| Literature DB >> 35957115 |
Diana Serbezeanu1, Tăchiță Vlad-Bubulac1, Mihaela Dorina Onofrei1, Florica Doroftei1, Corneliu Hamciuc1, Alina-Mirela Ipate1, Alexandru Anisiei1, Gabriela Lisa2, Ion Anghel3, Ioana-Emilia Şofran3, Vasilica Popescu4.
Abstract
The development of intelligent materials for protective equipment applications is still growing, with enormous potential to improve the safety of personnel functioning in specialized professions, such as firefighters. The design and production of such materials by the chemical modification of biodegradable semisynthetic polymers, accompanied by modern manufacturing techniques such as electrospinning, which may increase specific properties of the targeted material, continue to attract the interest of researchers. Phosphorus-modified poly(vinyl alcohol)s have been, thus, synthesized and utilized to prepare environmentally friendly electrospun mats. Poly(vinyl alcohol)s of three different molecular weights and degrees of hydrolysis were phosphorylated by polycondensation reaction in solution in the presence of phenyl dichlorophosphate in order to enhance their flame resistance and thermal stability. The thermal behavior and the flame resistance of the resulting phosphorus-modified poly(vinyl alcohol) products were investigated by thermogravimetric analysis and by cone calorimetry at a micro scale. Based on the as-synthesized phosphorus-modified poly(vinyl alcohol)s, electrospun mats were successfully fabricated by the electrospinning process. Rheology studies were performed to establish the optimal conditions of the electrospinning process, and scanning electron microscopy investigations were undertaken to observe the morphology of the phosphorus-modified poly(vinyl alcohol) electrospun mats.Entities:
Keywords: MCC test; PVA; electrospun mats; flame resistance; phenyl dichlorophosphate; thermal stability
Year: 2022 PMID: 35957115 PMCID: PMC9370101 DOI: 10.3390/nano12152685
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Chemical structure of PVA-OP (1-3).
Figure 2FTIR spectra of the PVA-OP (1-3) samples.
Thermal properties of PVA-OP (1-3).
| Sample | TGA | DSC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tonset | Tmax | Tendset | Char Yield (%) 4 | Tg | |
| PVA-OP1 | 46.62 | 56.15 | 101.61 | 10.34 | 67.65 |
| PVA-OP2 | 42.10 | 136.36 | 250.17 | 4.64 | - |
| PVA-OP3 | 52.57 | 140.00 | 150.37 | 8.24 | 58.49 |
1 initial decomposition temperature; 2 the temperature at which the decomposition rate is maximum; 3 final decomposition temperature; 4 carbonaceous residue yield measured at 750 °C; 5 glass transition temperature.
Figure 3TG and DTG curves for phosphorus-modified poly(vinyl alcohol)s.
Figure 4DSC curves for phosphorus-modified poly(vinyl alcohol)s.
Figure 5SEM images of PVA-OP2 pyrolysis residues at 342 °C (a) and 475 °C (b), in the oven of the thermogravimetric analyzer in nitrogen with a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
Data obtained from MCC analysis of poly(vinyl alcohol) samples.
| Sample | Weight (mg) | Char Yield | Char Yield (wt%) | Decomposition Rate (%) | HRC 1 (J/(g × K)) | THR 2 (kJ/g) | PHRR 3 (W/g) | TPHRR
4 | Time (s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PVA-OP1 | 20.09 | 2.46 | 12.24 | 87.76 | 265.65 | 18.24 | 108.53 | 479.98 | 339.50 |
| PVA-OP2 | 20.07 | 1.92 | 9.57 | 90.43 | 257.70 | 19.53 | 121.83 | 477.26 | 336.50 |
| PVA-OP3 | 20.02 | 1.69 | 8.44 | 91.56 | 245.38 | 19.31 | 111.35 | 479.20 | 332.00 |
1 heat release capacity; 2 total heat release; 3 peak to heat release rate; 4 temperature of peak to heat release rate.
Figure 6HRR versus temperature for PVA-OP (1-3).
Viscosity, electrospinning conditions (solution concentration, tip–collector distance (TCD), and flow rate (FR) of spinning solution, applied voltage, relative humidity (RH), and ambient temperature), and the average fiber diameters of PVA-OP (1-3).
| Sample | Viscosity | Electrospinning Conditions | Average Fiber Diameters (µm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PVA-OP1 | 0.5677 | 30%, 20 cm, 50 μL/min, 22 kV, 20%, 25 °C | 0.111 ± 0.03 (fibers) |
| PVA-OP2 | 0.0961 | 15%, 20 cm, 50 μL/min, 22 kV, 20%, 25 °C | 0.056 ± 0.023 (fibers with beads) |
| 0.6154 | 25%, 20 cm, 50 μL/min, 22 kV, 20%, 25 °C | 0.217 ± 0.045 (uniform fibers) | |
| PVA-OP3 | 0.0289 | 2%, 20 cm, 50 μL/min, 22 kV, 20%, 25 °C | - (beads only) |
| 0.0467 | 5%, 20 cm, 50 μL/min, 22 kV, 20%, 25 °C | - (beads only) | |
| 0.0666 | 8%, 20 cm, 50 μL/min, 22 kV, 20%, 25 °C | - (beads with fibers) | |
| 0.0734 | 10%, 20 cm, 50 μL/min, 22 kV, 20%, 25 °C | - (fibers with beads) | |
| 0.0972 | 12%, 20 cm, 50 μL/min, 22 kV, 20%, 25 °C | 0.031 ± 0.019 (fibers with beads) | |
| 0.1211 | 15%, 20 cm, 50 μL/min, 22 kV, 20%, 25 °C | 0.048 ± 0.020 (fibers with beads) | |
| 0.1437 | 18%, 20 cm, 50 μL/min, 22 kV, 20%, 25 °C | 0.062 ± 0.032 (fibers with beads) | |
| 0.1663 | 20%, 20 cm, 50 μL/min, 22 kV, 20%, 25 °C | 0.304 ± 0.087 (uniform fibers) | |
| 0.7967 | 25%, 20 cm, 50 μL/min, 22 kV, 20%, 25 °C | 0.214 ± 0.048 (uniform fibers) |
Figure 7Specific viscosity versus PVA-OP3 concentration in distilled water. SEM images are presented, allowing the visualization of the formation of nanofibers depending on the concentration.
Figure 8SEM images for the PVA-OP (1-3) electrospun mats at optimal concentration: (a) PVA-OP1; (b) PVA-OP2; (c) PVA-OP3.
Figure 9SEM images for PVA-OP3 at different concentrations (15% w/v (a), 20% w/v (b), and 25% w/v (c)).