Literature DB >> 3595519

The suppression of nocturnal pineal melatonin in the Syrian hamster: dose-response curves at 500 and 360 nm.

P L Podolin, M D Rollag, G C Brainard.   

Abstract

It has recently been shown that wavelengths in the near-UV range (UV-A, 320-400 nm) are capable of influencing pineal melatonin content in the hamster. The purpose of this study was to compare the capacities of monochromatic visible and UV radiation for suppressing nocturnal pineal melatonin. Groups of male Syrian hamsters adapted to a 14-h light, 10-h dark cycle (lights on, 1700-0700 h) were exposed to irradiances of 500 or 360 nm light for 5 min during their dark phase. Both wavelengths suppressed pineal melatonin in a dose-related manner. The resultant fluence-response curves were similar in shape, although their corresponding threshold irradiances were markedly different. The calculated ED50 values for 500 and 360 nm light were 0.022 microW/cm2 (1.66 X 10(13) photons/cm2) and 0.306 microW/cm2 (1.66 X 10(14) photons/cm2), respectively. These data show that the induction of a 50% depression of pineal melatonin requires 10 times the number of 360-nm photons compared to 500-nm photons at the level of the cornea. Despite this difference in sensitivity to wavelength, environmental irradiances of UV-A are well above the threshold for melatonin suppression in the hamster. These results thus demonstrate the importance of considering UV-A, in addition to the visible wavelengths, in the regulation of hamster pineal physiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3595519     DOI: 10.1210/endo-121-1-266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocrinology        ISSN: 0013-7227            Impact factor:   4.736


  10 in total

1.  Effects of irradiance and stimulus duration on early gene expression (Fos) in the suprachiasmatic nucleus: temporal summation and reciprocity.

Authors:  O Dkhissi-Benyahya; B Sicard; H M Cooper
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Effects of light at night on laboratory animals and research outcomes.

Authors:  Kathryn M Emmer; Kathryn L G Russart; William H Walker; Randy J Nelson; A Courtney DeVries
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Effect of spectral transmittance through red-tinted rodent cages on circadian metabolism and physiology in nude rats.

Authors:  Robert T Dauchy; Melissa A Wren; Erin M Dauchy; John P Hanifin; Michael R Jablonski; Benjamin Warfield; George C Brainard; Steven M Hill; Lulu Mao; Lynell M Dupepe; Tara G Ooms; David E Blask
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.232

4.  Relevance of Electrical Light on Circadian, Neuroendocrine, and Neurobehavioral Regulation in Laboratory Animal Facilities.

Authors:  John P Hanifin; Robert T Dauchy; David E Blask; Steven M Hill; George C Brainard
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2020-10-19

Review 5.  The melatonin rhythm: both a clock and a calendar.

Authors:  R J Reiter
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1993-08-15

6.  Action spectrum for melatonin regulation in humans: evidence for a novel circadian photoreceptor.

Authors:  G C Brainard; J P Hanifin; J M Greeson; B Byrne; G Glickman; E Gerner; M D Rollag
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  The influence of red light exposure at night on circadian metabolism and physiology in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Robert T Dauchy; Melissa A Wren; Erin M Dauchy; Aaron E Hoffman; John P Hanifin; Benjamin Warfield; Michael R Jablonski; George C Brainard; Steven M Hill; Lulu Mao; Georgina L Dobek; Lynell M Dupepe; David E Blask
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.232

8.  Effects of spectral transmittance through standard laboratory cages on circadian metabolism and physiology in nude rats.

Authors:  Robert T Dauchy; Erin M Dauchy; John P Hanifin; Sheena L Gauthreaux; Lulu Mao; Victoria P Belancio; Tara G Ooms; Lynell M Dupepe; Michael R Jablonski; Benjamin Warfield; Melissa A Wren; George C Brainard; Steven M Hill; David E Blask
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 1.232

9.  Ultraviolet light provides a major input to non-image-forming light detection in mice.

Authors:  Floor van Oosterhout; Simon P Fisher; Hester C van Diepen; Thomas S Watson; Thijs Houben; Henk Tjebbe VanderLeest; Stewart Thompson; Stuart N Peirson; Russell G Foster; Johanna H Meijer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Light and the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  Stuart N Peirson; Laurence A Brown; Carina A Pothecary; Lindsay A Benson; Angus S Fisk
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.390

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.