| Literature DB >> 35956561 |
Anish Khan1,2, Aftab Aslam Parwaz Khan1,2, Hadi M Marwani1,2, Maha Moteb Alotaibi2, Abdullah M Asiri1,2, Ayyar Manikandan3, Suchart Siengchin4, Sanjay Mavinkere Rangappa4.
Abstract
The development of a sensitive glucose monitoring system is highly important to protect human lives as high blood-glucose level-related diseases continue to rise globally. In this study, a glucose sensor based on polyaniline-bimetallic oxide (PANI-MnBaO2) was reported. PANI-MnBaO2 was electrochemically synthesized on the glassy carbon electrode (GCE) surface. The as-prepared PANI-MnBaO2 was characterized by field emission scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, cyclic voltammetry, and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Glucose sensing on PANI-MnBaO2 is based on the electrocatalytic oxidation of glucose to the glucolactone, which gives oxidation current. The oxidation potential for glucose was 0.83 V, with a limit of detection of 0.06 µM in the linear and in the concentration range of 0.05 µM-1.6 mM. The generated current densities displayed excellent stability in terms of repeatability and reproducibility with fast response. The development of a sensitive glucose sensor as obtained in the current study would ensure human health safety and protection through timely and accurate glucose detection and monitoring.Entities:
Keywords: PANI-MnBaO2; conducting polymer composite; cyclic voltammetry; electrochemical sensor; glucose sensor; linear sweep voltammetry
Year: 2022 PMID: 35956561 PMCID: PMC9370187 DOI: 10.3390/polym14153047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1(a) Chronoamperogram obtained during synthesis of PANI at a constant potential of 1.0 V. (b) Cyclic voltammogram obtained during deposition of MnO on PANI coated GCE in a solution containing 0.1 M MnSO4/0.1 M KNO3 at a scan rate of 75 mV/s. (c) Cyclic voltammogram obtained during deposition of BaO on PANI−MnO coated GCE in a solution containing 0.1 M Ba(NO3)2/0.1 M KNO3 at a scan rate of 75 mV/s.
Figure 2(a) Image of unmodified GCE (before electropolymerization). (b) Image of deposited PANI of GCE surface. (c) Image of PANI@MnBaO2 (low magnification). (d) Focus on MnBaO2 nanostructure (high magnification).
Figure 3(a) FTIR spectrum of the synthesized PANI−MnBaO2 composite. (b) XEDS spectrum of the PANI−MnBaO2 composite.
Figure 4(a) Cyclic voltammogram obtained in 0.1 mM Fe (CN)6 3−/4− at a scan rate of 75 mV/s. (b) EIS spectrum obtained in 10 mM Fe (CN)6 3−/4−.
Figure 5(a) Cyclic voltammogram obtained in a solution containing 20 mM glucose and 0.1 M NaOH.at a scan rate of 75 mV/s. (b) Cyclic voltammogram obtained in a solution containing 0.2 mM glucose and different pH/supporting electrolyte.
Figure 6(a) Linear sweep voltammogram obtained at different glucose concentrations at the scan rate of 75 mV/s. (b) Cyclic voltammogram obtained in 2 mM glucose/0.1 M NaOH solution at the scan rate of 25 mV/s to 550 mV/s. (c) calibration plot with error bars. (d) Linear regression graph of oxidation current density against the square root of the scan rate. (e) Plot of the logarithm of oxidation current density against the logarithm of the scan rate.
Figure 7(a) Current density response of PANI-MnBaO2 in 4 mM glucose performed at five consecutive times. (b) LSV response of PANI-MnBaO2 in 2 mM glucose obtained over a period of 30 days. (c) Peak current density in 2 mM glucose (with and without likely interferents). (d) the obtained response time in 2 mM glucose solution.
Result of real sample analysis.
| Sample | Replicate Number | Spiked Concentration (mM) | Detected Concentration (mM) | Bias | RSD (%) | Recovery (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human serum Albumin | 3 | 0.5 | 0.38 ± 0.02 | −0.12 | 5.2 | 76 |
| 3 | 1 | 0.85 ± 0.019 | −0.15 | 2.2 | 85 | |
| 3 | 2 | 2.2 ± 0.07 | 0.2 | 3.18 | 110 |
Reported current density of the bioanode in the literature.
| Electrode Materials | LR (mM) | FDR (mM) | LOD (µM) | Sensitivity (µAmM−1 cm−2) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANI/GO/CuO | 0–13 | 0–20 | 1.5 | 1252 | [ |
| PDDA-graphene/CuO | 0.04–4 | 0.04–4 | 0.2 | 4982.2 | [ |
| Au NPs/PANI | 0.01–10 | 0.01–10 | 3.05 | 150 | [ |
| Graphene/polyaniline-co-diphenylamine | 0.001–1 | 0.001–1 | 0.1 | 500 | [ |
| CuO/NiO/PANI | 0.02–2.5 | 0.02–2.5 | 2.0 | - | [ |
| PANI/CuNi | 1–7 | 1–10 | 0.2 | 1030 | [ |
| Ni2(dihydroxyterephtalic acid) MOFs | 0.04–0.8 | 0.04–6 | 1.46 | 40.95 | [ |
| Polypyrrole-MOFs | 0.02–0.5 | 0.02–3 | 1.13 | 1805 | [ |
| MXene-Cu2O | 0.01–30 | - | 2.83 | 11.061 | [ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|