| Literature DB >> 35957068 |
Shubin Yan1,2, Xiaoyu Zhang1,2,3, Jilai Liu1, Haoqian Xu1, Feng Wen4, Tingsong Li1,2,3, Jiamin Cui1, Pengwei Liu1,2,3, Lifang Shen1, Yang Cui1, Yifeng Ren3.
Abstract
With the continuous progress of artificial intelligence and other manufacturing technologies, there is promising potential for wearable piezoresistive sensors in human physiological signal detection and bionic robots. Here, we present a facile solution-mixing process to fabricate a multiwalled carbon nanotube/graphite powder (MWCNT@Gp) film, which has high sensitivity and great linearity and is more oriented to flexible piezoresistive sensors. The sensor consists of two parts: a spinosum microstructure shaped by a sandpaper template and polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) as the top substrate and interdigital electrodes as the bottom substrate. The experiments we have conducted show that these two parts provide good protection to the MWCNTs@Gp film and improve sensor sensitivity. Additionally, the sensitivity of the optimal ratio of multiwalled carbon nanotubes and graphite powder is analyzed. The 5%MWCNT@5%Gp composites were found to have relatively good conductivity, which is convenient for the fabrication of conductive films of piezoresistive sensors. Finally, we conducted application experiments and found that the flexible piezoresistive sensor can detect minute signals of human motion and different pressure points. This indicates the feasibility of portable sensors in electronic skin and smart devices.Entities:
Keywords: graphite powder; multiwalled carbon nanotubes; piezoresistive; pressure sensor; wearable
Year: 2022 PMID: 35957068 PMCID: PMC9370412 DOI: 10.3390/nano12152637
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Fabrication process of the three-layer piezoresistive sensor.
Figure 2The properties for different doping ratios of Gp. (a) Current variation induced by different top substrates under different pressures. (b) Resistance variation of different Gp doping ratios under different pressures. (c) Current variation induced by different Gp doping ratios under different pressures.
Resistance values of different Gp doping ratios at different pressures.
| Pressure (kPa) | 0%Gp (kΩ) | 1%Gp (kΩ) | 3%Gp (kΩ) | 5%Gp (kΩ) | 7%Gp (kΩ) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.392 | 72 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 2.5 | 2.8 |
| 1.176 | 28 | 1.09 | 1.03 | 0.884 | 0.957 |
| 2.352 | 5 | 0.871 | 0.769 | 0.643 | 0.829 |
Figure 3(a) SEM image of the top substrate on a scale of 200 μm and 3 μm. (b) TEM image of the 5%MWCNTs@5%Gp film on the scale of 500 nm. (c) TEM image of the 5%MWCNTs@5%Gp film on a scale of 2 μm. (d) SEM image of the 5%MWCNTs@5%Gp film on a scale of 2 μm.
Figure 4Electromechanical properties of the sensor with 5%MWCNTs@5%Gp conductive film. (a) Fitting curves of I-V for different pressures. (b) The I-V curves of forward and backward sweeping at a voltage range from −1 to 1 V under a pressure of 2.352 kPa. (c) The I-V curves under different pressures. (d) The minimum detection of the sensor. (e) The rising and releasing time of the sensor. (f) Durability of the sensor for 1200 loading/unloading cycles. (g) Hysteresis characteristics of the sensor under a pressure of 1.176 kPa. (h) Fitting curves of sensitivity for different pressures. (i) Schematic diagram of the working principle of the pressure sensor.
Comparisons with other reported piezoresistive sensors.
| Reference | Conductive Composite Material | Sensitivity in the Range of | Rising and Releasing Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| [ | F-MXene@C-CNTs/CCS aerogel | 3.84 | 62 ms |
| [ | Carbon nanotube sponge | 4015 | 119 ms, 127 ms |
| [ | MXene/MWCNT | - | 28s under 50% RH, 66 s under 50% RH |
| [ | PDMS/Multilayer Ti2C-MXene | 507 | 60 ms, 40 ms |
| This work | PDMS/5%MWCNTs@5%Gp | 980 | 105 ms, 172 ms |
Figure 5Applications of designed flexible piezoresistive sensors. The I-T curves of (a) cheek bulging, (b) throat swallowing, (c) pulse, (d) finger touching, (e) arm bending, and (f) knee bending.