| Literature DB >> 35955927 |
Elisa Boschetti1,2, Leonardo Caporali3, Roberto D'Angelo2, Carolina Malagelada4,5, Anna Accarino4,5, Maria Teresa Dotti6, Roberta Costa1, Giovanna Cenacchi1,2, Loris Pironi2,7, Rita Rinaldi2, Vincenzo Stanghellini2,7, Stefano Ratti1, Lucia Manzoli1, Valerio Carelli1,3, Roberto De Giorgio8.
Abstract
mitochondrial neuro-gastrointestinal encephalomyopathy (MNGIE) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by thymidine phosphorylase (TP) enzyme defect. The absence of TP activity induces the imbalance of mitochondrial nucleotide pool, leading to impaired mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) replication and depletion. Since mtDNA is required to ensure oxidative phosphorylation, metabolically active tissues may not achieve sufficient energy production. The only effective life-saving approach in MNGIE has been the permanent replacement of TP via allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell or liver transplantation. However, the follow-up of transplanted patients showed that gut tissue changes do not revert and fatal complications, such as massive gastrointestinal bleeding, can occur. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether the reintroduction of TP after transplant can recover mtDNA copy number in a normal range. Using laser capture microdissection and droplet-digital-PCR, we assessed the mtDNA copy number in each layer of full-thickness ileal samples of a naive MNGIE cohort vs. controls and in a patient pre- and post-TP replacement. The treatment led to a significant recovery of gut tissue mtDNA amount, thus showing its efficacy. Our results indicate that a timely TP replacement is needed to maximize therapeutic success before irreversible degenerative tissue changes occur in MNGIE.Entities:
Keywords: MNGIE; gastrointestinal degeneration; microanatomical dissection; mitochondrial disorders; mtDNA depletion
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35955927 PMCID: PMC9369323 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158792
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1MtDNA depletion in the ileum of MNGIE patients. The figure reports the mtDNA content per cell in the different layers of the ileal wall of control subjects (black circles) vs. MNGIE patient (black squares) specimens. Specifically, the panels are representative of the comparison between controls and MNGIE. Data are reported as scatter plots of mtDNA copy/cell with average ± SD, respectively (a) in the mucosa, 630 ± 114 vs. 274 ± 247 (* p = 0.0159); (b) in the small vessel wall, 383 ± 90 vs. 101 ± 97 (* p = 0.0159); (c) in circular muscle layer, 1018 ± 338 vs. 320 ± 387 (* p = 0.0317); (d) in myenteric plexus areas, 521 ± 110 vs. 281 ± 116 (* p = 0.0317). No selection of cells present in the ganglion was made; thus, the values refer indistinctly to neuronal, glial, and interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) which have been obtained from the unavoidable interface between smooth muscle and myenteric plexus; and (e) in longitudinal muscle 634 ± 165 vs. 377 ± 162 (* p = 0.0317).
Figure 2MNGIE patient mtDNA recovery after TP replacement therapy. Each panel (a–e) reports the mtDNA content per cell in the different layer of the ileal wall of the same patient pre- vs. post-LT. Data are reported as box and whiskers plot, with min to max, of mtDNA copy/cell. Each graph also reports the average of control value, indicated by the dotted line, with ± SD, represented by the grey area. Specifically, the comparison pre- vs. post- LT was performed (a) in the mucosa, 296.1 ± 78.3 vs. 399.4 ± 48.8 mtDNA copy/cell ± SD respectively; p = 0.2 n.s.; (b) in the submucosal small vessel wall, 147.3 ± 45.8 vs. 292.2 ± 45.7 mtDNA copy/cell ± SD respectively; * p = 0.0286; (c) in the circular muscular layer, 109.1 ± 79.2 vs. 954.0 ± 351.6 mtDNA copy/cell ± SD respectively; * p = 0.0286; (d) in the myenteric plexus, 56.7 ± 12.3 vs. 200.1 ± 99.6 mtDNA copy/cell ± SD respectively; * p = 0.0286; and (e) in the longitudinal muscular layer, 136.2 ± 22.4 vs. 533.7 ± 299.3 mtDNA copy/cell ± SD respectively; * p = 0.0286. Panel (f) is the representation of measurements obtained in the patient post-LT (reported in panel a) in comparison with a patient post-AHSCT (331.7 ± 112.0 mtDNA copy/cell ± SD) vs. control subjects (630 ± 114 mtDNA copy/cell ± SD); *# p = 0.0317.
Figure 3Microdissection of ileal samples. The picture is representative of an ileal section of an MNGIE patient stained with hematoxylin and eosin pre- and post-microdissection. (a) Full thickness ileal sample; from the right to the left, we can appreciate the mucosa (M), the submucosal layer (SM), the circular muscular layer (CML), the myenteric plexus (MP), and the longitudinal muscle layer (LML). Image was captured using 5× magnification. (b) Pre- and (c) post-laser capture of a mucosal sample. Both images were captured using 5× magnification. (d) Pre- and (e) post-laser capture of the myenteric plexus. Both images were captured using 10× magnification. (f) Pre- and (g) post-laser capture of longitudinal and circular muscle layers samples. Both images were captured using 5× magnification. (h–k) Microdissection of the small vessel wall. (h) Picture representative of the three selected vessels (20× magnification). (i) A first dissection was made to clean the inner part of the vessel from circulating cells. The captured section is discarded (20× magnification). (j) Collection of the section containing the vascular wall (20× magnification). (k) Post-laser capture of vascular wall in the submucosa (10× magnification). All microdissected sections were separately collected onto the caps of 0.2 mL PCR tubes, and DNA was extracted on the same day of collection.