| Literature DB >> 35955465 |
Antoine Cazelles1,2, Maxime K Collard1,2, Yoann Lalatonne3,4, Sabrina Doblas5, Magaly Zappa5,6, Camélia Labiad1,2, Dominique Cazals-Hatem2,7, Léon Maggiori1,2, Xavier Treton2,8, Yves Panis1,2, Ulrich Jarry9,10, Thomas Desvallées9, Pierre-Antoine Eliat11,12, Raphaël Pineau13, Laurence Motte3, Didier Letourneur3, Teresa Simon-Yarza3, Eric Ogier-Denis2,13,14.
Abstract
Fistulizing anoperineal lesions are severe complications of Crohn's disease (CD) that affect quality of life with a long-term risk of anal sphincter destruction, incontinence, permanent stoma, and anal cancer. Despite several surgical procedures, they relapse in about two-thirds of patients, mandating innovative treatments. Ultrasmall particles of iron oxide (USPIO) have been described to achieve in vivo rapid healing of deep wounds in the skin and liver of rats thanks to their nanobridging capability that could be adapted to fistula treatment. Our main purpose was to highlight preclinical data with USPIO for the treatment of perianal fistulizing CD. Twenty male Sprague Dawley rats with severe 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid solution (TNBS)-induced proctitis were operated to generate two perianal fistulas per rat. At day 35, two inflammatory fistulas were obtained per rat and perineal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed. After a baseline MRI, a fistula tract was randomly drawn and topically treated either with saline or with USPIO for 1 min (n = 17 for each). The rats underwent a perineal MRI on postoperative days (POD) 1, 4, and 7 and were sacrificed for pathological examination. The primary outcome was the filling or closure of the fistula tract, including the external or internal openings. USPIO treatment allowed the closure and/or filling of all the treated fistulas from its application until POD 7 in comparison with the control fistulas (23%). The treatment with USPIO was safe, permanently closed the fistula along its entire length, including internal and external orifices, and paved new avenues for the treatment of perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease.Entities:
Keywords: Crohn’s disease; fistula treatment; iron oxide nanoparticles; perianal fistula; preclinical model
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35955465 PMCID: PMC9368411 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23158324
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Clinical and radiological characteristics of the fistulas before treatment of the 17 rats that preserved 2 fistula tracts.
| Treated Fistula | Control Fistula | |
|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | |
|
| ||
| Rectitis | ||
| - Soft stools | 17 (100) a | |
| - Perineal tumefaction | 17 (100) | |
| - Rectorrhagia | 10 (59) | |
| Weight (g) | 395 ± 51 [325–521] b | |
| External orifice presence | 17 (100) | 17 (100) |
| Internal orifice presence | 17 (100) | 17 (100) |
|
| ||
| Fistula tract c | 17 (100) | 17 (100) |
| External orifice presence | 17 (100) | 17 (100) |
| Internal orifice presence | 16 (94) | 17 (100) |
| Fistula tract diameter (mm) | 2.17 ± 0.6 [1.2–3.3] | 1.92 ± 0.3 [1.5–2.5] |
| Peripheral tract inflammation | ||
| - T2 Signal (a.u) | 3.60 ± 0.56 | 3.50 ± 0.52 |
| [2.22–4.56] | [2.13–4.61] | |
| - ADC (mm2/s) | 1.42 ± 0.20 | 1.49 ± 0.23 |
| [1.058–1.709] | [1.09–1.92] | |
a Number of cases (percentage of cases). b Mean ± standard deviation [range]. c Fistula tract: the number of rats with more than 50% of visibility of the fistula tract.
Figure 1Baseline MRI. (A): T2-weighted image, axial section, hyposignal of the fistula tract, and hypersignal of peripheral inflammation. (B): Axial ultra-short echo time (UTE) images evidenced the 2 visible tracks (red arrows). (C): Inflammation is seen as a high apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) area on the ADC map. The ADC scale is located on the right.
Radiological characteristics before treatment of the 3 rats with 1 fistula tract and the MRI findings at POD 7 and POD 14.
| USPIO Rats | Control Rat | |
|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | |
|
| ||
| Fistula tract a | 2 (100) b | 1 (100) |
| External orifice presence | 2 (100) | 1 (100) |
| Internal orifice presence | 2 (100) | 1 (100) |
| Fistula tract diameter (mm) | 1.3 [0.9–1.7] c | 1.9 |
| Peripheral tract inflammation | ||
| - T2 Signal (a.u) | 4.96 [3.96–5.96] | 3.37 |
| - ADC (mm2/s) | 1.10 [0.91–1.28] | 1.40 |
|
| ||
| External orifice closure | 2 (100) | 0 |
| Internal orifice closure | 2 (100) | 0 |
| Filling/closing of fistula tract d | 2 (100) | 0 |
| Fistula tract diameter (mm) | 4.95 [4.7–5.2] | 2.3 |
| Peripheral tract inflammation | ||
| - T2 Signal (a.u) | NM | 3.17 |
| - ADC (mm2/s) | NM | 0.997 |
|
| ||
| External orifice closure | 2 (100) | 0 |
| Internal orifice closure | 2 (100) | 0 |
| Filling/closing of fistula tract | 2 (100) | 0 |
| Fistula tract diameter (mm) | 4.15 [3.8–4.5] | 4 |
| Peripheral tract inflammation | ||
| - T2 Signal (a.u) | NM | 2.66 |
| - ADC (mm2/s) | NM | 1.39 |
a Fistula tract: the number of rats with more than 50% of visibility of the fistula tract. b Number of cases (percentage of cases). c Mean [observed values]. d Filling/closing of the fistula tract: the number of fistula tracts filled or closed ≥ 50% by either USPIO or saline. NM: non-measurable; POD: post-operative day; USPIO rats: 2 rats with only 1 fistula tract treated by USPIO; Control rat: 1 rat with only 1 fistula tract treated by saline.
Clinical evolution of the fistula tracts.
| Treated Fistula | Control Fistula | |
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| POD 1 | 17 (100) a | 3 (17) |
| POD 4 | 17 (100) | 15 (88) |
| POD 7 | 17 (100) | 15 (88) |
|
| ||
| POD 1 | 17 (100) | 17 (100) |
| POD 4 | 17 (100) | 17 (100) |
| POD 7 | 17 (100) | 17 (100) |
|
| ||
| POD 1 | 395 ± 51 [325–521] b | |
| POD 4 | 407 ± 53 [329–534] | |
| POD 7 | 414 ± 54 [337–538] | |
a Number of cases (percentage of cases). b Mean ± standard deviation [range].
MRI findings of the fistulas after treatment of the 17 rats that preserved 2 fistula tracts.
| Treated Fistula | Control Fistula | |
|---|---|---|
| ( | ( | |
|
| ||
| External orifice closure | 17 (100) a | 3 (17) |
| Internal orifice closure | 17 (100) | 0 |
| Filling/closing of fistula tract b | 17 (100) | 0 |
| Fistula tract diameter (mm) | 3.7 ± 0.9 [2.2–5.4] c | 1.8 ± 0.5 [1.2–2.9] |
| Peripheral tract inflammation | ||
| - T2 Signal (a.u) | NM | 3.14 ± 0.5 [2.4–4.29] |
| - ADC (mm2/s) | NM | 1.54 ± 0.19 [1.20–1.94] |
|
| ||
| External orifice closure | 17 (100) | 7 (41) |
| Internal orifice closure | 17 (100) | 2 (11) |
| Filling/closing of fistula tract | 17 (100) | 3 (17) |
| Fistula tract diameter (mm) | 3.2 ± 0.8 [1.9–4.5] | 1.6 ± 0.4 [1.1–2.4] |
| Peripheral tract inflammation | ||
| - T2 Signal (a.u) | NM | 2.49 ± 0.5 [1.79–3.46] |
| - ADC (mm2/s) | NM | 1.55 ± 0.29 [1.21–2.36] |
|
| ||
| External orifice closure | 17 (100) | 9 (53) |
| Internal orifice closure | 17 (100) | 4 (23) |
| Filling/closing of fistula tract | 17 (100) | 5 (29) |
| Fistula tract diameter (mm) | 3.2 ± 0.9 [1.2–4.8] | 1.4 ± 0.3 [0.9–2] |
| Peripheral tract inflammation | ||
| - T2 Signal (a.u) | NM | 2.25 ± 0.5 [1.64–3.35] |
| - ADC (mm2/s) | NM | 1.49 ± 0.27 [1.14–1.96] |
a Number of cases (percentage of cases). b Filling/closing of the fistula tract: the number of fistula tracts filled or closed ≥ 50% by USPIO or saline. c Mean ± standard deviation [range]. NM: non-measurable; POD: post-operative day.
Figure 2MRI images at POD 1 (A), POD 4 (B), and POD 7 (C). Left: T2-weighted image axial section. Right: axial ultra-short echo time (UTE) image. Red arrows 1: control fistula. Red arrows 2: fistula treated with USPIO (on the T2-weighted images, note the presence of an MRI hyposignal due to the iron nanoparticles present in the tract).
Figure 3Histological characteristics of the control and USPIO-treated fistulas: representatives H&E-stained serial slices showing control (left panels) and USPIO-treated (right panels) specimens (magnification ×100). The control fistula lumen was visible with internal (black arrowhead—digestive side) and external (yellow arrowhead—perineal skin) orifices. There were local inflammatory signs of suppurative inflammation with abscess formation around the epithelialized fistula. The USPIO-treated transphincteric fistula was closed on its entire length (black arrowheads—revealed by black staining in the H&E section). Note that the internal orifice was no longer visible.
Figure 4Scheme of the timeline and the main steps for inflammatory fistulas formation from day 0 to day 35.
Figure 5Main steps of fistula formation (day 7). (A): rectal enema with 500 µL of TNBS solution. (B): insertion of a surgical thread (Vicryl® 1, ETHICON Laboratory, Issy les Moulineaux, France) into the rectum (internal orifice) and exiting at the perineum about 1 cm from the anal margin (external orifice). (C): instillation of 100 µL of a TNBS solution within each fistula tract. (D): 2 fistulas were created at 3 o’clock and 9 o’clock.
Figure 6Treatment with USPIO. (A): inflammatory fistulas obtained at day 35. (B): treatment with 2 µL of USPIO injected directly into the fistula tract. (C): external manual pressure on the perineum maintained for 1 min in order to close the tract.
Figure 7Physico-chemical characterizations of the citrated USPIO nanoparticles: (a) TEM image of the citrated USPIO nanoparticles of 9.0 ± 2.2 nm; (b) magnetization curve of the citrated USPIO nanoparticles at room temperature; and (c) FTIR spectra of the coated USPIO nanoparticles (USPIO@Cit) and the corresponding coating molecule (Cit).
Figure 8Scheme of the follow-up after treatment with saline or USPIO, corresponding to POD 0, 1, 4, and 7.
MRI acquisition parameters.
| T1-Weighted | T2-Weighted | UTE | DWI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 3.8 | 56 | 0.008 | 23 |
|
| 460 | 5300 | 4 | 2000 |
|
| 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
|
| FLASH sequence | RARE sequence | 3D acquisition | 20 segments; 3 directions; b values = 0, 150, 400, 800 s/mm2 |
|
| 60 × 60 | 60 × 60 | 60 × 60 × 60 | 60 × 60 |
|
| 256 × 256 | 256 × 256 | 128 × 128 × 128 | 128 × 128 |
|
| 1 | 1 | - | 1 |
|
| 29 | 29 | - | 11 |
|
| Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
|
| 3 min 55 s | 8 min 29 s | 3 min 25 s | 6 min 40 s |
Figure 9Global proctitis scores (GPS) from T2-weighted morphological images by MRI. 0: no proctitis, no inflammation in the rectal wall, nonmodified signal; 1: mild proctitis, hypersignal in the rectal wall; 2: moderate proctitis, hypersignal in the rectal wall + peri-digestive oedema; and 3: severe proctitis, hypersignal in the rectal wall + peri-digestive oedema + submucosal oedema with cocarde appearance.