| Literature DB >> 35958248 |
Denggao Peng1,2, Hua Huang3, Zhichao Liu1, Yanzhang Gao1, Yingxia Liu1,2.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the picture between vitamin D levels and clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant BA.2 in children.Entities:
Keywords: BA.2; Omicron; SARS-CoV-2; children; subvariant; vitamin D
Year: 2022 PMID: 35958248 PMCID: PMC9358048 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.960859
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Flow chart of the pediatric cases selection and analysis process.
Figure 2Spearman correlation analysis of serum 25(OH)D concentrations with other clinical parameters, r represents the correlation coefficient. The red dots in B, C, E, F represent outliers. APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; CT, cycle threshold; IL-6, interleukin-6; PT, prothrombin time; WBC, white blood cell. (A) age; (B) SARS-CoV-2 IgM; (C) lymphocytes; (D) platelets; (E) IL-6; (F) procalcitonin. Equation: (A) Y = −0.276*X + 15.1; (B) Y = −0.03*X + 1.51 (Outlier included); Y = −0.012*X + 0.88 (Outlier excluded); (C) Y = 0.035*X + 0.81 (Outlier included); Y = 0.031*X + 0.86 (Outlier excluded); (D) Y = 0.76*X + 212; (E) Y = 0.38*X + 7.85 (Outliers included); Y = 0.25*X + 9.8 (Outliers excluded); (F) Y = 0.006*X + 0.11 (Outliers included); Y = 0.003*X + 0.13 (Outliers excluded).
Demographic characteristics of pediatric cases infected with Omicron subvariant BA.2.
|
| |
|---|---|
| Age (years): Median (IQR) | 7.8 (3.3–12.0) |
| ≤3: | 26 (22.4%) |
| >3, ≤6: | 25 (21.6%) |
| >6, ≤12: | 37 (31.9%) |
| >12, ≤18: | 28 (24.1%) |
| Male gender: | 65 (56.0%) |
| Serum 25(OH)D concentration (ng/mL): Median (IQR) | 23.9 (18.6–31.4) |
25(OH)D, 25 hydroxyvitamin D; IQR, interquartile range.
Univariate comparison of clinical characteristics between the iVD and sVD groups.
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years): Median (IQR) | 9.7 (5.9–13.7) | 2.9 (1.9–4.5) | <0.001 |
| Male gender: | 46 (57.5%) | 19 (52.8%) | 0.689 |
| Vaccination: | 17 (21.3%) | 5 (13.9%) | 0.447 |
| Clinical symptoms: | |||
| Asymptomatic | 3 (3.8%) | 4 (11.1%) | 0.201 |
| Fever | 38 (47.5%) | 22 (61.1%) | 0.229 |
| Respiratory symptoms | 38 (47.5%) | 11 (30.6%) | 0.106 |
| Digestive symptoms | 10 (12.5%) | 4 (11.1%) | 1.000 |
| Imaging findings of pneumonia: | 11 (13.8%) | 6 (16.7%) | 0.778 |
| Positive SARS-CoV-2 IgM: | 1 (1.3%) | 2 (5.6%) | 0.227 |
| Positive SARS-CoV-2 IgG: | 56 (70.0%) | 18 (50.0%) | 0.059 |
25(OH)D, 25 hydroxyvitamin D; iVD, insufficient vitamin D; IQR, interquartile range; sVD, sufficient vitamin D; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Figure 3Dynamic changes in laboratory results for seven time periods from T1 to T7 within 28 hospitalization days after admission. T1 to T7 represent the following: T1 ≤ 1 day; 1 < T2 ≤ 3; 3 < T3 ≤ 5; 5 < T4 ≤ 7; 7 < T5 ≤ 14; 14 < T6 ≤ 21; 21 < T7 ≤ 28 days. The red line represents the iVD group, n = 8–80 per condition. The blue line represents the sVD group, n = 4–36 per condition. Points on the line chart represent mean or median. (A) N gene cycle threshold; (B) ORF1ab gene cycle threshold; (C) white blood cells; (D) lymphocytes; (E) interleukin-6; (F) procalcitonin; (G) platelets; (H) D-dimer; (I) fibrinogen.
Figure 4The COVID-19 pneumonia lesions included ground-glass opacity (GGO), consolidation (CO), and nodular opacities were identified and measured by AI and radiologists. The differences in the ratio of total lesion volume to total lung volume in computed tomography at admission (not significant) and 1–2 weeks later (P = 0.04) were compared between the iVD (A) and sVD (B) groups.