| Literature DB >> 35955757 |
Xin Wang1, Jiahao He1, Shuyu Pang1, Shuangquan Yao1, Chunxia Zhu1, Jinwei Zhao1, Yang Liu1, Chen Liang1, Chengrong Qin1.
Abstract
Hemicellulose is a major component of the complex biomass recalcitrance structure of fiber cell walls. Even though biomass recalcitrance protects plants, it affects the effective utilization of lignocellulosic biomass resources. Therefore, the separation and extraction of hemicellulose is very important. In this study, an improved two-step alkali pretreatment method was proposed to separate hemicellulose efficiently. Firstly, 16.61% hemicellulose was extracted from bamboo by the weak alkali treatment. Then, the physical freezing and the alkali treatment were carried out by freezing at -20 °C for 12.0 h and thawing at room temperature, heating to 80 °C, and treating with 5.0% sodium hydroxide for 90 min; the extraction yield of hemicellulose reached 73.93%. The total extraction yield of the two steps was 90.54%, and the molecular weight and purity reached 44,865 g·mol-1 and 89.60%, respectively. It provides a new method for breaking the biomass recalcitrance of wood fiber resources and effectively extracting hemicellulose.Entities:
Keywords: extraction; freeze–thaw; hemicellulose; high quality; two-step alkali treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35955757 PMCID: PMC9369068 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158612
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Effect of the freezing treatment on the extraction yield of hemicellulose (a, effect of freezing temperature; (b), effect of freezing time. The error bars represent the mean ± SD of samples over three replicates).
Figure 2Effect of the alkali treatment on the extraction yield of hemicellulose and lignin ((a), effect of alkali concentration; (b), effect of temperature. (c), effect of time. The error bars represent the mean ± SD of samples over three replicates).
Extraction yield of hemicellulose after different treatments.
| Raw Material | Extraction Method | Extraction Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Poplar [ | Steam explosion, alkali and alkali/ethanol were treated at 75 °C for 3.0 h with 0.3%, 0.6%, 1.0%,1.5% and 2.5% KOH. | 76.40 |
| Coconut shell [ | Combined treatment with 20% NaOH and steam for 1.0 h. | 93.0 |
| Bamboo [ | Distilled water, alkali and organic solvents were treated with 1.0%, 3.0%, 5.0% and 8.0% NaOH for 3.0 h at 60 °C. | 80.10 |
| Bamboo [ | −30 °C for 12.0 h, 7.0% NaOH treatment for 1.5 h at 75 °C. | 64.71 |
| Bamboo | Weak alkali treatment, −20 °C for 12.0 h, 5.0% NaOH treatment for 1.5 h at 80 °C. | 90.54 |
Figure 3SEM of bamboo before and after different treatments ((a,b), Raw material; (c,d), after weak-alkali treatment; and (e,f), freeze–thaw-assisted alkali treatment).
Figure 4Changes of main functional groups and crystallinity index of bamboo with and without different treatment (a), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra; (b), X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns; WAT, Weak alkali treatment; FAT, Freeze–thaw assisted alkali treatment).
Extraction yield and purity of hemicellulose obtained by different treatments.
| Samples | Extraction (%) | Purity (%) | Xylose (%) | Glucose (%) | Arabinose (%) | Galactose (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WAT | 16.61 ± 0.66 | 77.94 ± 3.12 | 47.01 ± 1.88 | 37.52 ± 1.50 | 11.48 ± 0.46 | 3.99 ± 0.16 |
| FAT | 73.93 ± 2.96 | 89.60 ± 3.58 | 60.18 ± 2.41 | 33.97 ± 1.36 | 4.39 ± 0.17 | 1.46 ± 0.06 |
Chemical composition of bamboo after different treatments.
| Samples | Cellulose (%) | Hemicellulose (%) | Lignin (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Raw material | 49.50 ± 2.47 | 17.19 ± 0.86 | 25.25 ± 1.26 |
| WAT | 47.75 ± 2.12 ** | 14.33 ± 0.72 ** | 24.00 ± 1.15 ** |
| FAT | 43.41 ± 2.03 ** | 4.47 ± 0.16 ** | 18.99 ± 0.89 ** |
** Statistically significant differences between the raw material and remaining solids after the treatment are marked with an asterisk (** p < 0.01; ANOVA).