| Literature DB >> 35955378 |
Hao Liu1, Ping-Hu Chen2, Yong Chen1, Wen-Xing Wu1, Sheng Li1, Chang-Jun Qiu1.
Abstract
The effects of laser parameters on the microstructure and properties of plasma-sprayed yttrium oxide coating on the graphite matrix were investigated. Tensile strength, porosity, roughness, and scratch meter tests were carried out to evaluate the critical load and mechanical properties of the coating after spraying and laser micro-melting. When the porosity and surface roughness of the coating are minimum, the critical load of the coating is 7.85 N higher than that of the spraying surface. After laser micromelting, the crystal phase of Y2O3 coating surface does not change, the crystallinity is improved, and fine grain strengthening occurs. When the laser power density is 75 W/mm2, the scanning speed is 30 mm/s, and the defocusing distance is 40 mm, the film base bonding performance and wear resistance of the material reach the maximum value. The failure of Y2O3 coating is mainly due to the degradation of mechanical properties such as film base bonding strength, surface porosity, and surface roughness, which leads to the local collapse of the material. The coating after laser micro-melting only presents particle disintegration at the end of the scratch area.Entities:
Keywords: critical load; laser micro-melting; mechanical properties; plasma spray
Year: 2022 PMID: 35955378 PMCID: PMC9369895 DOI: 10.3390/ma15155443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Plasma spraying parameters of Mo transition layer and Y2O3 coating.
| Plasma Spray Parameters | Molybdenum Coating | Yttria Coating |
|---|---|---|
| Arc current (A) | 450 | 750 |
| Arc voltage (V) | 50 | 40 |
| Primary argon gas flow (LPM) | 40 | 45 |
| Secondary H2 gas flow (LPM) | 4 | 2 |
| Standoff distance (mm) | 100 | 100 |
Figure 1(a) Sectional view of coating; (b) microstructure of coating with EDS over the entire area.
Experimental layout of laser micromelting parameters.
| Experiment No. | Power Density | Scanning Speed | Defocusing Distance | Mean | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 50 | 25 | 30 | 15.3 | 6.903 |
| T2 | 50 | 30 | 40 | 14.2 | 6.451 |
| T3 | 50 | 35 | 50 | 12.7 | 6.35 |
| T4 | 75 | 25 | 40 | 13.9 | 6.480 |
| T5 | 75 | 30 | 50 | 10.2 | 5.826 |
| T6 | 75 | 35 | 30 | 16.5 | 7.087 |
| T7 | 100 | 25 | 50 | 10.7 | 6.182 |
| T8 | 100 | 30 | 30 | 16.8 | 6.813 |
| T9 | 100 | 35 | 40 | 13.5 | 6.426 |
| T0 | - | - | - | 14.6 | 6.98 |
T value analysis of laser micromelting reaction.
| T-Value | Porosity | Surface Roughness | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Density | Scanning Speed | Defocusing Distance | Power Density | Scanning Speed | Defocusing Distance | |
| K1 | 42.2 | 39.9 | 48.6 | 19.704 | 19.565 | 20.803 |
| K2 | 40.6 | 41.2 | 41.6 | 19.393 | 19.09 | 19.357 |
| K3 | 41 | 42.7 | 33.6 | 19.421 | 19.863 | 18.358 |
| t1 | 14.1 | 13.3 | 16.2 | 6.568 | 6.521 | 6.934 |
| t2 | 13.5 | 13.7 | 13.9 | 6.464 | 6.363 | 6.452 |
| t3 | 13.7 | 14.2 | 11.2 | 6.474 | 6.621 | 6.119 |
| R | 0.6 | 0.9 | 5 | 0.104 | 0.258 | 0.815 |
Figure 2Effect of laser micromelting parameters on porosity of Y2O3 coating.
Figure 3Microstructure of Y2O3 coating after laser micromelting.
Figure 4Effect of laser micromelting parameters on surface roughness of Y2O3 coatings.
Figure 5XRD patterns of Y2O3 coated graphite (T0) and laser micromelted Y2O3 coated graphite (T5) and (T9).
Figure 6(a) The surface EDS of (T5); (b) The section EDS of (T5); (c) The section SEM of (T6); (d) The section SEM of (T8).
Figure 7(a) (T0) coating surface microstructure; (b) (T3) coating surface microstructure; (c) (T5) coating surface microstructure; (d) (T8) coating surface microstructure.
Figure 8(a) (T1) scratch behavior; (b) (T2) scratch behavior; (c) (T3) scratch behavior; (d) (T4) scratch behavior; (e) (T5) scratch behavior; (f) (T6) scratch behavior; (g) (T7) scratch behavior; (h) (T8) scratch behavior; (i) (T9) scratch behavior; (j) (T0) scratch behavior.
Figure 9Critical load and tensile strength of coating.