Literature DB >> 35957663

NEK2, a promising target in TP53 mutant cancer.

Martina Cusan1, Lili Wang1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35957663      PMCID: PMC9362867          DOI: 10.1097/BS9.0000000000000106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood Sci        ISSN: 2543-6368


× No keyword cloud information.
In human cancers, aberration of tumor suppressors and oncogenes cooperate to contribute to tumor initiation and progression.[1,2]TP53, one of the best-known tumor suppressors, appears to have diverse roles through working together with different oncogenes.[3,4] A good example is RAS mutations co-occurring with TP53 lesions. KRAS hyper-activation leads to cell replicative senescence, which could be overcome by lesions in TP53, escaping immune clearance surveillance and promoting tumorigenesis. In the current issue of Adv Sci 2022, Feng et al expand the significance of TP53 loss to drug resistance through co-regulating oncogene NEK2 amplification/gene overexpression with multiple myeloma (MM) as a disease model.[5] In this paper, the authors set out the study with systematic identification of the correlation between TP53 genetic lesion and amplification/overexpression of NEK2 in MM through data mining of public available datasets. This led to the discovery of co-occurrence between TP53 deletion and NEK2 amplification/ overexpression, which is significantly associated with poor overall survival in MM. Of note, this synergy is a shared feature across various cancer types as TCGA data reanalysis confirmed this observation, indicating a high priority to understand the molecular mechanism for this co-occurrence as well as its clinical implication (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

TP53 genetic lesions promote NEK2 abundance by regulating gene expression and oncogene amplification. TP53 genetic lesions employ multiple molecular mechanisms to regulate NEK2 abundance, which either by increasing promoter hypermethylation to control gene expression or by inducing chromosomal instability to modulate copy number of NEK2. Combined defects in TP53 and NEK2 render multiple myeloma cells drug resistance to Bortezomib.

TP53 genetic lesions promote NEK2 abundance by regulating gene expression and oncogene amplification. TP53 genetic lesions employ multiple molecular mechanisms to regulate NEK2 abundance, which either by increasing promoter hypermethylation to control gene expression or by inducing chromosomal instability to modulate copy number of NEK2. Combined defects in TP53 and NEK2 render multiple myeloma cells drug resistance to Bortezomib. The authors first established a causal relationship between TP53 deletion and NEK2 gene overexpression/amplification using MM cell lines with and without TP53 allele. Loss of TP53 gene led to differential expression of genes involved in cell cycle, methylation control, and chromosomal stability, resulting in the transcriptional hyper-activation of NEK2 through down-regulating methyltransferase (eg, DNMT) and up-regulating E2F genes. Moreover, TP53 loss also promoted the acquisition of multiple copies of NEK2 by increasing genomic instability. Consequently, NEK2 activation and TP53 suppression caused mitotic aberrations, tumor proliferation, and disease progression in MM. All these phenotypes can be reversed by overexpression of wildtype p53, highly suggesting that TP53 loss unleash NEK2 amplification/overexpression to boost cancer cell genomic instability and proliferation. NEK2 was previously reported to induce drug resistance through activation of efflux drug pumps.[6] The authors then tested if TP53 loss/NEK2 overexpression may form the basis of drug resistance to contribute to the disease aggressiveness. Using MM front line therapy Bortezomib (BTZ) as an example, they demonstrated that silencing of NEK2 in TP53 depleted MM cells sensitized these cells to the drug treatment and impaired cell proliferation. Stable expression of wildtype p53 enhanced the therapeutic effect of BTZ both in vitro and in vivo with further improvement upon NEK2 depletion. Altogether, these results suggest that targeting the function of the NEK2 and p53 pathways may have therapeutic values by reversing the adverse outcome of MM patients without p53. As one of the most frequently mutated/deleted tumor suppressors in cancer, TP53 genetic lesions are often associated with poor overall survival; hence, it is a good therapeutic target. However, most of the lesions produce generally inactive proteins, making it challenging with drugs. The current strategy has been focusing on restoring wildtype p53 function with small molecules or other means.[7-10] This discovery illustrates that targeting NEK2 kinase in TP53 mutated/depleted cancers could be an alternative strategy. In this light, the development on NEK2 kinase inhibitors and testing their efficacy alone and in combination with gold standard treatment would be a priority in MM and maybe other tumor types. In this scenario, investigation of synergy between lesions in TP53 and NEK2 in other tumoral contexts would be beneficial. Although a causative link was established in this current study, some MM samples with TP53 deletion but without NEK2 overexpression/amplification remains to be further investigated for their antagonist mechanism (s) in controlling this synergy.
  10 in total

1.  C-myc overexpression and p53 loss cooperate to promote genomic instability.

Authors:  X Y Yin; L Grove; N S Datta; M W Long; E V Prochownik
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  1999-02-04       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Tumor suppressor p53 restricts Ras stimulation of RhoA and cancer cell motility.

Authors:  Mingxuan Xia; Hartmut Land
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2007-02-18       Impact factor: 15.369

3.  Oncogenic ras and p53 cooperate to induce cellular senescence.

Authors:  Gerardo Ferbeyre; Elisa de Stanchina; Athena W Lin; Emmanuelle Querido; Mila E McCurrach; Gregory J Hannon; Scott W Lowe
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  NEK2 induces drug resistance mainly through activation of efflux drug pumps and is associated with poor prognosis in myeloma and other cancers.

Authors:  Wen Zhou; Ye Yang; Jiliang Xia; He Wang; Mohamed E Salama; Wei Xiong; Hongwei Xu; Shashirekha Shetty; Tiehua Chen; Zhaoyang Zeng; Lei Shi; Maurizio Zangari; Rodney Miles; David Bearss; Guido Tricot; Fenghuang Zhan
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2013-01-14       Impact factor: 31.743

5.  Small-molecule antagonists of p53-MDM2 binding: research tools and potential therapeutics.

Authors:  Lyubomir T Vassilev
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Synergistic response to oncogenic mutations defines gene class critical to cancer phenotype.

Authors:  Helene R McMurray; Erik R Sampson; George Compitello; Conan Kinsey; Laurel Newman; Bradley Smith; Shaw-Ree Chen; Lev Klebanov; Peter Salzman; Andrei Yakovlev; Hartmut Land
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-05-25       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Restoring the p53 'Guardian' Phenotype in p53-Deficient Tumor Cells with CRISPR/Cas9.

Authors:  Sergiu Chira; Diana Gulei; Amin Hajitou; Ioana Berindan-Neagoe
Journal:  Trends Biotechnol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 19.536

Review 8.  Vectors for Glioblastoma Gene Therapy: Viral & Non-Viral Delivery Strategies.

Authors:  Breanne Caffery; Jeoung Soo Lee; Angela A Alexander-Bryant
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 5.076

9.  Genetic Aberrations and Interaction of NEK2 and TP53 Accelerate Aggressiveness of Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Xiangling Feng; Jiaojiao Guo; Gang An; Yangbowen Wu; Zhenhao Liu; Bin Meng; Nihan He; Xinying Zhao; Shilian Chen; Yinghong Zhu; Jiliang Xia; Xin Li; Zhiyong Yu; Ruixuan Li; Guofeng Ren; Jihua Chen; Minghua Wu; Yanjuan He; Lugui Qiu; Jiaxi Zhou; Wen Zhou
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 16.806

10.  Discovery of Novel Isatin-Based p53 Inducers.

Authors:  P Davidovich; V Aksenova; V Petrova; D Tentler; D Orlova; S Smirnov; V Gurzhiy; A L Okorokov; A Garabadzhiu; G Melino; N Barlev; V Tribulovich
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 4.345

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.