFIIH core complex helicase subunit2q14.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/2071
2146EZH2Enhancer of zeste 2 polycomb repressive complex 2 subunit7q36.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/2146
2167FABP4Fatty acid binding protein 48q21.13 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/2167
2200FBN1Fibrillin 115q21.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/2200
55294FBXW7F-box and WD repeat domain containing 74q31.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/55294
2261FGFR3Fibroblast growth factor receptor 34p16.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/2261
3006H1-2H1.2 linker histone, cluster member6p22.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene?term=(hist1h1c[gene])%20AND%20(Homo%20sapiens[orgn])%20AND%20alive[prop]%20NOT%20newentry[gene]&sort=weight
3105HLA-AMajor histocompatibility complex, class I, A6p22.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/3105
3113HLA-DPA1Major histocompatibility complex, class II, DP alpha 16p21.32 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/3113
3213HOXB3Homeobox B317q21.32 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/3213
3479IGF1Insulin-like growth factor 112q23.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/3479
3488IGFBP5Insulin-like growth factor–binding protein 52q35 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=IGFBP5
3514IGKCImmunoglobulin kappa constant2p11.2 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=IGKC
3569IL6Interleukin 67p15.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/3569
3570IL6RInterleukin 6 receptor1q21.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/3570
3608ILF2Interleukin enhancer binding factor 21q21.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/3608
3662IRF4Interferon regulatory factor 46p25.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/3662
55818KDM3ALysine demethylase 3A2p11.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/55818
10365KLF2Kruppel-like factor 219p13.11 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/10365
3936LCP1Lymphocyte cytosolic protein 113q14.13 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/3936
4023LPLLipoprotein lipase8p21.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/4023
151827LRRC34Leucine-rich repeat containing 343q26.2 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=LRRC34
344657LRRIQ4Leucine-rich repeats and IQ motif containing 43q26.2 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=LRRIQ4
389692MAFAMAF bZIP transcription factor A8q24.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/389692
9935MAFBMAF bZIP transcription factor B20q12 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/9935
9500MAGED1MAGE family member D1Xp11.22 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/9500
4170MCL1Apoptosis regulator, BCL2 family member1q21.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/4170
4193MDM2Murine double minute 212q15 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/4193
4582MUC1Mucin 1, cell surface associated1q22 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/4582
4609MYCMYC proto-oncogene8q24.21 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/4609
55892MYNNMyoneurin3q26.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/55892
7468NSD2Nuclear receptor–binding SET domain protein 24p16.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/7468
5174PDZK1PDZ domain containing 11q21.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/5174
10957PNRC1Proline-rich nuclear receptor coactivator 16q15 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=PNRC1
57580PREX1Phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate-dependent Rac exchange factor 120q13.13 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/57580
78994PRR14Proline-rich 1416p11.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/78994
339105PRSS53Serine protease 5316p11.2 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=PRSS53
5710PSMD4Proteasome 26S subunit ubiquitin receptor, non-ATPase 41q21.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/5710
23475QPRTQuinolinate phosphoribosyltransferase16p11.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/23475
5888RAD51RAD51 recombinase15q15.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/5888
25780RASGRP3RAS guanyl releasing protein 32p22.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/?term=25780
1102RCBTB2RCC1 and BTB domain–containing protein 213q14.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/1102
55159RFWD3Ring finger and WD repeat domain 316q23.1 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=RFWD3
9810RNF40Ring finger protein 4016p11.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/9810
6152RPL24Ribosomal protein L243q12.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/6152
6161RPL32Ribosomal protein L323p25.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/6161
11224RPL35Ribosomal protein L359q33.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/11224
6181RPLP2Ribosomal protein lateral stalk subunit P211p15.5 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/6181
6203RPS9Ribosomal protein S919q13.42 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/6203
6223RPS19Ribosomal protein S1919q13.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/6223
710SERPING1Serpin family G member 111q12.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/710
51548SIRT6Sirtuin 619p13.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/51548
6635SNRPESmall nuclear ribonucleoprotein polypeptide E1q32.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/6635
11262SP140SP140 nuclear body protein2q37.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/11262
6850SYKSpleen-associated tyrosine kinase9q22.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/6850
54855TENT5C or FAM46CTerminal nucleotidyltransferase 5C1p12 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=TENT5C
7018TFTransferrin3q22.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/7018
10043TOM1Target of myb1 membrane trafficking protein22qf12.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/10043
7157TP53Tumor protein p5317p13.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/7157
57212TP73-AS1TP73 ARN antisense 11p36.32 https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=TP73-AS1
7295TXNThioredoxin9q31.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/7295
7311UBA52Ubiquitin A-52 residue ribosomal protein fusion product 119p13.11 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/7311
9898UBAP2LUbiquitin-associated protein 2 like1q21.3(https://www.genecards.org/cgi-bin/carddisp.pl?gene=UBAP2L).
55585UBE2Q1Ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 Q11q21.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/55585
29089UBE2TUbiquitin conjugating enzyme E2T1q32.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/29089
7398USP1Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 11p31.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/7398
7874USP7Ubiquitin-specific peptidase 716p13.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/7874
7412VCAM1Vascular cell adhesion molecule 11p21.2 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/7412
1462VCANVersican5q14.2-q14.3 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/1462
10413YAP1Yes1-associated transcriptional regulator11q22.1 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/10413

Abbreviation: DEG, differentially expressed genes.

Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in multiple myeloma selected from various databases and scientific publications. Abbreviation: DEG, differentially expressed genes.

Analysis Software

STRING software analysis

Analysis by STRING version 11.5 (https://string-db.org/) allowed us to reveal key genes and co-expressed genes in MM, to identify enriched biological terms, GO terms, and finally to determine key signaling pathways of core genes. FDR value ⩽ 0.05 was considered as the cut-off criterion, with a confidence score of 0.400 set as the cut-off criterion.

Determination of key genes

The input file, composed of 114 DEGs collected, has been submitted for analysis by STRING. The parameters retained for the analysis were the type of organism (Homo sapiens), type of network (evidence network), and confidence score (<0.400). The analysis was performed without enrichment. The core genes were selected based on their number of interactions with other genes (⩾20 interactions) and their location in the PPI network (at the center).

GO analysis

The GO enrichment analysis includes biological process, cellular component, and molecular function. GO terms have been analyzed from files corresponding to the GO enrichment, then downloaded from the software in tabular separated values (TSV) format, which can be opened in Excel as simple tabular text output. The top GO analysis results were selected with their significant values of FDR.

Identification of co-expressed genes

To determine the co-expressed genes, a file corresponding to the string interaction was downloaded from the software in TSV format, which can be opened in Excel as a simple tabular text output. We allow classifying the co-expressed genes by their scores, which indicates the level of association of the expression data and can also be determined by the presence of a black line between the nodes in the PPI network.

Determination of key signaling pathways

They were obtained from the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) process in String software and selected with their significant FDR value ⩽ 0.05.

Cytoscape software analysis

To verify the results obtained by String software, Cytoscape version 2.3.8 (https://cytoscape.org/) was used, considering the P value < .05 and a confidence score of 0.400 as cut-off criteria.

Key genes identification

The TSV file of the gene’s interaction was imported into Cytoscape software. The CytoHubba Cytoscape plugin was used to classify the network nodes according to their characteristics. The degree is one of the topological analysis methods provided by CytoHubba, allowing us to observe target genes with higher degrees, which could constitute key genes.

GO enrichment

The Cytoscape BiNGO plugin was used to provide the GO enrichment. The most significant GO terms were selected with their P value < .05 and their number of annotated genes.

Network clusters

Cytoscape software groups PPI networks generated by STRING into clusters, taking the P value < .05 and a confidence score of 0.400 as cut-off criteria. ClusterMaker Apps from AutoAnnotate application was used to perform Markov Clustering (MCL) of the protein network. Markov Clustering makes it possible to visualize the enriched terms in the form of circular plots on the nodes of the network.

DAVID functional annotation bioinformatics microarray analysis

The DAVID database version 6.8 (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/) was used to perform KEGG pathway enrichment, to determine the most significant signaling pathways and compare them with those obtained by STRING. The data were pasted as a list of official gene symbols into the DAVID database.

Results

Network analysis

The network analysis of the set of 114 DEG revealed that 110 were annotated by STRING (Figure 2). A central network was obtained encompassing 99 genes, and a small network at the periphery, grouping together 2 genes, APOBEC3H and APOBEC3C. In addition, 9 genes have been outside the core network: RASGRP3; CEP120; MAGED1; CHRDL1; PNRC1; ALOX12B; PREX1; RCBTB2; DENND2D, and 7 core genes constitute the network engine: TP53; MYC CDND1; IL6; UBA52; EZH2; MDM2. In this functional network, all 101 genes represented various interactions, which may be explained by functional links between them.
Figure 2.

Network of protein-protein interaction. The network view (evidence view) summarizes the set of predicted associations for a group of 110 genes. The nodes of the network are the gene product, and the edges represent the predicted functional associations. The edges are represented by lines of different colors that indicate the type of interaction to predict the associations. Clicking on a node will give detailed information about the protein and clicking on an edge will display a detailed breakdown of the evidence.

Network of protein-protein interaction. The network view (evidence view) summarizes the set of predicted associations for a group of 110 genes. The nodes of the network are the gene product, and the edges represent the predicted functional associations. The edges are represented by lines of different colors that indicate the type of interaction to predict the associations. Clicking on a node will give detailed information about the protein and clicking on an edge will display a detailed breakdown of the evidence.

Co-expression results

From the first network, we determined the co-expression related to the core target genes of MM (Table 2). Key genes have been identified by their scores, which indicate the level of association of the gene expression data. The nodes represented genes and the black line shown between the nodes in the PPI network indicated co-expression (Figure 2). A co-expression score existing between 2 genes represented it. The score indicated the level of association of expression data during a process. If 2 genes showed similar expression under different conditions, it was likely that they were jointly involved in the same process (one requiring the other).
Table 2.

Co-expressed between core genes.

Node 1Node 1Score of co-expression
CCND1 MYC 0.069
CCND1MUC10.071
CCND1CKS1B0.068
CCND1FGFR30.065
CCND1CKS20.065
CCND1YAP10.317
CCND1IGFBP50.098
EZH2 MYC 0.091
EZH2 TP53 0.074
EZH2WHSC10.120
EZH2USP10.152
EZH2RAD510.212
IL6CYP1B10.086
IL6FABP40.058
IL6VCAM10.063
MYC TP53 0.070
MYCRAD510.069
MYCCDCA7L0.096
MYCMUC10.065
MYCAPEX10.070
MYCMCL10.065
MYCTXN0.063
TP53RFWD30.073
TP53RAD510.073
TP53CKS1B0.076
TP53RPS190.087
TP53UBE2T0.062
UBA52RPL320.531
UBA52RPL350.323
UBA52RPLP20.259
UBA52RPS90.112
UBA52CKS1B0.065
UBA52RPL240.211
UBA52RPS190.548

The genes marked in bold signify co-expression between 2 key genes.

Co-expressed between core genes. The genes marked in bold signify co-expression between 2 key genes. Among the identified core genes, some of them represented co-expression with each other, including CCND1 with MYC, EZH2 with MYC, EZH2 with TP53, and MYC with TP53. In addition, they also represented co-expression with other genes in the functional network, which were presented in Table 1.

GO enrichment

GO terms were classified in the STRING software according to the value of the false discovery rate and the number of core genes they contained. Moreover, they were classified according to the number of annotated genes in each GO term. Thus, the most important ones had a high number of key genes involved in the development of MM. The GO analysis allowed the obtaining of a total of 448 GO items, including 392 biological process (BP) entries, 23 molecular function (MF) entries, and 33 cellular component (CC) entries (Figure 3).
Figure 3.

Gene Ontology enrichment. The diagram represents the most significant GO terms according to the number of genes involved in the network, which are indicated in parenthesis in the diagram.

GO indicates Gene Ontology.

Gene Ontology enrichment. The diagram represents the most significant GO terms according to the number of genes involved in the network, which are indicated in parenthesis in the diagram. GO indicates Gene Ontology. The most significant biological process determined with FDR values of 7.55e-09; 1.26e-08; 1.26e-08 were as follows: Cellular macromolecule metabolic process (GO:0044260) (64/114 genes), regulation of gene (70/114 genes), respectively. The most significant molecular function observed with FDR values of 0.00011; 0.00019; 0.00019; were as follows: RNA binding (GO:0003723) (28/114 genes), nucleic acid binding (GO:0003676) (46/114 genes), and protein binding (GO:0005515) (66/114 genes), respectively. Potentially important target genes have been expressed in the membrane-bounded organelle (GO:0043227), organelle (GO:0043226), and intracellular organelle (GO:0043229), which have a number of annotated genes of 97/114; 100/114; 96/114 and FDR values of 2.80e-06; 1.45e-05; and 1.45e-05, respectively.

Identification of KEGG pathways

KEGG pathway enrichment analyses were performed to reveal potential signaling pathways in the 114 DEGs (Table 3). They were significantly enriched in Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection (hsa05169), MicroRNAs in cancer (hsa05206), PI3K-Akt signaling pathway (hsa04151), and p53 signaling pathway (hsa04115), which were considered as the major pathways involved during the development of MM.
Table 3.

KEGG pathways enrichment.

KEGG pathwayDescriptionCount in networkNumber of central genesFalse discovery rate
hsa05169Epstein-Barr virus infection1454.49e-09
hsa05206MicroRNAs in cancer1157.12e-07
hsa04151PI3K-Akt signaling pathway1351.85e-05
hsa04115p53 signaling pathway733.33e-05

Abbreviation: KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

The table represents the most important KEGG pathways, selected with their significant FDR value ⩽ 0.05 and their number of genes annotated in the functional network.

KEGG pathways enrichment. Abbreviation: KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. The table represents the most important KEGG pathways, selected with their significant FDR value ⩽ 0.05 and their number of genes annotated in the functional network.

Identification of key genes

Cytoscape analysis showed 110 annotated genes. CytoHubba apps from the Cytoscape program allowed users to determine the top genes with the “degree” method, where the target genes have the highest degrees, and which are often key target genes (Figure 4). Each node showed a different color depth depending on its own degree (the darker the color, the higher the degree). The network provided 7 important key target genes involved in the regulation of many other genes in the PPI network, which may have potential therapeutic targets in MM.
Figure 4.

Network of genes interaction degree. Proteins with a higher degree of importance are more likely to be essential.

Network of genes interaction degree. Proteins with a higher degree of importance are more likely to be essential.

GO enrichment by BINGO plugin

The analysis by the BINGO apps in Cytoscape allowed identifying a set of GO terms with a high number of annotated genes and a significant P value (Supplementary Table S1). These results supported the results obtained by STRING software, and the most GO common were:—Biological process: GO ID 48518 (positive regulation of biological process); GO ID 10467 (gene expression); GO ID 44260 (cellular macromolecule metabolic process)—Molecular function: GO ID 5515 (protein binding)—cellular component: GO ID 43227 (membrane-bounded organelle); GO ID 43229 (intracellular organelle); GO ID 43226 (organelle), and they were marked in bold in Table S1. All GO terms identified in this analysis could be implicated in the development of MM. The 110 annotated genes were involved in 13 clusters, of which 12 were linked, forming a large network, and 1 remained outside this large network named Apolipoprotein deaminase single, with 2 genes (APOBEC3H and APOBEC3C) (Figure 5). The subgroups of this large network were named according to their protein annotations, and they were classified according to the number of genes involved: Susceptibility apoptosis cell is the largest subgroup and the most important, containing 51 genes, of which 6 were top genes (TP53, c-MYC, CCND1, EzH2, IL6, and MDM2);
Figure 5.

Clustered protein association network. The cluster network provides 13 groups (clusters) of all 114 myeloma gene sets. Each node presents a gene or gene product, the color of the node indicates the 3-dimensional structure of the protein. Each gene cluster indicates a biological function.

Protein us4 ribosomal with 10 genes of which one (UBA52) is the top gene; Reattaching heterochromatin mitotic with 8 genes; Chondroitin proteoglycan microfibrils with 5 genes; Proteinase c1s c1r with 4 genes; na chloride scarb1 with 4 genes; Somatomedin insulin higher with 3 genes; Single deaminase independent with 3 genes; Removes h2a h2afz with 3 genes; Exosome 3’ untranslated with 3 genes; dm mhc class with 2 genes; Cytolytic release cytochrome with 2 genes. Clustered protein association network. The cluster network provides 13 groups (clusters) of all 114 myeloma gene sets. Each node presents a gene or gene product, the color of the node indicates the 3-dimensional structure of the protein. Each gene cluster indicates a biological function.

DAVID database results

To validate the results obtained by STRING and Cytoscape, an analysis by the DAVID software was carried out. The results obtained showed 10 GO terms representing 10 signaling pathways classified according to their P value and the number of genes involved in them (Table 4). The most significant signaling pathways were EBV infection, PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, MicroRNAs in cancer, and the p53 signaling pathway. These results consolidated those obtained by STRING software.
Table 4.

KEGG pathways enrichment by DAVID.

CategoryTermGenesCount%P valueBenjamini
KEGG_PATHWAYEpstein-Barr virus infection 109,12,3E-63,2E-4
KEGG_PATHWAYPI3K-Akt signaling pathway 1311,81,0E-47,2E-3
KEGG_PATHWAYMicroRNAs in cancer 1110,04,0E-41,5E-2
KEGG_PATHWAYp53 signaling pathway 65,54,6E-41,5E-2
KEGG_PATHWAYB cell receptor signaling pathway 65,55,2E-41,5E-2
KEGG_PATHWAYBladder cancer 54,56,3E-41,5E-2
KEGG_PATHWAYPathways in cancer 1210,91,3E-32,4E-2
KEGG_PATHWAYSmall-cell lung cancer 65,51,4E-32,4E-2
KEGG_PATHWAYFoxO signaling pathway 76,41,8E-32,8E-2
KEGG_PATHWAYRibosome 76,42,0E-32,8E-2

Abbreviation: KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.

Pathways found by DAVID database, selected with their significant P value and their number of genes annotated.

KEGG pathways enrichment by DAVID. Abbreviation: KEGG, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Pathways found by DAVID database, selected with their significant P value and their number of genes annotated.

Discussion

In this study, we performed a bioinformatics analysis of a biological data set to identify the key genes and signaling pathways involved during the development of MM. The functional PPI network resulting from the STRING database and Cytoscape software identified that among 114 DEGs introduced, 7 are considered as key genes that represented a high connectivity in the network. Including TP53; MYC, CDND1, IL6, UBA52, EZH2, and MDM2. The CCND1 with MYC, EZH2 with MYC, EZH2 with TP53, and MYC with TP53 are co-expressed, which can be explained by their complementarity and involvement in the same or different processes during the transformation of normal plasma cells into myeloma plasma cells (MM evolution). Indeed, the study of the co-expression of cell cycle genes has shown the presence of a dynamic balance between the co-expression of sets of genes activating and inhibiting the cell cycle (CDK/cyclin-dependent kinases and CDK1) in MM. The clustering analysis showed that the susceptibility apoptosis cell cluster (the largest subgroup and the most important), containing 6 top genes (TP53, c-MYC, CCND1, EzH2, IL6, and MDM2), could be implicated in the development of MM.[5,16,20,49,50] Nevertheless, the UBA52 gene was found in the protein us4 ribosomal cluster. The ribosomal us4 protein has multiple functions, including mRNA decoding, initiation of small ribosomal subunit aggregation by binding directly to the 16S rRNA and translation repression. It was also involved in the anti-termination activities of transcription. The ontological analysis revealed the involvement of these 7 hub genes of the functional network in BP related to cellular macromolecular metabolic process, regulation of gene expression, macromolecular metabolic process, and positive regulation of the biological process. These hub genes were the major regulators of these 4 important processes that can be altered during the development of MM.[16,49,52 -54] The CC results suggested that the 7 hub genes were mainly scattered throughout the cell, including the nucleus, mitochondria, plastids, vacuoles, vesicles, ribosomes, and the cytoskeleton. Then, the MF reflected the involvement of hub genes in RNA binding, nucleic acid binding, and protein binding. The alteration in the expression of one or more of these key genes may lead to deregulation of these processes, which can be essential for the cell life cycle and their deregulation may play a role in the development of MM.[16,20,49,50] was significantly down-regulated in MM, identified as the first hub gene in the PPI network, and it represented the highest degree of connectivity (43 interactions), including the most important interactions with the other 6 major genes identified. It is well known that TP53 is a critical tumor suppressor gene that encodes a tumor suppressor protein with domains for transcriptional activation, DNA binding, and oligomerization. When dysregulated, TP53 plays a key and multifaceted role in cancer development and cancer therapy, including MM. It is implicated in a variety of biological functions, with canonical roles including cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, senescence, and apoptosis, as well as noncanonical roles, such as regulation of cell metabolism, and autophagy. This gene is activated by various stress stimuli and is maintained at a low level by a variety of regulators in normal cells. Its dysregulation was presented in 3 forms in newly diagnosed patients with MM: monoallelic deletion of a part of the chromosome 17p (~8%), monoallelic mutations (~6%), and biallelic inactivation (~4%). Del 17p was still considered a high-risk characteristic in MM and was a part of the current illness staging standards. The gene was significantly up-regulated in MM. In the PPI network, it was represented in the center with a high degree of connectivity, which involves 36 interactions, including TP53, MYC CDND1, IL6, UBA52, EZH2, and MDM2. It is one of the regulatory and proto-oncogenes that encode transcription factors. It is involved in the regulation of many biological functions, including functions that affect cell growth and proliferation-replication, transcription and translation, cell metabolism, and apoptosis. It has also been recognized as 1 of 4 genes, including Oct4, KLF4, and Sox2, which could together reprogram fibroblasts into a pluripotent stem cell state. This gene is considered a key regulator of MM. Its dysfunction was one of the main features of disease progression, being a trigger for MGUS to MM transition. These alterations include translocations, which have been observed in 50.1% of patients with newly diagnosed MM. These translocations involved immunoglobulin (IG) loci (IGH, IGL, IGK) and certain non-IG partners, in particular FAM46C, FOXO3, and BMP6, where the hypermutations associated with APOBEC deregulation are located. These mutational hotspots are often found at MYC breakpoints, indicating their roles in the generation of the MYC translocation in MM. In addition, MYC gains and duplications at the 8q24.21 locus were present in almost 15% of newly diagnosed patients with MM, which was related to shorter survival in univariate analysis. , a gene encoding Cyclin D1, was also a gene that was upregulated in MM. It has also been identified as a core gene based on its importance in the network. It interacted with 30 genes in the PPI network. Cyclin D1 was a key cell cycle regulator and was involved in the pathogenesis of several cancers. Its overexpression and translocation are frequent events in MM, suggesting that it might be the cause of the initiation and development of this malignancy. During mitosis, the transition of the cell cycle from G1 to S phase is controlled by the cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), CDK4 and CDK6, which form protein complexes with cyclin D1. Cyclin D1 catalyzes the phosphorylation of the tumor suppressor protein retinoblastoma (RB) while releasing the transcription factor E2F and triggering the downstream gene transcription required for cell cycle progression. As a result, cyclin D1 inhibition was conducted to cell cycle arrest, while overexpression of the protein accelerates the G1 phase transition. Due to chromosomal duplication, translocations, and alteration of normal intercellular trafficking and proteolysis, abnormal expression of cyclin D1 has been reported in a variety of human tumors. In particular, 15% to 20% of MM samples carry a t(11;14) chromosomal translocation, resulting in abnormal transcriptional activation of CCND1. This most common translocation in MM, t(11; 14) (q13; q32), involves an abnormal fusion of the IGH locus with cyclin D1. Overexpression of cyclin D1 was also observed in 25% to 50% of MM samples, indicating that the deregulation of cyclin D1, which was a critical regulator of the G1/S transition and therefore of the cell cycle, may be a key event in MM development. In the PPI network, Interleukin-6) represented the connectivity of 25 interactions. This gene was significantly upregulated in MM. IL6 is a pleiotropic cytokine with extensive functions in inflammation and immunity. It has been extensively studied for its role in normal antibody-producing plasma cells. It promotes the normal B-cell differentiation into cells producing antibodies without triggering the proliferation of B cells. It has been shown that IL6 is a key factor in the proliferation of MM, promoting the growth, proliferation, and survival of myeloma cells. Bone marrow stromal cells presented the major source of IL6 in MM cells, and its overexpression was linked to poor prognosis and larger tumor cell mass in MM. (Enhancer of Zeste 2 Polycomb Repressive Complex 2) represented a high degree of connectivity, with 22 interactions in the PPI network. It is one of the DEGs upregulated in MM. The EZH2 gene was a histone methyltransferase that acts primarily on H3K27 and catalyzes the conversion to a trimethylated marker (H3K27me3). This gene played a critical role in normal B cell development since H3K27me3 expression and levels influence differentiation decisions. Increased EZH2 expression in germinal center B cells resulted in cell cycle checkpoints disappearing and allowing B cells to expand. Subsequently, EZH2 decreased, as a result allowing the cells to differentiate into plasma cells. EZH2 was known to be deregulated in MM. Pawlyn et al discovered for the first time a link between high expression of EZH2 and myeloma survival. This association was robust across different datasets, persisted regardless of the treatment method used, and was independent of other factors known to affect survival in patients with myeloma. This reinforces the importance of EZH2 expression in the pathogenesis of myeloma and suggested that its inhibition may be a potential therapeutic approach for myeloma therapy and should be studied in clinical trials. (ubiquitin A-52 residue ribosomal protein fusion product 1) was one of the up-regulated genes observed in MM. In the PPI network, it was also recognized as a core gene, representing high connectivity of 22 interactions, the most significant of which are those with the other 6 hub genes. This gene is essential for the selective degradation of proteins by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). In addition, it has been found to play a central role in cellular functions, including cell cycle control, apoptosis, signaling, and transcriptional regulation. UBA52 has been shown to promote the development of cancer through multiple mechanisms, which may indicate its involvement in the development of MM. UBA52 has been the most novel target gene proposed as a driver of MM until there are enough studies on its involvement in myeloma. Further genomic studies are needed to explain the function of UBA52 in the process of the disease. (Murine double minute protein) represented important connectivity with about 21 interactions in the network. The MDM2 gene is a pleiotropic protein located on the 12q13-14 chromosome, known to facilitate the ubiquitination of p53 required for its proteasome-mediated turnover. In MM, this gene is highly and constitutively expressed through processes such as chromosomal trisomy or gene amplification and functions both to drive cell proliferation and to enhance cell survival. It activates E2F-1, which promoted the transition from G1 to the S phase, and suppressed the function of wild-type p53 (wtp53), which can enhance cell survival. MDM2 binds constitutively to E2F-1, wtp53, and mtp53 (mutant-type p53) in all myeloma cells, as well as p21 in malignancy cells lacking p53. Then p21 was activated by wtp53 and potentiated the tumor suppressor function of wtp53 by strongly inhibiting cell cycle regulatory proteins such as cyclin E and CDK2. This indicated that MDM2 can improve the cell cycle progression of MM cells by downregulating cell cycle inhibitory proteins (wtp53 and p21) and activating E2F-1. Therefore, overexpression of MDM2 may contribute to the growth and survival of MM cells, indicating that therapeutic strategies targeting MDM2 have potential utility in MM.[16,74] KEGG pathway enrichment analysis showed that the 7 key genes were significantly enriched in EBV infection (hsa05169), microRNAs in cancer (hsa05206), PI3K-Akt signaling pathway (hsa04151) and p53 signaling pathway (hsa04115). Many studies have been in concordance with our results, which demonstrated the existence of an association between EBV infection and MM development, in which a polymerase chain reaction was performed and revealed the presence of an elevated level of EBV DNA in patients with MM compared with healthy controls.[75,76] MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small noncoding RNAs aberrantly expressed in solid and hematopoietic malignancies, where they play a central role as post-transcriptional regulators of gene expression. Recently, some studies have demonstrated the efficacy of miRNAs as specific and sensitive biomarkers for the classification, prognosis, and diagnosis of human cancer. Jones et al discovered 3 miRNAs in serum, miR-1308, miR-1246, and miR 720, which have the potential to be used as diagnostic biomarkers in myeloma. They demonstrated that the joint use of miR-1308 and miR-720 provided a powerful diagnostic tool for distinguishing normal healthy controls from patients with MGUS/myeloma. Furthermore, the combination of miR-1246 and miR-1308 can distinguish patients with MGUS from those with myeloma. The PI3K/Akt pathway has attracted considerable attention as a promising therapeutic target in MM. A study conducted on the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway (mammalian target of rapamycin) by Vijay Ramakrishnan and Shaji Kumar has shown that it played a critical role in the biology of diseases. This pathway was aberrantly activated in a large proportion of patients with MM by multiple mechanisms. It may also play a role in resistance to several existing therapies, making it a central pathway in the pathophysiology of MM. The study by Vikova et al showed after whole-exome sequencing on a large cohort of 30 human MM cell lines, representative of a large molecular heterogeneity of MM, and 8 control samples, that many canonical pathways known to be implicated in the proliferation and survival of MM cells have been mutated, including PI3K-AKT. In addition, 76% of myeloma cell lines had mutations in the p53 cell cycle pathway genes.

Conclusion

STRING, Cytoscape, and DAVID Software analyzed a set of 114 MM DEGs. TP53, MYC, CCND1, IL6, UBA52, EZH2, and MDM2 were identified as hub genes, which may play a key role in the pathogenesis of MM. They were implicated during different stages of disease progression. The 7 hub genes were identified as being significantly enriched in various pathways, particularly in EBV infection, microRNAs in cancer, the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, and the p53 signaling pathway, which can be critical for the progression of myeloma. This predictive study can be a relevant tool for a better understanding of the evolution of MM in its complex microenvironment. Understanding the pathogenesis of MM could reveal new biomarkers of myeloma cells and promising potential therapeutic targets. Click here for additional data file. Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-bbi-10.1177_11779322221115545 for Multiple Myeloma: Bioinformatic Analysis for Identification of Key Genes and Pathways by Chaimaa Saadoune, Badreddine Nouadi, Hasna Hamdaoui, Fatima Chegdani and Faiza Bennis in Bioinformatics and Biology Insights
  81 in total

1.  Transcriptional features of multiple myeloma patients with chromosome 1q gain.

Authors:  S Fabris; D Ronchetti; L Agnelli; L Baldini; F Morabito; S Bicciato; D Basso; K Todoerti; L Lombardi; G Lambertenghi-Deliliers; A Neri
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to target c-Myc.

Authors:  Jake E Delmore; Ghayas C Issa; Madeleine E Lemieux; Peter B Rahl; Junwei Shi; Hannah M Jacobs; Efstathios Kastritis; Timothy Gilpatrick; Ronald M Paranal; Jun Qi; Marta Chesi; Anna C Schinzel; Michael R McKeown; Timothy P Heffernan; Christopher R Vakoc; P Leif Bergsagel; Irene M Ghobrial; Paul G Richardson; Richard A Young; William C Hahn; Kenneth C Anderson; Andrew L Kung; James E Bradner; Constantine S Mitsiades
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 3.  Multiple myeloma epidemiology and survival: A unique malignancy.

Authors:  Dickran Kazandjian
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Degradation of CCNB1 mediated by APC11 through UBA52 ubiquitination promotes cell cycle progression and proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Fajiu Wang; Xi Chen; Xiaobo Yu; Qiang Lin
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Bone marrow fibroblasts overexpress miR-27b and miR-214 in step with multiple myeloma progression, dependent on tumour cell-derived exosomes.

Authors:  Maria Antonia Frassanito; Vanessa Desantis; Lucia Di Marzo; Ilaria Craparotta; Luca Beltrame; Sergio Marchini; Tiziana Annese; Fabrizio Visino; Marcella Arciuli; Ilaria Saltarella; Aurelia Lamanuzzi; Antonio G Solimando; Beatrice Nico; Maria De Angelis; Vito Racanelli; Maria A Mariggiò; Rosistella Chiacchio; Michele Pizzuti; Anna Gallone; Ruggiero Fumarulo; Maurizio D'Incalci; Angelo Vacca
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 7.996

6.  Variants in ELL2 influencing immunoglobulin levels associate with multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Bhairavi Swaminathan; Guðmar Thorleifsson; Magnus Jöud; Mina Ali; Ellinor Johnsson; Ram Ajore; Patrick Sulem; Britt-Marie Halvarsson; Guðmundur Eyjolfsson; Vilhelmina Haraldsdottir; Christina Hultman; Erik Ingelsson; Sigurður Y Kristinsson; Anna K Kähler; Stig Lenhoff; Gisli Masson; Ulf-Henrik Mellqvist; Robert Månsson; Sven Nelander; Isleifur Olafsson; Olof Sigurðardottir; Hlif Steingrimsdóttir; Annette Vangsted; Ulla Vogel; Anders Waage; Hareth Nahi; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Thorunn Rafnar; Ingemar Turesson; Urban Gullberg; Kári Stefánsson; Markus Hansson; Unnur Thorsteinsdóttir; Björn Nilsson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Targeting EZH2 in Multiple Myeloma-Multifaceted Anti-Tumor Activity.

Authors:  Helena Jernberg-Wiklund; Jonathan D Licht; Mohammad Alzrigat
Journal:  Epigenomes       Date:  2018-09-03

Review 8.  Prognosis, Biology, and Targeting of TP53 Dysregulation in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Erin Flynt; Kamlesh Bisht; Vinidhra Sridharan; María Ortiz; Fadi Towfic; Anjan Thakurta
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-01-24       Impact factor: 6.600

9.  Cytogenetic and FISH analysis of 93 multiple myeloma Moroccan patients.

Authors:  Hasna Hamdaoui; Oumaima Benlarroubia; Oum Kaltoum Ait Boujmia; Hossein Mossafa; Karim Ouldim; Aziza Belkhayat; Imane Smyej; Houda Benrahma; Hind Dehbi; Fatima Chegdani
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 2.183

10.  Multiple Myeloma Incidence and Mortality Around the Globe; Interrelations Between Health Access and Quality, Economic Resources, and Patient Empowerment.

Authors:  Heinz Ludwig; Susie Novis Durie; Angela Meckl; Axel Hinke; Brian Durie
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2020-05-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.