| Literature DB >> 35955329 |
Jin Yang1,2, Xiaolei Yu1, Xingyang He1,2, Ying Su1,2, Jingyi Zeng1, Fei Dai1, Shiyu Guan3.
Abstract
Phosphorus slag (PS), an industrial waste slag, has been used in geopolymers because it is rich in silicon and calcium. The poor performance of phosphorus slag-based geopolymer is due to its aluminum deficiency. In this work, low-calcium fly ash, treated by a wet-grinding process, named wet-grinding ultrafine fly ash (WUFA) was used as an Al supplement to replace some of the phosphorus slag, and the wet-grinding, ultrafine fly ash-phosphorus slag (WUFA-PS)-based geopolymer was prepared. The effects of the substitution amount of WUFA and the activator dosage on the hydration properties, mechanical properties, pore structure and SEM of the WUFA-PS geopolymer were discussed in detail. The results indicate that WUFA and more activators contribute to the Al and high alkalinity environment, which positively induces the production of more geopolymer gels, thus releasing more heat and optimizing the pore structure of the matrix. The compressive strength increased by up to 28.1%. The enhanced performance of the WUFA-PS-based geopolymer may also arise from the filling effect and activity improvement of WUFA. This study has proved the feasibility of preparing a geopolymer by blending wet-grinding ultrafine fly ash and phosphorus slag and has provided references for the ratio and performance evaluation of WUFA-PS-based geopolymer concrete.Entities:
Keywords: alkali-activated materials; fly ash; geopolymer; phosphorus slag
Year: 2022 PMID: 35955329 PMCID: PMC9369517 DOI: 10.3390/ma15155395
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Chemical composition of phosphorus slag and fly ash (%).
| CaO | Fe2O3 | SiO2 | MgO | Al2O3 | TiO2 | P2O5 | SO3 | F | LOI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PS | 38.8 | 1.5 | 41.3 | 1.6 | 5.9 | 0.4 | 3.5 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 2.6 |
| RFA | 5.2 | 3.6 | 44.8 | 0.6 | 39.2 | 1.4 | - | 1.5 | - | 3.4 |
Mix proportion of WUFA-PS and PS-based geopolymers.
| Sample | PS (wt %) | WUFA (wt %) | SS (wt %) | River Sand (wt %) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PS100-25 | 100 | 0 | 25 | 200 |
| PS95-25 | 95 | 5 | 25 | 200 |
| PS85-25 | 85 | 15 | 25 | 200 |
| PS75-25 | 75 | 25 | 25 | 200 |
| PS85-20 | 85 | 15 | 20 | 200 |
| PS85-15 | 85 | 15 | 15 | 200 |
Figure 1Hydration heat curves of WUFA-PS and PS-based geopolymers: (a) rate of heat release and (b) cumulative heat release.
Figure 2The compressive strength of WUFA-PS geopolymer mortars with different activator admixtures.
Figure 3The compressive strength of WUFA-PS and PS-based geopolymer mortars with different WUFA substitution amounts.
Figure 4The autogenous shrinkage of WUFA-PS and PS-based geopolymer mortars with different amounts of activators.
Figure 5The electric fluxes of WUFA-PS geopolymer mortars with different activator dosages.
Figure 6The electric fluxes of WUFA-PS with different WUFA substitutions and PS-based geopolymer mortars.
Figure 7TG-DTG curves of WUFA-PS-based geopolymers with different activator contents at 28 days.
Figure 8TG-DTG curves of WUFA-PS with different WUFA substitutions and PS-based geopolymer at 28 days.
Figure 9XRD patterns of WUFA-PS and PS-based geopolymers at 28 days.
Figure 10Pore size distribution of WUFA-PS and PS-based geopolymers at 28 days: (a) cumulative curves and (b) differential curves.
Figure 11Pore volume fraction of WUFA-PS and PS-based geopolymers at 28 days.
Figure 12SEM images of PS (a,b) and WUFA-PS (c–h)-based geopolymers at 28 days.