| Literature DB >> 35957312 |
Jin Han1, Jia Liu1, Hongmei Chang1.
Abstract
The detection of long-distance pavement elevation undulation is the main data basis for pavement slope detection and flatness detection, and is also the data source for 3D modeling and quality evaluation of pavement surfaces. The traditional detection method is to use a level and manual coordination to measure; however, the detection accuracy is low and the detection speed is slow. In this paper, the high-speed non-contact vehicle-mounted road undulationelevation detection method is adopted, combined with the advantages of each sensor measurement; three methods are proposed to detect the road undulation elevation: rotary encoders, accelerometers, attitude sensor data fusion detection; GPS RTK detection; and Kalman filtering detection. Through modeling and experimental comparison, Kalman filter detection is not disturbed by the environment, and the detection accuracy is higher than the current international standard.Entities:
Keywords: GPS RTK detection; Kalman filtering; data fusion detection; road undulation elevation
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35957312 PMCID: PMC9370868 DOI: 10.3390/s22155756
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Figure 1Working principle of road undulation elevation measurement.
Figure 2Schematic diagram of pitching complementary filtering.
Elevation data of a road in Jining, Shandong Province.
| Measure | Distance (m) | Level Elevation | Attitude Sensor Elevation (cm) | Error (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP1 | 50 | 26 | 25.2 | 3.0 |
| TP2 | 50 | 56 | 57.3 | 2.3 |
| TP3 | 50 | 86 | 87.5 | 1.7 |
| TP4 | 50 | 105 | 102.5 | 2.3 |
| TP5 | 50 | 147 | 151.6 | 3.1 |
| TP6 | 50 | 149 | 154.4 | 3.6 |
| TP7 | 50 | 152 | 156.5 | 2.9 |
| TP8 | 50 | 115 | 110.8 | 3.6 |
| TP9 | 50 | 102 | 105.5 | 3.4 |
| TP10 | 50 | 105 | 107.8 | 2.8 |
Figure 3The longitudinal slope of the runway of an aircraft test flight ground.
The slope of the runway on test flight ground.
| Measure the Node | Distance | Level | Sensor | Slope Error | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Δ | Slope | Δ | Slope | |||
| 0–1 | 100 | 1 | 0.01 | 3 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| 1–2 | 100 | 2 | 0.05 | 4 | 0.04 | 0.01 |
| 2–3 | 100 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.5 | 0.005 | 0.0015 |
| 3–4 | 100 | 7 | 0.07 | 6.7 | 0.067 | 0.003 |
| 4–5 | 100 | 1 | 0.01 | 2.8 | 0.028 | 0.018 |
| 5–6 | 100 | 4 | 0.04 | 5 | 0.05 | 0.01 |
| 6–7 | 100 | 5 | 0.05 | 3 | 0.03 | 0.02 |
| 7–8 | 100 | 10 | 0.10 | 9.3 | 0.093 | 0.007 |
| 8–9 | 100 | 2 | 0.02 | 4.7 | 0.047 | 0.0027 |
| 9–10 | 100 | 1 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.002 | 0.008 |
Figure 4Principle of RTK detection.
Figure 5GPS and level road undulation elevation detection curve.
Figure 6Comparison of measured data of road undulation elevation.
Figure 7Technology route.
Figure 8Kalman filter elevation contrast.
Figure 9The undulating waveform of road surface obtained by the data fusion algorithm.
Comparison of detection data.
| Node | Distance | Level | Sensor Fusion | GPS RTK Measured | Kalman Filter Data Fusion | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Error | Error | Error | ||||||
| 0 | 0 | 25 | 24.5 | 2.0 | 25 | 0 | 25.2 | 0.8 |
| 1 | 100 | 32 | 33.1 | 3.4 | 33 | 3.2 | 32.6 | 1.8 |
| 2 | 200 | 43 | 44.7 | 3.9 | 45 | 4.6 | 43.5 | 1.1 |
| 3 | 300 | 51 | 52.1 | 2.1 | 52 | 1.9 | 51.8 | 1.5 |
| 4 | 400 | 72 | 73.9 | 2.6 | 74 | 2.7 | 73.4 | 1.9 |
| 5 | 500 | 84 | 85.2 | 1.4 | 92 | 9.9 | 85.5 | 0.4 |
| 6 | 600 | 91 | 93.3 | 2.5 | 101 | 10.9 | 92.5 | 1.6 |
| 7 | 700 | 100 | 98.2 | 1.8 | 102 | 2 | 101.3 | 1.3 |
| 8 | 800 | 112 | 109.5 | 2.2 | 114 | 1.7 | 113.4 | 1.3 |
| 9 | 900 | 122 | 125.5 | 2.8 | 113 | 7.3 | 123.7 | 1.4 |
| 10 | 1000 | 131 | 134.6 | 2.7 | 135 | 3.0 | 134.3 | 1.8 |