| Literature DB >> 35955162 |
Candelaria Tejada-Tovar1, Angel Villabona-Ortíz1, Ángel González-Delgado2.
Abstract
Heavy metal pollution is a serious issue currently affecting the environment and public health, which has been faced by applying several alternatives such as adsorption. In this work, the adsorption technique was employed to remove nickel and lead ions from an aqueous solution using palm oil residual biomass as a biosorbent. Desorption experiments were also conducted to evaluate the desorption capacity of this biomass over sorption-desorption cycles. The polluted biomass was used to prepare bricks (5 and 10% biomass content) to encapsulate heavy metal ions into the cement matrix. Both mechanical resistance and leaching testing were performed to determine the suitability of these bricks for construction applications. The experimental results revealed a good biosorbent dosage of 0.1 g/L. The highest desorption yields were calculated in 11 and 83.13% for nickel and lead, respectively. The compression resistance when 10% biomass was incorporated into the bricks was reported to be below the acceptable limit. Leaching testing suggested a successful immobilization of heavy metal ions onto the cement matrix. These results indicate that the application of this immobilization technique allows solving disposal problems of biomass loaded with heavy metal ions.Entities:
Keywords: adsorption; biomass; cement; heavy metal; immobilization
Year: 2022 PMID: 35955162 PMCID: PMC9369611 DOI: 10.3390/ma15155226
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
Figure 1FT-IR spectrum of palm oil fruit shells before and after Pb (II) and Ni (II) uptake.
Figure 2Effect of biosorbent dosage on adsorption capacity for nickel uptake.
Figure 3Adsorption cycles for nickel and lead uptake using palm oil fruit shells.
Figure 4Effect of desorbing agent type on desorption yield.
Figure 5Effect of desorbing agent concentration on nickel and lead desorption yield.
Figure 6Performance of biomass over desorption cycles.
Figure 7Effect of biomass on the mechanical compression resistance of bricks.
Figure 8Leaching tests for bricks prepared with polluted biomass.
Leaching test results.
| Brick Composition | Leachate (mg/L) | Environmental Regulation |
|---|---|---|
| 5% Biomass-Pb (II) | 0.0365653 | 0.5 |
| 10% Biomass-Pb (II) | 0.0613582 | 0.5 |
| 5% Biomass-Pb (II), replica | 0.0548105 | 0.5 |
| 10% Biomass-Pb (II), replica | 0.0882052 | 0.5 |
| 5% Biomass-Ni (II) | 0.2489509 | 2 |
| 10% Biomass-Ni (II) | 0.2611262 | 2 |
| 5% Biomass-Ni (II), replica | 0.3134346 | 2 |
| 10% Biomass-Ni (II), replica | 0.3498111 | 2 |