| Literature DB >> 35958266 |
Vitalii Emelianov1, Anton Zhilenkov2, Sergei Chernyi2,3,4, Anton Zinchenko2, Elena Zinchenko2.
Abstract
The necessity to improve the metallographic analysis systems to automate diagnostics of the condition of the metals for all their characteristics has been substantiated. The metallographic analysis algorithm based on the use of neural networks for recognizing metal microstructures and a case-based reasoning approach for determining the metal grade is proposed. The structure of a multilayer neural network to determine the metals quantitative parameters has been developed. The recognizing results by neural networks for determining the metal quantitative parameters are shown. The high accuracy of determining the metals quantitative parameters by neural networks is presented. The specialized metallographic software to automate the recognition of metal microstructures and to determine the metal grade has been developed. Comparative results of carrying out metallographic studies with the developed neural network software to determine the metals quantitative parameters are shown.Entities:
Keywords: Case-based reasoning approach; Expert system; Intelligent technologies; Metallographic analysis; Neural networks; Software
Year: 2022 PMID: 35958266 PMCID: PMC9358429 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Diagram of the proposed automated metallographic analysis.
Figure 2The neural network structure for determining the metal quantitative parameters.
Figure 3Examples of reference microstructure images (Ratio Ferrite/Perlite) of the steel 16GS(K01803) from the training set.
Figure 4Graphs of the learning error (a) and classifying error (b) of the neural network.
The results of the created neural networks to determine the metal quantitative characteristics.
| Standard and metal parameters | The neural network structure | Classifying error | Optimal number of the learning epochs | Total amount of the analyzed metallographic images | A number of correctly classifying metallographic images | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GOST 5639-82 | Grain amount | 550-150-10 | 0.0149 | 820 | 280 | 274 |
| GOST 8233-56 | Ratio Ferrite/Perlite | 400-110-10 | 0.0285 | 930 | 140 | 139 |
| Size of carbide network | 210-70-6 | 0.0319 | 900 | 210 | 202 | |
| GOST 1778-70 | Grade of line nitrides | 210-70-5 | 0.0119 | 780 | 153 | 144 |
| Grade of sulphides | 210-70-5 | 0.0098 | 890 | 186 | 173 | |
| ASTME 1382 | Size of ferrite grain | 480-140-19 | 0.0463 | 1320 | 289 | 277 |
The experiments results of the metal grade determination based on the case-based reasoning approach.
| Metal type | Metal parameters - | The number of the precedent | Metal grade - the situation to be solved is |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structural Steel | 0.23С; 0.22Cr; 0.5Mn; 0.018S; 0.019P | 20 | 20пс(A 29 1020) |
| Structural Steel | 0.1С; 0.09Cr; 0.35Mn; 0.01S; 0.03P | 12 | 08кп(A 622) |
| Structural Steel | 0.2С; 0.24Cr; 0.6Mn; 0.02S; 0.02P | 19 | 20пс(A 29 1020) |
| Structural Steel | 0.12С; 0.09Cr; 0.38Mn; 0.02S; 0.027P | 13 | 08кп(A 622) |
| Structural Steel | 0.2С; 0.19Cr; 0.29Mn; 0.03Si; 0.03S | 7 | Ст3кп (A 107) |
| Structural Steel | 0.18С; 0.2Cr; 0.3Mn; 0.03Si; 0.04S | 6 | Ст3кп (A 107) |
| Structural Steel | 0.1C; 0.18 Si; 0.38 Mn; 0.02S; 0.03P | 4 | Ст1сп(A192 Gr A) |
| Structural Steel | 0.09C; 0.2 Si; 0.43 Mn; 0.03S; 0.03P | 3 | Ст1сп(A192 Gr A) |
Figure 5Developed software for automated metallographic analysis.
Figure 6Functional structure of the expert system.
Results of image analysis for carbon content and determination of the structural component.
| Analyzed steel microstructures | Processing time, min | Structural component of the steel | Carbon, % (С) | Non-metal inclusions | Resistance to rupture, МPа |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.22 | Ferrite and Perlite | 0.23 | Oxides (amount = 2) | 530 | |
| 0.34 | Ferrite and Perlite | 0.55 | Oxides (amount = 3) | 550 | |
| 0,27 | Ferrite and Perlite | 0.80 | Oxides (amount = 3) | 500 |
The results of the functioning of image recognition of microstructures of steel casings of torpedo ladle cars created by neural networks in the developed software.
| Neural network structure | Recognition Error | Optimal number of training epochs | Total amount of the analyzed alloy images | A number of correctly recognized images |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1500-500-100-10 | 0.943 | 2000 | 590 | 545 |
| 1500-500-500-50 | 1.384 | 2000 | 590 | 468 |
| 1000-300-140-20 | 0.883 | 2200 | 590 | 581 |
| 1000-600-280-30 | 0.994 | 2500 | 590 | 499 |
| 1200-300-100-20 | 1.141 | 3000 | 590 | 556 |
| 1200-600-280-30 | 1.294 | 3300 | 590 | 570 |
| 1100-400-150-20 | 1.141 | 3000 | 590 | 556 |
| 1100-450-180-30 | 0.784 | 2100 | 590 | 543 |
| 1100-600-200-50 | 0.971 | 2500 | 590 | 572 |
Assessment of the developed software functioning at the Alchevsk Iron and Steel Works in the Central Laboratory.
| Metallographic Systems to compare | Average time of metallographic analysis (including image recognition), min | Deviation of grain parameters in the analyzed metallographic image,% |
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary (outdated) metallographic system without developed software | 18 | 5–10 |
| New metallographic analysis system with developed software (based on neural networks) | 5 | 3–4 |
| Metallographic systems (Videotest, SIAMS etc) | 7 | 5–8 |
Experimental determination of the steel grain size using an ordinary system and a developed system.
| No. of the experiment | Ordinary metallographic analysis system without developed software | Upgraded metallographic analysis system with developed software | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| evaluated grain size | real grain size | evaluated grain size | real grain size | |
| #1 (steel C 70W2) | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| #2 (steel C 70W1) | 5 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| #3 (steel C 70W1) | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| #4 (steel A 622) | 2 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
| #5 (steel A 622) | 10 | 8 | 9 | 8 |
| … | … | … | … | … |
| #55 (steel S420N) | 9 | 8 | 9 | 9 |
| #56 (steel S420N) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| #57 (steel S420N) | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| #58 (steel S420N) | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| #59 (steel S420N) | 8 | 6 | 8 | 8 |
| #60 (steel S420N) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |