| Literature DB >> 35955685 |
Lidia Ibáñez1, Josep Nácher-Juan2, María Carmen Terencio2, María Luisa Ferrándiz2, María José Alcaraz2.
Abstract
Parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) C-terminal peptides regulate the metabolism of bone cells. PHTrP [107-111] (osteostatin) promotes bone repair in animal models of bone defects and prevents bone erosion in inflammatory arthritis. In addition to its positive effects on osteoblasts, osteostatin may inhibit bone resorption. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of osteostatin on human osteoclast differentiation and function. We used macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) and receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) to induce the osteoclast differentiation of adherent human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining was performed for the detection of the osteoclasts. The function of mature osteoclasts was assessed with a pit resorption assay. Gene expression was evaluated with qRT-PCR, and nuclear factor of activated T cells, cytoplasmic 1 (NFATc1) nuclear translocation was studied by immunofluorescence. We observed that osteostatin (100, 250 and 500 nM) decreased the differentiation of osteoclasts in a concentration-dependent manner, but it did not modify the resorptive ability of mature osteoclasts. In addition, osteostatin decreased the mRNA levels of cathepsin K, osteoclast associated Ig-like receptor (OSCAR) and NFATc1. The nuclear translocation of the master transcription factor in osteoclast differentiation NFATc1 was reduced by osteostatin. Our results suggest that the anti-resorptive effects of osteostatin may be dependent on the inhibition of osteoclastogenesis. This study has shown that osteostatin controls human osteoclast differentiation in vitro through the downregulation of NFATc1.Entities:
Keywords: NFATc1; PTHrP C-terminal peptides; bone; osteoclast; osteostatin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35955685 PMCID: PMC9369336 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158551
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1The effects of osteostatin on osteoclast differentiation. Osteoclast precursors were stimulated with M-CSF and RANKL for osteoclast differentiation in the presence or absence of osteostatin (final concentrations: 100, 250 and 500 nM) for 7–9 days. Cells were TRAP and hematoxylin stained, and TRAP+ positive cells with 3 or more nuclei were counted under a light microscope. (A) Representative images; Bar = 100 μm. (B) TRAP+ multinucleated cells (MNCs) per well are expressed as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments; ** p < 0.01 vs. M-CSF+RANKL.
Figure 2The effects of osteostatin on resorption. Differentiated osteoclasts were seeded on a 96-well osteoassay plate and incubated with RANKL in the presence or absence of osteostatin (final concentrations: 100, 250 and 500 nM) for 2 days. (A) Representative images of resorption pits; Bar = 100 μm. (B) Percentage of resorption area. Values are the mean ± S.D. of four independent experiments.
Figure 3The effects of osteostatin on the mRNA expression of osteoclast markers. (A) Expression levels at 2 days of differentiation. (B) Expression levels at 7 days of differentiation. Osteoclast precursors were incubated with M-CSF and RANKL in the presence or absence of osteostatin (final concentrations: 100, 250 and 500 nM). The levels of mRNA expression were determined with qRT-PCR and normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Values are the mean ± S.D. of four independent experiments; + p < 0.05, ++ p < 0.01 vs. control; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. M-CSF+RANKL.
Figure 4The effects of osteostatin on NFATc1 nuclear translocation. Osteoclast precursors were stimulated with M-CSF and RANKL in the presence or absence of osteostatin (final concentrations: 100, 250 and 500 nM) for 2 days, and then NFATc1 nuclear translocation was examined by immunofluorescence. (A) Representative images; Bar = 50 μm. Nuclei were stained by DAPI. (B) The nuclear/total integrated optical density (IOD) ratio was obtained to compare NFATc1 nuclear translocation. Results are expressed as the mean ± S.D. of three independent experiments; ++ p < 0.01 vs. control; * p < 0.05 vs. M-CSF+RANKL.