| Literature DB >> 35956637 |
Joaquín Hernández-Fernández1, Yoleima Guerra2, Esneyder Puello-Polo3, Edgar Marquez4.
Abstract
This article studies the effects of arsine on the synthesis and thermal degradation of 4 samples of virgin polypropylene (PP-virgin) and proposes reaction mechanisms that allow understanding of its behaviour. Different points are monitored during the polypropylene synthesis to perform TGA, DSC, FT-IR, RDX, and MFI analyses later. The content of AsH3 in polypropylene varies between 0.05 and 4.73 ppm, and of arsenic in virgin PP residues between 0.001 and 4.32 ppm for PP0 and PP10, increasing in fluidity index from 3.0 to 24.51. The origin of thermo-oxidative degradation is explained by the reaction mechanisms of the Molecule AsH3 with the active titanium center of the ZN catalyst and the subsequent oxidation to form radical complexes. OO-AsH-TiCl4-MgCl2 and (OO-as-OO)2 -TiCl4-MgCl2, which, by radical reactions, give rise to the formation of functional groups aldehyde, ketone, alcohol, carboxylic acid, CO, CO2, PP-Polyol, PP-Polyether, and PP-Isopropylethers. These species caused the TG and DTG curves to increase degradation peaks in pp samples.Entities:
Keywords: arsine; catalyst; degradation; ligands; polypropylene
Year: 2022 PMID: 35956637 PMCID: PMC9370903 DOI: 10.3390/polym14153123
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Diagram of the polymerization process and sampling points.
Reagents for polymerization.
| Run | Catalyst | Propylene | TEAl | Hydrogen | Nitrogen | Arsine | Selectivity Control Agent | T [°C] | Pressure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 5 | 1.2 | 0.25 | 30 | . | 0 | 1 | 70 | 27 |
| 1 | 5 | 1.2 | 0.25 | 30 | . | 0.05 | 1 | 70 | 27 |
| 5 | 5 | 1.2 | 0.25 | 30 | . | 0.84 | 1 | 70 | 27 |
| 10 | 5 | 1.2 | 0.25 | 30 | . | 4.73 | 1 | 70 | 27 |
1 triethylaluminium co-catalyst.
Identification and sampling points.
| Stage | Point | Substance | State of Origin | Identification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feeding | A | Propylene | LPG | A0, A1, A5, A10 |
| B | Nitrogen | Gas | B0, B1, B5, B10 | |
| C | Hydrogen | Gas | C0, C1, C5, C10 | |
| D | Arsine | LPG | D0, D1, D5, D10 | |
| Reaction | E | Gases | Inside the reactor | E0, E1, E5, E10 |
| F | Catalyst | Inside the reactor | F0, F1, F5, F10 | |
| G | Catalyst | Catalytic system | G0, G1, G5, G10 | |
| H | Propylene | Recovered | H0, H1, H5, H10 | |
| Degassing | I | Resin | Exits the reactor | I0, I1, I5, I10 |
| J | Gases | Retired in the purge | J0, J1, J5, J10 | |
| K | Polypropylene | Dust | K0, K1, K5, K10 |
Figure 2Arsine chromatogram.
Figure 3Reaction mechanism of residual AsH3 with TiCl4/MgCl2.
Figure 4Infrared spectra of the catalyst with distinct levels of arsine.
Figure 5Relationship between the arsenic content in the PP and the MFI, and the variation of the Mw.
Figure 6TGA and DTG of PP samples.
Figure 7Carbonyl index of PP samples.
Compounds determined in the degassing stage.
| Compound (ppm) | Point I | Point J | Point K | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I0 | I1 | I5 | I10 | J0 | J1 | J5 | J10 | K0 | K1 | K5 | K10 | |
| AsH3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Alcohol | 10.1 | 50.2 | 81.5 | 180.1 | 15.2 | 80.2 | 100 | 310.1 | 5.1 | 7.5 | 20.1 | 50.5 |
| Ketone | 19.5 | 80.2 | 160.1 | 220.1 | 30.2 | 130.1 | 220 | 280.7 | 4.5 | 10.6 | 31.5 | 45.5 |
| Aldehydes | 13.2 | 60.1 | 121.5 | 242.7 | 25.2 | 91.5 | 172 | 270.1 | 7.1 | 11.7 | 22.3 | 21.2 |
| Acid | 20.1 | 97.1 | 210.1 | 351.7 | 32.1 | 161.2 | 308 | 425.1 | 4.5 | 23.4 | 41.5 | 33.3 |
| CO | 0 | 0 | 0.2 | 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0.4 | 3.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 |
| CO2 | 0.1 | 1.5 | 5.5 | 11.3 | 1.2 | 2.1 | 8 | 20.2 | 0 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 1.9 |
Figure 8Mechanisms of reaction of peroxy radicals in arsenic complexes to form VOCs.