| Literature DB >> 35955140 |
Jacek Andrzejewski1,2, Mateusz Markowski2,3, Mateusz Barczewski1.
Abstract
The subject of the presented research focuses on a comparative assessment of three types of polymer fillers used to modify highly crystalline poly(lactic acid) PLA intended for the FDM technique. The aim of the presented work was to determine the performance of the developed materials. The key aspect of the work was the use of polymer fillers of three different types. Nano-sized montmorillonite (MMT), biobased biocarbon (BC) and mineral talc. The several types of composites were prepared using extrusion technique. The maximum content for BC and talc filler was limited to 20 wt%, while for MMT it was 5 wt%. Prepared samples were subjected to detailed material analysis including mechanical tests (tensile, flexural, Charpy), thermal analysis (DSC, DMTA), HDT/Vicat tests and structure analysis. The results of the test confirmed that even relatively small amount of nano-type filler can be more efficient than micrometric particles. The used type of matrix was highly crystalline PLA, which resulted in a significant nucleation effect of the crystalline structure. However, thermomechanical tests revealed no improvement in thermal resistance. Microscopic survey confirmed that for MMT and talc filler the structure anisotropy was leading to more favorable properties, especially when compared to structures based on spherical BC particles.Entities:
Keywords: fused deposition modeling; materials performance; polylactide acid; polymer fillers
Year: 2022 PMID: 35955140 PMCID: PMC9369621 DOI: 10.3390/ma15155205
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.748
The sample designations and material formulations for the prepared composites.
| Sample | MMT | BC | Talc |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLA | - | - | - |
| PLA/1MMT | 1 | - | - |
| PLA/2MMT | 2 | - | - |
| PLA/5MMT | 5 | - | - |
| PLA/10BC | - | 10 | - |
| PLA/20BC | - | 20 | - |
| PLA/10Talc | - | - | 10 |
| PLA/20Talc | - | - | 20 |
Figure 1The appearance of (A) montmorillonite—MMT, (B) biocarbon—BC, and (C) talc fillers. (D) The size distribution of the presented fillers obtained during SEM pictures analysis.
Figure 2The SEM observations results. Pictures are presenting the fractured surface of (A) pure PLA, (B) PLA/5MMT (C) PLA/20BC and (D) PLA/20Talc samples.
The results of density/porosity calculations and measurements.
| Sample | Density | Density | Density | Porosity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLA | 1.25 * | 1.247 (±0.005) | 1.203 (±0.034) | 3.9 |
| PLA/1MMT | 1.26 | 1.245 (±0.015) | 1.214 (±0.031) | 3.6 |
| PLA/2MMT | 1.26 | 1.246 (±0.008) | 1.218 (±0.047) | 3.3 |
| PLA/5MMT | 1.28 | 1.269 (±0.011) | 1.231 (±0.010) | 3.8 |
| PLA/10BC | 1.28 | 1.267 (±0.014) | 1.235 (±0.021) | 3.5 |
| PLA/20BC | 1.31 | 1.297 (±0.009) | 1.261 (±0.042) | 3.7 |
| PLA/10Talc | 1.32 | 1.313 (±0.011) | 1.278 (±0.038) | 3.2 |
| PLA/20Talc | 1.41 | 1.394 (±0.007) | 1.337 (±0.054) | 5.2 |
* Pure PLA density was determined using injection molded sample made from the same resin type.
Figure 3The results of the mechanical properties evaluation. (A) tensile modulus and strength; (B) flexural modulus and strength; (C) elongation at break and impact strength; (D) the appearance of samples after testing.
The results of heat deflection temperature (HDT), Vicat softening point (VST) measurements, and C-factor calculations.
| Sample | HDT (0.455 MPa) | VST * (10 N) | C Factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLA | 62.0 ± 0.3 | 68.1 ± 0.9 | 1.00 |
| PLA/1MMT | 57.3 ± 0.8 | 67.3 ± 2.1 | 1.10 |
| PLA/2MMT | 61.7 ± 0.1 | 69.4 ± 0.1 | 0.81 |
| PLA/5MMT | 62.2 ± 0.9 | 73.6 ± 4.0 | 0.03 |
| PLA/10BC | 57.8 ± 0.2 | 66.4 ± 0.6 | 0.77 |
| PLA/20BC | 63.4 ± 0.4 | 72.1 ± 0.3 | 0.64 |
| PLA/10Talc | 59.5 ± 1.1 | 67.0 ± 3.4 | 0.95 |
| PLA/20Talc | 60.7 ± 0.3 | 69.8 ± 0.1 | 0.13 |
* VST—Vicat softening temperature.
Figure 4The results of the DMTA analysis. (A) storage modulus plots; (B) tan δ plots.
Figure 5The results of the DSC analysis. (A) 1st heating; (B) cooling; (C) 2nd heating; (D) PLA crystallinity.