| Literature DB >> 35954590 |
Huiran Han1, Kai Yang1, Chengfeng Yang1, Gang Yang1, Lingyi Xu1.
Abstract
Built environment characteristics such as walkability, land use diversity, infrastructure accessibility and attractiveness may support or hinder the elderly's leisure activities, which in turn affects their health. Promoting the elderly's leisure activities through the creation of a positive built environment is of great relevance to healthy aging. In the context of the continuous increasing of aging in China, promoting leisure activities for the elderly through improving the built environment has become an essential issue in urban geography and urban planning. Based on the questionnaire survey data of the elderly in Hefei City, a multilevel ordered probit regression model was used to investigate the mechanism of the multi-scale built environment on leisure activities of the elderly. The results show that: (1) more than 60% of the elderly can carry out leisure activities more than seven times a week, more than 50% of the elderly have a duration of fewer than 30 min for each leisure activity, and there are significant spatial differences in the frequency and duration of their trips at multiple scales in city, community and residential district. (2) Residential quality and community-level land use mixture, the density of leisure facilities, proximity to high-level urban roads, community security, living in the old city, and individual characteristic variables such as age, education, and satisfaction with neighborhood interaction positively contribute to the leisure activities of the elderly. In contrast, the community activity participation and the location close to expressways and railway lines have a significantly negative impact on the leisure activities of the elderly. (3) The mechanism of interactions between multi-scale built environments on the leisure activities of the elderly is mainly summarized as the transmission effect and substitution effect. The transmission effect shows that the differences in the community-level built environment are primarily caused by the differences in the city-level built environment. In contrast, the substitution effect shows that the multi-scale built environment such as residential districts, communities, and cities jointly affect the leisure activities of the elderly. Based on the mechanism of the built environment at different scales, this study can provide theoretical references and planning implications to improve the built environment through planning means such as enhancing the walkability of streets, the accessibility of facilities and the scale of greenery in order to promote active leisure activities and improve the health of the elderly.Entities:
Keywords: Hefei city; built environment; leisure activity; multi-scale; the elderly
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35954590 PMCID: PMC9367775 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159237
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Figure 1The distribution of the study area and sample residential districts.
Profile of residential districts.
| Number | Sample Plots | Administrative Division | Types of Region | Geographical Location | Types of Residential District | Year of Construction | Number of Households Living | Surrounding Facilities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LiangShiJuDanwei Compound | Baohe District | Old city | Inside the First Ring district | Danwei compounds | 1990 | 793 | Metro station, shopping mall, major hospitals |
| 2 | ShiWeiDanwei Compound | Luyang District | Old city | Inside the First Ring district | Danwei compounds | 1998 | 635 | Metro station, shopping mall, major hospitals, Key middle schools |
| 3 | Apricot Flower Residential Area | Luyang District | Old city | Inside the First Ring district | Danwei compounds | 2000 | 1452 | Shopping mall, major hospitals |
| 4 | Amber Lodge Residential Area | Shushan District | Old city | Inside the First Ring district | Commodity housing | 2000 | 436 | Metro station, Shopping mall, major hospitals |
| 5 | BinHuHuiYuan Residential Area | Baohe District | Binhu New District | Inside the Third Ring district | Affordable housing | 2008 | 2368 | Key middle schools |
| 6 | YuHuGuanDi Residential Area | Shushan District | Economic and Technological Development Zone | Inside the Third Ring district | Commodity housing | 2012 | 2180 | None |
| 7 | XiangYuan Cheng Residential Area | Shushan District | High Tech Zone | Inside the Third Ring district | Commodity housing | 2016 | 4093 | Shopping mall |
| 8 | MeiShengBingJiangHuaYue Residential Area | Baohe District | General urban area | Inside the Third Ring district | Commodity housing | 2008 | 1086 | None |
| 9 | TongHeMinKang Residential Area | Baohe District | General urban area | Inside the Third Ring district | Affordable housing | 2008 | 492 | None |
| 10 | LiGangYinHeXinCheng Residential Area | Yaohai District | General urban area | Inside the Second Ring district | Commodity housing | 2010 | 3629 | Metro station, major hospitals, Shopping mall |
| 11 | HuPoMingCheng Residential Area | Yaohai District | General urban area | Inside the Second Ring district | Commodity housing | 2012 | 2608 | Metro station, shopping mall |
Profile of the samples.
| Variables | Category | Number | Percentage | Variables | Category | Number | Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 268 | 49.17% | Age | 50 to 54 | 60 | 11.01% |
| Female | 277 | 50.83% | 55 to 64 | 182 | 33.39% | ||
| Household Registration | city | 339 | 62.20% | 65 to 74 | 186 | 34.13% | |
| countryside | 206 | 37.80% | More than 75 | 117 | 21.47% | ||
| Career | Civil Service | 69 | 12.66% | Education | Primary school and below | 203 | 37.25% |
| Corporate manager | 44 | 8.07% | Middle School | 140 | 25.69% | ||
| Technical Staff | 61 | 11.19% | High School | 88 | 16.15% | ||
| Service staff | 30 | 5.50% | Associate degree | 56 | 10.28% | ||
| Company Staff | 47 | 8.62% | Bachelor’s degree or above | 58 | 10.64% | ||
| Teachers | 42 | 7.71% | Personal monthly income | Less than 2000 | 229 | 42.02% | |
| Self-employed | 23 | 4.22% | 2000 to 4000 | 186 | 33.94% | ||
| Farmers | 134 | 24.59% | 4000 to 6000 | 92 | 16.88% | ||
| Others | 95 | 17.43% | 6000 to 8000 | 29 | 5.32% | ||
| Source of income | Pensions | 312 | 57.25% | More than 8000 | 9 | 1.65% | |
| Child support children | 119 | 21.83% | Administrative division | Baohe District | 136 | 24.95% | |
| Self-reliance | 37 | 6.79% | Luyang District | 122 | 22.39% | ||
| Others | 77 | 14.12% | Shushan District | 186 | 34.13% | ||
| Yaohai District | 101 | 18.53% |
Variables definition and descriptive statistics.
| Level | Category | Variable | Description | Mean | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent variable | Duration of leisure activities | duration of single leisure activity for the elderly: within 10 min = 1; 10–30 min = 2; 30–60 min = 3; 60–120 min = 4 | 2.32 | 1.13 | |
| Individual-Level | Age | under 55 = 1; 55–64 = 2; 65–74 = 3; Over 75 = 4 | 2.66 | 0.94 | |
| Gender | male = 0; female = 1 | 0.51 | 0.50 | ||
| Length of residence | less than 3 years = 1; 3–5 years = 2; 5–10 years = 3; more than 10 years = 4 | 2.70 | 1.20 | ||
| Household registration | urban household registration = 0; rural household registration = 1 | 0.38 | 0.49 | ||
| Personal monthly income | less than 2000= 1; 2000–3999 = 2; 4000–5999 = 3; 6000–7999 = 4; 80–10,000 = 5; more than 10,000 = 6 | 1.98 | 1.12 | ||
| Living condition | living alone = 1; living with a spouse = 2; living with children = 3; living in a nursing home = 4 | 2.47 | 0.69 | ||
| Education | primary school and below = 1; middle school = 2; high school = 3; associate degree = 4; bachelor degree or above = 5 | 2.31 | 1.34 | ||
| Satisfaction with neighborhood interaction | very dissatisfied = 1~very satisfied = 5 | 3.49 | 0.93 | ||
| Community activity participation | never = 1~very frequent = 5 | 2.01 | 1.28 | ||
| Residential district-level | Objective built environment | Residential quality | Danwei compounds = 1; affordable housing = 2; commodity housing = 3 | 2.33 | 0.85 |
| Community-level | Objective built environment | Land use mixture | assign values 1–3 based on the degree of land diversity of housing properties | 2.09 | 0.64 |
| Density of leisure facilities | the sum of the number of chess and card rooms, parks, green spaces, and squares within 1 km of the community divided by the area (facilities/km2) | 3.61 | 2.70 | ||
| Intersection density | the number of road intersections within 1 km of the community divided by the area (intersections/km2) | 12.86 | 5.39 | ||
| Density of public transportation facilities | the number of bus stops within 1 km of the community divided by the area (facilities/km2) | 4.07 | 2.38 | ||
| walking time to the nearest subway station (minutes) | 1.42 | 1.01 | |||
| Road network accessibility | whether there are high-level urban roads within 1 km of the community: yes = 1, no = 0 | 0.46 | 0.50 | ||
| Traffic spatial constraints | whether there are expressways and railway lines within 1 km of the community: Yes = 1, no = 0 | 0.31 | 0.46 | ||
| subjective built environment | Community security | very dissatisfied = 1~very satisfied = 5 | 3.48 | 1.00 | |
| Community walking environment | very dissatisfied = 1~very satisfied = 5 | 3.52 | 1.00 | ||
| Community beautification | very dissatisfied = 1~very satisfied = 5 | 3.41 | 0.95 | ||
| City-level | Types of region | old city = 0; Economic and Technical Development Zone, High Tech Zone, Binhu New District = 1 | 0.51 | 0.50 |
Descriptive statistics of leisure activity duration of the elderly in Hefei city.
| <10 min/Time | 10–30 min/Time | 30–60 min/Time | 60–120 min/Time | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| Danwei compounds | 18% | 23% | 23% | 36% |
| Commodity housing | 28% | 34% | 17% | 22% |
| Affordable housing | 57% | 33% | 4% | 6% |
| Overall | 30% | 31% | 17% | 23% |
|
| ||||
| Old city | 21% | 27% | 22% | 30% |
| Economic and Technical Development Zone (ETD Zone) | 63% | 36% | 2% | 0% |
| High Tech Zone | 29% | 19% | 19% | 33% |
| Binhu New District | 18% | 42% | 24% | 16% |
| Overall | 29% | 29% | 19% | 24% |
Figure 2Statistical chart of leisure activity duration of the elderly in Hefei city.
The results of multilevel models for the duration of leisure activities of the elderly.
| Level | Category | Variable | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | Model 7 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Individual | Individual attribute characteristics | Age | 0.124 ** | 0.126 ** | 0.107 | 0.123 ** | 0.116 ** | 0.12 ** | 0.082 |
| Gender (male = ref.) | |||||||||
| female | −0.060 | −0.042 | 0.025 | −0.066 | −0.069 | −0.070 | −0.040 | ||
| Length of residence | −0.042 | −0.032 | −0.087 | −0.032 | −0.036 | −0.037 | −0.023 | ||
| registered residence Household registration (urban household registration = ref.) | |||||||||
| rural household registration | −0.109 | −0.131 | −0.085 | −0.127 | −0.106 | −0.114 | 0.079 | ||
| Personal monthly income | 0.010 | 0.005 | −0.049 | 0.007 | 0.010 | 0.007 | 0.002 | ||
| Living condition (living alone = ref.) | |||||||||
| living with a spouse | −0.157 | −0.150 | −0.064 | −0.148 | −0.158 | −0.167 | −0.089 | ||
| live with children | −0.111 | −0.081 | −0.207 | −0.099 | −0.103 | −0.109 | 0.155 | ||
| living in a nursing home | −7.166 | −6.379 | −5.050 | −6.633 | −6.843 | −6.145 | −5.904 | ||
| Education | 0.081 * | 0.088 * | 0.17 *** | 0.088 * | 0.087 * | 0.089 * | 0.083 | ||
| Satisfaction with neighborhood interaction | 0.201 *** | 0.225 *** | 0.299 *** | 0.169 *** | 0.159 *** | 0.155 *** | 0.173 *** | ||
| Community activity participation | −0.09 ** | −0.102 *** | −0.126 *** | −0.081 ** | −0.075 * | −0.071 * | −0.074 | ||
| Residential | Objective built environment | Residential quality | −0.149 | 1.000 *** | |||||
| Community | Objective built environment | Land use mixture (affordable housing = ref.) | |||||||
| Commodity housing | 0.951 *** | ||||||||
| Danwei compounds | 1.108 *** | ||||||||
| Intersection density | 0.013 | ||||||||
| Density of leisure facilities | 0.096 * | ||||||||
| Bus stops density | 0.041 | ||||||||
| Walking time to the nearest subway station | −0.041 | ||||||||
| Whether there are expressways and railway lines (no = ref.) | |||||||||
| Yes | −0.531 * | ||||||||
| Whether there are proximity to high-grade urban roads (no = ref.) | |||||||||
| Yes | 0.423 * | ||||||||
| subjective built environment | Community security | 0.114 * | 0.109 * | 0.110 * | |||||
| Community walking environment | 0.055 | 0.051 | 0.043 | ||||||
| Community beautification | −0.037 | −0.032 | −0.028 | ||||||
| City-level | Urban built environment | Types of region (the old city = ref.) | |||||||
| New towns and districts | −0.520 *** | ||||||||
| /cut1 | 0.146 | 0.112 | 3.265 | 1.554 | 0.830 | 0.612 | −0.009 | ||
| /cut2 | 1.066 | 1.012 | 4.242 | 2.482 | 1.757 | 1.538 | 0.806 | ||
| /cut3 | 1.624 | 1.556 | 4.756 | 3.044 | 2.320 | 2.101 | 1.370 | ||
| Log likelihood | −690.20 | −693.41 | −501.02 | −680.59 | −685.86 | −684.51 | −502.22 | ||
| chi2 | 28.23 | 35.12 | 71.59 | 61.37 | 37.35 | 41.76 | 35.35 | ||
| AIC | 1410.40 | 1418.81 | 1032.04 | 1403.18 | 1409.72 | 1413.16 | 1036.43 | ||
| Sample size | 545 | 545 | 408 | 545 | 545 | 545 | 382 | ||
Notes: * p < 0.10, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001.
Comparison of city-level built environment.
| Types of Region | Built History | Land Use | Space Form | Transportation Organization | Greenspace Network | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction Year | Green space rate (%) | Road network density (km/km2) | Average block area (km2/unit) | Bus line length density (km/km2) | Green space accessibility index (%) | |
| Old city | - | 13.15 | 7.62 | 0.09 | 17.60 | 100 |
| High Tech Zone | 1991 | 20.08 | 3.38 | 0.32 | 3.23 | 92.01 |
| Economic and Technological Development Zone | 1993 | 8.27 | 3.54 | 0.31 | 3.81 | 83.13 |
| Binhu New District | 2006 | 14.72 | 4.93 | 0.13 | 3.60 | 90.62 |
Notes: The service radius of green space accessibility is calculated as 300, 500, 1000, and 2000 m, respectively, according to the area scale of green space ≥0.5, ≥4, ≥10, and ≥20 hectares.