| Literature DB >> 35954684 |
Jiemeng Yang1,2, Chen He3, Zhongjun Mo2, Junchao Guo2, Run Ji1,2, Yu Wang3, Chunjing Tao1, Yubo Fan1.
Abstract
Understanding the effects of sloped roads in the pedestrian environment on the body during ambulation with a walking frame can help design friendlier living environments for elderly individuals. A survey of the characteristics of walking frames used in different pedestrian environments was investigated in five communities, and a controlled study of the effects of a sloped road on a subject with different walking frames was carried out as foundational research in the laboratory. A synchronous acquisition system consisting of a wireless motion capture module and a physiological information recording module was applied to collect data on the motion of the shoulder joint and skin conductance response (SCR) of fingers in one participant. Force data were collected from sensors placed on the four legs of the walking frame. The experimental data obtained during different tasks were quantitatively analyzed. Compared to flat ground, the shoulder joint rotated in the opposite direction in horizontal and internal/external planes when using a wheeled walking frame on an uphill road, and the supportive force decreased on both uphill and downhill roads. The range of motion of the shoulder joint reduced and the direction of the shoulder joint motion changed when using a footed walking frame on both uphill and downhill roads. Additionally, the peak value of the supportive force on the uphill road appeared in the first 50% of the gait cycle, which was earlier than in the other cases. In addition, walking on the uphill road with a walking frame had a maximum SCR value, which means a greater impact of psychological arousal. Biomechanics of the shoulder joint and psychological arousal are closely related to the ease of walking on a sloped road with a walking frame. These findings are beneficial for designing more appropriate environments for elderly individuals who walk with aids.Entities:
Keywords: elderly individuals; kinematics; pedestrian environment; shoulder joint; walking aids
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35954684 PMCID: PMC9368263 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159327
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
The information of five surveyed communities.
| Number | Year | Area | Number of Buildings | Number of Public Activity Spaces |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Community 1 | 1997 | 24 | 23 multi-story residential buildings and 5 high-rise residential buildings | 6 |
| Community 2 | 1991 | 19 | 18 multi-story residential buildings and 8 high-rise residential buildings | 4 |
| Community 3 | 1990 | 8 | 9 multi-story residential buildings and 3 high-rise residential buildings | 2 |
| Community 4 | 1995 | 14 | 21 multi-story residential buildings and no high-rise residential buildings | 4 |
| Community 5 | 1988 | 17 | 17 multi-story residential buildings and 8 high-rise residential buildings | 2 |
The results of a survey form of community pedestrian environments and problems.
| Pedestrian Environments | Problems |
|---|---|
| Roads in the community | Coexistence of people and vehicles |
| Sidewalks are occupied | |
| Narrow sidewalk | |
| Deceleration belt hinders walking | |
| Drainage grate is close to deceleration belt | |
| Entrance of buildings | No sloped walkway at the building entrance |
| Inappropriate gradient of sloped road | |
| Sloped roads are occupied | |
| Aisle spaces are occupied | |
| Sloped road is directly connected to vehicle road | |
| Barrier-free sloped road with pipe shaft | |
| Public activity Spaces | A height difference between the space and the sidewalk |
| Sloped roads are occupied by vehicles | |
| Uneven ground | |
| Paving of small facing bricks on the ground | |
| Dazzling lights on the ground | |
| Uneven pavement caused by water pipes |
Figure 1Physical activities of elderly individuals using walking aids. Including: (a) on level ground, (b) on uneven ground, (c) getting up after sitting down for a long time, (d) going uphill and downhill, (e) climbing the stairs, (f) carrying heavy objects, (g) obstacles, and (h) walking for a long time.
Figure 2The degree of slope in the barrier-free environment: (a) measured in an old community, and (b) simulated in the experimental environment.
Figure 3Two types of walking frames used for the experiment.
Figure 4Data acquisition methods for the different experimental tasks.
The problems of barrier-free environments for elderly individuals during walking.
| Environment Problems | Performance |
|---|---|
| Incoherent and disorganized accessibility | Accessible designs that directed elderly individuals to their destination are often not coherent enough. Generally, the following need to be properly connected: entrance to the residential building |
| Poor traffic layouts | Mixed modality routes were used by pedestrians and vehicles; some sidewalks are too narrow; and more than half of a sidewalk was blocked by trees. As a result, there might be insufficient space for an elderly person to use a walking aid. |
| Not enough attention is given to the details and there may be hidden dangers | The key parts of some accessible routes were poorly designed and may contain hidden dangers. |
| Poor or disorganized management of public spaces | Ramps were frequently blocked, which hinders the travel of elderly individuals. |
Characteristics of the elderly with walking aids in different pedestrian environments.
| Cases | Behaviors of Elderly Individuals |
|---|---|
| On level ground | Some elderly people can remain upright when using a walker, whereas others, due to their poorer sense of balance, lean their upper body toward the walking frame while walking. |
| On uneven ground | Due to their poorer sense of balance, elderly people are more likely to fall. Moreover, the walking frame would swing and become difficult to control. |
| Going uphill or downhill, climbing the stairs | Due to their weaker and less well-coordinated leg muscles, elderly individuals were clumsier when moving uphill and downhill or going up and down stairs. Since it is difficult to carry a walking frame forward, old people need others to bring the frame to the destination. They walk slowly forward while holding onto a handrail. If there is no handrail, they would need someone to support them. After walking, they have to sit down and rest. |
| Obstacles | They often stopped and took a short break before walking again. |
| Carrying heavy objects | Due to the weakened functioning of their body, especially in terms of the muscles, bones, and nervous system, elderly people could not carry heavy objects. |
| Getting up after sitting down for a long time | With atrophied leg muscles, especially calf muscles, and osteoporosis, it might be difficult to change from a sitting to a standing position. An elderly person can easily lose their balance. When an elderly person rises after sitting or squatting for a long time, they may feel dizzy. |
| Long duration of walking | Old people often move in a stop-and-start manner. |
Figure 5Comparison of the effects of different tasks on the motion of the shoulder joint.
Figure 6Supporting force on both sides of the walking aids, including: (a) force on the left side of the WW; (b) force on the right side of the WW; (c) force on the left side of the FW; and (d) force on the right side of the FW.
Figure 7Comparison of the SCR observed during different tasks.