| Literature DB >> 35955889 |
Iwona Golonka1, Beata Kizior2, Bartłomiej M Szyja2, Mateusz P Damek1, Witold Musiał1.
Abstract
(1) Background: Depending on the type of hydrophilic polymer used, different types of hydrogels may be chemically stable or may degrade and eventually disintegrate, or dissolve upon exposure to sunlight. Many over-the-counter medications are now stored with a limited control of temperature, humidity and lighting. Therefore, in this study, the photostability of a gel made of cross-linked polyacrylic acid (PA), methylcellulose (MC) and aristoflex (AV) was assessed, and the interaction between the polymers used and ascorbic acid and its ethylated derivative was investigated. (2)Entities:
Keywords: DFT method; UV radiation; ascorbic acid; degradation; ethyl ascorbic acid; gels; photosensitivity; stability; substance-polymer interaction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35955889 PMCID: PMC9369315 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158759
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1UV-Vis spectra of preparation AA-PA (A) and AE-PA (B), irradiated at 0(), 1(),2(), 3(), 4(), 5() and 6(–) h. The UV degradation gel containing PA and ascorbic acid (C), or ethyl ascorbic acid (D), presented as time function of absorbance. Red dots represent unexposed samples and blue dots represent irradiated samples. During the first hour, the specimen stabilizes—green dot represents the starting point of the procedure on (D) graph.
Figure 2UV-Vis spectra of preparation AA-PA-G (A) and AE-PA-G (B), irradiated at 0(), 1(),2(), 3(), 4(), 5() and 6(–) h. The UV degradation gel containing PA and ascorbic acid (C), or ethyl ascorbic acid (D), presented as time function of absorbance. Red dots represent unexposed samples and blue dots represent irradiated samples. During the first hour, the specimen stabilizes—the green dot represents the starting point of the procedure on (D) graph.
Figure 3UV-Vis spectra of preparation AA-MC (A) and AE-MC (B), irradiated at 0(), 1(),2(), 3(), 4(), 5() and 6(–) h. The UV degradation gel containing PA and ascorbic acid (C), or ethyl ascorbic acid (D), presented as time function of absorbance. Red dots represent unexposed samples and blue dots represent irradiated samples. During the first hour, the specimen stabilizes—green dot represents the starting point of the procedure on (D) graph.
Figure 4UV-Vis spectra of preparation AA-AV (A) and AE-AV (B), irradiated at 0(), 1(),2(), 3(), 4(), 5() and 6(–) h. The UV degradation gel containing PA and ascorbic acid (C), or ethyl ascorbic acid (D), presented as time function of absorbance. Red dots represent unexposed samples and blue dots represent irradiated samples. During the first hour, the specimen stabilizes—green dot represents the starting point of the procedure on (D) graph.
Figure 5The viscosities of preparations AA–PA, AA–PA–G, AA–MC, AA–AV, AE–PA, AE–PA–G, AE–MC and AE–AV at a temperature of 20 °C. Asterisk (*) indicate no differences (p > 0.005, ANOVA test) between AA–MC and AE–MC and AV and AA–AV preparations.
The differences between means obtained from Tukey’s test; the value of HSD was 0.188.
| AA-PA | AE-PA | PA-G | AA-PA-G | AE-PA-G | MC | AA-MC | AE-MC | AV | AA-AV | AE-AV | |
| PA | 0.6113 | 0.961 | 1.257 | 3.543 | 0.309 | 4.410 | 5.276 | 5.337 | 3.300 | 3.294 | 1.678 |
| AA-PA | 1.573 | 1.869 | 4.154 | 0.920 | 5.021 | 5.888 | 5.948 | 2.689 | 2.683 | 1.067 | |
| AE-PA | 0.296 | 2.582 | 0.653 | 3.449 | 4.315 | 4.376 | 4.261 | 4.255 | 2.639 | ||
| PA-G | 2.286 | 0.949 | 3.153 | 4.019 | 4.080 | 4.557 | 4.551 | 2.935 | |||
| AA-PA-G | 3.234 | 0.867 | 1.734 | 1.794 | 6.843 | 6.837 | 5.221 | ||||
| AE-PA-G | 4.968 | 4.968 | 5.028 | 3.609 | 3.603 | 1.987 | |||||
| MC | 0.866 | 0.927 | 7.710 | 7.704 | 6.088 | ||||||
| AA-MC | 0.061 | 8.576 | 8.570 | 6.954 | |||||||
| AE-MC | 8.637 | 8.631 | 7.015 | ||||||||
| AV | 0.006 | 1.622 | |||||||||
| AA-AV | 1.616 |
Comparison of selected physicochemical properties of ascorbic acid and 3-O-ethyl-l-ascorbic acid.
| Naming | Ascorbic Acid | 3-O-ethyl-L-ascorbic Acid |
|---|---|---|
| Molecular Formula | C6H8O6 | C8H12O6 |
| Molar Refractivity | 35.26 ± 0.3 cm3 | 44.65 ± 0.4 cm3 |
| Molar Volume | 90.1 ± 3.0 cm3 | 139.0 ± 5.0 cm3 |
| Polarizability | 13.97 ± 0.5 10−24 cm3 | 17.70 ± 0.5 10−24 cm3 |
| RDBE | 3 | 3 |
| Average Mass | 176.1241 Da | 204.1773 Da |
| logP | −2.41 ± 0.45 | −1.81 ± 0.52 |
Figure 6The geometries of the ascorbic acid in its ground state (a) and the conical intersection (b).
Figure 7The optimized geometry of the deprotonated form of the ascorbic acid in its ground state (a) and first excited state (b).
Figure 8The optimized geometries of the ethylated form of the ascorbic acid in its ground electronic state (a) and the first excited singlet state (b).
The specific and altered signals of preparation.
| Preparation | Bands Alteration Regions | Bands Alteration Regions |
|---|---|---|
| AA-PA | no differences | no differences |
| AA-PA-G | 3278, 2935,2879, 1653,1564, 569, | 3274, 2934, 2880, |
| AA-MC | 1652, 1316, 1273, 1023 | 1656, 1318, 1274, 1024, |
| AA-AV | 3524, 3309, 3205, | 3523, 3307, 3203, |
| AE-PA | 3305, 1673, 526 | 3313, 1671, |
| AE-PA-G | 3278, 2936, 2879, | 3277, 2935, 2880, |
| AE-MC | 3413, | |
| AE-AV |
New signals are written in bold.
Linear correlation parameters for the obtained data.
| Parameter | AE-PA | AA-PA-G | AE-PA-G | AE-MC | AE-AV | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Irradiated | Unexposed | Irradiated | Unexposed | Irradiated | Unexposed | Irradiated | Unexposed | Irradiated | Unexposed | |
| slope factor a | −0.0115 | −0.0003 | −0.1400 | −0.0953 | −0.0174 | −0.0023 | 0.0043 | 0.0008 | −0.0112 | 0.0003 |
| coefficient b | 1.1951 | 1.1965 | 1.3574 | 1.3149 | 0.9418 | 0.9619 | 1.1256 | 1.1312 | 1.0595 | 1.0463 |
| standard error a | 0.0004 | 0.0002 | 0.0093 | 0.0160 | 0.0020 | 0.0008 | 0.0005 | 0.0005 | 0.0024 | 0.0031 |
| standard error b | 0.0015 | 0.0008 | 0.0309 | 0.0529 | 0.0078 | 0.0034 | 0.0018 | 0.0020 | 0.0093 | 0.0120 |
| linear correlation coefficient | 0.9955 | 0.3857 | 0.9869 | 0.9224 | 0.9491 | 0.7228 | 0.9568 | 0.3733 | 0.8468 | 0.0653 |
| standard error of y stimation | 0.0016 | 0.0009 | 0.0294 | 0.0505 | 0.0084 | 0.0031 | 0.0019 | 0.0022 | 0.0100 | 0.0129 |
Parameters of F-test and Student’s t-test.
|
| |||||
| Parameter | AE-PA | AA-PA-G | AE-PA-G | AE-MC | AE-AV |
| F | 2.3830 | 47.543 | 64.405 | 0.3191 | 0.3192 |
|
| |||||
|
| |||||
| Parameter | AE-PA | AA-PA-G | AE-PA-G | AE-MC | AE-AV |
|
| 25.1859 | 0.2210 | 5.7483 | 7.3800 | 0.6131 |
|
| 0.0039 | 0.0039 | 0.0039 | 0.0039 | 0.0039 |
Composition of evaluated polymeric gels.
| Samples Group | Sample Acronym | PA [g] | MC [g] | AV [g] | NaOH | G-Glycerol [g] | Aqua | AA [g] | AE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| PA | 0.3 | - | - | q.s. * | - | 94.7 | - | - |
| PA-G | 0.3 | - | - | q.s. * | 25 | 74.7 | - | - | |
| MC | - | 2 | - | - | - | 98.0 | - | - | |
| AV | - | - | 2 | - | - | 98.0 | - | - | |
|
| AA-PA | 0.3 | - | - | q.s. * | - | 94.7 | 0.035 | - |
| AA-PA-G | 0.3 | - | - | q.s. * | 25 | 74.7 | 0.035 | - | |
| AA-MC | - | 2 | - | - | - | 98.0 | 0.035 | - | |
| AA-AV | - | - | 2 | - | - | 98.0 | 0.035 | - | |
|
| AE-PA | 0.3 | - | - | q.s. * | - | 94.7 | - | 0.013 |
| AE-PA-G | 0.3 | - | - | q.s. * | 25 | 74.7 | - | 0.013 | |
| AE-MC | - | 2 | - | - | - | 98.0 | - | 0.013 | |
| AE-AV | - | - | 2 | - | - | 98.0 | - | 0.013 |
* 2.5 mmol of NaOH solution was added to the polymer dispersion.
Linear correlation parameters for the standard curve y = ax + b.
| Preparation | AA-PA | AA-PA-G | AA-MC | AA-AV | AE-PA | AE-PA-G | AE-MC | AE-AV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| slope factor a | 802.86 | 769.66 | 721.43 | 868.60 | 2008.4 | 402.909 | 2241.19 | 2036.7 |
| standard error | 37.53 | 50.12 | 59.80 | 49.64 | 80.47 | 65.786 | 81.500 | 112.45 |
| coefficient b | −0.093 | 0.069 | 0.016 | −0.017 | 0.054 | −0.189 | 0.093 | 0.018 |
| standard error | 0.033 | 0.078 | 0.053 | 0.046 | 0.021 | 0.209 | 0.023 | 0.031 |
| linear correlation coefficient | 0.989 | 0.992 | 0.967 | 0.987 | 0.994 | 0.949 | 0.996 | 0.991 |
Preparation AA-PA, AA-PA-G, AA-MC, AA-AV, AE-PA, AE-PA-G, AE-MC and AE-AV concentration is expressed in w/w%.
Figure 9Structures of the studied forms of ascorbic acid: 1. neutral; 2. deprotonated; 3. ethylated.
Figure 10Optimized structures of microsolvation models of ascorbic acid in protonated (i), deprotonated (ii) and ethylated (iii) form. Carbon, oxygen and hydrogen atoms are shown in grey, red and white, respectively.